Comments by "ex muslim Alonzo Harris" (@exmuslimAlonzoHarris) on "I Never Thought I'd Make This Video On Being Funded By Islam." video.

When talking to an abdul: Q. How many qurans? A. One quran Q. Is hafs quran a quran? A. Yes Q. Is warsh quran a quran? A. Yes Q. Is doori quran a quran? A. Yes Q. How many qurans? A. One quran Q. Are all qurans around the world same? A. Yes Q. Do the Sana manuscript and Birmingham manuscript have variants? A. Yes Q. Are qurans preserved word for word, letter for letter? A. Yes Q. In sura 37.12, one quran says "you", another "I"? A. They are different accents Q. How many ahrufs did muhamad recite? A. 7 Q. How many ahrufs did uthman destroy? A. 6 Q. How many ahrufs today? A. 7 Q. How many qiraats did muhamad recite? A. None Q. How many qiraats today? A. 10, 15, 20, 50 Q. Is Bible preserved? A. No Q. Is muhamad prophesied in the Bible? A. Yes Q. Did muhamad marry a child? A. No Q. How old was aisha? A. 6
34
one quran says "you", another says "I". Dawah script: "they are different accents" 🤣🤣🤣 Hafs says "you (muhummud) wonder", while hamza, al kesai and khalaf versions say "I (allah) wonder". Which is the correct quran? This is the text of sura 37.12 in the hafs quran: بَلْ عَجِبْتَ وَيَسْخَرُونَ: “ But YOU are amazed, and they mock” hamza, al kesai and khalaf: بَلْ عَجِبْتُ وَيَسْخَرُونَ: “But I am amazed, and they mock” The difference between the two sentences is the speaker’s perspective. The first sentence uses “عَجِبْتَ” (you are amazed), indicating that the speaker is addressing someone else. The second sentence uses “عَجِبْتُ” (I am amazed), indicating that the speaker is referring to themselves.
22
The anonymous author of the qurans thinks pharaoh is a personal name not a title. Scholar Gabriel Reynolds: Imho firʿawn/Pharaoh in the Moses material of the Qur'an is not a title but a personal name. Unlike Exodus (by which Moses returns from Midian when a new pharaoh reigns) there is only one Pharaoh in the Qur'an (see Q 26:18). Nowhere in the Q is firʿawn used for anyone else. So it's not that the Q distinguishes the Egyptian ruler of Joseph's time with the title malik but refers to later rulers all as "Pharaohs" it's that the Q uses firʿawn for one character as a name (a bit like it uses al-masīḥ as a name not a title).
7
abduls believe in three qurans
7
Words of scholar Dr. Michael Pregill: It has always seemed to me that Joseph's "pharaoh" is called al malik to distinguish him from Fir'awn as the "pharaoh" of Moses. That is, "Fir'awn" is all over the Qur'an as the antagonist of Moses, the ruler from whom the Israelites were liberated, and treats the title as if it is the character's name - when you see "Fir'awn" in the Qur'an, you know exactly who is meant. I think the ruler of Joseph's time is called al malik because it allows "Fir'awn" to remain clearly associated with Moses.
4
Words of scholar Sean Anthony: In the Qur'an, Pharoah seems to be used as the proper name of the ruler in Moses' time rather than a title. It's a relatively simple inference. The Qur'an only calls the enemy of Moses "Pharoah" and never calls him the "pharoah of Egypt", "one of the pharoahs", etc. Also one has the phrase آل فرعون like آل موسى, etc.
4
When talking to an abdul: Me: How old was aisha? Abdul: her age doesn't exist in the qurans Me: Does aisha exist in the qurans? Abdul: aisha is mentioned in sahih hadiths Me: Is sahih bukari sahih? Abdul: yes Me: Sahih bukari says aisha was nine Abdul: it's not sahih Me: How old was aisha? Abdul: 18 Me: Show us a sahih hadith Abdul: Mary was 12 Me: Evidence? Abdul: Catholic encyclopedia Me: The Catholic encyclopedia says the source for Mary's age is not authentic Abdul: Rebecca was 3 Me: Evidence? Abdul: Sarah's death and Rebecca's birth happened at the same time Me: Evidence? Abdul: The rabbi said it Me: Do abduls accept rabbis? Abdul: no Me: Do Christians accept rabbis? Abdul: no Me: Do all Jews agree with rabbis? Abdul: But they had laws that permit marriage to children Me: Are lawmakers moral examples for mankind? Abdul: 👺
3
Here's how abduls do taqi-yya and shift the goalposts: 1. Abduls claim all qurans around the world are perfectly preserved and are exactly the same word for word, letter for letter. 2. When we show them different qurans with different words they cunningly shift the goalposts claiming that the qurans may have different words but the differences are only due to different accents or different dialects. 3. When we then point out that the differences are not due to different accents or different dialects but that there are different words with different meaning altogether, they shift the goalposts again alleging that it's the context that is preserved because the different qurans complement each other. 4. When we again point out that certain verses in different qurans contradict each other, they make another excuse claiming all the different qurans are actually different qira'ats and were authorized by muhummud and so are preserved. 5. When we then ask them for proof from their qurans or hadiths where muhummud or allah authorized 10, 15 or 50 qira'ats, abduls start fuming and get triggered crying that we are Islamophobes and are lying 🤦 6. So notice how they shift their goalposts multiple times: "Perfectly preserved word for word" to "different words but different accents or dialects" to "context is the same" to "all qira'ats authorized by muhummud"!
3
zakir naik debated only 2 people in his entire life but abduls call him the best debater 🤣 And since when do abduls take rabbis as their authority? Don't rabbis say muhummud was a false prophet and isa was not the Messiah? Abdul forever an abdul 🤦
2
@MayIsraelstateendlikeBarKochba Abdul refuted himself and then thanks me 😂
2
@MayIsraelstateendlikeBarKochba You know your religion is false. This is why you have to write "islam is the truth" in every comment to convince yourself 🤣
2
@chrisatspeakerscorner Hi Chris, why do you want to debate abdul hamza? He is not on the same level as you. You already schooled one of their shakes, fadel suleiman using the shake's own book.
1
@ProfYaffle The qurans say all praise belongs to allah in sura 1.2 but muhummud means praised one. Conclusion: muhummud = allah
1
MUHAMMAD THE DELUSIONAL Sahih Muslim, Book 030, Number 5654: Jabir b. Samura reported Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: I recognise the stone in Mecca which used to pay me salutations before my advent as a Prophet and I recognise that even now.
1
By the way, the word Palestinian or philistine in Hebrew means invader.
1
MUHAMMAD THE D E L U S I O N A L Sahih Muslim, Book 030, Number 5654: Jabir b. Samura reported Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: I recognise the stone in Mecca which used to pay me salutations before my advent as a Prophet and I recognise that even now.
1
@MayIsraelstateendlikeBarKochba You agreed that abduls don't take rabbis as an authority which refutes your first comment! Take reading classes. Lol
1
@MayIsraelstateendlikeBarKochba Your beliefs are so weak, you have to write islam is the truth in every comment to convince yourself 🤣
1
@MayIsraelstateendlikeBarKochba The hadith shows muhummud was delusional and you thanked me for it. You are delusional like muhummud 🤣
1