Comments by "Colorme Dubious" (@colormedubious4747) on "The Battle of the Libs: Samantha Lux vs Professor Dave" video.

Dave turned off comments on both of his transgender videos, explaining himself in his response video to you with a string of hateful ad hom accusations against everyone who "hatefully" criticized his position with completely valid questions. So courage! Much brave! Please challenge him to a debate, if he'll even read your e-mail.
523
@Amlux1984 His ACTUAL science content is watchable, but he really shot himself in the crank with this topic.
64
@martinkratzsch8655 I watched both of Dave's videos as well as Matt's original critique. You've only heard Dave's side of the story but believe it uncritically for no rational reason whatsoever, in spite of Dave's bigoted invective against everyone who "dared" to raise a valid question or point out the very real gender ideological extremism that Dave completely avoided discussing. He claims that some sort of "hate campaign" was waged against him yet HIS very, VERY few answers to politely critical comments were full of childish name-calling, straw-manning, and appeals to authority. The real clincher rests upon who turned off their comments rather than defend their position. Was it Matt? No. It was "Dave's not here" who did so.
39
@demef758 That's quite a non sequitur. Could you please clarify what you meant to say?
3
@thenewzealandgringo9296 Woke Dave is the least fun of all the Daves. I bet he wonders why he never gets invited to the parties at the cool kids' houses.
3
@martinkratzsch8655 "Couldn't argue?" Matt made an entire documentary film demonstrating how bat-guano crazy modern gender ideology has become. All Dave did was define some terms and hurl insults at everyone who doesn't uncritically buy into that fringe lunacy. Exactly WHAT are you defending, here?
3
@grogu833 Everyone? That's not the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. There absolutely were a handful of trolls and asshats, but most people simply asked a fair question about issues that Dave had ignored or respectfully challenged his assertions. Instead of thoughtfully considering their perspectives and defending his position, he spewed bigoted invective and insults when he even bothered to reply. You'd be able to see that right now if he hadn't so stunningly and bravely disabled comments.
2
@truthbetold1855 It's also quite hilarious.
1
@alwal social There are several. Use the search feature and find one that suits you.
1
@grogu833 I am doing no such thing. I'm criticizing Dave's debating tactics and obvious bigotry. Trans people exist (although their incidence is closer to 0.6% than 1.0%), and many of them are suffering from very real mental health issues that should NOT be addressed with medical procedures that mutilate their bodies or render them irreversibly sterile. We certainly should NOT allow children to make such monumental decisions for themselves. My toddler wanted to be a Teletubby so she could get one of those giant rabbits. She grew out of it. Trans-trenders also exist, but Dave just handwaved that away and refused to acknowledge that social contagion is a real phenomenon no matter how often it was pointed out. Even Liberal icon Bill Maher recently called that out. I have to ask: what do you think you're defending?
1
@highroller-jq3ix I was unaware that there was a cult that hated transphobes.
1
@highroller-jq3ix Unlike you religious fanatics, I worship no man. Nice projection, though. You may have revealed more of your buggy software than you intended. Given that DAVE was the one who turned off his comments while Matt keeps his open, why on Earth would you take Dave's word for that? Oh, I see, you're only three weeks old. Come back for an adult conversation when you've experienced something real.
1
@highroller-jq3ix As you have demonstrated. Can you coherently explain what you are defending and why?
1
@highroller-jq3ix No worries, mate. Your lack of arguments and obnoxious name-calling has brilliantly won me over to your side of the debate. You should run for public office.
1