Comments by "holocene event" (@holoceneevent4534) on "Model Rocket Engine In A Vacuum Chamber - 4K Slow Motion - will it burn? - Rockets (S1 • E3)" video.

  1. Oh,wow. You mock those that question lies yet show yourself that you do not comprehend what is being discussed.
    3
  2. e=(+/-)h(1/lambda) one variable defines all folds. You fools think we cant go to Antarctica because its dangerous? Fuck that, if i want to adventure who are they to tell me no? What a shill answer to a fundamental issue about world.
    2
  3. That's how we feel talking to people who think dropping an object proves an external force. Hilarious that people that stupid can breathe
    2
  4. Dont bother they ignore the basics of propulsion and latch onto "it has its own oxidizer".
    2
  5. +wildphotoshooter you just proved you are not qualified to be partaking.
    2
  6. +wildphotoshooter you just proved you have no idea how physics is established. stop quoting people on things you don't understand.
    2
  7. +Dead Meme you think people who think dropping an object is proof of an external force are smart? WHEWLADS
    2
  8. Peter Galbraith "known physics" you have discarded the ability to discern truth from fiction in order to feel better about yourself. This is a blatantly biased experiment. Anyone claiming any sort of "knowledge" or "intelligence" refutes force gravity. Common sense isn't so common anymore.
    2
  9. +peter Poop if you choose not to see you will not, when you accept the possibility you might surprise yourself.
    2
  10. +sonic boom ships dont disappear bottom first that is a known misconception and shows your lack of knowledge on the subject. You show that you haven't even looked into the model proposed by the theory, so why even take part?
    2
  11. +sonic boom youre pretty stupid.
    2
  12. this man doesnt understand thrust
    1
  13. how far society has fallen that you think this is proof of anything but flawed experimentation.
    1
  14. because e=(+/-)h(1/lambda)
    1
  15. +Akbar photonic energies displace entropic energies, no need for an external force. One force makes the universe go round.
    1
  16. What part of propulsion dont you get?
    1
  17. Clearly the age of adventure is over, the world is mapped, why risk your safety citizen?
    1
  18. prove gravity
    1
  19. model e=(+/-)h(1/lambda) in all dimensions, youll see it.
    1
  20. what vacuum, i dont see a vacuum, just a tube filled with atmosphere
    1
  21. Aye, and when uneducated laymen take on physics without proper understanding of its governance, math, you get bullshit like gravity force.
    1
  22. It is, we are a manifest in a sea of entropic energies, we only exist because in this space photonic movements displaced some energies.
    1
  23. +WildPhotoShooter scientific method, which refutes gravity force btw.
    1
  24. +David Emery that is a very large stretch and a very important conclusion.
    1
  25. +William Chamberlain does this take into account that all reference frames on earth have other matter to "push" off of compared to space where there is no "pushing" occurring?
    1
  26. +David Emery it would do you well to discern from a fundamental force and a phenomena of that force.
    1
  27. +William Chamberlain result of pressures between 2 objects, don't know if differentials in pressures has much of a sway...
    1
  28. +William Chamberlain the atmosphere would act as a wall (and likely you are creating a pressure stream all the way to the "wall") but you should see some threshold distance where a physical "wall" will enable increased thrust.
    1
  29. ohhey evolution, lets talk about how things don't get more complex with time, let's talk about the circular logic of dating fossils based on rocks and rocks based on fossils, lets talk about how dropping an object proves external force. Let's talk about how you need to go back to elementary school.
    1
  30. +DFX2KX and physics to others
    1
  31. exactly, no resistance = no movement, derp
    1
  32. you cannot get a phenomena effect outside the manifest so the beam you send up bounces off the inner edge. Relativity is very complex, but if you forget this gravity force garbage it becomes very straight forward (that's a play on words well see if you can figure it out) ;)
    1
  33. Wait, you think this experiment proves anything? Let me guess, you think dropping an object proves external force too!
    1
  34. And those who push "current model" should be jettisoned into the entropic void.
    1
  35.  @CrazyPets0  highly doubt you have the foundations to preach such things.
    1
  36. +Samtab galaxy whewlad you just made a huge mistake. Claiming things don't work without gravity force when I have right here an equation that makes all things go along all dimensions: e=(+/-)h(1/lambda).
    1
  37. +Samtab Galaxy Show me where someone has used gravity force in a practical application with verified success.
    1
  38. +Samtab Galaxy that isnt an example of gravity force in application, still waiting.
    1
  39. +JihadJared you think things can push off of nothing? You're a moron.
    1
  40. +JihadJared you don't understand the basics of movement.
    1
  41. +Samtab Galaxy Einsteins theory doesn't in anyway support "current model", it in fact proves there is only one active force in the universe. But its ok, you keep going on listening to others telling you how things are, I doubt you have any critical thinking ability yourself.
    1
  42. +Kaydn Burns you have shown you do not understand physics of movement.
    1
  43. Like the fact this is an enclosed space?
    1
  44. prove gravity
    1
  45. you mean repping lies and deception?
    1
  46. What blade meant to say, is, you are deceived on launch the way they position the cameras makes it look like they ascend, truly all rockets launches curve off to a horizontal movement towards sea, look it up.
    1
  47. negative manifest, those energies displaced by -e while photon is at -lambda points.
    1
  48. +Eva Nilsson well that example i don't like, relativity states that one would be upside-down if there is no proper "up". but your next post is spot on there are too many reasons to question this model.
    1
  49. basic maths refutes such a claim, but you can believe what ever fairy-tails you want, i guess.
    1
  50. +Rico Motions you probably believe in circles too. You cannot prove things to people who do not know how to reason.
    1
  51. e=(+/-)h(1/lambda) defines your reality in all dimensions. Wake up from such fairy-tails as thrust in a vacuum.
    1
  52. +Warped perception we won't, you cannot produce thrust in a proper vacuum environment.
    1
  53. +Ryleigh S He would agree and point out how stupid you are for thinking his third applies in vacuum.
    1
  54. Without particles to push off of you will not move, just sending a stream of particles out into the void. Basic stuff, you talk about "the force being exerted by the expanding gasses" yet you do not comprehend why this expansion of gasses causes thrust in atmosphere. You cannot claim with any validity that this is an "observed" phenomena.
    1
  55. Globetards, were focused on propulsion not chemistry.
    1
  56. Thrust vector not reaction. Were looking at physics not chemistry.
    1
  57. +sonic boom why are you even participating, does the challenge to your worldview offend yo so much that you need to be this way? Since you brought up "video games" ill let you in on a secret, when we model a spherical world vs a linear flat world and ascend our camera view, in the digital video game world, we observe the same horizon in the flat simulation, proving the sphere model incorrect, try it yourself, can you even?
    1
  58. +sonic boom So you disagree with modeling software and?
    1
  59. +sonic boom remove yourself from this discussion you are not here to partake in discussion of the topic, only to push your fanatical worldview.
    1
  60. +sonic boom you couldn't even properly identify the issue people have with this experiment, you are so far out of your league it is sad. You bring up "proofs" for your worldview which are easily debunked and you make it clear you have never tried to model alternative options.
    1
  61. +sonic boom thee is no one proof , when you look at the mosaic that is painted from the info we can gather around us it becomes obvious how quantum system interactions affect our perception of the digital reality.
    1