Comments by "Dan Adams" (@danadams6477) on "WFLA News Channel 8" channel.

Any professor in any community college or university across America will tell you exactly the same thing I will tell you. In order to win a debate you need to present facts, statistics, and truths, and be able to argue your point and convince your audience in a concise manner. Vance did none of that. He kept reverting back to immigration on nearly every question asked of him. And in nearly every half-assed answer he gave, he lied. You can’t win a debate if you lie. I’m sure many of us who are posting and reading comments on here are parents. As a parent, if your child came up to you and asked you if they could hangout with their friends after earlier during the day you asked them if they had completed any or all of their chores and they flat out lied to you by saying yes when in actuality they hadn’t. How well do you think they are going to sway you and win the argument in convincing you to let them go out with their friends? Probably, not a snowball’s chance in hell. Why? Because they lied to you. Just like Vance lied to you during the debate. If you are the kind of person that likes being lied to, then Vance is your man. If you prefer someone to be straight forward and tell you the truth, then Walz is your man. The choice is clear. I’m sticking with Walz. Harris/Walz 2024 💙🌊🇺🇸
1
Yes, I am. Thank you very much.
1
@Lisha-s6c Trump’s a chump. He’s a loser. I find it ironic that Evangelical Christians support and follow him like he is a cult leader, yet he has broken all Ten Commandments. He disrespects women. He had incited an insurrection upon the US Capitol. Not to mention he has disparaged military veterans and their families. All big “No Go’s” in my book. I’ll be voting for Harris/Walz in November. 💙🌊🇺🇸 Thank you kindly. 🫡 Cbt Eng 86-92 ~ Semper Laborantes
1
No. He just reiterated what Trump said. He was asked a direct question which required a simple “yes”, or “no” answer, to which he did not give.
1
Tim Walz was the clear winner in my book. Yes, he got off to a shaky start, but like a locomotive he gained steam and momentum, and in the end he delivered the goods. His truths were self-evident. Whereas Vance’s lies were also self-evident.
1
Nope!
1
On not directly answering the questions and telling lies? Yes, he won.
1