Comments by "Colorme Dubious" (@colormedubious4747) on "Thunderf00t" channel.

  1. 619
  2. 66
  3. 16
  4. 16
  5. 14
  6. 14
  7. 13
  8.  @andrewfranklin4429  It's interesting that you completely avoided addressing the point. EVERY so-called "innovative" transit solution proposed over the past 30 to 40 years has been an abysmal failure. Several flavors of urban PRT (most notably Raytheon's PRT2000), the DuoRail concept, cantilevered monobeam, and too many others to list. Each and every one of them promised use of "off-the-shelf" technology, insanely cheap implementation, and even the impossible "profitable operation at no cost to taxpayers." Each failed because there was NO compelling reason to select it over existing transit modes. Like your boy Musk, the developers of these "innovative" transit modes insisted on solving "problems" that simply DO NOT EXIST. In so failing, they distracted from real, proven solutions with actual operational history and predictable costs with their pie-in-the-sky bullshittery. Likewise, Musk's bullshittery WILL cost the taxpayers plenty: street-level disruption during construction, opportunity costs due to distracting the local government from more viable transit modes, surface connections to the "system" of holes in the ground eating up acres of streets and sidewalks, emergency services, etc. You're defending a slick con man whose only goal is to SELL MORE CARS. HIS cars. His tunnels lack adequate ventilation, ensuring that only pure electric cars can operate in them. ALL of his still-existent companies depended on taxpayer handouts to become profitable. SpaceX needed NASA contracts. Tesla needed billions in state and local tax incentives plus a per-vehicle federal tax credit that YOU paid for whether you bought a Tesla or not. I must repeat: Musk has NEVER built one inch of functional transit infrastructure. NEVER. His Boring Company was actually FIRED from multiple transit projects. Why are you defending him? Do you own Tesla stock?
    13
  9. 12
  10. 12
  11. 11
  12. 10
  13. 9
  14. 9
  15. 8
  16. 8
  17. 7
  18. 6
  19. 6
  20. 5
  21. 5
  22. 4
  23. 4
  24. 4
  25. 3
  26. 3
  27. 3
  28.  @Reach3DPrinters  I'm not the one who started sprinkling salt and ad-homs in this discussion, Mister "Honda sucks compared to Tesla." Let's face reality, here. Musk is an INVESTOR. I'll give him full credit for financial acumen but he has never INVENTED a thing. Take PayPal, for example: "PayPal was originally established by Max Levchin, Peter Thiel, and Luke Nosek in December 1998." Musk BOUGHT it, went public, and then sold it to eBay. He did not invent new battery technology. Such tech has historically experienced average efficiency gains of one to two percent annually. Battery tech is about where it would be anyway without his influence. His Tesla is based upon the original 19th century automobiles (which were battery powered) and the self-driving research of many other companies (Google was testing autonomous cars here in Texas for many years before Tesla hyped it up). ALL of his rocketry tech is based on public-domain NASA research (and some Russian stuff, as you mentioned). The so-far mythical Hyperloop is simply a combination of Alfred Ely Beach's pneumatic subway from 1869 combined with the MagLev developed at the Brookhaven National Lab in the 1960s as imagined by Harry Harrison in his novel "A Transatlantic Tunnel, Hurrah!" in 1972. As to my issue with Musk on a personal level, it's mainly the fact that he's made himself exceptionally wealthy by picking the taxpayers' pockets. SpaceX wouldn't even exist without government-funded research and government contracts. He wouldn't have sold half of the Teslas he made without that juicy EV tax credit. I'm all for space exploration and reducing fossil fuel dependency, but his constant overpromising and underdelivering offers more harm than benefit to those causes. My issue on a professional level is that his Hyperloop is a completely unnecessary modal alternative. We already HAVE proven high-speed intercity transportation technologies. We already HAVE several proven urban transit modal options. He could have offered useful incremental improvements to those. He did not. He hyped a shiny coffin in a sewer pipe instead, because he's an investor, promoter, and hypemaster. What have I done lately? Glad you asked. I'm at the finish line of a decade-plus project to convert my stick-built suburban house into a USGBC LEED-certified dwelling unit. I've adapted it to the hot local climate with a number of passive techniques that have worked so well that I was able to downsize my HVAC system a few months ago (out with the 5-ton, in with the 4). I've replaced appliances and lighting with Energy Star certified devices. I've also automated the whole joint for aging-in-place. I've eliminated most sources of VOCs and replaced them with low- and no-VOC items. I've replaced climate-inappropriate ornamental plants with dry-climate trees and shrubs and producing fruit trees. I installed a rainwater capture system two years ago. I installed a 7.5Kw solar array after that and just last week I ordered my first Tesla Powerwall module (4 month lead time on those at the moment). After that's installed I'll build some raised garden beds and a greenhouse watered by a drip irrigation system to grow veggies super-efficiently. I doubt I can reach a LEED platinum rating in a 1980s stick-built house but I can push it close to silver, if not beyond. My monthly electric bills in the hot Texas summers are down from about $225 to around $33 for a 2,400 square foot single-family house (which includes my offices -- I have a 40-foot commute and a full tank of gas lasts me 1 to 3 months). My water bills are about the same. I'll collect another year or two of data before I publish. That's what I've been up to. Yourself?
    3
  29. 3
  30. 3
  31. 2
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 2
  44. 2
  45. 2
  46. 2
  47. 2
  48. 2
  49. 2
  50. 2