Comments by "Alexander Philip" (@alexanderphilip1809) on "Louis Rossmann" channel.

@_PatrickO India had until very recently a similar problem. Thy couldnt fire people if the establishment employed more than a set number of people without govt punishment. In fact their is a famous judgment Bharat Forge v. Uttam Nakhate. Your arguements are ill informed and outright stupid.
7
@drawnfunny he has a point about the constant "country being rigged against them" chatter. the ironic aspect of this is that even of you set up multitrillion dollar fund(which could do reverse a lot of the damage of used and administered properly) for the improvement of "black experience" you'd still need a coherant and stable sociocultural background not every african american has that. compared to that newer african immigrants to US dont have those socio-cultural baggages plus they also mostly have their education paid for and have stable social setting and are prepped to compete in the US labour market for good paying jobs.
6
@InventorZahran both are equally bad. " some random store" often has the blood sweat tears of some poor b@5t@rd who spend the better part of his life building it onto what it is. Any moron can destroy.
5
@EndersSaga urban regions require significant investments in low cost housing, it'll take serious political will power, it doesnt have nearly as much to do with the upper class as that guy makes it out to be, it can be done without screaming revolution, every time your champagnes a bit late to arrive. East asian states have done some good work in that regard.
4
12:09 there we go. this is paul krugman writing a piece for New York Times. Out of touch idealized stupidity is kind of their speciality.
3
Crime is crime, regardless of where it happens.
3
surely that number has increased.
3
@Bladings That is something that actually can be solved and would go a long way in improving the quality of life for a lot of americans. The problem with the US is thing get down effectively at the local level as we move upwards from state to federal level however its harder to mount a coherant response, its the way the country is, i mean even before the settlers came, there was no overarching central authority despite the bountiful geography just regional powers that looked out for their own interests.
2
@Pyxis10 Oh I can give you any number of reason across the globe where great leaders did things despite luck being the last thing in their arsenal. Anything can be attributed to luck to negate the magnitude and complexity of an achievement.
2
AOC is what i would call an out of touch delusional socialist. Garden variety intellectual moron. Socialists who actually mattered are mostly dead.
2
Trust in gov. Is something most people dont talk about. Amongst one of the reason why so many people died in the US despite being seen as the nation most likely to weather such a crisis.
1
Plus wireless earphones require desperate charging.
1
which is exactly what it is and its perfectly fine. China does it, S.Korea and Taiwan did it until their labor was price out, Infact suppression of labor activism and strikes is a foundational necessity for sustained industrial expansion and moving up the value chain, Japan did it with their Enterprise unions(which is a corporated sys.), Taiwan didnt even allow collective bargaining and had a union that was effectively controlled by kuomintang, Same goes for S.K and Singapore who had one union thaymt the state could control to facilitate and institute industrial development. You wanna go back to reliving Datta Samant's moronic delusions, be my fckkng guest. Vietnamese, Thais and Indonesians are already angling for the outbound investments from china centric OEM's. The former two have clear advantages over India.
1
@johanmetreus1268 parastic work force that strikes to gain unwarranted concession doesnt help the sustainability of a business either. You live in the west, removed from the excesses of parasitic labor activists, There are few reasons why outsourcing became a thing. so just dont.
1
@me700gnomes No No and No. Maybe in the US. But United States is not the world. Your country has the wealth and inherent domestic advantages to make such concessions. The rest of the world is not so lucky.
1
@me700gnomes when do you think Outsourcing as an option began to emerge ?
1
@fappesaft1249 No. There is a stronger cultural force at play. Scandanavian countries are ethnolinguistically homogenous for the most part. Creates a sense of close knit solidarity and sense of unity, The perks of which extend to the majority of people possessing a willingness to make sacrifices for those they consider to be part of the "family" vis-a-vis your avg fellow citizen and that goes beyond mere class fantasies. Look at countries with strong industrial and manufacturing systems and the corresponding level of participation in unions and the ethnolinguistic make up of the society(Germany being the obvious one there is also nearly every country in Europe). I guarantee you there will be either an ethnic/linguistic or cultural majority(definition of which varies from country to country) that forms the core of the support group for the sustainment of that system. Ergo not universally practical for a country to endorse trade unions, without removing unions and applying pressure when needed no cpuntry on the planet has become and industrialized state unless you use a corporated system which very few societies have the option of.
1
@bigkirbyhj666 Anarchists are always a nuisance.
1
@MegaBanne China didnt liberalize did quite well for themselves despite that. liberalization is useless without the agency, capital and infrastructure foundations. Which is why there is divergence amongst countries who liberalized. A country needs to follow a Colbertist/mercantalist model for a significant period of time, To develop the basic necessities of nation building and industrial infrastructure to take advantage of a future move towards liberalization. Indian manufacturing was mediocre before liberalization its largely worse after liberalization with some very bright exceptions.
1
@MegaBanne OOH such biting insights. Corporate oligarchs didnt rule shit. They influences policy, Policy which was ultimately defined by State in India's case the Empire's Interest. There is a reason why youbdont hear about EIC going about their businesses nowadays. The state influenced and leveraged corporations to further the former's interests, It was a symbiotic relationship. Kinda like what the Japanese did later.
1
@MegaBanne India has been a sovereign socialist country for 60+ years. You are using the example of one company whose success was more of an indictment of Indian incompetence and political disunity than anything. while Countries like Japan and Korea developed and used Zaibatsus and Chaebols to advance along the industrial and technologica value chain. Strongly held anticapitalist and socialist fetishes condemned India to be what it is today. The problem with the "evil" capitalist company(EIC) that ran India was not capitalism but to whom did the benefits accrue.(The profits and tax revenues generated where sent back to London) and whether the country in which these companies operated had the capacity to enforce what ever legal provisions that did exist to rein them in. India failed at capitalism and never recovered from that failure, Even after independance the trauma of that failure lingered to the point that India didnt participate in globalization(in relative terms) until they failed again at the socialist developmental state model after which they had no choice but to. In essence India is most experienced at failing more than it is at successes(which are nominal to begin with). So dont go about barking on the evil's of capitalism as of capitalism is about some sentimentalist vision, Its the equivalent of crying about the immorality of nuclear energy. Its a tool unlike socialism which needs large scale social buy making it fundamentally ideological. Capitalism has survived in various forms across millenias, so in essence Cap's body count is higher by virtue of having been around longer but spread out across space and time while Soc and Com managed to rack up the numbers that they did in less than three centuries.
1
@MegaBanne Not officially ? The where constituted by a literal Royal Charter. They had the mandate.
1
@MegaBanne @Electro-Cute Leopold presided over a small country in Europe surrounded by great powers. You dont survive in such an environment by grand standing on principles of social justices. Again assuming that you are Indian Read the preamble of the fckig Indian constitution courtesy of IG. Read the fine print of the Indian Industrial Policy Resolution of 1956. There are entire states who have had continuous far left goverments in power at the subnational level through out their entire post Independence existence than right leanin ones and you talk about 'oohh no socialism'.
1
@dkoda840 corporatized. not entirely but its getting there. Frankly america could use some protectionist measures to deal with the outflow of jobs. Nafta 2 should reshore some. Infact last I heard you were looking at a labor crunch.
1
@MegaBanne You've been swallowing too much of Vaush's illinformed banal ideological bs. If you dont have it, Maybe get a job ?
1
There is literally a proverb in my language that says "eliye pedich illam chuduka" which translates to "burning down the mansion just to kill a rat" usually said to point out an act of overreaction that causes more loss than was necessary to address the issue.
1
Not to blame Obama or anything but, the author of this article runs in political circles, she might have a vested interest in catering to a particular group. say single women who are professionals, which is a strong support base for the Democratic party. So this is no different from an opinion piece from Trump's or Biden's camp. Just political jibberish and half truths to invigorate once own base or piss off the other side.
1
you want sentimentalism. run a charity.
1
Similar problem in India.
1
wow. SNL ads? They must be desperate.
1
how do you expect to pay for it then ?
1
true. redheads are a class apart.
1
@albundy06 both parties are uninformed on the concept of competant governance
1
Got lost in translation.
1
@setter_soul_waifu0930 something is better than nothing. india is already a terrible place for manufacturing one of the reasons why it lags behind its regional peers in that regard. You need only look at India's export mix. The share of manufactured goods is pathetic to begin with.
1
@bobfg3130 no where in your comments is it implied that you are capable of thinking let alone thinking clearly. "They're not paying anyone for unskilled labour" really ?. Do you know the difference between an engineer or a technician vs that of say a regular farm worker or somebody who works retail, there is a differemce in skill level, not paying enough is an issue but thats why the government is for to balance the interest of the State, The People and the Capital, because without all three working in conjuction you end up like your avg. third world country I should know I live in one. America's or California's problem in particular has to do with too much blind idealism borderline stupid, Are the citizens of California really recieving what they paid for in taxes. There are nation states that are less richer than Cali but are able to providing govt. services competantly and effectively without such blatant incompetance. Your obsession with "wage theft" focuses on a narrow issue without understanding why or how to resolve it and what are effects that will follow, instead you pin it all on the boogeyman "corporations/capitalists". There is a world beyond your stupid fantasies you are pinning the failure of governance and administration on private players who (if they are in Cali) already pay high taxes, infact the reason why everything is so costly in california is in part due to its geography and silicon valley(one of the largest destroyers of jobs) If the US had a functional govt, then education and healthcare would've been reformed and the deadlock resulting from regulatory capture of necessary measures by idealogues on both ends would've been resolved.
1
@bobfg3130 If anybody is denying facts here its you. Yoy are selectively twisting facts to suit your preferred narrative. "Most criminals are poor before they involved in crime" they dont turn to crime because they are poor you idiot, they turn to crime when they have no way out of poverty that whatever efforts they engage in isnt enough to drag them out. My father was born in poverty, Countless others too, they didnot turn to life of crime because they had a robust social support system in their extended family employment opportunities to feed their ambitions and stave of hunger. You are twisting statistical data and interpretting it in the most smooth brained manner . True Poverty is an issue but focusing on poverty as if that solves everything is kinda stupid because regardless of whether you are poor what propels you into crime is circumstances poverty being one amongst the contributing factors, but solving poverty requires you to set aside ideology.
1
@TheCarpenterUnion and you belong to a union, if what your username suggests is indeed genuine. so essentially pot calling kettle black.
1
What people need to understand is that there are layers to this incident. Its the middlemen/agents that rope in workers and they are responsibile for the dissemination of salaries considering that these guys are on contract. I think they've already reopened after the initial controversy and the suppliers are planning for an expansion with labor hostels and what not to increase their capacity.
1
13:40 this idiot. There is a reason why it is so. Ask the Kuomintang Party.
1
They did burn and destroy company property. The consequence of which would be India becomes a more untenable place to do business in.
1