Comments by "Colorme Dubious" (@colormedubious4747) on "City Beautiful" channel.

  1. 171
  2. 101
  3. 63
  4. 52
  5. 46
  6. 41
  7. 30
  8. 27
  9. 26
  10. 18
  11. 17
  12. 15
  13. 14
  14. 13
  15. 12
  16. 9
  17. 9
  18. 8
  19. 8
  20. 7
  21. 6
  22. 6
  23. 6
  24. 5
  25. 5
  26. 5
  27. 5
  28. 5
  29. 5
  30. 4
  31. 4
  32. 4
  33. 4
  34. 4
  35. 4
  36. 4
  37. 3
  38. 3
  39. 3
  40. Let's not overlook the other underlying issues with high-rise housing projects: It wasn't JUST the concentration of poverty, it was ALSO the massive employment deserts surrounding them, the lack of mixed uses, and the streets with no street-level windows. Rather than look to government to "fix" this issue, let's pursue ACTUAL solutions in the context of public/private partnerships. Eminent domain: No. Just NO. Eminent domain brought us to the most corrupt slum clearance/redevelopment scandals of the 40s and 50s, displaced at least 300,000 people under Moses' rule, and created the hellscape of urban freeways that has devastated our cities. No! NIMBYs: Also known as productive people living and working in functioning neighborhoods who keep the local economy going, pay the taxes that pay the public servants' salaries, and have EVERY right to push back when they hear the most frightening words ever to be uttered outside of a horror film: "We're from the government and we're here to help you." Doing housing right: Take lessons from various HOPE VI projects and focus investment on scattered-site, mixed-use, mixed-income development with a majority of market rate units. Take lessons from Montgomery County MD and other jurisdictions that reward(ed) developers with increased density permitting for inclusion of ADUs above and beyond the basic code requirements. Allow any owner-occupied single-family home to add a garage apartment, casita, or mother-in-law suite regardless of local ordinances or HOA rules. That alone could introduce hundreds of thousands of ADUs while the owner occupancy requirement satisfies the NIMBYs.
    3
  41. 3
  42. 3
  43. 3
  44. 3
  45. 3
  46. 3
  47. 3
  48. 2
  49. 2
  50. 2
  51. 2
  52. 2
  53. 2
  54. 2
  55. 2
  56. 2
  57. 2
  58. 2
  59. 2
  60. 2
  61. 2
  62. 2
  63. 2
  64. 2
  65. 2
  66. 2
  67. 2
  68. 2
  69. 2
  70. 2
  71. 2
  72. 2
  73. 2
  74. 1
  75. 1
  76. 1
  77. 1
  78. 1
  79. 1
  80. 1
  81. 1
  82. 1
  83. 1
  84.  @TheTroyc1982  Yes we do - in part because of nations like China threatening Taiwan and their ally/client state North Korea threatening South Korea. Would you prefer that nations like China, North Korea, and Russia have NO check on their ambitions? Before you point out the obvious, I'll do it for you. Yes, the US government is "less than efficient" with military spending (intentional understatement). Yes, we could probably do just as well with more intelligent project management. Yes, we could probably safely divert a fair portion of our military spending to civil works projects. No, now is NOT the time for that due to the current Administration's policies making us look ridiculously weak and ineffectual in the geopolitical sphere. Due to their short-sighted pandering to climate alarmists, they have also completely DESTROYED our two best revenue sources for funding construction of public transit projects: severance and end-user fuel taxes. Increasing those revenue streams is politically off the table indefinitely. Also, their destruction of our economic growth means that the fuel and literally EVERYTHING else it takes to construct ANYTHING is growing more costly by the day. Their desire to pretend to be "doing something" for the environment and climate change has revealed that they do not know anything about these issues and they simply do not truly care. They don't even BELIEVE in climate change. Look at all the expensive beachfront properties owned by the loudest climate alarmists in politics: Al Gore, Barack Obama, and Joe Biden. That $40 billion that we sent to Ukraine to repay Burisma's investment in Biden Inc could have built about 800 miles of modern streetcar lines. They don't care about transit. They don't care about climate change. They don't care about YOU!
    1
  85. 1
  86. 1
  87. 1
  88. It's Grand Central TERMINAL. Just sayin'. Also, this Texas HSR proposal is hauntingly reminiscent of the abject failure of the 1993 Texas HSR bids. I followed that duel between competing companies at the time (it was basically French TGV vs German ICE technology) and predicted failure when the company that claimed "no taxpayer money required" was awarded the bid. The more honest company lost and the winner never built a dang thing. Let's also not forget the 6-track rail corridor that was promised in the Trans-Texas Corridor proposal. The Texas 130 tollway has existed for roughly 15 years and not one single inch of railroad track has been installed along its right of way. I predict this plan will also fizzle for several reasons (I'd love to be wrong about that, but it already looks a little shaky): First and foremost, the line is all new-terrain construction. Why not expand or closely parallel existing rail routes? They're already fairly flat and straight between the triangle cities. Just acquire land adjacent to existing track. They'd attract fewer lawsuits AND be able to transport construction supplies by rail. Portions of those routes are already grade-separated. The company could save some loot by not having to elevate the entire thing (fences are cheaper). Second, too many of the station locations are rubbish. Dallas seems okay, but if they're going to build an elevated station anyway, it might as well be closer to Union Station, which serves several light and commuter rail lines, as well as Amtrak. Also, just ONE station for the entire Metroplex? Really? Stupid! The line should enter Dallas from the southeast (from Houston), continue northwest to DFW Airport and then curve southwest through Fort Worth before continuing south along I-35W toward Austin. The Houston station's location could hardly be worse. Who's going to choose to travel 180 miles in 45 minutes only to hop on a BUS when they get to their destination? Buses do NOT attract riders-by-choice. Trains do! Again, if they're going to elevate it anyway, they could put it closer to the UH downtown campus and light rail station on Main. There's a parking lot between that location and the Amtrak station that might be an ideal location for it. Don't get me started on the unabashed stupidity of the Brazos Valley station! They intend it to serve Bryan/College Station AND Huntsville. Those cities are FIFTY MILES APART. Pick one! I would choose College Station. Amtrak used to serve it on their Dallas-Houston route before they discontinued it. There is some land and surface parking across Wellborn Road from the main campus with room for an elevated station and parking structures, plus the population of B/CS (primarily a college town) is much greater than that of Huntsville (primarily a prison town). Austin's Amtrak station is ALREADY on the edge of a 24-hour neighborhood. Skyscrapers, including the hideous "Jenga building," have sprouted like weeds after a summer rain all over the western side of downtown. Whole Foods' flagship store is within walking distance. The redeveloped Seaholm power plant, thousands of apartments, restaurants, and offices are within spittin' distance. There are properties adjacent to the tracks that could be redeveloped without demolishing the YMCA or parklands. Alternatively, replace the YMCA property with a mixed-use high-rise that contains the station and a brand-new YMCA facility, as well as shops and offices. Third, there are too many missing stations. Granted, there's not much between Houston and San Antonio but a West Houston station near Katy and the I-10/Grand Parkway interchange would make sense and pick up a lot of business from local commuters (Katy Freeway is a 24/7 crack-addled nightmare). The eastern leg could benefit from stations at Corsicana and Conroe/The Woodlands. The most egregious gap in the plan is along the western leg (I-35 corridor). Waco, Temple/Belton, San Marcos, and New Braunfels are all cities that exist. The plan completely fails to address serving these population centers. At least the 1993 proposals had a station planned for Waco! Fourth, they don't need government funding nor guarantees to build this thing. They need that to build it RIGHT. This plan is sloppy and fails to serve our citizens' needs. By failing to plan properly, they have planned to fail spectacularly. I don't WANT to come back in a few years to say "I told you so," but I WILL. ;-) Thank you for your attention to this issue.
    1
  89. Thank you for an excellent explanation. About those bans on gasoline-powered vehicles... When California's Governor did that, you realize that he also accidentally (I hope) banned hybrid-electric vehicles because most politicians are law school and Poli Sci graduates (in other words, idiots). As ironically hilarious as that is in and of itself, the bigger picture reveals that CA politicians are even dumber than you think. The Gov ordered the ban (starting in 2035) before EVs were ready for prime time, AFTER they tore down their nuclear and other power plants, AFTER Texas left them in the dust in wind energy generation, and AFTER they spent billions on HSR but BEFORE said HSR has earned a single penny at the farebox (they're going to erase a significant source of revenue from fuel taxes and pick the pockets of their citizens instead, prompting even more of them to take their wealth and tax revenue to states with sane, moderate policies). They've been suffering from brownouts and rolling blackouts since the turn of the century but have done NOTHING to bring more capacity online. The ban is an empty virtue-posturing gesture that panders to a microscopic minority of climate alarmists and is yet another example of that once-great state shooting itself in the proverbial foot. The big auto manufacturers have been quietly dialing back EV production because the economics just don't work without massive governmental intervention, which translates to: Each and every taxpayer who does NOT own an EV is subsidizing those who buy them. They've been robbing the poor to help the wealthy buy Teslas and other overpriced EVs. THAT is what you voted for!
    1
  90. 1
  91. 1
  92. 1
  93. 1
  94. 1
  95. 1
  96. 1
  97. 1
  98. 1
  99. 1
  100. 1
  101. 1
  102. 1
  103. 1
  104. 1
  105. 1
  106. 1
  107. 1
  108. 1
  109. 1
  110. 1
  111. 1
  112. 1
  113. 1
  114. 1
  115. 1
  116. 1
  117. 1
  118. 1
  119. 1
  120. 1
  121. 1
  122. 1
  123. 1
  124. 1
  125. 1
  126. 1
  127. 1
  128. 1
  129. 1
  130. 1
  131. 1
  132. 1
  133. 1
  134. 1
  135. 1
  136. 1
  137. 1
  138. 1
  139. 1
  140. 1
  141. 1
  142. 1
  143. 1
  144. 1
  145. 1
  146. 1
  147. 1
  148. 1
  149. Since you didn't mention it, I guess I will. The Texas 130 tollway was built as an alternate route bypassing Austin to the east. The southern segments are famous for having the fastest posted speed limit in the USA (85mph). Most of the tollway has been open for barely 15 years and they're ALREADY widening it. Part of the rationale for building it was allegedly to relieve congestion on I-35. I knew that was BS when then-Governor Perry first proposed his Trans-Texas Corridor plan, which was a poorly-disguised scam to allow private companies to get rich by building underutilized toll roads all over the state without using much taxpayer money. The original plan proposed corridors containing toll roads, rail lines, and utility infrastructure that would connect Texas' major cities and then connect to NOTHING at the state's borders. Texas 130 is the only part of the plan that exists today. He lied like a rug and we fell for that crap. Live and learn. If congestion relief had truly been the goal, the answer was and remains obvious: Make 130 a "free" road and initiate tolling on I-35. Yeah, you aren't "supposed" to do that on an Interstate built with public funds. So what? Robert Moses did it more than half a century ago. Numerous toll roads are, today, part of the Interstate Highway System. Tolled express lanes are being added to Interstates all around the country. Even right here in Austin, the It-Will-Never-Ever-Be-An-Expressway-We-Promise-Cross-Our-Hearts-And-Swear-To-Die Mopac Expressway (Democrats lie like rugs, too) has tolled express lanes right where the UP rail corridor SHOULD have been expanded to double tracks and a commuter rail line overlaid. It's clearly possible to legislate such changes. Vote better, people!
    1
  150. 1
  151. 1
  152. 1
  153. 1
  154. 1
  155. 1
  156. 1
  157. 1
  158. 1
  159. 1
  160. 1
  161. 1