Comments by "" (@colby25) on "See why a crowd laughed at a top Russian official" video.

  1. Its not historic ties that bind india and russia its india becoming as nationalist as russia under modi. The next logical step for modi, if he follows the putin method, is to change the constitution to become leader/dictator for life. His propaganda channels on YT are witness already to the same anti western/anti democratic/ pro russia narrative as RT etc.. Orban loves putin. Modi loves putin. Carlson loves putin. MTG loves putin. Nationalists just love fellow nationalists. Even imperialistic militant ones like putin.
    2
  2. Thats what a state propaganda budget of 1.5 billion usd/112 billion rubles a year buys you. Its been tripled since the invasion too.
    2
  3. So if you hate the UK/west so much, then why not end all cultural and sporting ties with us like cricket. Perhaps russia will teach you to play ice hockey instead. It will certainly teach you how to be nobodies in a nation of nobodies. All doing as yer master "putin/modi" bids.
    2
  4. 9/11 and othe terror attacks on the west by islamic fundamentalism based in the middle east ring any bells regarding terrorist atrocities.
    1
  5.  @MasudRana-ll4cc Sunni iraq under saddam and sunni afghanistan taliban were hosting them. Al queda in iraq morphing into isis in syria and isil in libya proved this. So israel were behind 9/11? Ok mate.... if you say so. America thinks its the police in the world.. Without police you have anarchy.
    1
  6. Being a cold hearted, selfish, braindead nobody in putins Zombieland sure would suit you. Bye.
    1
  7.  @samhull8382  3 letters. Begins with M and ends with D
    1
  8. Reasons for maidan..... Ukraine voted 92% to be independant from a union with russia in 1991. With all the oblasts voting in favour including the donbas regions and crimea. In 2013 putin puppet yanukovych scrapped a potential union with the EU for one with the very country they voted to leave in 1991.. Whilst also jailing his main political opponent yulia tymoshenko.. In 2004 , another maidan had previously occured, with an orange revolution, against that same elected puppet yanukovych. This time for "voting corruption", which was later proved true, as his "poisoned" opponent victor yushchenko won the rerun comfortably.. Maidan began peacefully at first but then violence was used againt protestors and it escalated until yanukovych ordered snipers in to shoot unarmed protestors. 120 died and thousands were injured. No way could he survive that bloodbath. Evidence was later found in his abandoned palace of voting corruption casting doubt on his earlier close election win....Was the US "warmongers" involved in 2004 as well?... I tell you who has been interfering all along in ukraine and thats your little dicktator putin as he never recognised that 1991 vote. Despite all the world nations recognising ukraine as an independant sovereign state, included russia. He has been bombarding ukraines ethnic russian border areas with his state tv propaganda since he came to power. No doubt creating the etnic and political division in ukraine to garner support for this whole "greater russian world" imperialist project of his. As well as creating the whole "nazi" warmongering .propaganda to justify "his" imperialist war.
    1
  9. The only certainty is whatever the result of this conflict, putins russia assuming it still exists in its current form, will hopefully be restored once again behind an iron curtain where it belongs. Until one day they might discover what civilised behaviour is again. Nobody questioned the USAs involvement in the middle east because the "war on terror" involved most of the western world suffering terror attacks on them as well after 9/11. Its called national security. Protecting your citizens. Putin did the same to the chechnyan rebels after terror attacks on civilians at beslan and elsewhere. Former yugoslavia again the US was part of a coalition, this time NATO, to prevent further genocide in the region by bringing later convicted war criminal milosevic to the negotiating table. What choice or way they have? How about not interfering and invading a peaceful neighbour for imperialist ambitions. How about just living alongside each other in peace.
    1
  10. I reckon the ukranian people that voted him in would disagree profoundly
    1
  11.  @brianhalberg131  I reckon putin has outsourced his propaganda to india like all the other outsourced call centre crap india does.
    1
  12. Nah your pro putin. Pro putins lie a lot.
    1
  13. Thats exactly what far right nationalists want wherever they infest. Ban anything they disagree with. Easier to control and manipulate the people.
    1
  14. Yugoslavia involved other nations in nato as well. It was to prevent further genocide and bring the later convicted serb war criminal milosevic to the negotiating table. Iraq, libya, syria were all part of the 20 year "war on terror" after sunni islamic fundamentalist groups declared a terror war on western civilisation after 9/11. Again multiple countries helped in that war which has been won as there has benn no major terror attacks on the west since afghan.
    1
  15.  @AstralFilesVR  "Ukrainian genocid to Russians populations from 2014" Is that the genocide that putin claimed was happening in the donbas, that the UN monitors present those 8 years never noticed. How come he only brought this to the attention of the UN the day he invaded. He could have brought UN and worldwide condemnation on ukraIne if he had provided evidence to them earlier. Nah he only fed those lies through his propaganda to the people that mattered. His own and nationalist sympathisers worldwide like you. At the hague trials on former yugoslavia many people were rightly charged and convicted from all sides. Nato intervention was to prevent further genocide. Serbia had the biggest military and were winning so committing the most. It did end the genocide as later convicted war criminal milosevic was made to stop the ethnic cleansing and negotiate. Iraq was never about biological waepons, tho saddam did have them as he used them earlier against the kurds and in the iraq/iran war. It was all part of the 20 year "war on terror" after 9/11.. Sunni islamic fundamentalist groups declared a terror war on the west so the west responded.accordingly just like putin did at about the same time, tho more brutally, to the chechnyan rebels after beslan and other terror attacks on his people..Its called national security. The protection of your citizens.
    1
  16.  @asakurayoh3909  The world where the people control who governs them. Not the putin world where a few individuals and their state funded propaganda control the people.
    1
  17. So international law bears no part in your thinking then? In 1991 after 92% ukranians voted for their independance from a union with russia, all the worlds nations recognised ukraine as an independant sovereign state, including russia. Long live russia=long live militant nationalism then as that is what putins russia has now become.
    1
  18.  @asakurayoh3909  Yep so they are siding with the evil empire then. Funny how indian nationalists hate what the british imperialism did to india and yet now those same nationalists supports putin imperialism.
    1
  19. Western MSM has various types of media from the left/centre and right political viewpoint. So there are checks and balances. The people can then decide for themselves on the truth. Whereas putins media is putins media. Putin controlling the people. Thats propaganda.
    1