Comments by "Colorme Dubious" (@colormedubious4747) on "CNN" channel.

  1. Get over him already. He's just not into you.
    476
  2. The last time they tried something like this, it worked out quite poorly for them.
    70
  3. Hey, CNN, if these books are perfectly fine for elementary and middle school children, why won't you show us the illustrations or play the audio clips of parents quoting them? Asking for a friend.
    23
  4. Corrected title: "CNN is Desperate to Halt Ratings Freefall, Continues to Pretend that FBI Report Regarding the Jan 6th Riot Doesn't Exist"
    12
  5. WORST scripted "reality" show EVER. You need to hire better actors.
    9
  6. "but not civillains or unarmed people" -- Islam makes no such distinction. Either you are Muslim or a nonbeliever, and their Big Book of Bad Ideas orders them to murder nonbelievers unless they pay a bribe to not get murdered. How could you possibly be unaware of this?
    8
  7. "Even the Crusaders lost interest after a few years" -- Not correct. They didn't "lose interest," they achieved their objectives and pushed the Islamic invaders out of Europe! Your conclusion, however, is inarguably correct.
    6
  8. One person was shot in the neck by the CP. One cop was killed by blunt trauma (fire extinguisher to the head). But weren't 3 people victims of "unrelated medical issues?" You might want to fact-check before posting is all I'm saying. Perhaps we should ALL hold our emotions in check until the investigation is completed. Do we not do that any more?
    5
  9. Do you really think America existed 1400 years ago? Read a book other than the Big Book of Child Rape and Torture Porn!
    4
  10. Hello everyone. This is YOUR daily reminder that the mainstream media instigated the most pointless WAR in American history in order to sell more papers. Remember the Maine!
    4
  11. "A rate they've never seen before" would include ZERO. Just pointing that out.
    4
  12. "this country owes me" -- So, it's all about giving you free stuff that you haven't lifted a finger to earn? Thanks for clearing that up for everyone!
    3
  13.  @rappakalja5295  Nobody has advocated burning them. Do you really need to read the whole thing after someone reads aloud just ONE graphic sex scene from a book ostensibly for KIDS? What are you defending, exactly?
    3
  14. Hello everyone. This is YOUR daily reminder that the mainstream media instigated the most pointless WAR in American history in order to sell more papers. Remember the Maine!
    3
  15. Nobody is burning or even censoring these books, you hysterical old woman. They simply want them restricted to age-appropriate people. Or do you truly believe elementary aged children should have access to books with graphic illustrations of adult sexual activities? I do not, but I'm not a pervy groomer.
    3
  16. "usa is behind this in done believe the lies they want to feed us" -- Ironic, indeed, coming from a "religion" that encourages its followers to lie in four flavors to spread their insane ideology of conquest. Don't think for one moment that your fake Hispanic name fooled ANYONE, you despicable taqiyya-spewing propagandist!
    2
  17. This technology is unnecessary. We already have proven MagLev designs that don't require passengers to lie down in a windowless coffin and get shot through a dark sewer pipe. Even if they solve the myriad engineering challenges, they will NEVER overcome the psychological barriers. People want to sit comfortably, enjoy the view, and occasionally get up and walk around.
    2
  18.  @rappakalja5295  You keep using the word "fascists." I do not think it means what you think it means. But an even better counterargument is: Buzzword, buzzword, buzzword. I win.
    2
  19. It would have, if a law-abiding gun owner with a CCL had been in the store. Instead of restricting guns, perhaps we should be requiring them. "When seconds matter, the cops are minutes away."
    2
  20. Perhaps his hearing isn't what it used to be and he relies on facial expressions and other nonverbal cues to fill in the blanks. Hearing-impaired people are getting royally screwed by these mask ordinances, you despicable ableist!
    2
  21. "I would never defend the right to tell a joke over someone's right to live their chosen lifestyle" -- How, in ANY way, does a joke or even a mean tweet impair anyone's right to live their chosen lifestyle?
    2
  22. Due to your blatant misrepresentations of the Berkeley riots, you clowns have compelled me to utter a sentence I never thought I would: Trump was right. You ARE fake news! Legitimizing those who call a gay ethnic jew who likes black men a "Nazi" and a "white supremacist" is disingenuousness of the highest order. Implicit condoning of anti free speech riots by the left is heinous to the extreme. Will your tune change when the crazy authoritarian left turns on you or will it be too late by then? Spreading propaganda that the right was somehow responsible for this is the sort of "false flag" delusion that we would expect from Alex Jones. Don't worry, though -- the way you're pushing so many moderates and centrists toward the right is only going to put more coin in Jones' pockets. I'm certain that he'll become wealthy enough to offer you blind ideologues gainful employment at Info Wars. That IS the dream, is it not?
    1
  23. @renideo Nice job pretending you didn't know exactly what I meant.
    1
  24.  Lee Jigi  I was saying something relevant to the topic. What were you saying?
    1
  25.  @drsnova7313  [citation needed]
    1
  26.  @cathychase663  I identify as singular, not plural. Do you have any actual FACTS to offer with which to challenge the FBI's findings? BIDEN's FBI, to be specific.
    1
  27. Is the data flawed or the results fictional, or both? Answer: Both. See the analysis that the flawed and fictional "journalists" at CNN failed or refused to do here: https://youtu.be/Kh-j8cX90uw
    1
  28. She's "helping" to get that thing that already exists? Got it. Please let me know where background checks are NOT required. It's a federal (ATF) rule!
    1
  29.  @SloppyMaracas  "Selfish?" You're hilarious! Who forced healthy people to wear face diapers? Who forced healthy people to stay at home while the economy dissolved like tissue paper in a vat of acid? Who are the people who are NOT your doctor pushing universal mandates regardless of individually acquired natural immunity and other health factors? If you think you're at risk then get the jab, wear a mask while alone in your car, or opt out of society and productivity by staying home. Demanding that everyone ELSE do these things because YOU live in a permanent state of unjustifiable abject terror is the ULTIMATE selfish act!
    1
  30.  @thermiafps3320  You can build a maglev in a tunnel, you silly wabbit.
    1
  31.  @FlankyFrankie  Proven technology that exists vs fantasy digital renderings isn't clear enough? Hyperloop is a "solution" that lacks a problem.
    1
  32. It's actually "Don't walk out of your job or don't get paid." Glad I could help you understand.
    1
  33.  @timgehrsitz3267  You are absolutely correct while also completely missing my point.
    1
  34.  @jeffzheng3136  Nobody said "duct tape." That might wreck the lens. They just said "tape." I assume they use masking tape (unironically). I use Post-Its.
    1
  35. Dems lost seats in the House and failed to attain a decisive majority in the Senate. The Supremes lean right. There were major dem losses in most state legislatures and they lost ground gubernatorially as well. The Executive branch is the least important (though most visible) of the three. Are you sure you're using the word "tsunami" correctly? I don't think that word means what you think it means. Has ANYONE in this comment section passed a high school civics course?
    1
  36. If you're all self-isolating at home, then don't you have ZERO risk of contracting the disease from political rally attendees or rioters? Why should you even care what they choose to do?
    1
  37. It made perfect sense. Free speech is the next right they'll take away once they confiscate your guns (using YOUR tax money), of course!
    1
  38. You didn't "have" to be a completely inept Authoritarian. You CHOSE to be a completely inept Authoritarian!
    1
  39.  @lucariothegodboi  You're gonna need to post more than a few citations to back that up. There were fewer than 814,000 deaths attributed to the 'rona in the United States, so that's one HELL of a rounding error on your part. Are you blaming him for the world-wide death toll? Remarkable! Are you saying that the guy who fast-tracked vax development thinks he ordered a billion doses of poison? QUITE remarkable! Also, there have been more 'rona deaths in 2021 than 2020. Does Biden have bloodier hands than Trump? If not, why not? I'm eager to see just how much more contorted your mental gymnastics can get. Please do not disappoint us, you're going for the gold medal here.
    1
  40.  @rappakalja5295  That is not the book to which I referred.
    1
  41. Did you really use the word "meaningfully" in the same sentence as "white privilege" unironically? Thanks for the laughs!
    1
  42. Furlongs per femtosecond.
    1
  43. Didn't she contradict herself the very same week? I just don't know WHAT to believe. LOL!
    1
  44.  @alxd5068  We're merely #66 in mass shootings. You can look that up. In fact you have to -- the media won't mention that statistic because it doesn't sell their fear porn.
    1
  45. The Court's decision did NOT "make abortion illegal." CNN's trademarked spin has devolved into blatant lies that even a toddler can discern.
    1
  46. YOU nonproductive talking haircuts were fine with this for 4 years, even glorifying Hollyweird's finest idiots when they shouted "Tuck Frump" (slightly edited for "decorum") during televised award shows, cheering on the Speaker of the House when she tore up a copy of a State of the Union speech, and falsely framing video evidence of more than 570 violent left-wing riots. YOUR nonproductive talking haircut colleague CREATED this meme by attempting to run cover for our increasingly unpopular Pres-I can't even say it- our increasingly unpopular selected Chief Executive. It is long past time for ALL of you to take a remedial Journalistic Ethics course!
    1
  47. "She not in it for money." -- Yet, there's apparently more than ONE MILLION DOLLARS (read that in Dr. Evil's voice) in donated funds (via internet campaign) awaiting her as well as a book deal. That's a LOT of coin for "not being in it for the money!"
    1
  48. I recall that many media pundits were enthusiastically "speaking out against" vaccines when President Trump initiated Operation Warp Speed, proudly stating that they'd NEVER subject themselves to an experimental jab touted by him. Please square that particular circle for us.
    1
  49. "... when people take the country back and prove you wrong?" -- Nearly half the country thinks that they already did that in November 2016. Perspective can be enlightening, eh?
    1
  50. The chunky basketball smuggler has a clear bias and a very poor grasp of reality, thus demonstrating why, as a group, the news media is less trusted than even politicians. Your viewers are fleeing like innocent bystanders escaping an antifa riot, CNN, yet you stay the propagandist course. You create more right-leaning voters in one week than Fox has during their entire existence. Enjoy your slow, painful demise. It makes very entertaining television.
    1
  51.  Ron Carson  How is my observation in ANY way partisan? [Citation Needed!]
    1
  52.  Ron Carson  That's a very verbose way to NOT answer my question. I originally referred to the Spanish-American War which was primarily instigated by Hearst. You accused me of partisan motives. I asked you to justify your baseless accusation. You then brought up the Vietnam War which raises the obvious question "What the heck does that have to do with the Spanish-American War but - as long as you brought it up - WHO sent the money, supplies, and advisors?" President Kennedy, that's who. Exactly what point are you trying to make? It seems that even you don't know.
    1
  53. With all due respect to the Senator and her honorable service, less than 25% of active-duty military personnel are women. Less than FIVE percent of those women are in combat roles. That's a hysterics-based definition of "gutting." You ARE aware that Google is a thing that exists, right? Don't bother asking the obvious follow-up questions, CNN, just keep being you. You're withering away in real time for a reason.
    1
  54. Worst Journalist of the Year Don Lemon (Worst Journalist of the Year 2014) couldn't find a fact that was literally on the screen in front of his face. Is ANYONE really surprised by this?
    1
  55.  @chilibeans7772  ✔ Pro Crime ✔ Pro Corruption ✔ Pro Inflation ✔ Pro Armageddon Dear Lord! Have you learned NOTHING during the past year and a half?
    1
  56.  @savlosavage  The Dem agenda is "successful???" Sure, if you define "success" as an 800% surge in the murder rate in Portland, proposing spending bills that equal Obama's entire budget during his 8 years in office in merely 5 months, chaos at the southern border, a mass exodus from unlivable California to affordable conservative states, inability to hire workers due to competition from the dole, divisive rhetoric, skyrocketing prices for housing, building materials, energy, and food, rapid devaluation of the dollar, and teetering on the razor's edge of hyperinflation. Your definition of "success" is deeply flawed. May you reap what you've sown with your emotion-driven vote. The problem is, you're taking the rest of us down the toilet with you.
    1
  57. It's a "dog whistle" that ONLY the talking haircuts at CNN can hear. Thanks for reminding us yet again who the REAL racists are!
    1
  58. It's quite odd that you failed to mention that nearly EVERY attendee you didn't interview IS wearing a mask. Were you unaware that they were in the shot? Do you even watch your own show? Apparently not, or you'd remember that YOU pinheads told us that the WHO said not to bother with masks back in January and February. I wonder why most people distrust the so-called "experts" and "journalists?" Must be Trump. Yeah, sure, it's all Trump!
    1
  59.  @Perroden  I assume you're being sarcastic since CNN didn't show the illustrations nor did they allow us to hear the parts that were quoted. It's quite true that some of the parents didn't know what was in the books but quite a few knew too well what was in them (like the one with illustrations of sex acts).
    1
  60. Somebody is trying very hard to earn another "Worst Journalist of the Year" award from the Columbia Journalism Review!
    1