Comments by "Wandering Existence" (@WanderingExistence) on "CNBC Television" channel.

  1. ?? I didn't she her "fangirl" out. Tasha just understand disruptive innovation. Don't act like Tesla isn't years ahead of its next competitors.
    1
  2. Blockchain, all entries are public and simultaneously known by all referencers
    1
  3. Thank you. I scrolled and scrolled for someone who hasn't lost their mind thinking that giving Big Brother more data is good, as if it doesn't conflict with the core values of privacy and freedom from government that America is built on.
    1
  4. This short squeeze wasn't collusion, We like the stock! billionaires are just mad that they got caught with their pants down with 140% short position. They deserve it.
    1
  5. Lol, you realize corporate drug companies got people addicted to opiates. The realize criminals are inside already.
    1
  6.  @longbeach7623  Lol, We literally helped protect product that helped fund the Taliban.... And then wage a multi-trillion dollar war on terror that failed. You don't think that debt bill hits close to home?? Lmao. You probably cry about tax spending, so shut up, you gnarled twit. P. S. NEVER BEEN TO COLLEGE, saved me so much money considering America has a terrible tuition inflation problem
    1
  7. AAPL and MSFT don't earn anything? Not selling my QQQ
    1
  8. Do you guys really not understand that corporate lobbying has undermined the concept of democracy in this country? Stop with the idealism, learn about the real world.
    1
  9. That dip is here!! Bought some at $220 and $240 not too long ago.
    1
  10. Probably a Jan 6er. Have you gotten picked up by the Fed yet?
    1
  11. Lol
    1
  12. If you've listened to Cathie Woods you'd know she operates on a 5-year time horizon... Over the past 5 years QQQ is up 221% and ARKK is up 372%. People get so caught up in the short-term they don't understand the underlying assets, lol. By the way I own both ark funds and QQQ in my Roth.
    1
  13.  @HateTheIRS  Do you know what my largest ETF holding is? QQQM. ARKK is full of high risk /high reward potential stocks, an 90% of my ARK funds are in my long time horizon Roth to weather volatility. if anyone thinks ARkK and the Q's have the same risk profile they are bonkers.
    1
  14.  @HateTheIRS  I care about expensive shoes but I care about holdings more, I prefer the holding of QQQ(M)
    1
  15.  @HateTheIRS  For starters NASDAQ 100 has 102 stocks, as opposed to VGT with 360 and XLK at 75. Please find me Amazon, Tesla (consumer discretionary), and Google (communications) in either of those two funds. The QQQ also excludes financials and include some healthcare. Not to mention, position sizing is key when looking at holdings. I want my holdings to be concentrated within the top 10, but of the top 10 I want them to be fairly diversified, not +40% in the top two. Sorry, these are basic things I looked at when choosing my fund In the first place and things I was able to double check now within just a few minutes.
    1
  16.  @HateTheIRS  I'm annoyed, because you don't know why I choose my funds/ sizing and you want to recommend things that don't accomplish my goals, while acting like "it's all the same bro". It's not just an index for me, I choose QQQM because it's an easy way to DCA into multiple names I'd like to hold individual shares of and adds some extra growth diversity, and if I want to weight higher I just buy the individual as well, like I do with NVDA. Amazon Google and Tesla are all companies I want exposure to that your two funds don't hace, but they become too pricey to buy three on a regular basis w/o fractionals. If AAPL or MSFT slow down from their past decade of quick growth or other names just rise faster VGT and XLK have more concentration risk than the Q's. The financial industry is rife with people giving suggestions without having any clue about the person's goals.... So yeah, excuse me when I chirp up and say they aren't the same for my goals.
    1
  17.  @HateTheIRS  I like VUG, but my preference mainly came down to position sizing. NASDAQ 100 has a Goldilocks zone for my concentration risk tolerance in terms of top 10 and total holdings. I want less top 2 concentration risk than XLK and VGT provide, but more total concentration risk than VUG has. QQQ also has more than just tech, with healthcare consumer discretionary & staples, and some industrial/utiltiies, but VUG is definitely better diversified withholdings like Home Depot and Starbucks, and it shows in both the volatility to the downside and upside. It's more of picking an idiosyncratic shade of gray than being married to white or black. Thanks for inquiring.
    1
  18.  @HateTheIRS  I'd like to specify that QQQM gives me exposure to FaanngMT+ as a part of a larger portfolio that's highly concentrated in growth due to a long-term time horizon and an interest in technology, specifically semiconductors, AMD, NVDA, SMH, GOOG, and INTC. MY Short-term allocations are in things like VIG and VTIP. I am super bullish on tech long term, as long as we don't go into a nuclear world war 3 I think demand for semiconductors is going to be an insane secular growth trend. Tech will have bad times, but I'm young enough with enough stomach to handle the volatility through to the correction to the upside. I'm curious where are you with your personal finance risk allocation? What kind of time horizons drive your investment decisions?
    1
  19.  @HateTheIRS  Cool, thanks for sharing. My taxable account is on a 5-10yr horizon so I can hopefully put a down payment on a house. I know growth companies face some headwind in the short term but I think my top holdings I've chosen have good management and ride on trends that will push them through. My Roth has 34yrs before I can draw on the gains, so it's aggressively growth oriented, holding QQQM, SMH, AMD, ARK funds, ETHE (Ethereum trust), NDAQ, and some other small moon bets. XLY looks like a good addition- You also gave me the idea to add VUG to the Roth for better diversification than the Qs, thanks. Switching to dividends is pretty far out for me, when I do need low volatility and some dividends I like VIG. Although I plan to keep many of these risk on bets, I do plan to add to lower risk assets with future contributions.
    1
  20.  @SolitarySparrow  You act like it's a bad thing to not help blow up Innocent wedding parties in Yemen....
    1
  21. Half of you that complain that "Biden isn't doing enough" also complain when there are social programs to help drug addicts....
    1
  22. Lol, ok
    1
  23. .... On a fasting diet.
    1
  24. .... On a fasting diet.
    1
  25. TSMC has too much capex, it cuts down their dcf valuation
    1
  26.  @Inokea560  It's literally a global industry, asml is a Dutch company that sources its lenses and mirrors from Germany and sends a majority of its products to Taiwan and South Korea that produce chips for us companies that design them and wall st that invests in them... It's a business that literally circles the globe.
    1
  27. AMD, NDVA, and SMH are the biggest parts of my portfolio. I like these stocks a lot!
    1
  28. Ethical? WeChat, Lockheed Martin, Apple, Facebook and Palentir are ethical? I was looking at their ESG ratings yesterday on ETF.com, I think the best one was ARKW which had a BBB rating (6.6/10). While I do really like the anti-cancer proposition of Arkg, let's be honest after a deflationary boom, profit margins will rise as consolidation happens in the winner take most economy, leading to common pharma price gouging of sick people.
    1
  29.  @Anonymous-vh9tc  Lol, ikr. People actual think Capitalism is ethical. The whole economy is build on treating animals, plants, and people like capital goods (e.g. human capital) for the profit of a plutocratic few.
    1
  30. @Chairman Jiao Bai Dun What's the point?
    1
  31. Do not understand the irony of supporting the real value of freedom... And supporting a company like palantir which is giving big data to big brother government to end freedoms?
    1
  32. Lol, that's a joke
    1
  33. My AMD and NVDA are happy
    1
  34. 666 in 33 months.... Did you get an occult vision from Baphomet? BTC isn't just clandestine, blockchain is a totally new way of transferring funds. It will have business uses as a method of payment by TSLA and SQ.
    1
  35.  @warntheidiotmasses7114  TSLA is not just a car company, Woods is betting on an automous ride haling service, as Telsa cars already have hardware built in and billions more AI driving than Waymo- that would mean lots of small transactions, in which blockchain's low transaction cost can be a simple payment type. P2P is next gen payment transfer. "Smart money" is an establishment view, TSLA and BTC are disruptors for a reason- at one time smart money won bets on telegram stocks... then innovation happened.
    1
  36.  @warntheidiotmasses7114  EngineeringExplained has a great video on EV's and the grid... It'll be fine has the grid has grown multiple times in size in the past few decades. As for Bitcoin yes I agree it is very very very energy intensive, It's not going to be used for all transactions, that is a ridiculous assumption.
    1
  37. You really don't understand anything about taxes if you think this is inherent problem of progressive taxation. You could just as easily have a flat tax rate and have loopholes so that effective tax rates are not "flat".
    1
  38.  @SamGal4E  Lol. I mean if "nominal tax rate" and "effective tax rate" are two entirely different things then yes a "flat tax" rate can still differ. But I'm sure with your ideology it would work out perfectly and there would be no loopholes at all... Suuuuure.
    1
  39.  @SamGal4E  lmao, I didn't "infer" any particular ideology. But if you think "flat tax" is completely immune from loopholes that would shift effective tax rates away from the nominal "flat" amounts, then yes, then that ventures into ideology.
    1
  40. Did you watch GTC? Did you see the high level data center and AI computing they do? Intel wanted to do stock buybacks and large dividends for decades rather than push innovation. Nvidia has grown over 30% per year over the past decade.
    1
  41.  @hondajacka2  I wouldn't bet against INTC though, they are getting lots of subsidies because Western governments want local chip fabs. INTC has a lot of weight to throw around.
    1
  42. Yesterday CNBC said the tech slide was possibly GME... a 10B company somehow caused a multi trillion dollar slide in the markets.
    1
  43. Tax bills? He gets 1.5 million shares and has to pay about 1 million shares worth of taxes... Each sale nets himself another half million shares.... Or nearly $500M
    1
  44.  @TristenHernandez  He gets 1.5 million shares in stock options as deferred salary compensation, and has to sell a million shares for taxes. Net 500,000 shares.
    1
  45. Lol
    1
  46. If you don't read the news, you're uninformed, and if you read the news, you're misinformed - Mark Twain
    1
  47. Lol, okay, buddy
    1
  48.  @Zebra663  Great, source citing. u da tru academek, bruh
    1
  49. 10%? What country do you live in??
    1
  50.  @eidrahhtarts4102  Sold my individual shares, I still have it in my NASDAQ100 and ironically in my broad market ESG fund. Somehow slave labor is ESG friendly, lol.
    1