General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
upabittoolate
UFC
comments
Comments by "upabittoolate" (@upabittoolate) on "UFC" channel.
i didnt see the fight but my friend tells me that athletic deficit is not what lost the fight for brock. my pal told me that brock merely lacked experience. having watched him in the pro wrestling ring, i know damn well that speed & agility are not his weak suits. so as an analyst, what do really thikn happened?
1
i quoted them just fine, they were yours. call me whatever you want; this useless bastard of a dumbass just used your own words against you. YOU FAIL
1
ps, who i like doesn't really matter, i'm not vince mcmahon. you can continue to namecall all you want, but it makes you look dumb to ignore the empirical facts: vince makes the call ultimately, lesnar wrestled, you didn't. what you're doing is tantamount to arguing baseball when you've never picked up a bat. i'm merely paying due respect to someone who worked got hurt, got out & got into other things. you're being a textbook hater
1
if it were about paying dues, all the jobbers would get to hold the belt for a while. but that's not what happens. lesnar went through OVW, he had extensive amateur background. he did house shows & ran the whole circuit for a year before he came top raw. but ultimately, that all means 0, mcmahon makes the decisions. are you just too thick to understand that part?
1
to be an authority, yes. in order to critique food, you at least better understand how to boil an egg. to you can't say anything about management of a company unless you've worked there. yes, you need to understand something about it otherwise you sound like a fool. btw, i never heard you amswer yes to any of those questions. where's your proof about lewsnar's drawing power?...i i'll wait
1
again, you can call me all the names you like but i'm the jackass that made YOU look stupid. like i said before, a paycheck is tender paid for goods or services rendered. that's business... unless you misunderstand the concept. you work at your job without being paid?
1
very nice. you actually took time to cut & paste that. thanks again for confirming everything i've said (including the part about you being a pencilneck geek with a pc). namecall, flip birds, jump up & down and throw a tantrum all you want. it doesn't change the fact that you don't know what the the fuck you're talking about. go wrestle then critique a wrestler. go manage a company then critique management until then, holster your f bombs
1
yes it does. it proves that what you think doesn't matter. what HE thinks does. it proves that 'dues paid' is just a cliche. the fact that you've never wrestled proves that you can't really be an analyst of what they do. i couldn't talk about surgery in depth unless i at least understood something about anatomy. the same concept applies here. i'll be an asshole on youtube if it makes you feel better. but it doesn't make you correct though.
1
oh yeah, he's obviously a smart man. im sure he cycles. but i also sure that he had plenty of size to work with from birth as well
1
you know this because you were a stock holder with wwe? lemme guess you're statistician specializing on attendance at wrestling events? no? here's 1, you were a traveling ticket taker for the wwe? or perhaps you sold paper to the printing company that makes the tickets & you observed spikes & pits in inventory sales? unless you answer yes to 1 of those questions, it's you who continues to look foolish; it's you who's proved nothing
1
i'm not talking about anything but what the reality is. i treat no man like a god. BUT i have enough sense to know who's captain of the ship. i never treated anything like it was perfect, i said that vince makes the decisions. i also said that vince hasne missed a meal lately, so i suppose his decision making hasn't been that awful. any fool could see that. you're a fool, you can also see that, you're just too stubborn to admit it
1
so lemme see if i understand your reasoning. the man broke his neck & risked serious injury (if not death or paralysis) because he didn't care? i'm sure you can be a little more ational than that. nevertheless, you couldn't do 1 iota of what he's done in college, WWE or mma. granted, competency comes with a degree of experience which he didn't have but that doesn't mean that YOU are in any position to critique what he's done. as far as the other stuff you've said, i'm just giving due props
1
I QUOTED YOU DIRECTLY!!...VERBATIM!! WTF ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? okay, you're debating skills are weak, i understand that. but don't lie
1
BUT in order to be an authority on the inner workings (ie who paid dues; who "deserves"), you need to be 1 of those people. i've seen instances at sporting events & entertainment venues where blocks of tickets are bought & never used by corporations for a myriad of reasons. so just that you perceive it, doesn't make it so. again, you know about low ratings because you worked for nielsen or arbitron? you've been at every house shoe? nope. you're another fool with a pc
1
hey genius, there is no 'if' about it. mcmahon makes all the decisions. period. lesnar was evidently a good enough draw because he was working. as has been stated, you can try to challenge what lesnar did but you did wrestle. you can challenge mcmahon's marketing judgement, but you haven't made a living like he has by promoting wrestling. you're a pencilnecked geek on a pc screen. you can't tell me about 'deserve'. i did though, just tell you what was & is. peace
1
my friend, i quoted you VEERBATIM. i didn't parse your words, i used complete, predicated sentences typed by YOU
1
"Everything he did was 4 a paycheck, nothing more and the only reason he broke his neck for that paycheck" again, your words. paycheck = tender paid for goods or services rendered; ie, a business transaction the last time i looked. thanks again for proing my points for me
1
you didn't prove shit. you shared your uninformed opinion. tell you what, get in a ring or run a wrestling league then talk. i'll be here to listen to you
1
dude, you were quoted word for word. this isn't an argument for 1. on the other hand, what kind of loser wants debate victory credit on youtube. your words are pointing toward the same theme; your premise is wrong. like i said, unless you've risked life & limb, your opinion deserves 0 respect unless you're saying "he deserves respect for the work he did". otherwise, you're just talking out of your ass
1
i can only go by what you said, it's all there in plain text. you can't tell me what you said when it's right there in text. you're not too smart are you?
1
your an idiot
1
right & wrong doesn't matter at all in the real world my friend. either way, unless you've been in the ring, you're nothing but a (s)mark. you don't know about spots, bumps, 4step, kayfabe, etc (not that i do, but i've been in the ring). what's funny is that you're expressing some nonsense about morality but you have no concept of what really is. you'd claim to be the good guy but were the 1st to call someone a nasty name & flip the bird. again, thanks for the confirmation
1