Comments by "Wandering Existence" (@WanderingExistence) on "Second Thought" channel.

  1. 1300
  2. 973
  3. 393
  4. 282
  5. 247
  6. 143
  7. 137
  8. 119
  9. 91
  10. 79
  11. 75
  12. 68
  13. 67
  14. 30
  15. 27
  16. 25
  17. 25
  18. 22
  19. 21
  20. 20
  21. 18
  22. 18
  23. 18
  24. 16
  25. 15
  26. 15
  27. 15
  28. 12
  29. 12
  30. 10
  31. ​ @hydromic2518  First of all capitalism is a terrible system. "Why?" You may ask, well wage labor is renting yourself via "self ownership" and employing someone is literally renting another human being as if they're property. The employer-employee relationship is a very insidious dynamic. Employment is a rental contract, like if you rented capital (say, a chainsaw from Home Depot), you pay rent for the "time preference" (basically the cost of time) for a piece of property. Capitalism is based on a principle of self ownership, which sounds empowering, until you realize that most people don't own capital goods other than themselves, and must rent out the authority over themselves as pieces of "human capital". This is a process of dehumanization where human beings are valued for their return on investment as capital goods. This is why, at the very least, capitalism needs unions and safety nets (or abolishment), or else the system won't value people for their human value. Importantly we must also think about our sick, elderly, and disabled people, as they can't provide competitive economic return for the investor class to value. We must figure out a way to change this economic system if we wish to value each other. Which is where socialism comes in. Socialism creates worker and community control of the means production which empowers workers to control the full product of their labor. For this reason capitalism cannot coexist with socialism because socialism is the abolishment of private property and the exploitation of people through wage labor.
    9
  32. 8
  33. 8
  34.  @jbturtle  The economic exploitation under capitalism is twofold, firstly they alienate decision making from the people who are doing the tasks. This division of decision making from material consequence is a prime factor in negative externalities associated with authority. But the primary economic extraction of value comes from renting people out and then pocketing the change. Profit sharing is a way that workers collectively share the full product of their labor. They can earn a wage and then collectively they decide whether to reinvest in certain aspects of production or to share the added value. In downturns less people are laid off and jobs are rearranged to make sure people have the ability to stay afloat and not be discarded and alienated by the institutions they depend on most. Personally I am a fan of cooperatives and their ability to subtly shift the mindset of people to think more in terms of community wealth building. Here is an example of how profit sharing has decreased exploitation by allowing people the full benefit of their product. "In the 11 years since then, Evergreen Cooperatives has added three more cooperatives to its ranks, growing from two companies with a total of 18 workers in 2010 to five companies with approximately 320 workers. Those workers are paid 20 to 25 percent higher than employees at the cooperative’s competitors. “Our average pay rate is close to $15,” says John McMicken, CEO of Evergreen Cooperative Initiative. “But when you take profit sharing into account, which could equate to $4 to $5 an hour, we’re hoping that we have a shot at breaking the $20 an hour ‘blended rate,’ if you will.” In 2019, the average compensation at Evergreen Cooperative Laundry was around $18 per hour." - Despite a Rocky Start, Cleveland Model for Worker Co-ops Stands Test of Time, by Brandon Duong
    8
  35. 8
  36. 8
  37. 7
  38. 6
  39. 6
  40. 6
  41. 5
  42. 5
  43. 5
  44. 5
  45. 5
  46. 4
  47. 4
  48. 4
  49. 4
  50. 3