Comments by "upabittoolate" (@upabittoolate) on "Washington Post" channel.

  1. There's plenty of nice, Black communities. You wouldn't know that because you haven't spent much time outside of your mother's basement. Frail.
    1
  2. All holidays are made up you idiot. So what if King had a few women. That's his personal life. If you're perfect, lemme know. But what does that have to do with the work he did? ZERO. Appease Blacks some more? That's ridiculous. In what world do you live? About Lincoln, he never made such a promise. Besides, we built this shit. We ain't goin' no-fuckin'-where. Multiculturalism is a REALity. Think for yourself. Oh wait, you're not capable or inclined to do that.
    1
  3. ??? I think you were aiming at someone else with that comment. And no, I think "the free market" just sounds nice to libertarians. It's not good for small biz owners at all.
    1
  4. That's not what the report said. It looks like you didn't read that either. Pathetic. Lemme clear a few things up for you. The King papers came out of Stanford, the WSJ article was 2ndary information. In addition, the issues about his dissertation were not about direct wording but the use of bad paraphrasing & bad citing. There was nothing lifted verbatim, you can actually look a PDF. The footnote markers are all there. You're a child.
    1
  5. Pedo? lmao. Sure he had a few women. Many married men do. But that don't make him no pedophile. You can do a little better than that.
    1
  6. His PhD IS bona fide. In the end, a written thesis isn't what you over the hump anyway. The oral defense does. But since you don't understand that process because the only education you have is a 2.0 hs GPA and 6 credit hours from a JuCo, you don't understand that nuance. You got nothing.
    1
  7. He didn't plagiarize anything. You're talking about some early drafts of his dissertation. Had you actually read it, you'd know that. You'd also know that it wasn't an issue of direct lifting but that he simply confuses the authors. You're actually trying to cite the literary mistakes of a 24yo grad student in order to debase the man? Loser.
    1
  8. fail
    1
  9. I could literally look outside my window & see it if there weren't so many beautiful homes obfuscating my view. MLK in Denver is rather nice. Most of MLK in the Bronzeville area of Chicago is considered affluent. MLK in Harlem has an extremely high property value (although there's more White in Harlem than Blacks right now). Again, get out of your ma's basement. There's a great big ol' world for you to explore.
    1
  10. No 1 said it's racist. But if you don't consider the fact that American history is unoffcially White as it is, well you're just being obtuse. They're not called "black colleges". They're called "Historically Black Colleges & Universities". Why do they exist? Because there was a point in history when Blacks, who were inclined, weren't allowed to attend most universities. If George Wallace hadn't stood on those stairs it'd be a non-issue. But he did. Do you get it yet? BLACK POWER!!
    1
  11. *look AT a PDF.
    1