Comments by "christian wolf" (@christianwolf68) on "Protest held outside of New Orleans Court of Appeals, as stability of Roe v. Wade is questioned" video.

as a man i would pose this question , would those who are against abortion support the similar laws banning male masturbation. if when doing so you reach "full release" you are in effect killing millions of potential children. i ask my self if the very same laws were applied to men would they be as ok with it. i know i wouldnt and am not currently ok with it now . i would propose in the avent a woman becomes pregnant then to have an abortion, since it does take 2 people, for both parties to be in agreement and legal waivers of what ever sort must be signed. with exceptions made for incest or rape which results in pregnancy. if not then the very same people who are in support of banning abortion,should be responsible for the child as a result. if you people want it ,then you should take care of it
1
@converge3111 no religious people say life begins at conception. i say life began about a billion years ago and its an ongoing process.i wouldnt want anyone regulating what i could do with my "man" parts so i dont want anyone regulating what a woman can do with her woman parts. well yes i can argue it not being a human life. proof a unborn fetus can not be counted in the government census. why. because there are certain MEDICAL things that must take place. for the fetus to be declared a live baby, one of them is birth and then they get assigned a government number. if you are going to take away an individuals freedom of choice you are robbing them of one of the bedrock foundations of this nation. keep the religious "a fetus is a life " crap to your self .a persons own personal belief in the make believe has no thing to do with a medical procedure. and the science argument is just as lame as the "4 out of 5 dentists agree" stchick . some one Dr that says one thing i can find another to say the opposite.what it comes to is that this is being religiously and politically driven. the decision is not being made now on the basis of denying a REAL LIVE AMERICAN who participates in this experiment we call a republic
1
for those on government assistance right? do you have any clue how many veterans that served honorably are on government assistance because the very same government they signed up to defend let them down and abandoned them. but hey why stop there why not mandate it as law to sterilize anyone with a criminal record or any you listed, but why stop there lets just include people that are generally thought of as problematic, or disruptive to the general welfare of the good of the public. the very first time any persons individual freedom is taken away we are all guilty of a crime. it is funny to me the very same people that were screaming about individual freedom about a simple thing like a mask during the initial covid outbreak now are wanting to take that individual freedom away from others.
1