Comments by "" (@colby25) on "'My jaw dropped': Eylon Levy reflects on 'flabbergasting' Sky News interview with Kay Burley" video.

So why hasnt the ICC brought charges then? Also that 12000 is from hamas sources. You know, that proven and recognised terror group that uses civilians as a human shield. Isnt that a crime against humanity by the way?. Funny how they never mention any of their own losses. Just the civilians. Anybody would think they have an agenda. You know like trying to use civilian colateral propaganda to draw in other arab states and terror groups to join in with their holy jihad. No negotiations for them. Its all in there charter.“Hamas rejects any alternative to the full and complete liberation of Palestine, from the river to the sea” — i.e., the annihilation of Israel. The charter says: “The Day of Judgment will not come about until Muslims fight Jews and kill them.”.
2
Or thousands of palestinian children being forced into a war zone by hamas making it into a war zone.
2
Or the invention of islamic fundamentalism in the 80s which spurned hamas along with many thousands of other undesirable, uncivilised terror groups.
2
Well considering it was remembrance weekend then probably those far right viewers were just a tad worried that all those far left marxist corbynistas and extreme religious islamists amongst the demonstrators would try to wreck a great and much loved british tradition by doing what they had been doing in whitehall the previous weekends..
1
Yep i definately gonna tune into that bunch of lying left wing marxists and known putin sympathisers. Also you forgot to mention the reason for all of your supposed happenings occuring. You know october 7th, just like in 1948/67 and 1973 israel was invaded yet again, for the 4th time by arabs.This time it had 1200+ of its civilians along with many other nationalities mass murdered at close range. Plus another 250 odd hostages taken in true terrorist style.Just to make certain that israel would have to retaliate. So then the hamas propagaganda narrative of colateral civilian casualties could be used to draw in other arab/muslim nations and terror groups to join in with their holy jihad. Which is the total destruction of israel. From the river to the sea. And with it no negotiation. And you support no negotiation? Really! The same propaganda narrative that you are now being duped into supporting. Just like putins state funded propaganda duped a lot of those supposed independant journalists you mention above. So when are the ICC going to bring charges then? If the totally uncorruptable UN, the geneva convention(which is a treaty by the way, not a court ruling) and the pacifists at amnesty international have all decided that israel is guilty without trial. The stopping of water etc israel admitted was an attempt to try and use it to negotate the release of the hostages. As for the bloodbath now occuring in gaza that is exactly what hamas wanted and planned for. They are the ones ultimately responsible here. . The geneva convention states that parties in conflict are to try and prevent civilian losses as much as possible. Proportional response is allowed tho, especially when responding to any attack on its own civilians. Thousands of rockets were launched by hamas at civilian targets in israel after the war against hamas was declared. If it wasnt for the iron dome then israeli civilian casualties would have been just as high as in gaza. So hitting the command centres and rocket launch sites were the rockets were coming from had to be a priority to any country protecting its citizens . That has to be taken into consideration here. So too, where the geneva convention mentions about warning civilians to leave in advance of military strikes and actions. Which israel did for 3 weeks along with leaflets dropped advising civilians to move south of the wadi gaza. Plus they are sacrificing their own soldiers in a land invasion as well to try and limit the civilian losses. They could have done what putin did to grozny allepo and mariupol instead and simply flattened all of it . This was always going to be a bloodbath. Just as hamas intended it to be. The apartheid you mention. Maybe if hamas hadnt been organising suicide bombings against israeli civilians for many years then all the checkpoints, walls, fences and tight security wouldnt have been required. The balfour declaration didnt begin israel in 1948. That was earlier in the century. It was the UN in 1948 that decided on how the territory was divided up afer its previous owners, the british empire left. It also had the another empire controlling it before that. .The ottaman empire.
1