Comments by "" (@colby25) on "Jake Broe" channel.

  1. Yep and all the missiles and the iran kamikaze drones are the modern day versions of the V1s and V2s which terrorised london later in the war.
    2
  2.  @TheLemonYogurt  Since when has a pro ukraine channel become pro democrat? The guy being criticised is a democrat ffs. 50% will vote republican. So what. Civilised people will support other civilised people whatever wont they? Or dont they do civilised in american politics?
    2
  3. Nah. He didnt like being criticised after providing starlink support for ukraine right at the start of the invasion. Like all spoilt brats he didnt like being criticised and the more he is criticised the more he hunkers down. Now he has become just another mega rich elite oligarch siding with mega rich elite putin and mega rich elite trump.. The money men v our democracy and all its associated freedoms
    2
  4. It was done to hinder the german war effort. Twelve war production factories were destroyed, and around 100 more were damaged. Thousands of acres of farmland were ruined. Germans instantly referred to it after the raid as the "Mohne catastrophe". Even albert speer admitted that it was "a disaster for us for a number of months". About a thousand died. The same as how many died in the blitz of my city plymouth. Though half of the losses in germany were pows and forced labourers. The bombing of coventry was done for the same strategic purpose. To hurt our industrial base.
    2
  5. Maybe about time the US had more than 2 parties then the extreme right and the extreme left could have their own parties. The more parties there are then maybe the less "out of control" politics you would get? Lumping everyone to the left in one party and everyone to the right in the other is just not helping "centrist" politics which is where most people usually reside.
    2
  6.  @davidscheepers6033  So what in his mindset doesnt align with yours? Is it that he supports democracy, ukraine and you dont? Why is it only in the US, the equivalent republican conservative party to all the other conservative parties in the west, that they oppose supporting ukraine, democracy and international law? Wouldnt be that the GOP has lurched to the far right poltically towards putin style nationalism? Trump, like putin is seen as a strong leader. The kind nationalism thrives on. Nationalism, historically, is also no friend of democracy. Nationalists also support and promote other nationalists, including their propaganda. Nationalism itself is a selfish ideology meaning they dont give a toss about anyone else. Plenty of evidence from trump and other republicans on that in recent times.
    2
  7. And why shouldnt he? Trumps united states is right now causing extra ukranian civilian casualties. Including kids. You ever heard of humanity? It comes way before some sodding flag.
    2
  8. The US never annexed territory tho like putin has in ukraine. Or tried to to rerussify/ethnic cleanse a nation and its culture like putin is attempting. The cold war era was an ideological struggle. It took in many wars and coups all over the globe not just south america. It also involved many other democracies not just the US. Communism isnt democratic in any form so not surprising a major democratic power would try to prevent its influence spreading to a neighbour. Cold war communism was also doing exactly the same and trying to spread its influence worldwide too.
    1
  9. Trust and respect i would guess. Thats what i always feel towards someone in uniform here in the UK. It shouldnt be mandatory tho.
    1
  10. Disagree. I can remember listening to a muslim lady on UK tv in the 1990s saying that the biggest threat to world peace looking forward was the rise of islamic fundamentalism. I had no idea then what she was on about. Then the terror attacks began with one on the USS cove and then 9/11. Various sunni terror groups like al queda based in sunni led iraq and sunni afghanistan had to be dealt with as they had ultimately declared a terror war on western civilisastion. Even western countries that opposed the iraq invasion got targetted later as well. They eventually joined the 20 year "war on terror" too.The west would have had to intervene in iraq at some point. After 9/11, unsurprisingly. the US took leadership of that war. Which has been won, by the way, as no major terror attacks on the west since leaving afghanistan, fingers crossed. The mistakes we made in both countries was trying to impose democracy there. So instead of being liberators, as we were seen at first, we became occupiers instead and the insurgancy began in iraq with al queda morphing into IS there. In afghanistan the taliban/terrorists sided against the coalition/democracy tho a settlement was eventually agreed with the taliban and we pulled out. Now they fight the terrorists instead, tho project "impose democracy" failed disastrously. In iraq there is now a form of democracy which over time might improve. Tho it is sharia majority led now so is bound to lean towards sharia iran. Saddam was also a dictatorial tyrant who murdered thousands of his own people. He also had and used chemical weapons on his own people/kurds and in his war with iran. He also invaded another nation/kuwait. Justifiable reasons to regime change on its own.
    1
  11.  @jurgnobs1308  "it's a fact that ISIS was literally founded by members of the ba'ath party and iraqi military after they lost the war". No it was because rumsfeldt, who had been given overall control of the situation by bush, decided to disband the iraq army and police and impose democracy. The original state department plan was to regime change. Some officer level members of saddams disbanded military and al queda then formed IS. Added here as my replies are being removed.... From googling...."Most historians of the Islamic State agree that the group emerged out of al-Qaeda in Iraq as a response to the U.S. invasion in 2003. They also agree that it was shaped primarily by a Jordanian jihadist and the eventual head of al-Qaeda in Iraq, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. The Jordanian had a dark vision: He wished to fuel a civil war between Sunnis and Shiites and establish a caliphate. Although he was killed in 2006, his vision was realized in 2014—the year isis overran northern Iraq and eastern Syria." More..."Baathists began collaborating with al Qaeda in Iraq – the early incarnation of what would become Islamic State – soon after Saddam Hussein was ousted in 2003." Baathists being saddams military disbanded by rumsfeldt.
    1
  12.  @jurgnobs1308  From googling. "Most historians of the Islamic State agree that the group emerged out of al-Qaeda in Iraq as a response to the U.S. invasion in 2003. They also agree that it was shaped primarily by a Jordanian jihadist and the eventual head of al-Qaeda in Iraq, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. The Jordanian had a dark vision: He wished to fuel a civil war between Sunnis and Shiites and establish a caliphate. Although he was killed in 2006, his vision was realized in 2014—the year isis overran northern Iraq and eastern Syria." More..... "Baathists began collaborating with al Qaeda in Iraq – the early incarnation of what would become Islamic State – soon after Saddam Hussein was ousted in 2003". Baathists being saddams military which rumsfeldt disbanded..
    1
  13.  @jurgnobs1308  From googling...."Most historians of the Islamic State agree that the group emerged out of al-Qaeda in Iraq as a response to the U.S. invasion in 2003. They also agree that it was shaped primarily by a Jordanian jihadist and the eventual head of al-Qaeda in Iraq, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. The Jordanian had a dark vision: He wished to fuel a civil war between Sunnis and Shiites and establish a caliphate. Although he was killed in 2006, his vision was realized in 2014—the year isis overran northern Iraq and eastern Syria." More..."Baathists began collaborating with al Qaeda in Iraq – the early incarnation of what would become Islamic State – soon after Saddam Hussein was ousted in 2003." ..."Baathists" being saddams military disbanded by rumsfeldt.
    1
  14.  @jurgnobs1308  From googling...."Most historians of the Islamic State agree that the group emerged out of al-Qaeda in Iraq as a response to the U.S. invasion in 2003. They also agree that it was shaped primarily by a Jordanian jihadist and the eventual head of al-Qaeda in Iraq, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. The Jordanian had a dark vision: He wished to fuel a civil war between Sunnis and Shiites and establish a caliphate. Although he was killed in 2006, his vision was realized in 2014—the year isis overran northern Iraq and eastern Syria." More..."Baathists began collaborating with al Qaeda in Iraq – the early incarnation of what would become Islamic State – soon after Saddam Hussein was ousted in 2003." Baathists being saddams military disbanded by rumsfeldt.
    1
  15. From googling...."Most historians of the Islamic State agree that the group emerged out of al-Qaeda in Iraq as a response to the U.S. invasion in 2003. They also agree that it was shaped primarily by a Jordanian jihadist and the eventual head of al-Qaeda in Iraq, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. The Jordanian had a dark vision: He wished to fuel a civil war between Sunnis and Shiites and establish a caliphate. Although he was killed in 2006, his vision was realized in 2014—the year isis overran northern Iraq and eastern Syria." More..."Baathists began collaborating with al Qaeda in Iraq – the early incarnation of what would become Islamic State – soon after Saddam Hussein was ousted in 2003." Baathists being saddams military disbanded by rumsfeldt. Edited to add after further investigation. Al queda in iraq was not formed until 2004 under zarqawi. So i am wrong to suggest they were based there pre the 2003 invasion. Apologies for that. 9/11 and terrorism still played a part tho. Google again...."U.S. President George W. Bush argued that the vulnerability of the United States following the September 11 attacks of 2001, combined with Iraq's alleged continued possession and manufacture of weapons of mass destruction and its support for terrorist groups, including al-Qaeda, justified the U.S.'s war with Iraq"
    1
  16.  @jurgnobs1308  Sorry tried to reply but they keep disappearing. Have given up. So much for freedom of speech.
    1
  17. Or was that a "there are no mistakes" here freudian comment. Unlike the most super duper stupidly mistaken marjorie traitor green.
    1
  18. Ive seen reports of izium falling. On artur rehas channel. Edit just noticed you mentioned it.
    1
  19.  @shidosllqsbx  Do you actually know what propaganda is? Western democratic media has multiple outlets from the poltical left, right, centre and independant viewponts. So there are checks and balances in play so the people can decide for themselves on the truth and act/vote accordingly. Thats not propaganda. State funded with only one view allowed or else you are jailed or even assassinated. Like in your "master" putins russia and historically in hitlers nazi germany and many other authoritarian dictator led countries. As for the censoship. Its called a sanction. You become reasonably civilised again and then all the sanctions imposed on your country because of putins imperialist dreams might be lifted.
    1
  20. Sorry jake. Disagree with you about the iraq war being total unnecessary. The iraq war was part of the 20 year "war on terror" after 9/11. No 9/11 then there would have been no regime change in iraq. Sunni iraq under saddam was supporting sunni al queda along along with many other terror groups. They eventually morphed into IS there. Sunni islamic fundamentalist terrorism had been on the rise since the 1990s. The attack on the USS cove was their declaration of war on western civilisation. 9/11 following after. The west would have had to intervene in iraq/afghanistan/middle east at some point. Even the western countries who opposed iraq came around to supporting the "war on terror" once their countries got targetted as well. Also the "war on terror" has been won as there has been no major terror attacks on the west since leaving afghanistan, fingers crossed. Obama said it would take 20 years to win it. The only thing we did wrong was trying to impose democracy into iraq and afghanistan. So instead of being liberators, which we were seen as in the beginning, we became occupiers instead so leading to insurgencies in both countries. Though iraq doesnt have a proper democracy right now. It might become better over time. It is a sharia majority country now tho, due to democratic voting taking place, so is always going to lean towards sharia iran. Saddam was also a dictatorial tyrant who murdered thousands of his own people. Including using chemical weapons against the kurds in his country and in his war with iran. Plus he invaded kuwait previously as well.
    1
  21. Since when has carlson been prevented his freedom of speech? Dont he have his own channel now? Freedom of speech works both ways. You have the right to say something but then so has anybody else in criticising what you say. Unless it is to incite violence of course. Speaking from a uk perspective mind. It is under threat tho tbf and why cancel culture is wrong and people are rightly fighting back against it. But that debate is for another day. This is a pro ukraine/democracy channel after all.
    1
  22.  @lumpydark6173  Hes a nationalist posing as a conservative. All putin supporters at home and abroad are nationalists. Thats what putin has been promoting and supporting these past 22 years with his worldwide propaganda. They all parrot the same disinformation and lies that his media do. Modis indian channels for example. Just watch some of them on YT and you can see the same anti western bollox as putin state tv put out. A lot of that ukraine corruption was caused by pro russian yanukovych supporting oligarchs. Did you know that putin state tv has been transmitted to the ukraine border areas were the 16% ethnic russians live since he came to power. No doubt creating the political and ethnic division which caused the orange revolution and then maidan. All oblasts voted in favour in ukraines 92% 1991 independance referendum including the donbas and crimea. Did carlson mention any of this? Putin never recognised that referendum and has been trying to recreate the old USSR as a "greater russian world" ever since. So incorporating the belorussianns the greater russians and their so called "little ukranians" into a powerful faction to once again challenge western democratic civilisation. He has never feared nato like his media and supporters keep banging on about. He fears democracy.
    1
  23.  @logros13 Firstly this was 1978. Iran and china were not like they are now. Iran was still western friendly under the shah. China back then were full on communists, unlike now, and sided with the mujahideen rebel guerillas due to disputed issues with the other communist nations involved over a war being fought in vietnam by them. Both afghanistan and Iraq was the "war on terror" after sunni islamic fundamentalists declared a terror war on western civilisation after 9/11. Iraq was not mandated for sure as terror groups are not represented at the UN. So the western coalition tried to get round that via the WMD route instead. Intervention in sunni iraq was inevitable at some point anyway as thats were al queda and eventually IS where being hosted. Worldwide terrorism was on the rise. Afghanistan did have a UN mandate tho. That "war on terror" has now been won as no major terror attacks on the west since afghan. Obama said it would take 20 years to win it. So there is a big diference between modern day stateless terrorism being handed weapons as opposed to aiding rebel guerillas fighting for a cause in their homeland. Same as national security and the protection of its civilians has to be assured. Just as putin did to chechyan rebels after beslan and other terror attacks. So not hypocritical by jake at all.
    1
  24.  @simonschneider5913  Because wiki cals them that and not the taliban in the specific case of afghanistan in 1978..
    1
  25.  @ari_california8873  Says the selfish, cold hearted, fascist supporting, nationalist propaganda fed, putin troll.
    1
  26.  @marie-v2j  I voted brexit. I didnt vote for farage. I voted brexit for democratic reasons. The EU has a massive democratic deficit. Meaning the mep i elected had no say in anything the unelected EU commisioners decided. They just rubber stamped their decisions through. The EU intends ever increasing union as well. Maybe most of europe remembers WW2 and being subjegated by the nazis as their reason for more federalisation. A federalised union would remove that threat ever happening again? Well the uk never surrendered its sovereignity in WW2 and thats probably why the uk has always had sizeable anti EU support. Eventually leading to brexit. Farage and the schengen/immigration issue he raised was just part of the whole brexit debate.
    1
  27. Such a good journalist never condemning putin. Putin thinks hes the absolute best journalist in his mind too.
    1
  28.  @ChucksSEADnDEAD  Yep reported with glee that the casualty figures were 7 to 1 in favour of russia.
    1
  29. The same way that milions of voters worldwide have failed to vote and support their own incumbent governments in recent months. The US is just following a trend that has been fed by a worldwide economic recession after a worldwide pandemic along with a war in europe compounding it.
    1
  30. "MTG is part of a small group of Republicans which oppose aid to Ukraine "...There were 112 nayes.....Small group?
    1
  31. Thats the problem with the states. Youve only got 2 parties so all the extremists get lumped into one party or the other. And the extremists are always the most vocal and active. We aint got that problem here in the UK. Extremists are kicked out of mainstream parties as the parties need to be more moderate and near the centre ground to get elected. They usually end up in small parties where we can all ignore them lol. Hope you can find a way to vote somehow and the GOP regain its former moderate conservatism..
    1
  32. Because he supports him and his imperialist ambitions over western civilised democratic behaviour and international law. You not understanding that simple truth, that is the crap.
    1
  33. Does he support trump? Or just traditional republicanism? If he does support trump then it would seem very strange. Though boris johnson is very pro ukraine and he has been cozying up to trump recently. Maybe he is trying to influence him towards supporting ukraine and NATO in case he is elected? I remember theresa may uks prime minister getting into trumps ear after his last election win and making him a little more supportive of NATO. After earlier threatening to leave it because of the 2% spending obligation. Trump is deffo in backchannel contact with putin this time tho imho. Last time the failed maria butina spy scandal was putins attempt to contact trump through the NRA. Been 8 years since then for putin and maga to now become fully acquainted. Hence magas frequent use of putins propaganda.
    1
  34. "The USA Far surpasses the amount of $$ directly Provided." Ever wondered why. Cuz youare fortunate to live in the biggest economy in the world. Thats why %per gdp is a fairer way of judging. Which , no doubt, trump doesnt like as it would hurt his election chances.
    1
  35. Its not 13 million democrat voters tho. Its 13 million unaffiliated/undecided. Who chose to vote for biden in 2020 and then not vote for either trump or harris in 2024. Its always the undecided/unaffiliated who win elections. I believe trump won over more of them, that did vote, than harris did in an early exit poll that i saw from memory. The first sign that something was going wrong for harris. I think it was florida.
    1
  36. It does make me angry if it means F to anybody who isnt american. Nationalism to a tee. F to all those who fought and those who died fighting alongside the US in coalitions over the last 20 odd years makes me real angry. We came to your aid after 9/11 to fight islamic fundamentalist terror. Ukranian troops were there as part of that first coalition too. Now some of you dont want to know. Even when no american lives are at risk.
    1
  37.  @chrismoon7518  Fellow nationalists supporting fellow nationalists. See it everywhere sadly.
    1
  38. I am. Your the one being duped. "Both sides are being forced to fight".......One side is invading the other. Didnt you know that? "We should be trying to end the war with diplomacy".....One side is invading the other and annexing their teritory. Didnt you know that? "The war machine is working hard, people are hysterical"....One sides war machine is invading the other. The other is defending its people...........Didnt you know that?. "The military industrial complex. You guys are backing this."......... No we are backing the country thats being invaded and so far have had 500 plus of its kids killed, 10k civilians overall with 20k wounded. All because putins military complex want ukraine under their control. Didnt you know this either? What content has Tim made to help Russia?......Try watching the whole video above. "Ukraine is our enemy"....."We should apologise to russia"...... for them invading ukraine. Your the one being duped. Or more likely your just another far right nationalist backing other far right nationalists. As they always do. Thats who putins propaganda narrative is being aimed at.
    1
  39. Why not. Maga, who control the GOP and the US now, have been parrotting and repeating putins propaganda narrative the last few years. Why do you think putin has been helping trumps election campaign. Its been 8 years since putins spy maria butina was caught trying to implement backchannel relations with trump pre his 2016 election win. Trump/putin have had 8 years since to cement some form of backchannel relationship. Also helping shaft ukraine is just a form of this new american isolationism trump talks of. America first and stuff everybody else.
    1
  40. The ICC need the palestinians to bring a case forward as they are members but they havnt done so. Probably because hamas and their terror attacks against civilians would be taken into account as well. Ask milosevic and many other war criminals if the ICC is fake? So please explain why the MSM is famously fake when there are multiple media outlets to the left, right and centre all contributing, giving all the checks and balances required for us to decide on the truth. Whereas putins media is state funded and only gives one view. Thats propaganda or fake if you prefer. It would be famously fake to you tho i guess, as your famously and relentlessly told so by some propaganda nobody youve latched onto. Or perhaps your one yourself?
    1
  41. Selfish nationalism. America first and F everyone else.
    1
  42. How can a nations people vote for someone who lies so much? How can they trust anything trump says he is going to do if elected? Here in the uk one misdemeanor or lie and politicians are forced into resignation mode.
    1
  43.  @billyrio3767  1991 referendum of independance. 92% voted in favour. All the oblasts voted in favour. All the worlds nations recognising them as an independant sovereign nation. Including russia. Multiple democratic elections since including 2 since 2014.
    1
  44. Why do you say that we are choosing not to take him out? Why would we/the west even resort to terrorism, which is what you are suggesting, when we are not in a war with putin? We would be just as bad as putin and other terrorists if we attempted that. Maybe you do things like that in your country but thankfully not in mine. Stop giving their trolls ammunition. Apart from that i support the rest of the video. RIP to the heroinne at the end.
    1
  45. "The Russian Federation launches rocket attacks on houses with sleeping people, continues to carry out terrorist activities, BUT at the same time it chairs the UN Security Council."..................Agreed the UN and its security council is a joke..............Согласен ООН и ее совет безопасности это шутка.
    1
  46.  @DoloresJNurss  Way to go dolores
    1
  47.  @bob494949  Or vote for the orange billionaire oligarch who doesnt even believe in democracy. Just like his billionaire oligarch mate putin. Or his billionaire oligarch mate musk. Vote for the people and democracy or vote for corrupt billionaire oligarchs and trust them to run the world? No thanks. Respect to all true conservatives in the states who vote for democracy first over trumps corrupted far right nationalism.
    1
  48. Well i am british and we are not suffering. Even in the 70s with strikes and power cuts when i was a teen we were not suffering. Its political jargon used election time. Always has been . Always will be. If you want to see suffering go to third world were some are still starving to death at times. Sunak and the tories shift ended because they have had 14 years in power. Power changes hands in cycles here. Always has. Blair had 13 years with labour before the tories. Thatcher and major before that. Wilson and labour before that back to the 60s. It was different this time because of reform who split the tory vote causing the landslide. Sunak in the conservative party is seen as a social conservative. Same with cameron when they took power with the lib dems in 2010. He brought them into the centre where blair had taken "new labour" 13 years previously. Starmer has done similar with his labour party too. Tbf to the tories they have had a world pandemic to deal with and the war in ukraine affecting energy supply since their last election win. And a world recession because of it. Tho their internal political battles havnt helped them. Plus their last 2 leaders havnt been elected by the people either.
    1
  49. In that farewell speech sunak also called Sir kier starmer "a decent public spirited man whome he respected" as well as wishing him well as uk PM. I wonder if trump would do similar regarding biden, or any other democrat chosen, come election time in the states? I know there used to be a mutual respect in the past there when power change occured. Seems to have all gone there now with trump and his maga cult seemingly not into civil behaviour. I guess this is what you get if you allow a political extreme to take control of a political party.
    1
  50. Propaganda is putins most potent weapon. His government spends 1.5 billion usd a year on it. Half on state tv/radio and the other half on propaganda abroad with RT etc and on pushing their narrative on social media. His state tv was broadcasting to all the ethnic russian border regions of ukraine . So creating all the ethnic tensions and issues which eventually led to the orange revolution of 2004. Maidan and then the mini civil war that broke out afterwards in those border areas. All of the border oblasts voted for ukranian independance in 1991 including the donbas and crimea so it just shows the power of propaganda to change hearts and minds
    1