Comments by "" (@colby25) on "CNN" channel.

  1. 99
  2. 70
  3. 15
  4. 13
  5. 13
  6. 10
  7. 10
  8. 9
  9. 8
  10. 8
  11. 7
  12. 7
  13. 6
  14. 6
  15. 6
  16. 5
  17. 5
  18. 5
  19. 4
  20. 4
  21. 4
  22. 4
  23. 4
  24. 4
  25. 4
  26. 4
  27. 4
  28. 4
  29. 3
  30. 3
  31. 3
  32. 3
  33. 3
  34. 3
  35. 3
  36. 3
  37. 3
  38. 3
  39. 3
  40. 3
  41. 3
  42. 3
  43. 3
  44. 3
  45. 3
  46. 3
  47. 2
  48. 2
  49. 2
  50. 2
  51. 2
  52. 2
  53. 2
  54. 2
  55. 2
  56. 2
  57. 2
  58. 2
  59. 2
  60. 2
  61. 2
  62. 2
  63. 2
  64. 2
  65. 2
  66. 2
  67. 2
  68. 2
  69. 2
  70. 2
  71. 2
  72. 2
  73. 2
  74. 2
  75. 2
  76. 2
  77. 2
  78. 2
  79. 2
  80. 2
  81. 2
  82. 2
  83. 1
  84. 1
  85. 1
  86. 1
  87. 1
  88. 1
  89. 1
  90. 1
  91. 1
  92. 1
  93. 1
  94. 1
  95. 1
  96. 1
  97. 1
  98. 1
  99. 1
  100. 1
  101. 1
  102. 1
  103. 1
  104. 1
  105. 1
  106. Get that from modis propaganda did you?. You do know he is a far right nationalist? Heres some stuff i bet they never mentioned about the bengal famine.. There was a war cabinet. Churchill wasnt making these decisions alone. Clem atlee became deputy pm. Bevin, Chamberlain, Eden, Halifax, Greenwood, Beaverbrook, Wood and Anderson who replaced chamberlain when he died. So to blame churchill alone is just nonsense.. Also the official 1945 enquiry found the national indian and local bengal governments foremostly responsible along with the viceroy at the time Linithglow. With the imperial government(war cabinet) also criticised. Tbf the local government and national officials had used their famine relief methods on previous famines and they had been successful. This famine though was far worse than previous and needed much firmer action. Confiscation of all grain/rice and rationing introduced in the country as a whole was required but not forthcoming. By the time the new viceroy wavell intervened with this policy 1 and a half million had starved to death. Even after rationing another 1 and a half million died after as people were too weak to fight off disease. Terrible tragedy. The uk government/cabinet has to take some share of the blame too. Way too slow in reacting or maybe not realising how bad the situation really was? No social media/world news in those days remember. Plus there was a war going on with japan invading neighbouring countries, which created the famine, and controlling the bay of bengal. Plus dday was fast approaching and any spare transports were probably kept back for that. Also putin has an arrest warrant out for him for facilitating the abduction of ukranian children not illegaly invading ukraine. As for george bush. That was all due to 9/11 and the war on terror. Chemical weapons was just a front for that war tho saddam did have them as he used them earlier against the kurds and in his war with iran. Plus al queda were present in iraq as they eventually morphed into IS and saddam was supporting arab terrorist groups against israel. So that was probably another reason.
    1
  107. 2nd attempt.....There was a war cabinet. Churchill wasnt making these decisions alone. Clem atlee became deputy pm. Bevin, Chamberlain, Eden, Halifax, Greenwood, Beaverbrook, Wood and Anderson who replaced chamberlain when he died. So to blame churchill alone is just nonsense. Also the official 1945 enquiry into the bengal famine found the national indian and local bengal governments foremostly responsible along with the viceroy at the time Linithglow. With the imperial government(war cabinet) also criticised. Tbf the local government and national officials had used their famine relief methods on previous famines and they had been successful. This famine though was far worse than previous and needed much firmer action. It needed the confiscation of all grain/rice in the country as a whole and rationing introduced. By the time the new viceroy wavell intervened with this policy 1 and a half million had starved to death. Even after rationing another 1 and a half million died after as people were too weak to fight off disease. Terrible tragedy. The uk government/cabinet has to take some share of the blame too. Way too slow in reacting or maybe not realising how bad the situation really was? No social media/world news in those days remember. Plus there was a war on. Japan had invaded the neighbouring countries, which created the famine. They also had control of the bay of bengal and were attempting to invade india through the bengal area. Plus d day was fast approaching so any spare transports were probably being kept back for that.
    1
  108. 1
  109. 1
  110. 1
  111. 1
  112. 1
  113. 1
  114. 1
  115. 1
  116. 1
  117. 1
  118. 1
  119. 1
  120. 1
  121. 1
  122. 1
  123. 1
  124. 1
  125. 1
  126. 1
  127. 1
  128. 1
  129. 1
  130. 1
  131. 1
  132. 1
  133. 1
  134. 1
  135. 1
  136. Reasons for maidan..... Ukraine voted 92% to be independant from a union with russia in 1991. With all the oblasts voting in favour including the donbas regions and crimea. In 2013 putin puppet yanukovych scrapped a potential union with the EU for one with the very country they voted to leave in 1991.. Whilst also jailing his main political opponent yulia tymoshenko.. In 2004 , another maidan had previously occured, with an orange revolution, against that same elected puppet yanukovych. This time for "voting corruption", which was later proved true, as his "poisoned" opponent victor yushchenko won the rerun comfortably.. Maidan began peacefully at first but then violence was used againt protestors and it escalated until yanukovych ordered snipers in to shoot unarmed protestors. 120 died and thousands were injured. No way could he survive that bloodbath. Evidence was later found in his abandoned palace of voting corruption casting doubt on his earlier close election win....Was the US "warmongers" involved in 2004 as well?... I tell you who has been interfering all along in ukraine and thats your little dicktator putin as he never recognised that 1991 vote. Despite all the world nations recognising ukraine as an independant sovereign state, included russia. He has been bombarding ukraines ethnic russian border areas with his state tv propaganda since he came to power. No doubt creating the etnic and political division in ukraine to garner support for this whole "greater russian world" imperialist project of his. As well as creating the whole "nazi" warmongering .propaganda to justify "his" imperialist war.
    1
  137. 1
  138. 1
  139. 1
  140. 1
  141. 1
  142. 1
  143. 1
  144. 1
  145. 1
  146. 1
  147. 1
  148. 1
  149. 1
  150. 1
  151. 1
  152. 1
  153. 1
  154. 1
  155. 1
  156. 1
  157. 1
  158. 1
  159. 1
  160. 1
  161. 1
  162. 1
  163. 1
  164. 1
  165. 1
  166. 1
  167. 1
  168. 1
  169. 1
  170. 1
  171. 1
  172. 1
  173. 1
  174. 1
  175. 1
  176. 1
  177. 1
  178. 1
  179. 1
  180. 1
  181. 1
  182. 1
  183. 1
  184. 1
  185. 1
  186. 1
  187. 1
  188. 1
  189. 1
  190. 1
  191. 1
  192. 1
  193. 1
  194. 1
  195. 1
  196. 1
  197. 1
  198. 1
  199. 1
  200. 1
  201. 1
  202. 1
  203. 1
  204. 1
  205. 1
  206. 1
  207. 1
  208. 1
  209. 1
  210. 1
  211. 1
  212. 1
  213. 1
  214. 1
  215. 1
  216. 1
  217. 1
  218. 1
  219. 1
  220. 1
  221. 1
  222. 1
  223. 1
  224. 1
  225. incorrect. There was a war cabinet. Churchill wasnt making these decisions alone. Clem atlee became deputy pm. Bevin, Chamberlain, Eden, Halifax, Greenwood, Beaverbrook, Wood and Anderson who replaced chamberlain when he died. So to blame churchill alone is just nonsense. Also the official 1945 enquiry into the bengal famine found the national indian and local bengal governments foremostly responsible along with the viceroy at the time Linithglow. With the imperial government(war cabinet) also criticised. Tbf the local government and national officials had used their famine relief methods on previous famines and they had been successful. This famine though was far worse than previous and needed much firmer action. It needed the confiscation of all grain/rice in the country as a whole and rationing introduced. By the time the new viceroy wavell intervened with this policy 1 and a half million had starved to death. Even after rationing another 1 and a half million died after as people were too weak to fight off disease. Terrible tragedy. The uk government/cabinet has to take some share of the blame too. Way too slow in reacting or maybe not realising how bad the situation really was? No social media/world news in those days remember. Plus there was a war on. Japan had invaded the neighbouring countries, which created the famine. They also had control of the bay of bengal and were attempting to invade india through the bengal area. Plus d day was fast approaching so any spare transports were probably being kept back for that. Funny how this indian far right nationalist modi propaganda is now being used to denigrate one of the worlds most famous haters of far right nationalism and nazism isnt it?
    1
  226. 1
  227. 1
  228. 1
  229. 1
  230. 1
  231. 1
  232. 1
  233. 1
  234. 1
  235. 1
  236. 1
  237. 1
  238. 1
  239. 1
  240. 1
  241. 1
  242. 1
  243. 1
  244. 1
  245. 1
  246. 1
  247. 1
  248. 1
  249. 1
  250. 1
  251. 1
  252. 1
  253. 1
  254. 1
  255. 1
  256. 1
  257. 1
  258. 1
  259. 1
  260. 1
  261. 1
  262. 1
  263. 1
  264. 1
  265. 1
  266. 1
  267.  @RC-tv7hi  Maidan is a long story but here you go. Putin for the last 20 odd years has been influencing, coercing and now finally invading ukraine. Trying to create a form of the old USSR. Or a "greater russian world". His state tv propaganda has been transmitting into ethnic russians homes in ukraines border areas for all of that time. No doubt influencing political views as well as creating ethnic division. The nazi stuff especially since 2014. He also had pro russian oligarchs owning ukranian tv media influencing as well during that pre maidan period. Yanukovych was his puppet during all this. During the earlier 2004 "orange revolution"putin was influencing and "poisoning" his opponent yuschenko. Yanukovychs victory was later annulled by the courts as voting corruption was discovered after his win. The rerun election was then won comfortably by yuschenko. Yanukovych then won the next election fairly promising to join the EU. He then cloned putins actions in russia and changed the constitution to become more oppressive. He made judicial changes to jail his main political rival yulia tymoshenko on false charges. The media oligarch was also given a job in his govt and was suppressing opposition media. Then yanukovych went back on his promise to join the EU to create what his master wanted all along. A union with russia. So this triggered another revolution. This time called maidan. Peaceful at first but then yanukovych, no doubt under pressure from putin, sent snipers in to shoot unarmed protesters. 122 died with thousands injured. No way could he carry on after that bloodbath. He fled and parliament reformed the next day and changed the constitution back to its 2006 state. Yulia tymoshenko was released. New elections were planned and held. Petro poroshenko was duly elected. Yanukovychs lavish palace was searched and polling stamps were found casting doubt on his election victory. Proof that this has been putins objective all along can be found by googling petr akopov a pro putin author who wrote a piece for russian state media 3 days after the invasion. It was put up in error and got taken down quickly but was up long enough to be archived. A link to his article "the new world order" is in the spectator piece. It talks about creating a "greater rusian world" of greater russians, belorussians and their so called "little russians" of ukraine. The overall plan was to challenge the west as a true superpower once again.
    1
  268.  @ЭЮЯ-о3к  That would be the revolution of dignity where the ukranian people took to the streets of maidan to protest for the second time at putin cloned puppet yanukovych and his oppressive and corrupt regimes. First in the orange revolution where his alleged victory was annulled due to voting corruption. His poisoned opponent winning the rerun comfortably. When yanukovych was elected 4 years later in 2010 in a close election. He changed the constitution to allow for more oppression and immediately jailed his political opponent yulia tymoshenko. As well as oppressing opposition views. The final straw being to withdraw from a plan to join the EU for an alliance with putin instead. Not surprisingly the people took to the streets as 92|% of them had voted to be independant from russia in 1991. Protests began peacefully but then escalated as police become more brutal. Eventually yanukovych sent in snipers to shoot unarmed demonstrators. 110 died with thousands injured. No way could he survive after that bloodbath. He fled and the rada initiated new elections from which poroshenko was elected. In yanukovychs abandoned palace evidence was found of voting corruption casting doubt on his earlier election victory. As for the supposed "genocide" in donbas over the last 8 years dont you think that the UN monitors present during that time would have noticed this "genocide". Also only 2% voted far right in ukraines last election with no mps elected. Far less than most western countries. Zelenskys party is centrist and poroshenkos to the left. The only nazi style behaviour is coming from putin and his propaganda which has been broadcasting his state tv to the ethnic rusian border areas of ukraine since he came to power. No doubt creating the ethnic division required to bring about his ultimate goal. The reunification of the old USSR into a "greater russian world" so as to challenge the west once again as a true superpower.
    1
  269. 1
  270. 1
  271. 1
  272. 1
  273. 1
  274. 1
  275. 1
  276. 1
  277. 1
  278. 1
  279. 1
  280. 1
  281. 1
  282. 1
  283. 1
  284. 1
  285. 1
  286. 1
  287. 1
  288. 1
  289. 1
  290. 1
  291. 1
  292. 1
  293. 1
  294. 1
  295. 1
  296. 1
  297. 1
  298. 1
  299. 1
  300. 1
  301. 1
  302. Incorrect. Sorry to copy and paste but i dont have time to keep answering these far right attempts to target and humiliate true conservative individuals who opposed nazi and far right ideology and imperialism. There was a war cabinet. Churchill wasnt making these decisions alone. Clem atlee became deputy pm. Bevin, Chamberlain, Eden, Halifax, Greenwood, Beaverbrook, Wood and Anderson who replaced chamberlain when he died. So to blame churchill alone is just nonsense. Also the official 1945 enquiry on the bengal famine found the national indian and local bengal governments foremostly responsible along with the viceroy at the time Linithglow. With the imperial government(war cabinet) also criticised. Tbf the local government and national officials had used their famine relief methods on previous famines and they had been successful. This famine though was far worse than previous and needed much firmer action. It needed the confiscation of all grain/rice in the country as a whole and rationing introduced. By the time the new viceroy wavell intervened with this policy 1 and a half million had starved to death. Even after rationing another 1 and a half million died after as people were too weak to fight off disease. Terrible tragedy. The uk government/cabinet has to take some share of the blame too. Way too slow in reacting or maybe not realising how bad the situation really was? No social media/world news in those days remember. Plus there was a war on. Japan had invaded the neighbouring countries, which created the famine. They also had control of the bay of bengal and were attempting to invade india through the bengal area. Plus d day was fast approaching so any spare transports were probably being kept back for that.
    1
  303. 1
  304. 1
  305. 1
  306. 1
  307. 1
  308. 1
  309. 1
  310. 1
  311.  @larrysherk  You need to reread history then. Putin been interfering in ukraine since he came to power. He has never recognised the independance vote of 92% in 1991 were all the oblasts voted in favour including crimea and the donbas. Despite the vote being recognised worldwide and by russia. He created this war to bring his long term strategy to fruition. To create a new form of his beloved USSR in a "greater russian world". He has tried through politics with yanukovych, his cloned puppet president, and now hes using his military. Hes also been using his most potent weapon. Propaganda. Putin state tv for all the ethnic russians in ukraines border areas to create division and make political gain. Pro russian oligarchs did the rest by financin it all, one even owning some ukranian tv media. So putin been involved since day one of him coming to power in 2000. Twice, the ukranian people took to the streets in protest about the corruption and the oppression that followed yanukovychs 2 election wins. The orange revolution in 2004 where voting corruption was proven. His "poisoned" opponent easily winning the rerun. Then 10 years later at maidan after 4 years of oppression. Changing the constitution first to gain more power. Then jailing his political opponent yulia tymoshenko. Appointing that media oligarch in his govt who then started sanctioning opposition tv channels. Generally cracking down on all opposition views. Then he went back on a promise to join the EU. From which maidan began. It began peacefully at first but as he started to used more violent force the demo grew in size and numbers and became more resistant to the violent measures. He then sent snipers in to shoot unarmed protestors. 122 died with thousands injured. No way could he survive that bloodbath. He fled the next day with the rada reforming and voting yanukovych from office. The previous constitution was restored and tymoshenko released. New elections were organised and petro poroshenko became the new president. Also evidence was found of voting corruption in yanukovychs palace casting doubt on his close but fair win in 2010. So putin been attempting regime change since 2000. Even attempting to do it in 3 days in february. Utterly pitiful.
    1
  312. 1
  313. 1
  314. 1
  315. 1
  316. 1
  317. 1
  318. 1
  319. 1
  320. 1
  321. 1
  322. 1
  323. 1
  324. 1
  325. 1
  326. 1
  327. 1
  328. 1
  329. 1
  330. 1
  331. 1
  332. 1
  333. 1
  334. 1
  335. 1
  336. 1
  337. 1
  338. 1
  339. 1
  340. 1
  341. 1
  342. 1
  343. 1
  344. 1
  345. 1
  346. 1
  347. 1
  348. 1
  349. 1
  350. 1
  351. 1
  352. 1
  353. 1
  354. 1
  355. 1
  356. 1
  357. 1
  358. 1
  359. 1
  360. 1
  361. 1
  362. 1
  363. 1
  364. 1
  365. 1
  366. 1
  367. 1
  368. 1
  369. 1
  370. 1
  371. 1
  372. 1
  373. 1
  374. 1
  375. 1
  376. 1
  377. 1
  378. 1
  379. 1
  380. 1
  381. 1
  382. 1
  383. 1
  384. 1
  385. 1
  386. 1
  387. 1
  388. 1
  389. 1
  390. 1
  391. 1
  392. 1
  393. 1
  394. 1
  395. 1
  396. 1
  397. 1
  398. 1
  399. 1
  400. 1
  401. 1
  402. 1
  403. 1
  404. 1
  405. 1
  406. 1
  407. 1
  408. 1
  409. 1
  410. 1
  411. 1
  412. 1
  413. 1
  414. 1
  415. 1
  416. 1
  417. 1
  418. 1
  419. 1
  420. 1
  421. 1
  422. 1
  423. 1
  424. 1
  425. 1
  426. 1
  427. 1
  428. 1
  429. 1
  430. 1
  431. 1
  432. 1
  433. 1
  434. 1
  435. 1
  436. 1
  437. 1
  438. 1
  439. Dude this propaganda is 2 years out of date. Everybody knows putin did it for imperialist purposes. We knew it feb 28th 2022. Putins special military disaster has never been about NATO expansion or ukranian nazis committing genocide on ethnic russians. It has always been about russian expansion/imperialism. Evidence of this was given just a few days into the invasion, 28th february when a propaganda article was released early in error. The Kremlin’s propaganda publication RIA-Novosti accidentally published an article that was to be published after the rapid regime change in Ukraine. It was quickly removed, but the Internet Archive web service managed to save it. It was written by kremlin propagandist petr akopov......Sorry about the length but it wont let me use a link. A new world is being born before our eyes. Russia’s military operation in Ukraine has ushered in a new era – in three dimensions at once. And of course, in the fourth, internal Russian. Here begins a new period both in ideology and in the very model of our socio-economic system – but this is worth talking about separately a little later. Russia is restoring its unity; the tragedy of 1991, this terrible catastrophe in our history, its unnatural dislocation, has been overcome. Yes, at a great cost, yes, through the tragic events of a virtual civil war, because now brothers, separated by belonging to the Russian and Ukrainian armies, are still shooting at each other, but there will be no more Ukraine as anti-Russia. Russia is restoring its historical fullness, gathering the Russian world, the Russian people together – in its entirety of Great Russians, Belarusians and Little Russians. If we had abandoned this, if we had allowed the temporary division to take hold for centuries, then we would not only betray the memory of our ancestors, but would also be cursed by our descendants for allowing the disintegration of the Russian land. Vladimir Putin has assumed, without a drop of exaggeration, a historic responsibility by deciding not to leave the solution of the Ukrainian question to future generations. After all, the need to solve it would always remain the main problem for Russia – for two key reasons. And the issue of national security, that is, the creation of anti-Russia out of Ukraine and an outpost for the West to put pressure on us, is only the second most important among them. The first would always be the complex of a divided people, the complex of national humiliation – when the Russian house first lost part of its foundation (Kyiv), and then was forced to come to terms with the existence of two states, not one, but two peoples. That is, either to abandon their history, agreeing with the insane versions that “only Ukraine is the real Rus,” or to gnash one’s teeth helplessly, remembering the times when “we lost Ukraine.” Returning Ukraine, that is, turning it back to Russia, would be more and more difficult with every decade – recoding, de-Russification of Russians and inciting Ukrainian Little Russians against Russians would gain momentum. And in the event of the consolidation of the full geopolitical and military control of the West over Ukraine, its return to Russia would become completely impossible – we would have to fight for it with the Atlantic bloc. Now this problem is gone – Ukraine has returned to Russia. This does not mean that its statehood will be liquidated, but it will be reorganized, re-established and returned to its natural state as a part of the Russian world. Within what boundaries, in what form will the alliance with Russia be consolidated (through the CSTO and the Eurasian Union or the Union State of Russia and Belarus)? This will be decided after the end is put in the history of Ukraine as anti-Russia. In any case, the period of the split of the Russian people is coming to an end. Here begins the second dimension of the coming new era – it concerns Russia’s relations with the West. Not even Russia, but the Russian world, that is, three states, Russia, Belarus and Ukraine, acting in the geopolitical dimension as a whole. These relations have entered a new stage – the West sees the return of Russia to its historical borders in Europe. And it is loudly indignant at this, although in the depths of his soul it must admit that it could not be otherwise. Did anyone in the old European capitals, in Paris and Berlin, seriously believe that Moscow would give up Kyiv? That the Russians will forever be a divided people? And at the same time when Europe is uniting, when the German and French elites are trying to seize control of European integration from the Anglo-Saxons and assemble a united Europe? Forgetting that the unification of Europe became possible only thanks to the unification of Germany, which took place according to the good Russian (albeit not very smart) will. To swipe after that also on Russian lands is not even the height of ingratitude, but of geopolitical stupidity. The West as a whole, and even more so Europe in particular, did not have the strength to keep Ukraine in its sphere of influence, and even more so to take Ukraine for itself. In order not to understand this, they had to be just geopolitical fools. More precisely, there was only one option: to bet on the further collapse of Russia, that is, the Russian Federation. However, the fact that it did not work should have been clear twenty years ago. Moreover, already fifteen years ago, after Putin’s Munich speech, even the deaf could hear – Russia is returning. Now the West is trying to punish Russia for the fact that it returned, for not justifying its plans to profit at its expense, for not allowing the expansion of the western space to the east. Seeking to punish us, the West thinks that relations with it are of vital importance to us. However, this has not been the case for a long time already – the world has changed, and this is well understood not only by Europeans, but also by the Anglo-Saxons who rule the West. No amount of Western pressure on Russia will lead to anything. Losses from the sublimation of confrontation will be on both sides, but Russia is ready for them morally and geopolitically. Nevertheless, for the West itself, an increase in the degree of confrontation incurs huge costs – and the main ones are not at all economic. Europe, as part of the West, wanted autonomy – the German project of European integration does not make strategic sense while maintaining the Anglo-Saxon ideological, military and geopolitical control over the Old World. Moreover, it cannot be successful, because the Anglo-Saxons need a controlled Europe. However, Europe needs autonomy for another reason as well — in case the States go into self-isolation (as a result of growing internal conflicts and contradictions) or focus on the Pacific region, where the geopolitical center of gravity is moving. The confrontation with Russia, into which the Anglo-Saxons are dragging Europe, deprives the Europeans of even the chances of independence – not to mention the fact that in the same way Europe is trying to impose a break with China. If now the Atlanticists are happy that the “Russian threat” will unite the Western bloc, then in Berlin and Paris they cannot fail to understand that, having lost hope for autonomy, the European project will simply collapse in the medium term. That is why independent-minded Europeans are now completely uninterested in building a new iron curtain on their eastern borders – realizing that it will turn into a corral for Europe. Whose age (more precisely, half a millennium) of global leadership is over in any case – but various options for its future are still possible. Because the construction of a new world order – and this is the third dimension of current events – is accelerating, and its contours are more and more clearly visible through the spreading cover of Anglo-Saxon globalization. The multipolar world has finally become a reality – the operation in Ukraine is not capable of rallying anyone but the West against Russia. Because the rest of the world sees and understands perfectly well – this is a conflict between Russia and the West, this is a response to the geopolitical expansion of the Atlanticists, this is Russia’s return of its historical space and its place in the world. China and India, Latin America and Africa, the Islamic world and Southeast Asia – no one believes that the West leads the world order, much less sets the rules of the game. Russia has not only challenged the West, it has shown that the era of Western global domination can be considered completely and finally over. The new world will be built by all civilizations and centers of power, naturally, together with the West (united or not) – but not on its terms and not according to its rules.
    1
  440. 1
  441. 1
  442. 1
  443. 1
  444. 1
  445. 1
  446. 1
  447. 1
  448. 1
  449. 1
  450. 1