Comments by "upabittoolate" (@upabittoolate) on "New Attack Against Obama - He's a Baby Killer" video.

don't get me wrong, i know full well about the abuses of rights & abilities by doctors & some very unscrupulous women (i had a girlfriend terminate our child at 20 weeks), so spare me the pro lifer rhetoric. what i'm saying is that it's still the woman's right & doctors have to protect their patients' best health interests. you rendered the testimony of nurses speaking on behalf of a post puritan religious movement. although what happened to me was sad, i don't support that
1
...when it comes to who can determine if a life is viable, i'll trust the guy who graduated med school, took the hippocratic oath, does his CE's & maintains licensure & certification in good standing. not a nurse who doesn't have the necessary background or may have 'other' motivation. i dunno about you but i haven't graduated med school yet. neither nurses baker & stanek. in fact, we could argue the validity of their professional opinion. that's why these records are kept my friend
1
thanks for the 101 intro to philosophy lesson. i suppose next time you'll explain plato's apology for kicks. like i said, SHOW ME A MEDICAL RECORD. you can't because even if you had access, it would violate professional ethics. therefore, anything you're saying yourself or repeating is conjecture. don't give me testimony from a website which can just as soon be biased. a domain tools search can show me who rents the url & probably their tax status. that won't work. show me official records
1
don't be sorry, it was her right & she made a very bad choice. there were a lot of factors involved; she made the wrong decision. i'm not angry any more than i'm actually full of pity for her & her soul. at 33 i can still feel some punches from fights i had in the 90s. i can only imaginewhat it's like to still feel a vacuum in her uterus. or the pain her soul bears. i suppose that it's still an issue of women's health & women's civil rights. but if He forgives so can i
1
of course i would. but your critique on obama when he was a state senator is that he didn't support a logrolled bill that was already on the books. it's a slick trick to get a new law passed if you attach it to another 1 upon which everyone agrees. so don't blame obama for not touching that 1.
1
when were babies getting killed. show me 1 medical record....oh yeah, hipaa provides that you can't. therefore, you just old a boldfaced lie
1
he's a stubborn man. leadership requires a degree of stubbornness. what i'm trying to say though is that in stead of trying these lame character attacks or take shots by using these hatchetmen, why not either attack the issues or nominate a stronger candidate? i would have actually considered ron paul just for his notions on healthcare & the economy. but instead, the republicans chose a weakling. i'm going with obama strictly on his integrity.
1