Comments by "Fu Uf" (@fuuf7092) on "FULL FIGHT | #TheLastCrescendo: Artur Beterbiev vs. Dmitry Bivol" video.
-
4
-
i see what the issue is. In both fights, the commentary teams on both sky and dazn were so diabolically biased, it beggered belief.
throughout the fight, whenever bivol thru anything, they went wild, even more so when bivol didnt land a single one, they hardly mentioned any work that beterbiev did. it was shockin, both times. made no sense. When Beterebiev was doing good work, they were still waxing lyrical about flashy combos that Bivol thru which all missed the target.
to top it off, the replays were also very biased, esp in the first fight.
this is why a lot of casuals were duped.
i watched it again, and again, i just cant belive the bias in the commentary.
round 1 and 2 were close, but you could give them to bivol
3 swing round
4 5 and 6 were dominated by beterbiev
7 and 8 were swing rounds and could go either way
9 bivol
10 swing round
11 bivol
12 beterbiev
so 4 round were 100% beterbiev
4 rounds were 100% Bivol
i would say a draw, but due to the fact at no point did Bivol dominate, yet beterbiev dominated large parts of the fight, and that the rounds beterbiev won, he clearly won, whilst the ones Bivol won were close, i'd have to give it to Beterbiev.
it is unbelievable that the media are calling this a Bivol masterclass. wow
4
-
i see what the issue is. In both fights, the commentary teams on both sky and dazn were so diabolically biased, it beggered belief.
throughout the fight, whenever bivol thru anything, they went wild, even more so when bivol didnt land a single one, they hardly mentioned any work that beterbiev did. it was shockin, both times. made no sense. When Beterebiev was doing good work, they were still waxing lyrical about flashy combos that Bivol thru which all missed the target.
to top it off, the replays were also very biased, esp in the first fight.
this is why a lot of casuals were duped.
i watched it again, and again, i just cant belive the bias in the commentary.
round 1 and 2 were close, but you could give them to bivol
3 swing round
4 5 and 6 were dominated by beterbiev
7 and 8 were swing rounds and could go either way
9 bivol
10 swing round
11 bivol
12 beterbiev
so 4 round were 100% beterbiev
4 rounds were 100% Bivol
i would say a draw, but due to the fact at no point did Bivol dominate, yet beterbiev dominated large parts of the fight, and that the rounds beterbiev won, he clearly won, whilst the ones Bivol won were close, i'd have to give it to Beterbiev.
it is unbelievable that the media are calling this a Bivol masterclass. wow
2
-
all the sky pundits had it a draw, or to beterbiev,
tnt also had beterbiev winnin
in the first fight, as a beterbiev fan, i wasnt sure who would win after 12 rounds. However, Bivol knew he lost the championship rounds and the fight.
in this one, i was pretty comfortable that it was a clearer beterbiev win, and so was Beterbiev, he knew he won.
thats the difference in the 2 fights
it depends what you like. If you like point fighting, throwing combos, most of which miss, and running to nick rounds, Bivols your man
if you like people who dont run, and want to fight, and do damage, beterbievs your man
it takes more skill to stand and bang, whilst dodging and slipping, than it does to pitter patter and run
thats why vs canelo, bivol stood in front, and walked canelo down, vs beterbiev, bivol knew what time it was and got on his bike
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1