Comments by "RiteMo LawBks" (@ritemolawbks8012) on "David Pakman Show"
channel.
-
101
-
96
-
62
-
46
-
41
-
30
-
26
-
25
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
19
-
18
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I can help the man describe his own political ideology. This should have been on his teleporter to define TRUMPISM:
TRUMPISM is a far-right, authoritarian, ultranationalist political ideology and movement, characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy, subordination of individual interests for the perceived good of the nation and race, and strong regimentation of society and the economy. There's also a consistent pattern of supporting the policies and international agenda of Vladimir Putin rather than liberal democracies led by the United States and the EU.
TRUMPISM rose to prominence in early 21st-century American politics following the election and administration of the first Black-American president. The first TRUMP-LIKE political movement emerged in the European Union and the United Kingdom during migrant crisis related to Arab Spring and Civil Wars in the Middle East/North Africa, Brexit Vote, and following ISIS-inspired terrorist attacks across Europe and inside the United States, before spreading to other European countries, most notably Hungary, Poland, and parts of Eastern Europe.
TRUMPISM also had adherents outside of Europe, including of Brazil, Texas, and Florida. Opposed to anarchism, democracy, pluralism, liberalism, socialism, and Marxism, TRUMPISM is placed on the far-right wing within the traditional Left–Right spectrum.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Take a moment to think how extraordinary the events on January 6, 2021, would have been with any other US president, a governor, or even a city mayor. The stable leadership from Mike Pence after the Capitol Breach, and until the Inauguration Day met the bare minimum for anyone in public office. It wasn't heroic. During that time, America needed a "patriotic hero."
Pence may have personally been insulted for what happened and the threats against him and his family, but the attack was on America itself and the symbol of democratic government. Pence had the authority to convene the cabinet to invoke the 25th Amendment. Congress could have immediately expedited the impeachment trial to completely remove Trump and bar him from seeking re-election.
There was no reason to allow Trump to remain in the White House from January 7, 2021, until the Biden Inauguration and peaceful transition, which Trump didn't even participate in. Mike Pence was effectively the "acting president," while Trump was busy handing out pardons and ordering last minute withdrawals of US forces overseas.
There may be people still be some people interested in another miracle that will allow Trump to become president again. I've got nothing against them because they can vote how they please. If some reason that actually happens and Trump is re-elected, it's because Pence, GOP senators, and Merrick Garland allowed Trump to be above the law.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It's never safe to ask a far-Reich conspiracy theorist about specifics, or get them to go into details about blanket terms and dog whistles like "they," and their definition of "woke." That'll inevitably lead the interview to become a dark anti-Semitic, anti-globalist, pro-Russian, and White nationalist rant.
It doesn't matter what the topic is, if you find flaws in their logic and reason, they'll consistently return to their default distraction of what about the Blacks, Mexicans, and Jews. It's easier for them to try and be offensive, play victims, and remind you of why they're called, "deplorables," than it is to make a compelling argument to support Trump.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Did you say FL doesn't recognize "Covid-19" as the primary cause of death from coronavirus-related complications? I'm not a doctor and have never completed a death certificate, but I have faith in the determinations made by the coroners and other physicians. The government, healthcare providers, and insurance companies ultimately pay the high cost of ICU care, ventilators, and hospitalization, so they have an incentive to scrutinize the medical bills for accuracy.
Doesn't the CDC, epidemiologist, and John Hopkins National Covid-19 use other indicators and secondary causes to determine whether or not the deaths would have occurred but for the coronavirus infection and disease? In your uncle's case, was there still a reference to covid-19 virus infection followed by hospitalization, ICU, pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, or blood clot preceding death?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jimmipadge There are people who are genuinely interested in world affairs and love interacting with informed people, not imposters with a political agenda.
When you have to read something that's not relevant, intelligent, and obviously a cliché. You're going to want to let the poster know that they are uninformed.
It's my public service to advise you that you are lost. If it helps, get GPS, a map, and a mirror, but don't pretend to be Henry Kissinger, Noam Chomsky, or an intellectual. You're entitled to an opinion on international affairs, so I'm giving you the feedback and a grade of D+.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The final results are still unknown, but most consider midterm elections as a referendum on the White House incumbent and majority in Congress.
Since the balance of power is virtually unchanged, it's seen as 1) justification to maintain the status quo; or 2) a mandate for the president to continue his agenda.
The Democrats do appear to be celebrating, but it's mostly due to the many of Trump-backed candidates and election deniers that lost their campaigns. This will make the GOP leadership more competitive.
In the end, there will likely be a slight GOP majority in the House and the Senate remaining unchanged.
The GOP invested billions of dollars during this campaign season and expected Red Wave, and a solid majority to stop the president's agenda.
With the inflation rates, crime, Biden's low approval, and border situation being problematic, they expected to be awarded with a landslide of seats and have the power to pass veto-proof legislation.
We're two days out from the vote, and we still don't know the final results, which means that it was much closer to being evenly split than expected.
With the forecasted number of winning seats, the GOP won't be in a strong enough of a position to block the president's agenda. They will have the ability to pick the Speaker and committee assignments, not much else.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Previously, I had little or no interest in appeasing the fascist cult members, but there could be a reasonable power-sharing agreement and coalition arrangement that could help. It doesn't even require changing any laws or amending the constitution. Each of the two major political parties and their nominees can implement this.
Rather than the election for president and vice president continue being a "zero-sum game," we could return to the previous method of selecting the vice president: The candidate who gets the most electors will still become president, but the change is that the person receiving the second-most electors should become vice president. Currently, the running mate of the winner becomes vice president.
Since the vice president is mostly a ceremonial role, we could possibly have a Biden-Trump Administration, without it triggering a constitutional crisis. Also, since the DOJ Memo and legal opinion that prohibits the DOJ from indicting a sitting president does NOT apply to the vice president, Jack Smith can continue doing God's work in prosecuting Trump; i.e., if Biden wins and Trump is the GOP nominee.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The US and some EU sanctions against Russia are slightly different since they apply to, and must be followed by, every country that does business in US dollars.
As with all DC politics, American business interest has intervened since the Magnitski Act and later Crimean, Donbass, Malaysian Air bombing, and chemical-weapons related sanctions were apply to Russian oligarchs and business contracts.
During the Trump Administration, the US LNG and energy sector had more influence in the drafting of US sanctions. Under Biden, although he's administration is openly more hostile to Putin, they are more open to negotiating sanctions relief because he has authority to relax sanctions than Trump could on Russia. It politically, and by law, nearly impossible for Trump to remove any sanctions on Russia.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1