Comments by "RiteMo LawBks" (@ritemolawbks8012) on "Astrum" channel.

Find a away to cheaply bring it to earth, and them the US will replace the moon with Titan.
3
It has to remain constant. The measurements of lengths and time intervals are the relative and can change, but the speed of light in a vacuum is invariant.
3
It was so much more amazing before physics and economics took all the fun out of space exploration.
2
Exactly. What do we send them to school for? As long as they have antifreeze and some good break pads they should be able to stop at Mercury without falling into the Sun.
2
The particle accelerators at CERN and the large-hadron colliders have already been used to confirm special relativity and protons accelerated to significant percentages of the speed of light. There are many other including the photon reflector installed on the moon, astronomical observations, and the Global Positioning System. The theories of relativity and spacetime weren't just "guesses" and abstract mathematics from Einstein. It's from classical physics that's been well understood and experimentally verified for centuries. The modifications at the beginning of the 20th century, updated to 4d spacetime, length contraction/time dilation, curvature as gravity, and the constant speed of light in a vacuum, but it's still based on the classical laws of Newtonian mechanics and Galilean relativity. If someone disproved relativity and replaced it with a more precise theory that agrees with observations, it would have been adopted by physicist.
1
So you consider space boring now? Finding earth-like biology might nearly impossible.
1
It's relative to an observer outside the event horizon. It's not possible to observe the matter and radiation cross the event horizon, but it is possible to detect the frame dragging.
1
@zachariemelanson485 When you describe motion in physics, you have to state, "it's rotating with respect to [ INSERT 'X' HERE ]." Is the reason you're addressing time dilation due to the fact that most videos about non-rotating black holes describe objects being frozen at the event horizon and never crossing?
1
@zachariemelanson485 Are you visualizing "frame dragging" and the geometry as being like a whirlpool? That's not a perfect analogy, but the motion is similar to how the frame itself rotates. The problem with trying of describe the geometry of time dilation and curvature at the event horizon is most people assume that means the clock on the observer entering the black hole will appear to slow down and stop. The person entering the black hole would still observe his proper time as passing normally. Other than the intense tidal forces and high-energy plasma in the accretion disk, there's nothing observable that would indicate the event horizon has been crossed.
1
@zachariemelanson485 Trying to think of a better way to describe it, but the rotation is just another manifestation of energy and momentum curving the local spacetime coordinates. The frame dragging and gravitational waves is a delayed affect of gravity not transmitting instantaneously. The affect on earth is much weaker, but a satellite would experience frame dragging if the planet stop rotating and reversed directions. If the event horizon were travelling away from a smaller mass in a straight line instead of rotating, it would have the affect of dragging spacetime and any smaller objects in the region. That would have been the affect of using Newtonian gravity as well. The only difference is in general relativity, there is a cause and effect delay for the change to be transmitted.
1
There's more bipartisan agreement on funding space programs and military technology rather than housing and poverty. Special-interest groups, government contractors, and the chamber of commerce have more lobbyists to influence how taxpayer funds are spent. There's not a Washington, DC-based homeless lobby.
1
I've said "ploooms." It was spoken most elegantly, and with the accent of a young-sophisticated intellectual and English aristocrat from "old money" in the north.
1
Your theory about a velocity in the time dimension sounds a lot like the spacetime of Einstein and Minkowski. Have you learned Special relativity yet? The spacetime transformation can be described as a trade-off between motion in space and progression in time.
1
[ 13:02 ] I know Europa is always a big deal, but did the narrators change at this point, or did he get into character to transition to Europa?
1
@HenryThe2ndAnimator You predicted the demise of he Queen.
1
I think I see a side view of a nose and an upper lip.
1
They are more real than you are.
1
The dynamo and source of the EM field are the charged matter particles in the accretion disk and orbiting the local region. The matter and photons that pass the event horizon are causally disconnected from the observable universe and can't send detectable information to observers outside of the black hole.
1
@sagnorm1863 I've never heard any physics-related video or professor claim the black hole'e charge, electromagnetic field, hawking radiation, or any type matter-field interactions can be detected or observed after it crosses the event horizon. A charged particle accelerated by the electric field and detected is an "event," and it has a location in space and moment in time. All spacetime paths and world lines inside the black hole are going toward the singularity and can't transmit cause and effect information outside of the event horizon.
1
@sagnorm1863 At [ 2:57 ], he's describing "charge" works the same as it does with any other body. It works "AROUND' the body and not "INSIDE" the event horizon. The location and coordinates have NOT crossed the event horizon. The analogy with gravity and spacetime describes the classical and quantum field theory are interactions or excitation in fields. There would have to be a theory describing how it's possible for anything to escape the black hole. Neither gravity nor the hypothetical "graviton" can leave the black hole and attract mass outside of the black hole. It's the field outside the horizon transmitting the information. The charge, spin, and mass are not properties inside the event horizon. There has to be a way to describe information leaving the black hole to be detected. When they say "nothing leaves or escapes after crossing the event horizon," it's crystal clear. It's not possible, so I'm not sure what's confusing about it because that's introductory physics.
1
@sagnorm1863 We could have saved a lot of time if you would have been upfront about not believing in science, and claiming that you or anyone has disproved relativity. I don't know anything about pseudoscience or electric universe, so when you post a question, make sure you state that you don't understand general relativity, classical field theory, and Newtonian mechanics. No disrespect but this is a scientific topic. If you don't know or don't understand physics, then at least try learn it. You're claiming that modern physics states that a singularity has physical significance. There is no quantum gravity theory, so trying to make a statement about what happens at the singularity isn't even a scientific question. There is a break down in the mathematics, but that is not the same as saying "General relativity is wrong." You're trying to argue that modern physics is wrong, which means you don't know how it works. That is the "red flag" you could have shared instead of wasting my time and yours.
1
Someone obviously mastered their Maxwell equations and Special relativity._ That was a great explanation.
1