Comments by "RiteMo LawBks" (@ritemolawbks8012) on "DW News"
channel.
-
97
-
94
-
53
-
35
-
35
-
20
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The different forms of government are completely difference. The CCP is a police state led by a dictator. The liberal democracies of West aren't perfect, but the institution of 24-hr surveillance, censorship, show trials, Zero-Covid, One-child policy, coronavirus pandemic cover ups, one-party rule, and the Uyghurs concentration camps could only occur in Mainland China, North Korea, and possibly Russia, but definitely not in the US, South Korea, Australia, Japan, New Zealand, the UK, and the European Union.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@iggy5347 The Indian Government is looking out for its own national interests and making rational business decisions and exploiting the market for inexpensive fuel.
India is still mostly non-aligned in this latest "Cold War," despite having a border dispute with the CCP, being opposed to the use of force in Ukraine, and the historically friendly relations with the liberal democracies in the West.
In the long run, the goal should be to incorporate India into the West and the global order. Eventually, it will re-evaluate its foreign policy and relations with the Beijing and Moscow.
Right now, Washington, DC, and the European Union have offered India no economic incentive, infrastructure investment, nor mutual-defense agreements that would create a NATO-like democratic alliance in the Indo-Pacific.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Rather than trying to prematurely confront a US-led military alliance in the Pacific, which would definitely result a humiliating defeat for Beijing and cause Taiwanese independence, they should just maintain the status quo.
Mainland China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong were historically united as "One China," and separated by partially by American, European, and Japanese colonialism and political interference. Despite the very legitimate claims, the CCP has adopted a policy of regional hegemony, hostility, and forced re-unification.
There wouldn't be a massive American military presence in the region wasn't rushing a military and economic confrontation with the West. Peace and prosperity should be the goal for the region, but China's regional hostility and unrecognized claims to most of the South China Sea and East China Sea will result in a NATO-like military alliance with the ability to cut off China from international trade.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@eonglee44 Believe it or not, I have a lot of respect for China, its people, and its history. It's the oldest and probably most-influential country in the world.
During the early 20th century, it went through a period of weakness, colonialism, and instability. It should be strong and rich since it has the largest population, but it's hard to recognize the country and appreciate its history and culture under communism.
It's not my country, but watching films such as The Last Emperor, which was approved by the CCP and permitted to film in the Forbidden City, it becomes obvious how drastically China has changed. It's not just the government, but the culture, heritage, and open practice of religion.
Every country deserves to be rich, but most economist already know communism and centrally planned economies doesn't work in the long run. If they did, the West would have adopted the model. That's why the CCP has allowed private businesses to operate. The problem will come when the inevitable recession and market correction happens in China.
The economies of the US, Japan, South Korea, EU, and UK are free-market economies and work on business cycles. The government only controls regulations, taxes, and fiscal spending. A central bank controls interest rates, money supply, and how to respond to inflation and recession with monetary policy.
Recessions and unemployment are painful, but they're required to make the economies more stable, productive, innovative, and robust.
In the US, people will be homeless, suffer from unemployment, and exposed to violent crime, but they have access to the strongest and most stable economy and currency in the world. They also have the right to petition the government (and sometimes their employers) for change, and exercise free speech.
When the recession happens in China and people are angry and in the streets, what will happen?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@iggy5347 China’s GDP blackout isn’t fooling anyone
There is diminishing faith in the few economic indicators that, after years of obfuscation, still see the light of day
If you had paid a visit to China’s National Bureau of Statistics in the days following Xi Jinping’s election as general secretary of the Chinese Communist party in 2012, you would have found a cornucopia of economic data.
The number of people employed in the outdoor playground amusement equipment sector, natural gas exports from Guangdong to other provinces, the electricity balance of Inner Mongolia. You name it, they published it, along with more than 80,000 other time series.
But just one year later, those three series and thousands more were no longer updated. Skip to 2016, and more than half of all indicators published by the national and municipal statistics bureaus had been quietly discontinued. The disappearances have been truly remarkable.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@elliott7531 Hopefully, I didn't give the impression that Ukraine must have ONLY or PREFERABLY US-made tanks. I was mentioning the weapons depots and stockpiles of arms the US military warehouses around the globe in case of war.
The US will contribute the funds, weapons, intelligence, sanctions, and soft power it takes to destroy the Russian forces occupying Ukraine. It also buys all NATO, Chinese, Israeli, Russian, and/or Soviet-made ammunition and weapons.
Fortunately for the world, the US and NATO are not actively at war with Russia; so Zelenskyy and his generals are the battlefield experts and know the type of weapon systems needed.
The war has made NATO more relevant than ever. It's never been a philanthropic organization or an American-led charity. Other than defense, it's been about marketing and standardizing the weapons systems and the defense sectors.
The corruption that has plagued the Russian Armed Forces and its defense-production industry would have been exposed sooner in a NATO country.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@THETRUTH-BR That's a naïve stance of someone unfamiliar with China. It has a historic role of non-intervention outside of Asia.
Other than being a powerful trading country and potential superpower, there's not a lot of soft or hard power options available to Beijing because it's no going to use military force or economic sanctions like the US, UN, and EU does.
The geopolitically and diplomatically neutral states and NGOs are mostly in Benelux Europe, the Hague, Swiss, Finland, and UN organizations.
The CCP is more aligned, economically, culturally, and politically with Moscow. It could influence its junior partner: Russia, but Beijing leadership have no credible leverage to bring Ukraine, US, EU, and NATO to negotiate any settlements of a European War.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@linx8376 That's just Cold War-style politics. China has its own problems. Even if there were no hostile US, there would still be tensions will the CCP, India, UK, European Union ("EU"), Japan, Vietnam, Australia, South Korea, and even Russia. The despite the spying, the EU is more aligned with the US. It needs China for economic reasons.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@sunrae3971 The US DOES protect its foreign interests in Europe and throughout the world. If it were to simply sit back as an isolationist nation and allow the UK economy to collapse and become bankrupt, it would be damaging to the financial sector, international trade, international monetary policy, and the markets for US Dollars-UK Pound Sterling exchanges.
Despite being a sovereign nation with the sole authority to make the UK's austerity, fiscal stimulus, and monetary policy, Britain and the Bank of England ("BOE") will never act unilaterally.
The UK is closely integrated with the economies of its main trading partners, so the BOE's inflation targets, interest rates, exchange rates, and economic-growth projections are nearly identical to the influential policies and targets set by the US Federal Reserve Bank, Int'l Monetary Fund, and the European Central Bank.
The GDP of the UK is well above three US$ trillion, so from the perspective of the US and G7 nations, the UK economy, Pound Sterling, and the Bank of England are TOO big to fail without negatively impacting the global economic situation and consumer confidence.
In the past, the US has intervened around the world (including Europe), to protect both (1) the domestic economies and currency-exchange rates of its international trading partners; and (2) to implement policies beneficial to the US GDP, business interests, and the health of the domestic US job market.
If the UK were to be bailed out by the US again, the negotiations and settlements will mostly be determined by the leverage of US corporations and special interests groups that aggressively lobbies DC politicians and diplomats to include financially beneficial terms in treaties and executive international agreements that make US corporations wealthier, more productive, and competitive against international rivals.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1