Comments by "Al Jones" (@aljones9052) on "NYPD officers fatally shoot gun-wielding man" video.

  1. Criticizing the police for shooting a man waving a gun recklessly in New York City thank you Joe Biden, and the Democrat party
    13
  2. So many sick people out there they are actually criticizing the police for shooting a man with a gun who was waving a gun
    10
  3.  @babywizardkelly166  Civilians report that he was running with the gun waving it around when the police shot him use of deadly force authorized
    4
  4.  @babywizardkelly166  That’s right the man did not drop the gun. He was running away with the gun waving it around in New York City, causing a threat to innocent civilians. Thank you for proving.
    4
  5.  @babywizardkelly166  he had a handgun in his hand. He was waving it around, so the police are not allowed to stop a crazy man waving a handgun at New York City citizens.
    3
  6.  @babywizardkelly166  Thanks for proving that he did not drop the gun. He was running away waving the gun around and a story. He was putting citizens in Jeopardy stop making up your own laws watching police TV shows.
    3
  7.  @babywizardkelly166  He did not drop the gun. You just told me that he was running with the gun, waving it around. The muzzle of the gun was pointed in many peoples directions, even at the building a flame felon danger to the public eliminated. Play stupid games win, stupid prizes It’s funny I never heard people like you. Outrage for a female with no gun to be killed by the police 15 feet away crime trespass. Wow
    3
  8.  @babywizardkelly166  Even this particular news report reported the attempts to disarm. The man failed and the police shot him. So I guess he did not drop the gun automatically but you’re sticking with that story ?
    3
  9.  @babywizardkelly166  So what if he was running he was waving a handgun around, pointing it at things and people So when you’re mentally ill, the police stop a crazy man waving a handgun at people, even if he was running ? You make up your own rules, even if a person is running police can still shoot, especially if if that man is threatening other people as he had a gun in his hand and it was waving it around did you know New York City Brooklyn? The Bronx is very crowded. ? It does not matter if he was running stupid. He had a handgun, and he was waving it around that pointed at the gun pointed buildings. The bullet could have ricocheted and hit a innocent bystander. It does not matter. He was running you idiots make up your own rules.
    1
  10.  @babywizardkelly166  It does not matter if he was running he had a gun in his hand, and he was waving it around crowded New York City That gun definitely was pointed in peoples direction pointed at buildings. Bullet could have ricocheted and hit a civilian. That’s right next time a person is running with a gun, pointing it at civilians. The police should do absolutely nothing absolutely sick people like you been brainwashed by your TV. Did you know the police can actually shoot people running away if they are posing any type of threat even to a third person? I know your TV said no
    1
  11.  @babywizardkelly166  It does not matter if he was running away he had a gun in his hand, pointing it at people and buildings. He was a threat to citizens of a New York City. He was a threat to a third person. Police have every right to use deli force so now Police cannot even use their guns when a crazy man with a illegal gun points a gun at citizens of New York crazy crazy crazy.
    1
  12.  @babywizardkelly166  It does not matter if he’s running away he was waving the gun around a illegal handgun in New York City, waving it around. The muzzle was pointing in peoples directions, pointed it at buildings. The police had every right to use deli force stop being brainwashed by the police TV shows on your flatscreen TV.
    1
  13.  @babywizardkelly166  No, no no he had a gun he was waving around pointing that gun at people in New York City. That means the police can use deadly force if he’s threatening a third person you have been watching too many police TV shows. The police do not have to chase him if he has a gun waving it around stop being brainwashed by your TV The police are justified in using force shooting a flame Fallon if that flame Fallon is posing a threat to anybody that guy was waving the gun around. That is the absolute fact. Waving a gun around in New York City, causing harm to citizens of New York City stop being brainwashed by the Police TV shows
    1
  14.  @babywizardkelly166  Police can use deadly force on a flame felon when a fleeing felon is causing harm to a third person a New York City resident. The felon was reported waving the gun around pointing it at people in New York City case closed play stupid games win, stupid prizes. You have been watching too many police TV shows The threat had to be eliminated. The guy was running in. New York City reports indicated that he was waving the gun around, pointing at people and buildings in New York City and the story.
    1
  15.  @babywizardkelly166  They changed their statements. You have civilians that hate the police that actually said the man was running with the gun in his hand, waving it around.
    1
  16.  @babywizardkelly166  Proof that he did not drop the gun proof that he was waving it around when he was running that’s pretty dangerous in New York City so now in your mentally ill mind, the police cannot even shoot a man with the gun even if he’s waving around in New York City absolutely sickening That’s right the police should have used their stun gun or pepper spray, right? The police can shoot a felon. He was a felon, causing danger to citizens waving that gun around. Police did an excellent job. So again, and you are mentally ill mine Police cannot even shoot a man with a gun waving it around as that muzzle has been pointed in many peoples directions. Is that correct? Tell me ? It appears you have been watching too many police TV shows
    1
  17.  @babywizardkelly166  The man did not drop the gun reports state that he was waving it around as the muzzle of the gun was pointing and had been pointed at different people. He was causing serious injury or death to innocent people, a fleeing felon, causing danger to the public and the story . So now your mentally ill police cannot shoot a felon, even if he’s causing danger to the public ? Just like when the guy came at the Police with a large pair of scissors, the police had no right to shoot him ? Liberalism is truly mental disease The man did not drop the gun. The man was waving that gun around in New York City, even in the Bronx and Brooklyn the streets are crowded. The police ended the threat. The police do not have to just chase him when he’s waving the gun pointing it at innocent civilians but in your mind, you have definitely been brainwashed by police TV shows That’s right Ice Tea always chases the guy Captain Benson can use super karate and take a gun away from a perpetrator. You have been brainwashed by too many police TV shows.
    1
  18.  @babywizardkelly166  You just said he never put it down. You said he was running with a gun. That’s how many witness statements called it. You said he was running with the gun now you’re changing your story You said he was running
    1
  19.  @babywizardkelly166  He was about to shoot so if he was about to shoot, and then he, he was eliminated by the police once again justifiable but you constantly changed your story
    1
  20.  @babywizardkelly166  He was about to shoot then the police shot him. Can you stay on the same story? Then you said he was running away and then he was shot ? About to shoot, then put it down then he was shot, but then you just said he was running away ? He was about to shoot and then he was shot that’s justifiable, but then you said he was running away. Was he running away or was he just about to shoot? How come you change your story? He was just about to shoot, then he was shot once again justifiable You cannot even stay on the same story. I thought you said he was running away. ? Now you’re saying he was just about to shoot the police shot justifiable do you know the perpetrator does not have to shoot first ? just about to shoot the police, but you said he was running away. He was running the gun in his hand. Nobody can get on the same page.
    1
  21.  @babywizardkelly166  He was just about to shoot then the police shot him justifiable Then you said he was running was he just about to shoot when he was running? When he was running with the gun in his hand ? If he was just about to shoot, the police shot him justifiable, but said he was running ? You can’t stay on the same page ? Was he running or was he just about to shoot and then he was shot? Witnesses state he was running with the gun But you say he was just about to shoot then we’re shot so if he was just about to shoot, the police can shoot him because the police don’t have to wait for him to shoot first So what was just about to shoot the police shot him or did Santa Claus come?
    1
  22.  @babywizardkelly166  So if he just about to shoot and the police shot him even more justifiable, thank you But you said he was running ? Witnesses he was running with the gun ? Were you there? Did you see what happened? What have you been brainwashed by the lame stream media? Again, will you at the incident of the shooting? That’s right you’re just getting your news from CNN So he was just about to shoot and then the police shot him shooting ? And Police shot him ? Witnesses he was running with the gun in his hand. Were you there at the shooting?
    1
  23.  @babywizardkelly166  So your last statement just proves that the shooting was justifiable he was just about to shoot and the police shot him perfect because the police don’t have to wait for him to shoot The police also do not have to wait for the gun to be pointed at them so are you going with your last statement? Are you going to change your story?
    1
  24.  @babywizardkelly166  He was about to shoot then the police shot him perfectly justifiable
    1
  25.  @babywizardkelly166  so are you going to stick with that story? Witnesses state he was running with the gun maybe maybe not but how do you know your story is true did you hear that from the lame stream media?
    1
  26.  @babywizardkelly166  News reports did not indicate the man dropped. A gun news reports indicate that the man began to run, so I guess some of the witnesses are right he ran with a gun in his hand.
    1
  27.  @babywizardkelly166  A white shirt police commander is given a statement that the mail did not drop the gun when he was running, but you have to make up shit ? Why would a white shirt commander lie about the incident? Even the news reports in this particular case said he never dropped a gun you people are so brainwashed.
    1
  28.  @babywizardkelly166  the man was tased by the police, and the taser did not work as the man still had the gun in his hand, so the offices had to use dead force. This cannot be a lie because the taser indicates that it was used. You people are so mentally ill. The police officer tried to use lethal force on the man, but it did not work so then and only then the police officer used dead force 100% perfect shooting So apparently, the man never dropped the gun because he was tased by the police, but he still had the gun in his hand That criticize this particular incident is a pathetic moron
    1
  29.  @babywizardkelly166  Non, lethal weapon was used on the man first, but it did not work. The man still had the gun in his hand then and only then the police shot him. This is a 100% perfect case any body that criticize this particular incident is a pathetic moron. The police on this incident cannot lie because it’s logged in when the taser was used, they have witnesses that said the man still had the gun in his hand
    1