Youtube comments of RiteMo LawBks (@ritemolawbks8012).
-
3100
-
661
-
553
-
540
-
446
-
364
-
358
-
303
-
282
-
281
-
260
-
246
-
243
-
228
-
202
-
189
-
185
-
181
-
169
-
166
-
164
-
161
-
156
-
150
-
147
-
142
-
137
-
132
-
120
-
111
-
105
-
102
-
102
-
101
-
99
-
99
-
97
-
96
-
If the Russian military performed as well on the battlefield as they do in their Victory Day parades, they would have already taken Kyiv by now.
_____
EDIT: The goal post has been moved several times from the start of the war until the Battle of Kyiv, so I wanted to remind of the objectives of the "Special Military Operation." A few of the objectives were the following:
Putin, Feb 24: "to protect people who have been subjected to abuse and genocide by Kyiv regime for 8 years."
Lavrov, Feb 25: "to free Ukrainians from oppression and let them choose their own future."
Sergei Shoigu, Mar 1: "to protect Russians from the threat of Western countries who try to use Ukrainian people for their battle with Moscow."
Demitriy Peskov Mar 5: "to ensure the guarantees of our own security."
Putin, Mar 18: "to end the genocide of people."
Vyacheslaw Volodin, Mar 20: "to save people and demilitarize the country."
Sergei Shoigu, Mar 29: "to free Donbas."
Demitriy Peskov, Apl 7: "to prevent a third world war."
Lavrov, Apl 11: "to end the reckless NATO expansion and US dominance in the world."
Putin, Apl 12: "to rescue people of Donbas."
95
-
95
-
94
-
93
-
93
-
90
-
88
-
87
-
85
-
84
-
82
-
80
-
77
-
77
-
74
-
72
-
71
-
70
-
70
-
68
-
67
-
65
-
65
-
64
-
63
-
62
-
57
-
56
-
54
-
54
-
53
-
52
-
52
-
52
-
52
-
51
-
51
-
49
-
48
-
48
-
The US and NATO didn't react militarily and with aggression in Syria, Georgia, and after the annexation of Crimea because there wasn't political support for intervention in either Europe or America.
The US did conduct targeted strikes after chemical weapons attacks on civilians, but it was mostly symbolic because Syria has historically had closer political ties to Moscow. There has to be significant US business and foreign interest, or popular support to involved to use the hard or soft power to counter Russia or China.
The actions and public image of Zelenskyy, the Ukrainian Armed forces, and the Ukrainian people in the media is what rallied most of the West to intervene after the February 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
Until the 2016 political interference, election meddling, and hacking operations from Russia, Vladimir Putin wasn't considered a dangerous hostile adversary or military threat to the US, its foreign policy, or NATO.
Putin used the Russian media and online trolls to build this false image of him being a master spy playing and winning a game 4D chess against the US and Europe.
He's now made a major miscalculation and underestimated Zelenskyy and the resolve of the US and its allies. The war will either lead to his demise or the collapse of the Russian government, so as long as the Ukrainians have the weapons and funding, they will defeat Putin without the use of US troops.
47
-
47
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
45
-
45
-
44
-
44
-
43
-
41
-
41
-
40
-
40
-
39
-
This is a news to me and something I was never taught during world history in the Interwar Years. I'm glad the BBC has decided to cover the negative aspects and atrocities of the British Empire, including potential crimes against humanity committed during the era of colonialism and the British Mandate in Palestine.
It's been nearly a month since the Queen died, and although I wasn't part of the crowd who thought it was appropriate to criticize her role and involvement in the British Commonwealth, I couldn't help but notice the sizable minority condemning her. Although she was still very popular around the globe, I think a large part of the world considers her as a head of government like the US President instead of an impartial figurehead.
I'm not giving the UK government, foreign diplomats, or the Royal Family a free pass, but I would think these would be the type of "forgotten atrocities," committed by the UK/British Commonwealth that require official acknowledgement, and if possible, appropriate redress.
I just don't see how a constitutional monarchy in a liberal democracy with parliamentary supremacy is the party ultimately responsible for damages and losses committed at the direction of UK government ministers and private business profiting from imperialism.
39
-
39
-
39
-
38
-
38
-
37
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
Zelenskyy is a rock star now. I would have loved to travel to DC to get a chance to meet him in person. This will be the first time he's left the country since Russia invaded. No one is crazy enough try and target him on American soil, but the White House and media should have worked better to keep this secret. He began the year as a relativity unknown comedian turned politicians. No one expected that would be able to stand up to Vladimir Putin, fight off a Russian invasion, and
successfully use social media and public relations to boost morale of Ukrainian soldiers, civilians, and unite the liberal democracies of the world (The West) to oppose the unjustified aggression from the Kremlin.
Despite that, Zelenskyy and the Ukrainian people have proved us all wrong. Ukrainian politicians have put politics aside and have successfully rallied the world to get economic and military aid, the delivery of advanced weapons systems, access to US-UK intelligence information, and a US-EU led regime of financial sanctions, economic warfare, and a trade embargo against the Russian government, oligarchs, oil, and Russia's international business interests.
Given Zelenskyy's support in the UK as well, it wouldn't surprise me if he made a visit to the UK as an
appreciation of the unwavering support from the British government. He's a humble man, but he's become Time Magazine's Person of the Year, one of the most influential and recognizable world leaders, and a modern day Winston Churchill. The Ukrainians and the Government in Kyiv have now become a force to be reckoned with. Slava Ukraini! 💙💛💙💛
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
She's not denying the Holocaust, intentionally minimizing it, or spreading misinformation like Ye.
She's essentially using the American definition of race, and considering Aryans, Slavs, European Jews, Roma, Eastern Europeans, and the majority of the Nazi political prisoners as "White."
She's not correct because a European Jew couldn't simply convert to Christianity or renounce Judaism to avoid being sent to camps. They had racial, ethic, genealogy, and physical differences that could be identified, and they were intentionally targeted to be removed from Europe.
It was more racially motivated, xenophobic, and intentional ethnic cleansing than hating the practice of Judaism. She's wrong but not anti-Semitic.
I'd give her pass because you can spend a lifetime trying to make sense of the Holocaust, anti-Semitism, or understand why fascist primarily targeted some Jews and Communist but not others.
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
I don't think the impact of US extraterritorial sanctions and economic-warfare power is fully appreciated by most audiences. The amount of direct trade between the US and Russia, or the fact that Russia has access to an alternative market in China, is completely irrelevant.
The sanctions come in many forms and have the ability to disrupt nearly all of Russia's foreign trade, weapons system deals, and domestic projects requiring international financing. The White House could also damage the ability of the Russian State to sell government debt to raise capital to finance their military and military-industrial complex.
The US and its foreign interests aren't without risk. Russia is able to mount an effective defense and offense against the US, UK, EU, and NATO by using coercive tactics with asymmetrical warfare. They've used cyber and chemical-weapons attacks, disinformation, espionage, designing weapons to evade US missile-defense systems and interfering in elections and political discourse in the West.
They're currently holding Ukraine and other former Soviet Republics hostage by bullying and threatening to use its conventional armed forces and weapons, its massive nuclear weapons arsenal, and its vast natural resources, which are in high demand.
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
Despite the historical reputation of being militant and imperialist, the Pacific nations that share the region with the CCP voluntarily host US military installations. It's unusual in history that so many nations decide to surrender sovereignty to be under protection of a superpower.
The primary disadvantage of Mainland China is that nearly all of its neighbors see it as a existential threat to their economic and national security interests. China and Russia are part of a growing international alliance, but there wouldn't be a US global hegemony without hostile adversaries like Russia (Soviet Union), China, Iran, and North Korea.
I know there's plenty of global war talk and rumors, but neither the US nor the CCP will directly attack each other. There's saber-ratting and an escalation of tensions, but unless either country is attacked first, there won't be a direct conflict. Proxy wars, cyber attacks, arms races, economic warfare, and intelligence operations have made direct wars among permanent members of the UN Security obsolete.
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
It was mostly the firebombing of Tokyo and the two atomic bombs. After the Potsdam Declaration, the Japanese were negotiating with the Soviet Union regarding the term "unconditional," and whether or not Hirohito would be allowed to remain on the throne. The Soviet Union agreed to enter before the first nuclear weapon was developed. The Soviet war declaration only expedited the surrender. Obviously, Hirohito was allowed to remain on the throne.
The intent of Truman and the UK may have been to use it as a demonstration to Stalin and to stop Japan, China, and Korea from becoming split between communist and non-communist, but the Japanese Empire in the Pacific was already defeated by the US-led alliance along with the British Empire and the Republic of China (present-day Taiwan).
When the Emperor surrendered, he said it was because of the "cruel bombs," not because of the Soviet Union, or additional enemies. The Soviet Union mostly defeated Germany. That's why it took most of East Europe. The US and European allies were mostly responsible for defeating the Japanese and Spanish Empires. Hence the reason America, the UK, and France have a regional presence with former colonies in the Asian-Pacific region.
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
I can respect the judge's legal determination and credibility, but it's unusual following a potentially high-profile criminal case during the pre-indictment phase.
If the government failed to meet its burden of proof in support of a contempt of court charge, then the judge had no other option that to rule against the government.
I haven't read the court's ruling yet, but unless there's a new revelation calling into question this court's impartiality, moral character, and/or legal competence, then I see no reason to question the legitimacy of the ruling.
In spite of the fact that I will never vote in support of Trump holding public office, he's still entitled to his rights of due process, fair trail, and protection against vindictive and politically motivated prosecutions (AKA "Deep state witch hunts").
All public official should be held accountable and investigated when there's even the appearance of corruption, criminality, and abuse of official authority; but just like we often need reminders that Trump is "NOT ABOVE the law," it's also true that Trump is "NOT BENEATH the protections of constitutional law."
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
I'm so sorry to hear about what's going on in India. In the US, we've been blessed with many great doctors, many with families still in India, and now this happened. I feared it would get bad because they have the population of the US, Europe, Russia, and maybe Brazil. They definitely need prayers, oxygen, hospital ships, drugs, and vaccines.
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
I'm neither British nor a citizen of the Commonwealth, but even I know legal, political, and colonial matters were from decision that had been made by Parliament, prime ministers, aristocracy, judges, or privately own corporations; e.g., the British East India _Company.
I'm sure documents exist from legislation, cabinet minutes, court rulings, or other ministerial advice bearing a monarch's affixed seal of approval or a signature, but that's the basics of the monarch's head-of-state role in a liberal democracy.
If parliamentary supremacy has been the constitutional convention since 1689, then why would university researcher of slavery in the British Empire look for links that could be traced back to the royal assent or prerogative powers of a constitutional monarch acting on the advice of ministers?
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
I'm an outsider on the other side of the Atlantic, but do British politicians openly admit that they (including The Bank of England) are intentionally raising interest rates to cause a recession? They're normally vocal about cutting interest rates and lowering taxes to stimulate the economy, but I never hear them mentioning raising taxes, cutting spending, and higher interest rates to slow down an economy growing too fast. It's the same cost-of-living and inflationary pressures in the US, UK, EU, Japan, South Korea, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand that's been made worse from the post-Covid supply-chain problems and now the Russia-Ukraine war.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@Deadassbruhfrfr We're in no position to judge them. Another superpower could say the same about the US South. There's a deadly opioid crisis, and many men are committing suicide out of despair.
You should let other people handle US foreign policy and use-of-force doctrines. A pre-emptive nuclear strike, anywhere, would not give you the outcome your expecting.
There's a reason why the US, Russia, China, UK, France, Israel, India, and Pakistan have never used the bomb. America doesn't have a monopoly over nucleartechnology like we did in 1945.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
I'm not supportive of any of Russia's archaic measures to combat drugs, but even with harm-reduction measures and full legalization, no country has ever won a war against opioid addiction. It's one of the few addictions that lasts for life and the user will knowingly risk death rather than going through withdrawals.
The US has access to Methadone, Suboxone, Kratom, pharmaceutical opioids, and Narcan (overdose reversal), and despite that, we still lost over 70,000 people to opioids (mostly fentanyl) in 2020 and 100,000 to overdoses from all drugs.
Countries like Russia and the Philippines are openly sacrificing a generation lost to opioid addiction in order to protect the youth from becoming addicts themselves. The US and Canada are not willing to admit they're doing the same. The addicts definitely need compassion and access to treatment, but pretending there's a magic bullet is disingenuous.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
Dimitra Arvanitidis If Oprah Winfrey ("OW"), or anyone else in Hollywood, needed career advice, I don't think you'd be on the top of their list of advisors.
OW is an entertainer and businesswoman; she has her own production company and worked with CBS, Harry, and Meghan to finance and market this interview. None of them are trying to change the world, reform the British Monarchy, or end racism in the US, UK, or anywhere in the English-speaking world.
Everyone involved with this interview has a business interest in this protect and are entitled to profit from it. We can debate about whether or not Harry and Meghan should have privately addressed their concerns with Buckingham Palace, but they're no longer receiving a salary or financial support from the British taxpayers; thus however they decide to market themselves and their new brand is a decision the couple can make without the duty of consulting the Crown and the British government.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
In federal courts, there are different definitions of the terms JUDGE and JUSTICE of the Supreme Court.
Title 28 is where you'll find the legal process and rules for district JUDGE, but most of the ethics rules aren't applicable to the JUSTICE of the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court should have its own rules for the JUSTICES. There are proposals to pass new legislation; e.g., "the Supreme Court Ethics Act." At the moment, the only remedies against a JUSTICE or CHIEF JUSTICE are prosecution, impeachment, removal, censure, or discipline by the state bar. For the most part, they are self regulated.
-----------
28 U.S.C. § 351 - Complaints; JUDGE defined
(d)Definitions.—In this chapter—
(1)the term “JUDGE” means a circuit judge, district judge, bankruptcy judge, or magistrate judge; and
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
He's a Cold Warrior, and so am I. The Chinese people in the Mainland, Taiwan, and Hong Kong have never be our enemies. It's the oldest country on earth and there's plenty we can learn from them. I've been to Japan and Australia, but I won't visit an area under the control of the CCP and the Xi Jinping dictatorship. It's not hate. I'm just not going to sit back and watch a global empire it took centuries and two world wars to build get replace by a country that isn't innovative, steals technology, and spies on the US.
If a competitor asserts itself as a new global superpower and a counterbalance to America's international hegemony and the US dollar, then that's tantamount to a declaration of war. In the perfect world, there would be peace and we could sing Kumbaya. That's not realistic and US politician seen as weak on China, Russia, North Korea, or Iran should be no wear near the White House.
A better challenge for you would be to gain a better understanding of US foreign policy and what happened to cause US-China, South Korea-China, Australia-China, Vietnam-China, Taiwan-Mainland China, Japan-China, India-China, Eu-China, Canada-China, and UK-China relations to drastically deteriorate over the past decade. Hint: It wasn't Chuck.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@kensmith174 That's not the way sanctions work. I know in your mind you're a expert on geopolitics, and the UN Secretary General, but you're not.
If you could put together a legitimate argument, I would believe that, but I'm more familiar with Russia and US extraterritorial sanctions work. If they had a choice, they'd choose airstrikes over economic warfare of the US, because being attacked would get them more support.
This is a game of chess to remove the US sanction (EU ones aren't nearly as serious). The sanctions which have nearly destroyed the country and destabilized the oligarchs and future GDP growth. You might think they can just go to China, but every country that does business with the US has to follow the sanction, so China has to decide between Russia and it's most important trading partner, The United States.
You have an interest POV, but it's got nothing to do with reality.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
He's very articulate, well prepared, and has a traditional British stance on foreign policy. Reaching out and developing a stronger relationship with the US president doesn't count as a change in foreign relations. Nearly all of the English-speaking countries are always on the same side.
The tougher negotiations are the ones where a PM must demonstrate strength and resolve against governments hostile to No. 10 and Britain's domestic and foreign policy. Improving relationships and the successful de-escalation of tensions with Beijing, Moscow, and even Glasgow and Brussels would be a better achievement than simply reaffirming the Special Relationship with Washington, DC.
As an American myself, I'm not suggesting that the relationship with the US isn't important. It's a stable, predictable, and mutually beneficial bilateral alliance that's not strained. Americans are even bigger Anglophiles than the UK. Showing strength with Putin, Xi, and other hostile adversaries is where the new PM's attention should be.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@jacobcastro1885 Full disclosure, I am employed by the US military-industrial complex and fully support a hawkish foreign policy to counter Russia, the CCP, Iran, and North Korea.
I didn't consider you a "simpleton." You just seem to have a strong opinion on US foreign involvement and are refusing facts that aren't in complete agreement with your worldview.
You're preoccupied with trying to relitigate old disputes, treaties, and legislation as if will change the situation in Ukraine.
You don't have to be pro-Nato or for Zelenskyy, but Ukraine is sovereign. Regardless of your views about America's foreign policy, Ukraine didn't start the war.
If you're that afraid of confronting Russia, you can sleep fine at night because Ukraine is the one fighting and winning against Russia.
If you want peace and are tired of thousands of young Russians dying for nothing, then go get the Russians leave Ukraine and go home. As long as they remain Ukraine, they're target practice for US-made weapons.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@kevinsamuelsghost685 A few observations and points
regarding your posts:
1. The same Israeli study is being repeated like propaganda. It's no different than when other pseudoscientist misinterpreted the CDC memo about complications from coronavirus-related deaths from people with other conditions;
2. You're not using science, and are cherry-picking anything topic or article you think reinforces your own beliefs and echochamber. What makes you qualified to correctly interpret the vaccine study from Israel? You haven't mentioned your credentials; and
3. If you had a valid concern about Covid-19 precautions, treatments, guidelines, and vaccinations, you'd use authorities who can actually change policy. You're just making the pandemic political. We're not managing the pandemic by committee, and no one is waiting on a consensus from people who aren't relevant and are definitely not experts; so
That why I said, I really don't know what to tell you because you don't seem like you have any intention of ever learning about the vaccines or using truth, data, and science. I'm not a propagandist; I just go with the more credible information, and it's coming from the people with medical degrees or PhDs.
4
-
4
-
@kevinsamuelsghost685 Once again, you're advocating for something neither you nor I are educated and trained in to be considered authorities. We don't send doctors to college, medical school, internship, and residencies to get advice online.
There's no time to discuss alternative medicine. If you don't want it, don't take it. What you don't have the right to do is try to undercut medical professional, slader pharmaceutical companies, or pretend your suggestions are just as valid as the CDC, FDA, and NIH.
This is public health during a pandemic. Over 70% of the adult population have already taken the vaccinations. There is still a stubborn minority of people online with a large platform, who want to be heard by any means necessary. The reason social media companies are censoring them is because the misinformation and pseudoscience is getting ridiculous.
This is the largest global economy, and we're trying to reopen and return to normal. That's why so many in the government, private sector, public personalities, employers, and medical community have lost patience. Covid-19 isn't a novel coronavirus anymore. The vast majority of hospitalizations and nearly all deaths are among the unvaccinated.
There's not even a debate anyone, so I'm not sure what you're trying to accomplish because it has nothing to do with science, medicine, economics, constitutional rights and liberties, or any credible arguments against the public health strategy. The only are people spreading confusion and trying to sabotage recovery.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@kevinsamuelsghost685 THIS IS WHAT YOU SOUND LIKE TO ME:
ybe 6th booster shot that will be coming soon have a good day sirf2s5 without spreading covid to them or anyone else and visa versa so I'll take my chances with a healthy immune system and a healthy lifestyle that I live but goodluck to you with the 4th, 5th, and maybe 6th booster shot that will be coming soon have a good day sirf2s5
dfdhave managed to stay covid free without the sh
dfdhave managed to stay covid free without the shot and without spreading covid to them or anyone else and visa versa so I'll take my chances with a healthy immune system and a healthy lifestyle that I live but goodluck to you with the 4th, 5th, and maybe 6th booster shot that will be coming soon have a good day siroon have a good day sirf2s5
dfdhave managed to stay covid free without the shot and without spreading covid to them or anyone else and visa versa so I'll take my chances with a healthy im
fdfdfdfdssd21f3sd5f
have managed to stay covid free without the shot and without spreading covid to them or anyone else and visa versa so I'll take my chanceshjgslfkjhsdkjfhkjdd4d54have managed to stay covid free without the shot and without spreading covid to them or anyone else and visa versa so I'll take my chances with a healthy immune system and a healthy lifestyle that I live but goodluck to you with the 4th, 5th, and maybe 6th booster shot that will be coming soon have a good day sirf2s5
dfdhave managed to stay covid free without the shot and without spreading covid to them or anyone else and visa versa so I'll take my chances with a healthy immune system and a healthy lifestyle that I live but goodluck to you with the 4th, 5th, and maybe 6th booster shot that will be coming soon have a good day sir
fdfdfdfdssd21f3sd5f
have managed to stay covid free without the shot and without spreading covid to them or anyone else and visa versa so I'll take my chances with a healthy immune system and a healthy lifestyle that I live but goodluck to you with the 4th, 5th, and maybe 6th booster shot that will be coming soon have a good day sir
sdf5sdf5s4df54sd
ff545ff
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
With the Monroe Doctrine, annexation of Hawaii and Polynesia Island, colonies in the Philippines, Panama, Cuba, and Puerto Rico, I'm genuinely curious why the US government never openly admitted being an empire. Right now, it would be properly considered a "mega-super-duper global empire," but I guess it wanted to distinguish itself from empires in European, the Middle East, and Asian.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@peterhobday Yes. That's exactly what I meant. The only connection to Brexit was the status of the EU regulations, treaties, and legal precedents in conflict with British Law.
I can't think of any former colony that completely abandoned English common law. To nerdy Anglophiles like myself, it's considered the "gold standard."
It's not the current Acts of Parliament that are binding in the US. It's the pre-1776 legal interpretations, judge-made laws, and constitutional law that existed before independence and are still binding; e.g., Magna Carta, Habeas Corpus, English Bill of Rights, due process, and the Petition of Right.
There's also a law that prohibits the US executive branch and President from entering the US House of Representatives and arresting Congressmen. That was from your history with Charles I.
With all the complaints about colonialism and against the British Empire, the best gift they've given the world, other than free-market economics, was English common law and Magna Carta.
The fact that English law is still used in courts around the world shouldn't be controversial, but the reference to Brexit makes people lose their minds.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@realityobservationalist7290 You definitely have a right to your position, but the US and NATO are looking out for their own self-interest. The Kremlin is also doing what it believes in Russia's interest. We've had differences and conflicting interests with Russia in Europe and with China in the Pacific since the 1940s. Nothing about the US response to the invasion should be surprising. Ukraine is a young democracy, and it decided to seek closer ties with the US and European Union.
They can see the economic progress in the Baltic States and the former Warsaw Pact countries that have joined the EU and NATO. Ukraine is a very pro-American country, and when this conflict is over, we will have a new market of 45 million Ukrainians to export and sell iPhones, Hollywood films, NATO weapons, Coca-Cola, McDonald's, Google Online Services, UPS, Boeing aircraft, computer chips, loans and financial services, and American-made vehicles. The US weapons and money come with strings attached, so American corporations will have priority access to Ukraine and Ukraine will side with the US over China. Ukraine's relationship with the US will probably be closer than Ukraine and European Union.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
In the US, the original intent could have been to develop a separate American identity and promote patriotism, but the myth that George III was an out-of-control tyrannical leader and directly ran government and colonial affairs is still taught in American schools.
With the positive and closer US-UK-Canada relations that improved after the War of 1812, you'd think a more accurate description of events would be encouraged.
On occasion and out of habit, I'll make the mistake of describing pre-1776 America as under tyranny, or claim that the US is the longest continuously functioning liberal democracy with limited government, and our divinely inspired Founding Fathers invented the constitutional right to a fair trial.
After graduating law school, I have much more respect for Magna Carte, English common law, Bill of Rights, judicial independence, and parliamentary supremacy.
Although the empire is not without fault, and there are plenty of former colonies that endured actual tyranny, the British legal system, economic doctrine, and their language have all arguably been the best gifts to the world and sets the gold standard.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@tctc440 Mueller said Trump "could" be indicted after leaving office. He's already named as an "unindicted co-conspirator" in the SD New York case. Behind the scenes, I'm sure Trump's legal team is fully cooperating, snitching, and negotiating with prosecutors.
The Teflon Don and tough-guy act he puts on is just to appeal to his base. That's why is so important to have an ethical non-political Att'y General, FBI, judiciary, and DOJ. He's similar to a Mafia Don, and oversaw a corrupt criminal enterprise and White House Administration.
They have plenty of crimes they could indict him for and publicly embarrass him with the "Manhattan Perp Walk," but they have to give the appearance of fairness and equal justice, and ensure there's no politically motivated prosecution of Trump and his associates.
He's not above the law, but he's also not below the constitution and has the right of due process, and protection from a vindictive prosecution.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@tweedy4sg I saw your very first sentence, and I've got to end our conversation. Yesterday was an off day, and I had time for, but not anymore because:
1. You claimed there's confusion about US Extraterritorial Sanctions with UN Sanctions. No way to confused those two US sanctions are a unilateral type of warfare that existed before there was a UN, or even a League of Nations. I don't if you're an American or English is your first language, but it's clear I only referred to US sanction. Both Russia and China are members of the Security Council, and would have to sanction themselves before UN Sanctions could be applied. That doesn't even make sense and you should know that; so
2. I'm going to assume you are intentionally changing the subject, and/or either spreading misinformation, and because I don't have the time go through and correct everyone of your lies, I've stopped reading, and have to end the discussion with you because it's intentional misinformation and propaganda. If you want a platform to lie, just go somewhere, but don't disguise it as a genuine geopolitical question.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Beijing is calling for restraint on both sides, unless you bring up their Uyghurs Concentration Camp, Tibet, Taiwan, Wuhan Virology, Vladivostok, South China Sea, East China Sea, anything related to Australia, Japan, and the US; or how China's population declined by over one million in twelve months. Then you mind your own damn business, Yanks! "Where Hunter's Laptop and all Hillary's missing emails from 2016?"
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
With the rapid economic rise and global confrontation with the CCP, the US should remain a close ally with Japan and other democracies in the Pacific and Southeast Asia.
If Japan is finally permitted to re-mobilize its military, the US can formalize its security pacts with Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, New Zealand, the UK, and the Philippines. Establishing a NATO-like arrangement will work as a deterrent to Mainland China, Russia, and North Korea.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Fortunately, neither Congress nor its committees can sit as a judge, grand jury, federal prosecutor, or a court of law. I appreciate their work, investigations, and recommendations to change the law and prevent another January 6th Insurrection, but we have a Department of Justice, judiciary, and a prosecutor in Fulton County, GA with grand jury investigations that can handle the criminal matters.
Just like Donald Trump and John Eastman aren't above the law; they're not below the constitution and need a fair and speedy trial to resolve the criminality. Next month, it will have been two year since the attack on the Capitol and since government documents were unlawfully removed from the White House. There have been too many delays and political announcements as distractions. Let Jack Smith quickly resolve the criminality regarding Donald Trump, so it doesn't drag on for years.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Pence and the other members of Trump's cabinet shouldn't be considered heroes because there was no reason to allow Trump to remain in office between January 6th and January 20th.
After January 6, 2021, the biggest threat to national security and constitutional government wasn't the CCP, Kremlin, Iran, North Korea, ISIL, or Cuba. It was the occupant in the Oval Office and his fascist brown shirts.
The question of whether or not Trump's actions were criminal, impeachable, and removable was a question only the House, Senate, Justice Department, and Judicial branch could determine.
Whether or not it met the requirements to invoke the 25th Amendment was for the Cabinet, White House Counsel, and the Vice President. It's my opinion, but I believe they set a terrible precedent. It was a national emergency and they were too cowardly to protect American democracy and the peaceful transfer of power.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@exitscreaming No. I'm far from "anti-cop," and do give them the benefit of a doubt as long as they follow the law themselves; are compliant with police procedures and ethics; and do not abuse the office.
1. If the officers were completely compliant with policy, the investigation into their conduct will conclude with no disciplinary action and this will be another learning opportunity for other officers;
2. I did add my own personal views about Gabby, but holding law enforcement to account is not "anti-cop bias." They're agents of state and people are going to question whether giving Brian a free hotel room and leaving Gabby alone and isolated, and scripted to tell Brian she loves him and will return, made her more likely to seek out Brian rather than trying to escape;
3. It's a difficult job and no one is expecting them to be clairvoyant, but when they're in uniform with the body camera running, receiving taxpayer funds in a government vehicle, and providing taxpayer-paid hotel rooms to deconflict domestic violence, then they are subjected to public accountability and oversight. They know this before they activate the body camera;
4. You mentioned the word "allege," and I don't know how you define "allege," but it's not really relevant. "Factual allegation" and "accusations" are two different things. I go back the legal definition, and it's called an "allegation of fact," "charge," or "claim";
5. I'm old enough to know why they passed The Violence Against Women Act of 1994, and it required additional training to be able to identify domestic violence because women, typically, are intimidated and refuse to tell officers they're being abused. I'm no expert either, but there clues about Gabby that I can't see but other females can. I would have thought the female Park Ranger would have made her more comfortable;
6. If they interacted with a security guard in a hotel, that would be a different story. Anytime there is a police interaction before a crime and murder, it's going to attraction attention of the public, politicians, media, and higher ranking law-enforcement officials; so
7. It may have seemed like the decision to show leniency to Gabby, as the aggressor, and not arrest her for domestic-violence charges was the best decision; but there will be people who can make the counterargument that had that happened, a more thorough investigation and interrogation could have revealed that she was in fact the actual victim.
Maybe giving an abuser a free night stay at a hotel, while leaving the victim isolated to sleep alone in a van, with no family, friends, or contacts in the state was the best decision. It still needs to be investigated to know whether policy or procedures should be changed.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
TeeBaggin' FULL TRANSPARENCY: I haven't read a single word you've posted. I only saw those cringe emojis, and immediately hit the YouTube Mute Feature, which I would like to advertise now.
______________
SANE YOUTUBE COMMENTERS: Are your notifications getting cluttered with nonsense from Russian-back trolls, CCP bots, communist, socialist, fascist, and other nutcases?
What if I told you that you could immediately put a stop to it by using the YouTube Mute Feature, and SpamBot Reporting.
Just go about your day free of distraction, without seeing all caps messages about DOCTOR FAUCI, BLACK LIVES MATTER, JANUARY 6TH WAS ANTIFA AND THE FBI, HUNTER BIDEN's LAPTOP, and other crap you never asked about.
Just mute it; report it; and let them finish the conversation with your online ghost.
[ End of ad… ]
________________
Now, finish your conversation and pretend I’m here reading every word of it, which I am (wink, wink)! Your other two fake troll accounts [ @Brad Frye @Colonel OfTruth ] are blocked and muted as well.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@davidvelasquez1489 Full Transparency: I haven't read a single word you've posted. I only saw those cringe emojis, and immediately hit the YouTube Mute Feature, which I would like to advertise now.
_________
Are your notification getting cluttered with nonsense from Russian-back trolls, CCP, communist, socialist, fascist, and other nutcases? What if I told you that you could put a stop to it by using the YouTube Mute Feature, and SpamBot Reporting.
Just go about your day free of distraction, without seeing ALL CAPS about DOCTOR FAUCI, BLACK LIVES MATTER, HUNTER BIDEN's LAPTOP, and other crap you never asked about.
Mute it; Report it, and let them finish the conversation with your online ghost.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
What's the GDP of Russia versus the US? I could have sworn YouTube, Google, Apple, The top universities, Hollywood, Wall Street, and all the hi-tech weaponry were American made and owned. The satellites and space technology was from mostly American billionaires and NASA; but in reality it's Russia, China, Cuba, and Venezuela, right?
I guess we'll go back to only pretending to be the strongest, richest, and most influential country on earth. We're probably still living in the past.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@tweedy4sg I'm not sure where you're going with the China topic, but the US wouldn't use sanctions or other forms of economic warfare if they didn't already know they work.
It might seem random and spontaneous, but they're designed by economist, lawyers, mathematicians, and financial experts. The entire world has known vulnerabilities of the Russian economy since the days of Tsar Nichols.
It might sound like a logical alternative to avoid US sanctions, but their GDP, employment rates, consumer spending data, and currency exchange rates don't lie. The threat of invading Ukraine while in talks to for sanctions relief, nuclear treaty, and ending NATO expansion wouldn't be
happening if they could easily bypass the sanction by going to China.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The different forms of government are completely difference. The CCP is a police state led by a dictator. The liberal democracies of West aren't perfect, but the institution of 24-hr surveillance, censorship, show trials, Zero-Covid, One-child policy, coronavirus pandemic cover ups, one-party rule, and the Uyghurs concentration camps could only occur in Mainland China, North Korea, and possibly Russia, but definitely not in the US, South Korea, Australia, Japan, New Zealand, the UK, and the European Union.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@iggy5347 The Indian Government is looking out for its own national interests and making rational business decisions and exploiting the market for inexpensive fuel.
India is still mostly non-aligned in this latest "Cold War," despite having a border dispute with the CCP, being opposed to the use of force in Ukraine, and the historically friendly relations with the liberal democracies in the West.
In the long run, the goal should be to incorporate India into the West and the global order. Eventually, it will re-evaluate its foreign policy and relations with the Beijing and Moscow.
Right now, Washington, DC, and the European Union have offered India no economic incentive, infrastructure investment, nor mutual-defense agreements that would create a NATO-like democratic alliance in the Indo-Pacific.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I know many lovers of American Democracy are terrified of the possibility of a second Trump term and a constitutional crisis of Trump attempting to pardoning himself of federal crimes and using the power of the U.S. Justice Department, FBI, and the government to target his political enemies, RINOs, "Never Trumpers," Democrat voters, Democrat-run cities ,like Chicago; i.e., a dog whistle for "the Blacks," mainstream media, Blue States, Kathy Griffin, and Rosie O'Donnell.
I'm not afraid of him being the Republican Party Nominee to run against President Biden. The far-Right media and Fox News drastically overstate the popularity of Trump, outside of the Republican Party. If he runs again, there will be a large voter turnout and another nationwide electoral defeat for the GOP and Trump's conviction in the criminal justice-system process will be costly enough for the GOP to end their experiment with running a neo-fascist candidate. The Republican Party has turned into a desperate cult led by conspiracy theorist, liars, and Christian White Nationalists believing that an amoral, atheist loves Jesus and conservatives values more than himself, Ivanka, and Vladimir Putin.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I get the point, but you're not making a serious argument or even using proper statistics. You're just posting random facts, NRA talking points, and want us to play your political game.
If you don't have facts, stats, or genuine point, what's the point of the gaslighting? Just say you don't ever want to discuss changes in gun-control regulations, and it end it there. The political runaround about mental health, school doors, and other distractions just show that you're not serious.
You want to practice the script you've memorized from conservative media. That's your way of coping, but gaslighting, disingenuous arguments, and inviting a conversation without being transparent about political motives is not being respectful of other people's time.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@user-wb1ew8sl5u Your message is probably the most civil and polite online message I've read in a decade. It's evident that you value respect and the opinion of others, like most decent people do.
I've watched this lecture so many times, and never noticed the questions asked by the first students. There was a question from a male and female in the audience asking whether a coordinate transformation could mimic tidal forces. Was the same question you were commenting about?
If so, that is a very good question. He didn’t spend enough time explaining his justification, but that’s not a question I, personally, would ask him. In a normal lecture setting, I would bring the question to a professor.
Dr. Susskind appears casual and open to taking questions; but he’s used to lecturing on narrow topics, getting prepared questions, and at the end of class a standing ovation.
I could have misinterpreted his body language, but I think he views the excessive questions as an indication that his teaching techniques are ineffective.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I'm not downplaying the role European colonialism had played in the fermentation of racial/ethnic tensions and civil war, but this type of barbarianism and violence was unapparelled in history. There are more factors at play, and the role of the Catholic Church and nonintervention from the international community definitely contributed, but it's hard to describe this as anything other than hate and pure evil.
There are cases of wartime genocide, man-made famines, terror, and ethnic cleansing that occurred in Europe, the USSR, Turkey, Middle East, Sudan, and Asia, with higher total death counts, but the Rwandan genocide was much more brutal and involved the indiscriminate butchering and stabbing from regular citizens.
Rather than imprisoning victims in labor camps and using mass murder, starvation, and complications of disease to exterminate a population, the Rwandan genocide took place over weeks. It's unthinkable that now many of the perpetrators and surviving victims share a community and interact with each other. I hope something like this never happens again.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Irina35mm You've explained that very well. "Absolute power corrupts absolutely," but there haven't been many failed liberal democracies to be a case study in recent history.
Although most of the US Constitution and the American system of government is modeled from English common law and the UK, the "Term Limits for Executives" and "Fixed Election Dates" became normalized in the modern era. It could have begun outside of America, but I'm not sure.
Using America as an example: We have two terms limit for the president. FDR, who's regularly ranked among the greatest presidents in history, was the only president to ever exceed the two-term limit.
FDR did have expanded powers as a wartime president, but because he remained in office so long, the independence of the judiciary, foreign policy, and other agencies subjected to Presidential Appointment could be questioned.
That's one example, but my point was mainly to agree with you.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I can help the man describe his own political ideology. This should have been on his teleporter to define TRUMPISM:
TRUMPISM is a far-right, authoritarian, ultranationalist political ideology and movement, characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy, subordination of individual interests for the perceived good of the nation and race, and strong regimentation of society and the economy. There's also a consistent pattern of supporting the policies and international agenda of Vladimir Putin rather than liberal democracies led by the United States and the EU.
TRUMPISM rose to prominence in early 21st-century American politics following the election and administration of the first Black-American president. The first TRUMP-LIKE political movement emerged in the European Union and the United Kingdom during migrant crisis related to Arab Spring and Civil Wars in the Middle East/North Africa, Brexit Vote, and following ISIS-inspired terrorist attacks across Europe and inside the United States, before spreading to other European countries, most notably Hungary, Poland, and parts of Eastern Europe.
TRUMPISM also had adherents outside of Europe, including of Brazil, Texas, and Florida. Opposed to anarchism, democracy, pluralism, liberalism, socialism, and Marxism, TRUMPISM is placed on the far-right wing within the traditional Left–Right spectrum.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@stevewilson4321 Being that I originally agreed with your original post, but you read it as a disagreement. I'm beginning to questions 1) whether English is your native language; or 2) whether graduate-level physics, including the Classical Newtonian Dynamics is a field you're competent in.
I agree about the accomplishments of Isaac Newton, and the incorrect argument that "Einstein was right, and Newton was wrong." Outside of that, you've taken the alternate extreme by disregarding the last century in physics. There's essentially only two fields: Classical Physics (General Relativity), and Quantum Physics.
Astronomy, astrophysics, Newton's Laws of Motion, Gallian Relativity, Special Relativity, Newton's Universal Law of Gravitation, Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Mechanics, and Maxwell's EM Field Theory, Cosmology, and even Hawking Radiation are considered part of "General Relativity." That's not a controversial statement. If you knew, you'd know General Relativity ("GR") includes all of classical theories. It doesn't matter if it's on the scale of planets or velocities close to "c." The only topics GR can't accurately model are Quantum Field Theory, quantum gravity, and quantum electrodynamics.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@xoamare8650 No one wants war, but China is hostile adversary. The only requirement should be open dialogue among the US, Moscow, and China regarding nuclear issues.
I understand most people opposed US imperialism, but the US security agreement require us to treat Japan, Australia, NZ, Philippines, and South Korea like part of the US. The Taiwan issue can be resolved by giving assurance of what the US will do if China attacks Taiwan (Which is officially part of China).
All the military, Intel, and economic tools of the US and our allies should be focused on containing China.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Despite being strongly opposed to the CCP and communist dictatorship, I don't think he should try to embarrass China on the world stage also. First and foremost, the CCP isn't a global military superpower and doesn't have now, or a desire to ever have, political, economical, military, and cultural hegemony over the European continent. That's only been done by the US, Soviet Union, and now the European Union.
China first and foremost priority is about international economics and countering US regional influence in the Pacific. Despite being a geopolitical competitor with the United States, the CCP isn't going to jeopardize access to North American, European, British, Japanese, and Australian markets to violate primary and secondary sanctions from the West.
Putin blundered by starting a war and global confrontation against the West. The CCP would be a fool to interfere and give the US justification to increase arms, security aid, and increase US military presence in Taiwan, South Korea, Australia, the Philippines, and Japan.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I'm not sure what you got against Europe, but the US has essentially turned most of Europe into a colony.
US defends the EU because it rebuilt most of West Europe after WWII. Now we have access to market of half a billion people to sell out iPhones, Coke, films, weapons, loans, Facebook, and semiconductors.
The US created the largest empire by mostly peaceful means. It doesn't make sense to abandon an empire that took centuries of hot wars, cold wars, coups, and intelligence operation to build.
2
-
2
-
2
-
@o_o825 That doesn't work. Have you read economic history? You might as well be advertising communism, too. Isolationism, the gold standard, and Marxism are all failed economic theories that can't work in the modern world. They all led to deaths of millions and global conflicts.
You're referencing foreign trade as a percentage of GDP. Cut foreign trade and it would impact future GDP growth. There would be a nightmare scenario because GDP is influenced by other variables and not just Cosumption, Investment, GovernmentSpending, and NetForeignTrade.
The US is home to the largest supply of gold and wealth. That would be gone, and the international conglomerates like Google that spread US media and culture around the globe would all to Europe and China.
Isolationism might seem appealing on paper but it's a terrible idea. There has to be an international systems of rules. After WWII, one of the causes was determined to be the great depression and restrictions on international trade.
The only thing worse would be to go back to the gold standard. All of those changes would send America back to the standard of living during Theodore Roosevelt.
If that actually worked, don't you think a single country would have tried it. The last example of a nation doing that for centuries was Japan, and they were forced militarily by the US to reopen because a lot weaker and could defend against an imperial power like the US.
If the US went into isolationism, it would cause a global depression and likely another world conflict. That percentage of GDP than you're referencing isn't the entire picture. The stock market would go into free fall and unemployment would spike.
It would be a depression in the US as well. The Fed or federal spending wouldn't rescue the economy. The housing crisis in the US was enough to cause a recession in Europe.
We tried isolationism, and all it caused was a worsening of the economic recessions and hyperinflation and it enabled the rise fascism.
2
-
It's good to hear from an actual Russian, but there is not going to be a direct war between the US and Russia. I'm sure you realize that.
You also know Ukraine is not currently in NATO, and Ukraine is not trying to invade Russia; so why would Russia and Belarus invade Ukraine and fight in the street and have a bloodbath killing other Slavs? As soon as Ukraine is invaded, you're going to realize pretty quick that there are no US or NATO troops there.
This is another stage in the proxy conflict between Washington, DC, and Moscow. Even though they'll never admit it. The US and EU sanctions have damaged the Russian economy, access to loans, and personal wealth of the oligarchs, and this is a game of chess to pressure the White House to (1) relieve economic sanction and economic warfare; (2) rejoin/renegotiate the US-Russia treaty on mid-range missiles in Europe; (3) stop NATO's (and EU) western expansion to Georgia and Ukraine by creating a buffer zone; (4) restore the Ukrainian-based water supply cut off from Crimea after the annexation and continue the status quo in Donbass Russian-speaking Ukraine; and (5) reduce US troops levels and NATO wargames exercises in the Baltic States, Poland, and Black Sea.
There won't be a direct conflict because neither side would gain much. The US and EU are in a stronger economic position, and because of the proximity to Russia, the Kremlin is in a stronger military position. The problem is that you're holding a smaller Slavic nation hostage.
They never attacked Russia or posed a military threat. They tried to enter into a trade agreement with the EU and began NATO membership process. If Russia doesn't want a US military base that close to the border, there are ways of getting it done without war. They have more influence in Kiev than Washington, DC ever had.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@1.21Gigawatts_ You're fighting with Russian bots who don't know how economics, or why sanctions from the US are different and how the world has to follow them. The Russian assets of oligarchs and the Russian Central Bank have partially been seized. The US banned imports of Russian gas and is in the process of ending trade with Russia, so I'm not sure how they're expecting to recover the loss.
It might seem unfair, but after WWII the US and West Europe made the dollar the world's reserve currency for this very reason. It doesn't matter what tricks Putin or the CCP uses. The sanctions will still work. If they weren't effective, they wouldn't have been imposed. The sanctions were designed as economic warfare to prevent a direct military conflict with nuclear powers and collapse the Russian economy, and that's exactly what has happened.
You shouldn't have to try and make an argument because the Russian GDP and exchange rate against the dollar speak for themselves. The US is the only country that can unilaterally impose sanctions and trade embargos to collapse another country's domestic economy and international trade.
Whether or not Russia, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, Syria, or Venezuela have a significant amount of trade with the US isn't relevant. The reason US sanctions are different from even EU and UN sanctions is that the other nations are forced to either trade with the US and follow US sanctions, or do business with Russia. That's a not difficult choice for most countries, and even China would choose to trade with the US and have access to the world's largest economy.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@LeeEisenstein My opinion on drugs is that addiction is a treatable disease and not a crime. Also, there are short-term benefits of allowing an addict to have the drug their body is craving. If they're under medical supervision, I don't see how harsh drug enforcement is beneficial to anyone.
The reason I mentioned opioids in particular is because access to the drugs was expanded several times over the last century in the US and Canada, and remained unchanged in the rest of the developed world. There's evidence that expanded access was more harmful to public health, productivity, and society as a whole.
If there were enough data points showing that complete drug decriminalization would prevent deaths/overdose from illicitly manufactured drug, and show evidence of lower substance abuse and improved mental health, then it would make sense to legalize them.
There seem to be more interest in expanded access to marijuana from people who enjoy it recrationally. That's the drug of choice for some people, but not
everyone. if you're needing it everyday, then that sounds a lot like addiction and dependence. The people addicted to harder drugs, need their too.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The only thing you should expect from a career politician is that they focus on getting re-elected and serve the people who put them in power and the special interest that keeps them in power. You might not like grandpa Biden, McConnel, and other DC-insiders, but political experience matters to people and businesses that value effective government. Claiming all politicians are corrupt is just a cliché and a meaningless rant.
This video was about immigration enforcement under Obama, so I'm not sure where the hell you got the ten trillion dollar figure, but that was/is a priority for you only. That's if it even existed. Unless you have a contract with a politician, President Biden, Bush, Obama, and Senator McConnel wouldn't know anything about that either; or even care about it. I know I don't care.
You're free to rant and show faux outrage at "all politicians," as if you represent the majority of voter base, but this is a country of 340 million people, and you get only get a single vote. I don't know how you became entitled enough to you to believe that a president and the senate seek to please a single person. If you don't like a politician, then don't vote for them. There are plenty of people that will gladly replace your vote.
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Jamesgates355 It's called getting an education. You should get one. That's why that long laundry list of lies you posted went in one ear and out the other. When you stop lying and fighting with the TV, maybe you could be taken seriously. I know you probably thought you could win someone over, but I don't have a clue what you're talking about because it's all made up and fake.
You come off as crazy, uneducated, and nutz. You searched the comments to find one post that triggered you, and rather than trying to explain in English, you start doing the Trumpian/Russian bot swarm of nonsense and re-litigating stuff with Hunter Biden. This is 2022 and you're living in the past, and are trying to be heard but you sound crazy. The reason you get ignored is that you're making up stuff. That's still lying. Why would I want to sit and read nothing but lies? Why would the media just sit and report made-up BS that no one believes?
The lies you're repeating are meant for uneducated people who don't know any better. The MSM would get sued if they report these ridiculous lies from Trump and his voters. You can't even tell when it's a lie anymore. Being that you and your side of politics lie about everything including the elections, let someone more credible and sane make the argument. You're a little too crazy to make a case against the US media.
It's sad that Trump decided to weaponize the poorly educated, but I can't hold that against the media. I wish I could relate, but you don't believe in truth and you think the more ties you repeat the same lie the more credible it becomes. I'm going to pick Team TV on this debate. It sounds like you need psych help, and figure out how the media coverage of Donald Trump affects your life personally. Do you think I care about how FoxNews covers liberals? No. I'm not a fascist and for some reason, the media, elites, and the educated are always the first targets. That's because you don't believe in the truth. You spend the better part of an hour repeating the same made-up lies. Lying is wrong and disrespectful. If you are gullible enough to believe a compulsive liar, that's your right; but don't link that silly BS with me.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
It's just matter of semantics. The US follows common law, a form of parliamentary supremacy, and constitutional rights that all originated in England.
The rights to fair trials, free speech, ownership of guns, private property, rule of law, and democratic government were originally between English Kings and British subjects.
We have a codified constitution that went into effect in 1789, but just like our language, it was "Made in England."
The Queen would be the symbolic, and living, equivalent of the US Constitution. Her role is to not be a tyrant, act on the advice of ministers, and uphold the agreement between the King and his subjects.
It could seem like a "rubber stamp," but the Queen in her official capacity is required to legally administer government and pass legislation.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@reserva120 That's linked to Russia and Eastern Slavic countries, and it predated the Soviet Union, Marxism, and communism. It's been a stereotype since Ivan the Terrible and Catherine the Great.
The 20th-Century genocides you're talking about are the purges, holodomor, man-made famines, gulags, "No Step Back Directive," and Kaytn massacre that happened mostly at the direction of Stalin. Yes. Stalin killed thousands of Poles after invading with Hitler, who killed 6,000,000 Poles.
The indiscriminate killing, scorched-Earth policy, and war crimes are the stereotypes I'm talking about. The same claim has been made against Yeltsin and Putin in Ukraine, Georgia, Syria, and Chechen. It's more to do with Russophobia that Russian themselves have contributed to spreading.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
That's sort of true. COVID-19 is a highly contagious respiratory virus that quickly progresses to ARDS, and death. It kills faster than HIV/AIDS, but it's "curable" and can be vaccinated against. It might not seem like it, but the world was somewhat prepared for Covid-19 because it's a coronavirus, and most of the world remembers the Spanish Flu.
HIV/AIDS is retrovirus that can never be cured and arguably the worst disease ever, not just because of the 35~40Million who have already died of Aids, but because of the stigma, discrimination, politics, and lack of drug therapies and medical resources. During the 80s, people were so afraid they assumed it was as contagious as Covid-19. The drugs that stop viral replication took over a decade to develop, but it was too late because it was already on the blood supply and people were carrying it without even knowing.
The end-stage of untreated HIV infection, like it was before 1996, was terrifying and 100% fatal. They didn't even know what caused it in the 1980s, and since it took up to ten years to see symptoms, they didn't know whether they would live or die.
Dying of coronavirus on a ventilator is terrible, but AIDS victims died from pneumonia, cancer, dementia, tuberculosis, wasting syndrome, the were blind and deaf, stokes, heart attacks, and even the survivors were permanently disfigured and some stayed in progressive vegetative states.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Take a moment to think how extraordinary the events on January 6, 2021, would have been with any other US president, a governor, or even a city mayor. The stable leadership from Mike Pence after the Capitol Breach, and until the Inauguration Day met the bare minimum for anyone in public office. It wasn't heroic. During that time, America needed a "patriotic hero."
Pence may have personally been insulted for what happened and the threats against him and his family, but the attack was on America itself and the symbol of democratic government. Pence had the authority to convene the cabinet to invoke the 25th Amendment. Congress could have immediately expedited the impeachment trial to completely remove Trump and bar him from seeking re-election.
There was no reason to allow Trump to remain in the White House from January 7, 2021, until the Biden Inauguration and peaceful transition, which Trump didn't even participate in. Mike Pence was effectively the "acting president," while Trump was busy handing out pardons and ordering last minute withdrawals of US forces overseas.
There may be people still be some people interested in another miracle that will allow Trump to become president again. I've got nothing against them because they can vote how they please. If some reason that actually happens and Trump is re-elected, it's because Pence, GOP senators, and Merrick Garland allowed Trump to be above the law.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Today it would be considered an international war crime and targeted toward mostly civilians. We have a better understanding of radiation sickness, cancer, and environmental contamination that was unknown prior to the 1950s.
If the WWII roles and victories were reversed, resulting in a Japanese victory over the Allies (in spite of the nuclear weapons), there should be a case proving that atomic weapons were outlawed. In 1945, the closest treaty, convention, or analogous agreement would be the ban on chemical weapons. In WWI, chemical weapons were developed and then outlawed.
In conclusion, if the atomic bombs were determined to be "prohibited chemical weapons," then Hiroshima could have been a war crime. In spite of that, it would have been difficult locating an impartial tribunal because Japan had its own biological and chemical weapons labs. When Japan left the League of Nations, it showed complete disregard for international law.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The world's press overthink the meaning of US-UK Special Relationship. Both countries might be the closest international partners that are formally two distinct nations, but the Special Relationship is more applicable when dealing with foreign policy and national security.
An example would have been the conflict-of-interest with the US serving as an impartial arbitrator between the Argentina and the UK dispute, which eventually led the Falklands War. Leopoldo Galtieri, the president of Argentina, unwisely sought US help under the Monroe Doctrine in dealing with Thatcher's government. If a foreign power attempts to use Washington, DC, against London, it's a futile effort because both countries share military, diplomatic, intelligence, and even private business interest. When you tell one country, you're essentially telling it to both countries.
Another similar example occurred during WWII, when Charles de Gaulle tried to bypass Winston Churchill and get recognized President Roosevelt to recognize him as "leader of the Free French in exile."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Dominion of New England CountryBall Five Eyes ("5I") is the signal intelligence cooperative with US, UK, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. It began as a treaty between the US and British Empire. Kicking Australia out of 5I would harm the US access to eavesdropping conducted in Australian by the NSA.
5I is dominated by US intelligence agencies, and is separate from NATO, the Anglo-American Sphere, and US defense commitment to Australia, New Zealand, Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, and the Philippines.
The US current superpower competition with China is dependent on access to military bases and internation trade with its Pacific allies.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Gizawar Does Libya and the Arab Spring sound familiar? Where are you from because you're either very young or very uneducated on recent history? If someone showed up from a country that's not eligible for asylum, they get deported. There's already a process for that.
I think you're trying to make an anti-migrant position, but you're not able to articulate it correctly. What you're trying to do is make the claim that Europe is being overwhelmed by migrants from a different culture and religion; and that Slavs from Russia, Ukraine, and Eastern Europe can assimilate better than people from other continents and religions.
Based on the demographics, Europe could possible become majority non-White and Islamic; and that is something worth preserving. If you took that position, I could respect that. I wouldn't want Europe to be overwhelmed either. It saves so much more time by being honest and not doing this nonsense about not being xenophobic.
Rather than just being honest, you take this Right-wing tactic of re-inventing history and spreading misinformation and using euphemisms. You have the right to an opinion and a perfectly legitimate position (Keeping Europe White and Christian), but not your own facts.
When you claim Europe being overrun by economic migrants and not refugees, that's BS and we waste time going back and forth because you're too PC to just say your true intentions.
You probably see all those young men coming and think they are going to take all of the European women. If that's the problem, just get Europe to stop accepting men separated from their families. That's still quicker to resolve than trying to change the legal definition of "refugee."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
trump daddy Based on your username alone, I take it that you're elderly, overweight, unattractive, uneducated, racist, unvaccinated, and bitter.
You're constantly being blocked and bullied because there's nothing of use you can offer. Neither you nor the other Maga cult members are relevant to geopolitics, so all you can do is troll.
I'm sure that's what's bothering you, and the fact that if you live another decade, you'll become a minority and see even more of the women in your family marring outside their race.
The reason you support Russia is weird because I don't think you can even find Russia on a globe. The Russians are strictly opposed to homosexuality and chester the molesters.
With you being required to register as an offender here, they're not going to welcome you like the other Maga predators accept you here. Stop touching children and pay for an adult man.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TheIndependentLens You're the one calling a left-of-center party the same as a fascist, far-right, ultranationalist party run by a totalitarian megalomaniac.
FDR, Churchill, Eisenhower, and Truman were all supporters of liberal democracy and hated Bolshevik-styled communism, but they weren't fascist.
If you want to use hyperbole to insult Democrats and liberals, you're supposed to conflate them with far left groups or globalism, e.g., communist, anarchist, or ANTIFA.
That's a common mistake because you (1) don't know what fascism is; (2) think National Socialist German Workers Party ("Nazi" ) makes them politically liberal; or (3) you do understand Nazi ideology but are hoping other don't, so that you can go unchallenged by spreading misinformation.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@markrcca5329 We don't dictate to them. They are our closet allies, but dealing with Russia always involves the US. Russia would not have annexed Crimea, invaded East Ukraine, Georgia, or intervened in Syria without fear of US and NATO military support.
The message from the Kremlin is to the White House. The EU and Germany are very importantly, and influential, but the US is still the traditional "Leader of the Free World."
Just like in the Middle East, where the US allows Israel and Saudi Arabia to influence its foreign policy, in Europe, all of the NATO countries use US military, economic, and diplomatic power to unite and confront Russia.
1
-
@markrcca5329 The problem with the EU sanctions are the fact that US sanction trump (no pun) EU sanctions. That's why the Iran Nuclear Deal collapsed after the US withdrew from the agreement.
If the EU were a single political entity with a strong central government, economy, and foreign policy, then it would be very power and considered a superpower.
It is still dominated by Germany, and since WWII, Nato military power has been in place to keep the US in Europe; keep Russia out of West Europe; and stop Germany from rearming and becoming another empire.
It's complicated, but the US still leads diplomatic and military affairs of the European Union, and the status quo has been supported since the Soviet Union collapse.
When Russia became independent from the Soviet Union, they supported the US remaining in Europe. The US and Russia both brokered the nuclear security agreement, which required Ukraine to surrender their Soviet-nukes back to Russia, under the condition that the US and Russia secure its borders.
That's just one of the many concerns, but the US isn't just a symbolic leader. It's a modern version of the British Empire, and it's nearly impossible to trade with the world if you have US sanctions. If the US puts an embargo or sanctions on a country, every country that does business with the US has to honor the sanctions.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
We should send Donald Trump and Dennis Rodman to meet with Kim Jong Un since they're the only Americans who seem to understand him and his passive-aggressive style of getting international attention.
Biden may appear like an elderly and loveable Santa Claus, but he has the same hawkish and imperialist US foreign policy that will not be interested in ending the joint military drills or removing sanctions. Why would he need to kiss the butt of an anti-American hermit kingdom that's much weaker, militarily and economically, than South Korea?
The US isn't in the region to promote peace and international cooperation as a philanthropic organization. It's been there expanding markets and protecting its business interest, international trade, and the mutual-security agreements with South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, Australia, and New Zealand.
That doesn't even include the administration of US territories in the Pacific; and continuing the Cold War doctrine of containing Russia, Mainland China, and the spread of communism, as a threat to US corporations.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Rather than trying to prematurely confront a US-led military alliance in the Pacific, which would definitely result a humiliating defeat for Beijing and cause Taiwanese independence, they should just maintain the status quo.
Mainland China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong were historically united as "One China," and separated by partially by American, European, and Japanese colonialism and political interference. Despite the very legitimate claims, the CCP has adopted a policy of regional hegemony, hostility, and forced re-unification.
There wouldn't be a massive American military presence in the region wasn't rushing a military and economic confrontation with the West. Peace and prosperity should be the goal for the region, but China's regional hostility and unrecognized claims to most of the South China Sea and East China Sea will result in a NATO-like military alliance with the ability to cut off China from international trade.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Let Barr handle himself. He didn't go along with the fascist coup because obviously anyone with a law degree knew how that would turn out if he cooperated, but at least Trump is out of power for now.
He can spend his time rewriting history, pressuring GOP politicians to accept the "Big Lie," and raising funds to pay his hundreds of millions of dollars in legal expenses, but when he shows proof he has a longer than five-year life expectancy, being an obese senior citizen with corona-ravaged lungs and a heart working overtime to keep those amphetamines effective, then I consider his return to power and restoration of his Fourth Reich an imminent threat.
Maybe Ivanka might eventually hypnotize the Democratic Party and run, but her dad is old, insane, and tired. He's only a threat to himself, but he's still too toxic to retake the wing states he won in 2016. If he becomes a serious candidate, then the DOJ should not be so ethical, and just indict him for Mueller probe obstruction or the Stormy Daniels hush money.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I'm definitely a layman, and more of a professional passenger. It's rare to here criticism from American pilots (country not the airline) who fly or have flown the Boeing 737 Max. I thought it was maybe the iconic brand, pilot's preference for Boeing, or the sense of patriotism; but most of the comments from pilots are hostile to remarks that implicate all Boeing planes and not just the 737 Max.
It says a lot about the amount of influence, political power, and brand loyalty of the The Boeing Company, the international aviation market and over state and federal governments in the US. The head of the FAA even made a point to fly the plane himself before returning it to service. I even find myself subconsciously defending the company even though I hold no significant financial interest.
I can only image the political influence it has in Washington, DC, over the FAA, NTSB, USDOT, Congress, and the White House since it's a major employer and international symbol of American engineering and innovation. The main objective should be the safety of the planes, but it's in the US foreign and economic interests to insure The Boeing Company recovers and doesn't jeopardize US dominance in the civilian-aerospace manufacturing; and the market for research, developing, and manufacturing military aircraft and weapons systems.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Jenacide "Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Jenacide Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@RighteousRage Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@gluesniffer9073 Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@TheUMIA Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@billymadison8036 Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@mahaffer71 Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@gluesniffer9073 Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@Jenacide Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@billymadison8036 Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@TheUMIA Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@Jenacide Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@RighteousRage Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@Jenacide Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@mahaffer71 Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@billymadison8036 Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@gluesniffer9073 Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@billymadison8036 Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@billymadison8036 Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll give it to you as far as being creative and entertaining. Bravo
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@gluesniffer9073 Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll give it to you as far as being creative and entertaining. Bravo
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@billymadison8036 Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll give it to you as far as being creative and entertaining. Bravo
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll give it to you as far as being creative and entertaining. Bravo
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
Ems Life Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll give it to you as far as being creative and entertaining. Bravo
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@Jenacide Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll give it to you as far as being creative and entertaining. Bravo
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@mahaffer71 Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll give it to you as far as being creative and entertaining. Bravo
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@billymadison8036 Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll give it to you as far as being creative and entertaining. Bravo
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@billymadison8036 Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll give it to you as far as being creative and entertaining. Bravo
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@Jenacide Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll give it to you as far as being creative and entertaining. Bravo
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@TheUMIA Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll give it to you as far as being creative and entertaining. Bravo
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@Jenacide Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll give it to you as far as being creative and entertaining. Bravo
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@mahaffer71 Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll give it to you as far as being creative and entertaining. Bravo
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@gluesniffer9073 Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll give it to you as far as being creative and entertaining. Bravo
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@billymadison8036 Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll give it to you as far as being creative and entertaining. Bravo
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@billymadison8036 Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll give it to you as far as being creative and entertaining. Bravo
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@billymadison8036 Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll give it to you as far as being creative and entertaining. Bravo
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@Jenacide Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll give it to you as far as being creative and entertaining. Bravo
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@gluesniffer9073 Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll give it to you as far as being creative and entertaining. Bravo
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@RighteousRage Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll give it to you as far as being creative and entertaining. Bravo
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@Jenacide Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll give it to you as far as being creative and entertaining. Bravo
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@RighteousRage Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll give it to you as far as being creative and entertaining. Bravo
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@Jenacide Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll give it to you as far as being creative and entertaining. Bravo
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@Jenacide Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll give it to you as far as being creative and entertaining. Bravo
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@Jenacide Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll give it to you as far as being creative and entertaining. Bravo
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@TheUMIA Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll give it to you as far as being creative and entertaining. Bravo
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@gluesniffer9073 Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll give it to you as far as being creative and entertaining. Bravo
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
Ems Life Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll give it to you as far as being creative and entertaining. Bravo
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@billymadison8036 Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll give it to you as far as being creative and entertaining. Bravo
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@billymadison8036 Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll give it to you as far as being creative and entertaining. Bravo
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@billymadison8036 Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll give it to you as far as being creative and entertaining. Bravo
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@mahaffer71 Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll give it to you as far as being creative and entertaining. Bravo
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll give it to you as far as being creative and entertaining. Bravo
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@mahaffer71 Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll give it to you as far as being creative and entertaining. Bravo
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@billymadison8036 Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll give it to you as far as being creative and entertaining. Bravo
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll give it to you as far as being creative and entertaining. Bravo
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@billymadison8036 Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll give it to you as far as being creative and entertaining. Bravo
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@j m <- is a Russian Bot
Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll give it to you as far as being creative and entertaining. Bravo
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@mahaffer71 <- is a Russian Bot
Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll give it to you as far as being creative and entertaining. Bravo
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@mahaffer71 <- is a Russian Bot
Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll give it to you as far as being creative and entertaining. Bravo
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@gluesniffer9073 <- is a Russian Bot
Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll give it to you as far as being creative and entertaining. Bravo
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@Jenacide <- is a Russian Bot
Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll give it to you as far as being creative and entertaining. Bravo
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@RighteousRage <- is a Russian Bot
Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll give it to you as far as being creative and entertaining. Bravo
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
@RighteousRage <- is a Russian Bot
Want To Know How To Defeat A Swarm Of Russian Bots, covidiots, flutards, anti-vax, and flards, and MAGA fascist?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'll give it to you as far as being creative and entertaining. Bravo
Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂"Just because the "REPLY" button exists, doesn't mean it's mandatory. We don't even speak the same language, and I'd prefer to only interact with the sane."
Aka I prefer to hide in my safe little bubble where no one will challenge me 😂
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It's never safe to ask a far-Reich conspiracy theorist about specifics, or get them to go into details about blanket terms and dog whistles like "they," and their definition of "woke." That'll inevitably lead the interview to become a dark anti-Semitic, anti-globalist, pro-Russian, and White nationalist rant.
It doesn't matter what the topic is, if you find flaws in their logic and reason, they'll consistently return to their default distraction of what about the Blacks, Mexicans, and Jews. It's easier for them to try and be offensive, play victims, and remind you of why they're called, "deplorables," than it is to make a compelling argument to support Trump.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@chrismanuel9768 Definition of TYRANNY: "A government in which a single ruler is vested with absolute power; e.g., People liberated from a brutal tyranny."
That could apply to Putin's Russia, the CCP, and Britain's autocratic colonialism in Hong Kong, Indian Subcontinent, China, and Africa.
Calling George III or any other constitutional monarchy a form a dictatorship, tyranny, or autocracy is a sign that you're not familiar with how parliamentary supremacy works.
You can't trace an tyrannical abuse of power back to the a constitutional monarch because the decisions were made in Parliament, by British East Indian Company, or on the advice of government ministers.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Madminute1968 That just shows your concerns are related to politics, and are not real issues concerning the public. When you make accusations against public figures, you're not going to be taken seriously.
Dr. Fauci isn't a politician. He isn't invincible either. The reason he's still in office is because the people making claims against him, including the ex-president and KY-Senator, have no credibility.
When you spend years lying, crying wolf, and blaming everything on conspiracy theories, deep-state actors, and fake news, people will stop listening.
If someone who doesn't have a history of lying makes a real claim against Dr. Fauci, I'd listen, but no one believable or serious has come forward. Being bitter about losing an election is not evidence of public corruption.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jasonhochman3750 A few things to note:
1. COVID-19 HOSPITALIZATIONS AND RECOVERY: That's good news that most people recover. Most people recovered during Spanish Flu and Ebola as well. Today, we can treat HIV/AIDS with medications, but you still wouldn't want it spreading uncontrollably. The government and public health officials are trying to a) prevent the entire healthcare system from collapsing; and b) prevent another shutdown that would harm businesses and economic growth;
2. INFLATION AND CONSUMER PRICES: When there are budget deficits, it isn't the same as "printing money." The Fed does that, neither the president nor congress directly control the money supply. The 2020 global recession and halt in international trade was a man-made recession due to lockdowns. Now the economy is growing faster than it has in recent history, we see inflation in food prices and energy cost.
3. MONETARY POLICY AND MONEY SUPPLY: If inflation were actually a threat to US economic growth and the stability of the dollar, Jerome Powell and the Fed could raise interest rates; cause another recession; and slow the increase in consumer prices; and finally
4. POLITICAL HYPOCRISY: The reason the Right seems to conveniently care about Fiscal Policy is because they don't have control of the White House. There was no concern about budget deficits, when the GOP and Trump cut corporate income taxes during a economic growth in 2017. During the 2020 lockdowns, the Right wanted the economy reopened, so business could go back creating jobs. That's happening, so this is what you wanted.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jasonhochman3750
3. "I get that. BUT, do you remember 2 weeks to flatten the curve? That was a healthcare/economic measure, to allow the healthcare system to prepare for an increase in patients. The curve was flattened. But what did the health care system do? they fed their rich, over stuffed executives with even more money, but didn't bother to expand capacity. Hospital ICUs are always nearly full. They don't build an ICU to wait for a natural disaster or epidemic. They fill them right away. And the hospitals didn't change the model for COVID. Also, notice how the goal posts move farther away all the time. From two weeks to flatten the curve, now, who knows what is the end game? You aint gonna eradicate COVID entirely. Now, where are we heading?"
4. "this pandemic is caused by the Marc Booms of the world, and other rich health care executives. I stand with Maxine Waters and Bernie Sanders. We should nationalize the hospitals. Maxine Waters should once again call on BLM to loot and burn the rich hospital executives."
These were remarks from you, and honestly, I don't have no clue what you're talking about here; and since I don't make the Covid-19 guidelines, this is not something I could answer if I wanted, too.
Those are questions of politics and have nothing to do with medical science, public policy, and the epidemic.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@tweedy4sg That's a much butter response. I was expecting someone to say Russia doesn't do much business with US, but the EU isn't America's poodle.
The US is there protecting mostly European, and some US business interest. We've been there since the Normandy invasion, and the EU is in a lot stronger position with the US leading the effort than Russia using threats of force, or cutting gas supplies to the EU. They have the choice of cutting of the gas, but the EU is the second largest economy in the world. The US LNG industry would love to have access to Gazprom's European market share.
There's a lot of focus on China becoming a superpower and becoming the biggest challenge to US hegemony. They're definitely an economic power, but humble Germany, which dominates the EU, gets overlooked. It might be their intent, but outside of the UK, Germany is probably the only European nation that could apply pressure and stop US-led NATO actions, intel operations, and economic warfare against Russia.
That's one of the main reasons I don't call the EU or Ukraine, "America's poodle." They have more interest in this than the US, and they intervened on US sanctions on Russia when it interferes with their business interests.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@kensmith174 FULL TRANSPARENCY: I haven't read a single word you've posted. I only saw those cringe emojis, and immediately hit the YouTube Mute Feature, which I would like to advertise now.
______________
SANE YOUTUBE COMMENTERS: Are your notifications getting cluttered with nonsense from Russian-back trolls, CCP bots, communist, socialist, fascist, and other nutcases?
What if I told you that you could immediately put a stop to it by using the YouTube Mute Feature, and SpamBot Reporting.
Just go about your day free of distraction, without seeing all caps messages about DOCTOR FAUCI, BLACK LIVES MATTER, JANUARY 6TH WAS ANTIFA AND THE FBI, HUNTER BIDEN's LAPTOP, and other crap you never asked about.
Just mute it; report it; and let them finish the conversation with your online ghost.
[ End of ad… ]
________________
[ @Ken Smith ] Now, finish your conversation and pretend I’m here reading every word of it, which I am (wink, wink)!
1
-
1
-
1
-
Look at your post, and see how casually you make claims about Germany and the EU without providing any facts. If Russia is able to survive, then the markets will speak for themselves. I'm not sure if you've taken economics, but if you learned, you could make your arguments more credible.
Russia is much poorer than Europe and couldn't compete economically, so its strength is to pivot to developing countries that won't hold them accountable. Russia's future will depend entirely on its relationship with China, which had already become the dominant partner in the relationship.
There's no point in pretending Russia is still a superpower, and it's clear they don't care about democracy and international law. It's better that they have relationships with China, India, Pakistan, Africa, and South America. The first-world countries aren't going to tolerate corrupt and dangerous regime.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@cussword3725 After the November Election, Trump was enemies with FOXNEWS, Washington Post, New York Times, Wall St Journal, ABC News, MSNBC, CBS, CNBC, CNN, Meet the Press, Voice of America, National Public Radio, Facebook, Twitter, Google Search, Saturday Night Live, and CNN.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rafalszych They can't pass a new federal law or nationwide restrictions on access to ammunition and guns without a new law from Congress. The Republican Party is financed and controlled by a powerful gun-rights lobby called the National Rifle Association ("NRA").
The majority of the country would support new gun regulations, background checks, and to restrict a popular type of semi-automatic weapon that nearly all American mass shooters use, but because of our political situation in Washington, DC, there aren't enough votes in Congress.
The President and the individual states can make new restrictions, but anytime there a new mass shooting the NRA and Republicans go on a media misinformation campaign to claim that the government will try to seize all weapons from legal gunowners.
It may or may not be the intended consequence, but every time there's a new mass shooting in the US, gun sales increase and the NRA funds campaigns to make weapons easier to purchase, while at the same time it uses distraction and delaying tactics; e.g., they'll claim that the problem isn't the guns, and propose that America's real problem is related to mental health and not enough armed-guards at schools.
This has been happening for decades now, so it easy for people to get exhausted and stop talking about guns because NRA and Republicans refuse to even consider having a debate on gun control. They also have no serious plan on targeting mental health. It's just a tactic to make people not want to debate about gun regulations.
There was law passed in the early 1990s that banned assault weapons that are similar to what the military and mass shooter use, but the law expired in 2002; and since then the mass shooting have only gotten worse.
It could be the history of the country, but there are large portion of the population who are genuinely fearful of violent crime, especially the ones who feel uncomfortable and unsafe around Black and Brown men. I'm not exaggerating, but the country has a history of racism.
The only time the modern NRA and Republican Party are for new gun restrictions are when they mostly apply to minorities and immigrant gang members. IMO, it's more about fear and needing protection against scary Black and Brown men than constitutional to right of US citizens to "keep and bear arms" for the protection of themselves and their property.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@eonglee44 Believe it or not, I have a lot of respect for China, its people, and its history. It's the oldest and probably most-influential country in the world.
During the early 20th century, it went through a period of weakness, colonialism, and instability. It should be strong and rich since it has the largest population, but it's hard to recognize the country and appreciate its history and culture under communism.
It's not my country, but watching films such as The Last Emperor, which was approved by the CCP and permitted to film in the Forbidden City, it becomes obvious how drastically China has changed. It's not just the government, but the culture, heritage, and open practice of religion.
Every country deserves to be rich, but most economist already know communism and centrally planned economies doesn't work in the long run. If they did, the West would have adopted the model. That's why the CCP has allowed private businesses to operate. The problem will come when the inevitable recession and market correction happens in China.
The economies of the US, Japan, South Korea, EU, and UK are free-market economies and work on business cycles. The government only controls regulations, taxes, and fiscal spending. A central bank controls interest rates, money supply, and how to respond to inflation and recession with monetary policy.
Recessions and unemployment are painful, but they're required to make the economies more stable, productive, innovative, and robust.
In the US, people will be homeless, suffer from unemployment, and exposed to violent crime, but they have access to the strongest and most stable economy and currency in the world. They also have the right to petition the government (and sometimes their employers) for change, and exercise free speech.
When the recession happens in China and people are angry and in the streets, what will happen?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@175hydro No problem. I'm a hyper-partisan individual who strongly believes the quickest way to end this war is by giving Ukrainians all the humanitarian, economic, and military aid to defend against Putin.
I would never claim to be a geopolitical expert, but I've followed Putin's presidency since 1999. I lived in Moscow for a for two months during my study abroad and am very familiar with talking points from Kremlin-backed media. That's where the Cold War-term "useful idiot" originated.
Everyone have their own beliefs about what's considered "patriotic," so I can respect American dissenting to US involvement. Personally, I'm happy and supportive of aiding Ukraine because I believe we'll be on the right-side of history and defending our business and international interests in Europe.
In the comment sections, there are a swarms of Russian trolls, CCP bots, and people on the far-Right spreading misinformation and anti-American rhetoric that originated from Russian state TV and and Putin himself. The purpose is to scare the public by claiming that a direct NATO-Russia nuclear conflict is inevitable.
I came to that conclusion about you because it took me decades to comprehend and obtain sufficient knowledge about Moscow-Washington foreign policy and proxy conflicts, and from reading your first comment it sounded like a narrative of isolationist not familiar with either Russia or Ukraine.
I genuinely do respect to sacrifice and service of all American veterans, but that doesn't mean we put your opinions on equal footing with the foreign policy doctrines from the White House and NATO.
In a perfect world, pacifism and diplomacy would be a realistic option at this point, but it's not. Some wars are good against evil, and this is one of those. The US, Russia, and the UK forced Ukraine to surrender its Soviet-era nuclear warheads on the condition that the integrity of their borders was respected and we provide security assistance to enable Ukraine to remain an independent and sovereign nation.
Slava Ukrani!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@iggy5347 China’s GDP blackout isn’t fooling anyone
There is diminishing faith in the few economic indicators that, after years of obfuscation, still see the light of day
If you had paid a visit to China’s National Bureau of Statistics in the days following Xi Jinping’s election as general secretary of the Chinese Communist party in 2012, you would have found a cornucopia of economic data.
The number of people employed in the outdoor playground amusement equipment sector, natural gas exports from Guangdong to other provinces, the electricity balance of Inner Mongolia. You name it, they published it, along with more than 80,000 other time series.
But just one year later, those three series and thousands more were no longer updated. Skip to 2016, and more than half of all indicators published by the national and municipal statistics bureaus had been quietly discontinued. The disappearances have been truly remarkable.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jamie1128888 The US is clearly NATO member and the UN supported the war al-Qaeda in Afghanistan.
The 2003 Iraq War was the one with the legal ambiguity because the UN authorization was from the original Gulf War, but US and UK decided to only seek support from each other and led the invasion.
The post-Arab Spring conflicts, including Syria, Libya, Yemen, Iraq, and North Africa are the most complicated ones. The US, Russia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Israel fought against ISIS and groups labelled terrorist.
The US acted on behalf of itself and as a NATO member to fight ISIL, but fought on many different sides, including arming rebels to fight Syrian government forces and Russians.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
They are patient and skilled at not taking the aggressive militarism like the Soviet Union. There are structural problems in China, and it's likely being driven by the slowing of the GDP growth, Covid-19 pandemic, corruption, and confrontation with the US and allies. They don't want war, which they know is unwinnable; but they do NOT want to have another Century of Humiliation. They want to be treated as equal to the US, and they want the international community to treat them as an equal to the US. Rather than being hostile directly with the US, they target smaller nations with that have traditionally been aligned with the West: e.g., Australia, Canada, UK, and they are directly disrespectful to Japan, but they have changed to a more aggressive tone.
The territorial claims are insane, but they aren't demanding all of the disputed territories be returned immediately, and they appear to be using strategic patients. They have even claimed Vladivostok, which I doubt Putin has any intention of returning to China. Historically, Mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan were all part of a single country. They have mostly reintegrated Hong Kong back, but Taiwan is a different story and the most dangerous because that would bring the US into a war if they attacked Taiwan.
They have made huge strides in a short period of time, but communism never works. The new aggressive Chinese foreign policy is having the effective of diving the world similar to the Cold War between US/Nato and Soviet Union/China and US/NATO/China vs Warsaw Pact. There won't be a direct military conflict between the US, mostly because the PLA is inexperienced and not ready to try and fight another global power. We could see China attack a smaller nation that doesn't have a security agreement with the US, but it's more like that the US be the one using a proxy war or nuclear test as a demonstration and intimidation.
1
-
India is the world's largest democracy, and naturally, as Americans and also a former British Colony, we'd assume India has more in common with the US and Europe than Russia and China. Both the US and Russia will still have a friendly relationship with India regardless of their stance on sanctions against Russia. There are some sanctions that have strict international requirements, but most of them are voluntary and only applicable to corporations doing business with both the US and Russia. If India or China used the lower cost of Russian products to benefit themselves, that's one of the key aspects of capitalism.
The present conflict in Europe is completely different from the Cold War ("East versus West" and "Private versus Public Ownership"), or the strategy to contain/sabotage the recent economic growth and regional influence of the CCP. There is no wider ideological divide, religious dispute, or different economic systems between America and Russia. The US and EU have sanctioned Russia for attacking Ukraine, and the intention is to cause a recession and devalue the Ruble. The target is primarily Vladimir Putin and Russian Oligarchs who do business with US and European corporations.
The sanctions have already done economic damage to the Russian economy and international reputation that will take years to recover from. India isn't being forced to decide between the US, Russia, or be nonaligned. It may impact India's relationship with the Ukrainians, but
the US needs Indian political and economic alignment to counter the influence of China. The sanctions against Russia are only one specific issue and won't impact the wider importance of India being the largest democracy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Did you say FL doesn't recognize "Covid-19" as the primary cause of death from coronavirus-related complications? I'm not a doctor and have never completed a death certificate, but I have faith in the determinations made by the coroners and other physicians. The government, healthcare providers, and insurance companies ultimately pay the high cost of ICU care, ventilators, and hospitalization, so they have an incentive to scrutinize the medical bills for accuracy.
Doesn't the CDC, epidemiologist, and John Hopkins National Covid-19 use other indicators and secondary causes to determine whether or not the deaths would have occurred but for the coronavirus infection and disease? In your uncle's case, was there still a reference to covid-19 virus infection followed by hospitalization, ICU, pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, or blood clot preceding death?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@aljirou29 Those links are from far-Right media, and have nothing to do with academia or history. A political spectrum is subjective and relative, but no has ever gotten it that wrong. You would need to start with a simple description of Left versus Right. Mussolini, Franco, and Hitler were all clearly opposed to the Left. Before WWII, the Spanish Civil War was a proxy conflict between far-Left and fascist. Nationalism, anti-Marxism, traditionalist values, and militarism weren't associated with the Left at that time. The only similarities between Fascist and Bolsheviks are opposition to democracy, totalitarianism, and summary execution.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@DV8 *** That's interesting, but why would you talk with me? What do I get from exploiting dead kids for political purposes? That's other than hearing talking points that some like me trained you to parrot. You're assuming that I actually know any serious political/legal proposals to remedy mass shootings with new gun regulations.
You might not realize it, but both you and the OP are free to talk on your own. This comment says something about gun sales and linked to murder rates. That doesn't even make sense, and isn't a claim any, but the OP made. Why would someone explain or defend a position they never had?
It's a complete waste of time, and it's a tactic called "gaslighting." It's been happening for the past five years. We go over these stats and repeat that "correlation doesn't imply causation." When we're done going full circles and mental health, there'll be another mass shooting, and the cycle will repeat. You might think you can predict my positions on guns, but you can't because I don't have a position. My problem is with the ulterior motives and intellectual dishonesty. Why waste time and server space if you can just say, "gun-control is OFF the table?"
Since you're neither a legislature or a judge, why would I make a legal argument? You can't make laws, and neither can I. The only accomplishment will be you having a platform to show how well you've memorized the Fox News script. You don't need me or anyone else. You have the floor and are free to share all of your thoughts about guns. When you're done, let me know what has legally changed.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"Where ever the US dollar goes is our business."
We didn't rebuild and protect West Europe as a charitable donation. That's the biggest overseas investment the US has ever made and is another market to sell iPhones, Coke, McDonald's, Hollywood films, LNG, Facebook, bombs, airplanes, computers chips, and porn. If we back away, China will be happy to replace us.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Ken Bugbee It's because I have a brain. You can't use lies on a person with critical-thinking skills.
If you think the election was rigged, so what? Why are you telling me? That was a lie meant for you to believe, not me.
If I told you the Earth was flat and used my own conspiracy theory to support my claim, I would have just as good of an argument as you have right now.
It's not rocket science. Pick a popular candidate; win an election, and you won't have to keep relying on these lies that were meant for people like you to spread amongst each other.
For some reason, every state in the union, the Supreme Court, Congress, and all of America's allies must be gullible, too. That's the problem with you use make a fake reality, and are shocked the rest of the world stopped listening to the "alternative facts."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@atx4fun Are you thinking the judge dismissed the case without having established precedent?
I haven't read the order and am definitely not giving legal advice on state law, but the jury only answers questions of "fact." It's possible that no evidence of "malice" was uncovered during discovery, so NYT could have asked the judge for a summary judgment based on "law."
Regardless of the jury's decision, if the law doesn't support the case, then the Jury's determinations are futile and moot because no case exists for them to consider.
It's in a federal court because Palin and the NYT headquarters are in different states (and the claim > $75,000), but the judge is applying New York State Law for tort and personal injury claims.
Defamation cases are hard to prove in any state if the Plaintiff is a public figure. The NYT may have definitely harmed Palin's reputation, but they issued a retraction of the error.
I don't remember the name (I think it's was Sandman), but there was a high school kid who went to Washington, DC, and was there with a Native American group. He was able to sue CNN and settle with them. He had a valid defamation claim mostly because he wasn't a celebrity or public figure, and the requirement to prove "malice" wasn't necessary.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@michaelkulman7095 This is the interpretation
of the medical journal:
Interpretation
The sole reliance on vaccination as a primary strategy to mitigate COVID-19 and its adverse consequences needs to be re-examined, especially considering the Delta (B.1.617.2) variant and the likelihood of future variants. Other pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions may need to be put in place alongside increasing vaccination rates. Such course correction, especially with regards to the policy narrative, becomes paramount with emerging scientific evidence on real world effectiveness of the vaccines.
For instance, in a report released from the Ministry of Health in Israel, the effectiveness of 2 doses of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine against preventing COVID-19 infection was reported to be 39% [6], substantially lower than the trial efficacy of 96% [7]. It is also emerging that immunity derived from the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine may not be as strong as immunity acquired through recovery from the COVID-19 virus [8]. A substantial decline in immunity from mRNA vaccines 6-months post immunization has also been reported [9]. Even though vaccinations offers protection to individuals against severe hospitalization and death, the CDC reported an increase from 0.01 to 9% and 0 to 15.1% (between January to May 2021) in the rates of hospitalizations and deaths, respectively, amongst the fully vaccinated [10].
In summary, even as efforts should be made to encourage populations to get vaccinated it should be done so with humility and respect. Stigmatizing populations can do more harm than good. Importantly, other non-pharmacological prevention efforts (e.g., the importance of basic public health hygiene with regards to maintaining safe distance or handwashing, promoting better frequent and cheaper forms of testing) needs to be renewed in order to strike the balance of learning to live with COVID-19 in the same manner we continue to live a 100 years later with various seasonal alterations of the 1918 Influenza virus.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@daveday515 That's not the way justice or even the court system in English-speaking nations function.
The only way the US/UK would be relevant is if you're claiming there's a precedent granting immunity to sovereign nations.
It's mostly "whataboutism." The US and UK government have a past that not related to this. No one is condoning the foreign policy of the West.
The West is a hostile adversary of Russia, but use of chemicals weapons is a crime under international law.
If US and UK foreign policy were relevant, we could discuss it, but it's got nothing to do with this.
It would be like you constantly using Germany and Japan's conduct during the Second World War as a distraction to not address the US war in Indochina.
During the 50s, 60s, and 70s, there were Japanese citizens opposed to the US role in the Korean and Vietnam War, but since Japan committed war crimes in the 1930s and 1940s, does that mean Japan's war crimes are relevant to the US-led proxy wars and bombings in Korea, Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mikeboydus Can't end the Monroe Doctrine and become the best until you beat or intimidate the best. Russian have a worldview more similar to Western views of masculinity, being war heroes, and valuing being tough and dominate.
The CCP and historical China have never been imperialist like European nations and the US. They are more interested in economic growth and regional power, and are realizing, the rapid GDP growth of the last two decades have slowed. US imperialism was modelled of the British Empire, and having a economic and military hegemony to expand markets.
I have no doubt they will defend their mainland, but the CCP starting a war with Taiwan and the US, which would kill millions of Chinese on both sides and isolate the CCP further wouldn't result in any additional gains, and there a good chance Taiwan could win without US intervention.
Mainland China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong are all one nation, but they have an interest in maintain the status quo. It's not in the CCP's interest to start their first war of the 21st century against another superpower that's been in military conflicts and engagements since before the PRC existed.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@alexlo7708 Why do you keep going on with these rants? I do have a preference for the US dollar, but that's because so does the whole world.
Do you think countries like Japan, China, and the European Union countries invest trillions to buy US government debt because they are interested in charity, no?
The international currency-exchange markets and the Federal Reserve determines the value of the dollar. The US has perfect credit, and is the safest investment in the world.
That's not only coming from me. That's what the business markets decided. The only reason Russia is spreading the propaganda about the US dollar is because they're under sanctions, and need the US sanctions removed. They should work with the White House instead of spreading disinformation, fake news, and interfering in US and European domestic politics.
As soon as, US sanctions are lifted from Russia, you won't hear a word about the US dollar and oil. Yes, Russian oil is mostly purchased with US dollars because it would be insane, and too risky, to use another currency.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@lexsteel12 You've made no point what so ever because you're still wasting time talking about the media when your POV and stance on the media are irrelevant to the Biden White House or to Putin's Kremlin. The only media role is how he's distracting Trump's supporters, who are making this political when it's much bigger. As long as they don't violate the law, commit fraud, or defame someone, the media can profit from sensationalizing anything they want. Your complaints about media should be more directed toward social media rather than legacy media.
You would be too busy calling CBS fake news during the Cuban Missile Crisis. Think as an adult: "Why would two nuclear superpowers give a flying f**k about people who hate the media when this is a game of chess, and you've got no role in it."
Russia wants sanctions relief, reduction and NATO expansion, and a new mid-range arms treaty in Europe because they're not able to afford an arms race against NATO? What can the media do in regards to that when all of the decisions will be made by executive action or an international treaty from the White House and Senate.
It's fine that you have your opinion on the media, but you're just part of the demographic Trump targeted with his anti-media stance. I don't care about the media. I went to school and am too stubborn to be influenced by media. The local media with FCC-regulate standards and the printed press subjected to libel laws are not behaving lawlessly, and can be held accountable. They haven't had nearly as much influence as social media like Twitter and Facebook and video platforms like YouTube, which comes from individuals and algorithms recommendations.
You think I can watch RT and suddenly become pro-Putin, or watch FoxNews and become a Republican? It might make sense to you, but it doesn't to me. There is so much more to life than focusing on the media. They're private companies, with online competition and constitutionally limited government regulations. There's nothing I can do about that. The government and politicians work for me, not CNN and Google.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mattl2843 I'm sure you're already aware of this and heard it before: In 2017, President Trump using his constitutional authority as president, fired James Comey and appointed Christopher Wray as FBI director. A significant percentage of the federal judiciary were also appointed by his Administration.
Regarding the classified documents found at Biden's office, we still don't know if there was criminal conduct. I don't know anymore about what happen that what's publicly available. I couldn't give an opinion until there's an allegation of an intentional crime.
The Attorney General has assigned the inquiry to determine whether any crimes were committed to a Trump-appointed prosecutor and FBI director. That decision was made to avoid the appearance of conflict-of-interest from a Biden-appointed US attorney.
You haven't waited until the inquiry completed but have already come to the conclusion that there will be DOJ and FBI misconduct. You've got to give proof and example of FBI corruption and violating legal rights.
The legal system isn't perfect, but the legal actions and investigations into former President Trump aren't all being conducted by Democrat-appointed judges, prosecutors, and special counsels.
If the legal system is corrupt and there are witch hunts and politically motivated and vindictive prosecutions targeting Americans, then why are you solely focused cases involving Trump? What about the poorer people who aren't billionaire former presidents?
Trump has the financial resources, political influence, legal representation, and access to international media to bring attention to government depriving him of due process.
It's hard to consider that likely when it's other conservatives in DC investigating him; and unlike the experience of the average American suspected of a crime, he's still walking free and receiving more accomodations from the government than what would be available to every other citizen.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@dylanmurphy9389 I doubt you're replying to true atheists or agnostics. These are just people who hate all religions, or either people who are trying to make a philosophical argument without using logic and reason.
I don't like to judge people, but most of the time, they're not upset with Christian virtues of forgiveness, being like Jesus, and being opposed to killing and theft.
I thinks it's the anti-gay, anti-sodomy, and morality codes in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam.
If they actually thought religious people were all mentally ill and believing in fairy tales, that wouldn't personally harm or offend an non-religious person.
I would genuinely pity a person rather than just assuming they're part of a cult and can't leave.
IMO, they heard someone religious, a politician, or an evangelist preacher telling them that homosexuality was immoral, and only heterosexual families should be promoted.
No other parts of the Christian Bible are as controversial and in conflict with modern society than the condemnation of homosexuality in Abrahamic religions.
Simply being religious doesn't mean a rejection of science, promotion of theocracy, and an opposition to gay rights.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@kalijasin That could be true. The regulators, NY Att'y Gen, tax collectors, and law enforcement tend to look for obvious signs of criminality and RICO-like conspiracies like lying to investigators, retaliating against internal whistleblowers, and shredding and flushing documents down the toilet.
The complicity, or aiding and abetting would be a huge deal since is a criminal offense, but there's a chance that all or most of the criminal liability would be on Allen Weisselberg and auditing firm.
The gross incompetence (Deer-in-the-headlights defense) isn't criminal, and likely is the legal strategy of the Trump Family, but it could cost Weisselberg and the auditors their accounting licenses like what happened with Enron/Arthur Andersen.
Since the accountants and CFOs, and held to a higher ethical and legal the standard than the Trump Organization and the Trump Family, the "cookers of the books" could be the only ones who face felony indictments.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It sounds disturbing and stupid, but they might not know any better. They're probably not all anti-Semitic but hear the more appropriate comparison of Right-wing populist and nationalist movements in the US, Brazil, Poland, Russia, and Hungary called "fascist" or "fascist-adjacent."
It's a bit of a stretch, but they probably think if there are no wars or extermination camps involved then we (on the Left) are overreacting and mislabeling Trump as "literally Hitler," which he's definitely not because European Fascist were no where near becoming an existential threat to American democracy. A president who clearly loses an election and doesn't care, nor has any plans of a peaceful transition; and then uses his supporters to sacrifices themselves and start a civil war is worst than any threat from Middle Eastern terrorism, communism, Nazism, Soviet Union, CCP, or Putin's Russia.
Got off topic, but anyway maybe they believe mandates are unconstitutional, and they've lost a human right, and the only example autocratic government is Nazi Germany. How they associate Fauci, an immunologist and government bureaucrats, who can't and has never made public policy, who knows?
Trump, Rand Paul, and far-Right media have weaponized the ignorance of their supporters. The only response is to do the same, and use their own supporters ignorance to turn on their them, while hoping the sane majority runs the government.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@williamdavis9562 The problem you're not getting is that sanctions aren't intended to change behavior or force a withdrawal. We're beyond that. The US is engaged in economic warfare. The result will be famines, premature deaths, and economic destabilization. That's always happened. You're probably not able to measure the results, but it will be in GDP contraction, unemployment, inflation, and lower life expectancy.
No one is looking for Putin to be nice. They are intended to make life miserable and decrease the standard of living. If you're bringing up the ordinary Russian people, then it should be obvious no one cares. It's war and this is punishment for Russia and its citizens. Any international venture Russia attempts to engage in will be subjected to economic warfare and financial sanctions.
They are designed by economists and finance experts, so check the Russian GDP, inflation, and life expectancy figures this year. I get that you may have briefly read recent history and want a peaceful world, but you're not going to know more about economics than the professors and Harvard PhDs who designed the sanctions. The part you don't seem capable of comprehending is that no one would waste time or loss in economic activity (because it hurts the US, too) doing them if they didn't work.
1
-
@williamdavis9562 That's not the premise. Sanctions are economic warfare to ruin the economy and they're usually permanent. It's like a scotched earth tactic. They are made by economist, so the results should measured in the economic damage. If the US uses a biological weapon designed by doctors, wouldn't you look at the health effects. Example of sanctions: Venezuela, North Korea, Saddam's Iraq, Yemen, Maoist China, Cuba, Iran, Syria, and Afghanistan were more damaged by the sanctions than the US and international community who imposed them.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@SamKGrove It's not derived from anything more fundamental than NetF=ma. It's from classical physics and Isaac Newton and seems deceptively simple, but it's a powerful theory that can explain all motions of objects with mass.
It can be measured in Newtons (Unit of Force). In the simplest form, a body with no forces applied to it that has mass will maintain un-accelerated motion indefinitely.
When a force is applied, the action changes the motion an accelerates according to F=ma. Using the force, the past, present, and future state of an object calculated.
There are methods and alternatives to Newtonian mechanics and situations when it's invalid, but the classical definition of "force" is from Newton. Rather than using a force, problems can be solved using energy, spacetime curvature, action principle, and other easier and more efficient methods.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@elliott7531 Hopefully, I didn't give the impression that Ukraine must have ONLY or PREFERABLY US-made tanks. I was mentioning the weapons depots and stockpiles of arms the US military warehouses around the globe in case of war.
The US will contribute the funds, weapons, intelligence, sanctions, and soft power it takes to destroy the Russian forces occupying Ukraine. It also buys all NATO, Chinese, Israeli, Russian, and/or Soviet-made ammunition and weapons.
Fortunately for the world, the US and NATO are not actively at war with Russia; so Zelenskyy and his generals are the battlefield experts and know the type of weapon systems needed.
The war has made NATO more relevant than ever. It's never been a philanthropic organization or an American-led charity. Other than defense, it's been about marketing and standardizing the weapons systems and the defense sectors.
The corruption that has plagued the Russian Armed Forces and its defense-production industry would have been exposed sooner in a NATO country.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@anarchyorslavery1616 This statement was from you: "Ukraine is a rightful province of Russia, it is not a legitimate country."
I'm not being condescending. There's a huge problem with that statement. That would be like saying, "Armenia belongs to Turkey," or "Manchuria belongs Japan." Why would an educated person say that? I'm not being PC or sensitive, or even talking down to you. It sounds like you believe that literally, which mean you have heard some times of propaganda message making that claim. There are Ukrainian online you can talk to and ask without saying something that offensive. They lost millions of people under intentional famines and purges because Moscow wanted to punish Ukrainians. There's a reason why Russia, Belarus, and Ukraine are all different countries.
That means you don't know the difference between the Kremlins public message and their private stance. Russia isn't trying to re-integrate Ukraine into Russia. They are struggling to cover the pensions of former Ukrainians who lived in Crimea after the annexation. It doesn't sound like you're familiar with the situation and you are reading something from social media. if you were truly informed, you could properly state both the public and private positions of the Kremlin.
This is a stand off between Washington, DC, and Moscow. It's about (1) US and EU sanctions relief; (2) Crimean access to to Ukrainian water; (3) a new nuclear treaty on mid-range missiles in Europe; (4) maintaining the status quo in the Russian-speaking Donbass region; and (5) reduction of NATO wargames near the Russian border and commitment to keep Ukraine and Georgia from joining NATO and the European Union.
That other nonsense about Ukraine being part of Russia is just dumb because Kiev can claim that White Russia, Russia, and Ukraine belong to them.
1
-
@anarchyorslavery1616 You're talking about post-WWI Ukraine not being legally formed when Germany sent Lenin back to Russia to start a revolution, get them to stop fighting in the war; and killed the legal monarchy in Russia to become a communist dictatorship that wasn't even considered a legitimate country until the 1930s.
You are selectively choosing history. It sounds like you're not even a Russian. What part of the world are you in because you're thinking the Russian Empire, Soviet Union, and the Russian Federation are all a single country because the capital is Moscow?
They have many races, nationalities, ethnicities, and religions in modern Russia and of the former Soviet Union. You probably believe that Joseph Stalin and Nikita Khrushchev were Russian, too.
The Russian-speaking Slavs you considering as the "real Russians" were sent to Crimea, Eastern Ukraine, Baltic States, Central Asia, Chechnya, Georgia, Caucuses, Mongolia, Siberia, Kaliningrad, East Germany, Afghanistan, China, North Korea, and Warsaw Pacts states as part of a pro-Kremlin cultural-assimilation process called "Russification," but that doesn't make them the indigenous to the countries they're, including Ukraine.
The right of the people to self-determination has a process under international, Ukrainian, and Russian law, and if Russian-speaking Slavs want to rejoin Russia, they have that right, but they can't take part of another country (Ukraine) with them when they rejoin Russia.
EDIT: I just noticed your American flag, and it makes sense now. This is political and you're trying to take the stance from what you heard from RT or other propaganda that uses people in the West as "useful idiots."
It's not that your thin-blue line is the political statement I'm judging. It's because you're an American, and you're trying the give the stance that you think Vladimir Putin would have if he were a Foxnews Christian Conservative, or part of American Right-wing politics, which he isn't. He's much more progressive and leads one of the most ethically diverse nations in the world. It's fine to be Republican, but when the party of Reagan is softer on Moscow than the American Left, then it's a sign something is not right. If you share a world view with a hostile foreign adversary, then it's better to let the patriotic Americans handle foreign policy with Russia.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@nikoc8968 I don't have a problem with Trump. I survived four years of him and could work with him regardless of the political difference.
The concern I do have is the anti-media rhetoric, and turning off potential voters and his committed voter base during an election he should have easily won.
The media doesn't control the country, and all he had to do was use them like every other American president before him. The MSM does have a political agenda and are mostly Left wing (most people already know that). All he had to do was be the Donald Trump from the 1990s and not call them "fake news." He knew how to protect his public image, and get positive media coverage despite personal scandals.
After winning re-election he could have quickly returned to his previous behavior. I know you've stated he was cheated out of an election that had been stolen.
The problem was claiming a nationwide criminal conspiracy to defraud the US election and the government. The allegations were defective and led to numerous lawsuits dismissals because of an unlikelihood of succeeding on a merits and evidence, and the absence of a civil defendant to answer the charges.
It's my opinion, but I don't think he enjoyed being president. He has a voter base that supported him to the point of almost worshipping him. He owed it to his base to do more for them, and not make enemies within his own party and former cabinet staffers, e.g., Jeff Session, who lost his DC career in the Senate and Justice Department. Clearly, Sessions wasn't a "Never Trumper," and was one of the first GOP politicians to endorse him.
Scandals happen in nearly every White House Administration, but he focused too much on the GOP being loyal to him, and during the four years under Trump, most of it was wasted on culture wars, attacking disloyal Republicans who leaked to the media, and not recognizing that Russia was neither a supporter of Trump nor the US.
Rather than claiming the Russia probe was a Democratic witch hunt, he should have been able to see that the Kremlin paralyzed most of his first term by taking advantage of the domestic political polarization and racial problems in America and driving a wedge between the US and our European allies.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@THETRUTH-BR That's a naïve stance of someone unfamiliar with China. It has a historic role of non-intervention outside of Asia.
Other than being a powerful trading country and potential superpower, there's not a lot of soft or hard power options available to Beijing because it's no going to use military force or economic sanctions like the US, UN, and EU does.
The geopolitically and diplomatically neutral states and NGOs are mostly in Benelux Europe, the Hague, Swiss, Finland, and UN organizations.
The CCP is more aligned, economically, culturally, and politically with Moscow. It could influence its junior partner: Russia, but Beijing leadership have no credible leverage to bring Ukraine, US, EU, and NATO to negotiate any settlements of a European War.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@STeALtHsVidz That one is more problematic in court because of separation of powers, even considering the procedural violations. It would probably work for other government employee, but you'd have to get pass executive branch privilege and immunity. That's considered part of the President's inherent powers as commander-in-chief.
The charges related to Espionage Act, Presidential Records Act, obstruction, and being in possession of government-owned documents at Mar-A-lago are much easier to prosecute, and clearly criminal.
Trying to apply a classification procedure and regulations from Congress, Nation Archives, or from a previous executive order to a sitting president is unsettled law. He has plenty legal defenses to overcome that.
It similar to the problem with the Justice Department indicting a president without first going to Congress to inpeach and removing him from office.
I'm sure he'd lie about changing the classification and following the proper procedure, but that's an administrative function and inherent power of Executive Branch; i.e., unless it happened after he left office. Merrick Garland and President Biden would have the power to decide whether or not to charge.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Who the hell is Mrs. Kravitz? America is a capitalist arms producer that sees the potential market of rebuilding Ukraine to sell iPhones, Coca-Cola, KFC, Facebook, LNG products, Disney films, loans, bombs, drones, and Google products. We support democracy, but there's a return on investment in a country of 45 million pro-American consumers.
1
-
1
-
@jamram9924 It's rare to hear someone so well informed on anything related to Russia and Ukraine. It's the most complicated foreign affairs topic for Americans and English speakers.
It makes the Middle East seem simple. The Russians have a fascinating history, and there should be more courses on Sovietology or Kremlinology like that Dr. Rice specialized in.
I'm mostly focused on the economic aspect, but I don't see a direct military conflict, and definitely not a nuclear war between Washington, DC, and Moscow.
There could always be a miscalculation, but when both countries have come to the brink of a direct conflict, we've allowed each other to save face. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, and even now, there's mutual respect for each other; and there was no major celebration in America after winning the Cold War.
Rather than going for the kill, and attempting to overthrow Putin or destroy the Russian economy or Russian forces in Ukraine, the White House will still allow him an off-ramp and give Putin an opportunity to save face and exit Ukraine in a dignified manner.
Hopefully, this senseless war will end soon, but I don't see a nuclear escalation unless the Kremlin regime or the existence of the Russian state is under threat. That could happen, but it will be mostly from inside Russia.
Neither Ukraine nor the White House has called for Putin to be removed, and both are still attempting to negotiate with him. I think he's gained a higher level of respect for Zelenskyy and Kyiv. He could have made a direct attack to decapitate the government or poison Zelenskyy, but maybe Putin respects their strength now.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
That was a gracious concession speech. I know it's a low bar; but he lost the general election, the runoff, and can recognize the country is exhausted, so the quick concession makes him a patriot in my books.
He did come close to winning, and I genuinely wish him and his family the best in life. I don't think he's anywhere close to being ready for national politics.
He seems like a nice guy to have as a friend; and since I'm a fellow Texan, maybe I'll run into him at a Whataburger, and I can congratulate him in person.
GA is not really a Blue State. It's closer to being Purple. He didn't get the same statewide support as the other GOP candidates, and I doubt it was all due to his speeches, scandals, werewolves, and all the concussions.
IMO, part of the GA would have never supported neither Walker nor Warnock for senate.
It's not all of the state, but I doubt any of their political affiliations, qualifications, or background experience would have made any difference.
There's been a lot of progress since Jim Crow-era, but outside of the diverse urban areas, GA is still the former Confederate state that elected MTG. Although there was plenty of international interest, I don't think there was much excitement in the GA GOP.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@master_shifu4208 Putin doesn't seem to be making rational decisions anymore. For most of his time in office, he's been mostly predictable.
I would have never expected anyone of launching a major European war in 2022.
He could be receiving terrible advice about Russia's capabilities, but it does appear that he didn't expect strong Ukrainian resistance or the financial sanctions and economic warfare from the West.
The Javelins, NLAW, and stinger missiles from the West weren't part of a covert operation. Despite that, the Russians still seem to have been caught off-guard by the fact there were a lot of anti-tank, surface-to-air, and Neptune missiles in Ukraine.
Russia has probably lost close to 20,000 soldiers by now. At the start of the war, I did have some sympathy for the Russian conscripts, but after the war crimes in Bucha and Mariupol; and the reports of widespread rape and pillage, then there should be more Russian fatalities to prevent genocide.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@dimostenisn.4642 I am a US as citizen, and pay taxes and have a vote, too. I don't like cowardice and isolationism. I've benefited from US imperialism and global market access, so I prefer the traditionally US stance stance as being leader of the free world. We're not Switzerland, and when allies ask for help, we help them.
Only a fool would surrender a global empire because a younger generation is too naïve and cowardly to confront a dictator. The US can outproduce Russia, so were not counting weapons anymore than Russia measuring their snow.
Regardless, of the decision Putin makes, our role is to make the invasion as costly as possible. It's a foolish move, and he should be embarrassed on the international stage, which why you don't see him making a moving because the element of surprise and the propaganda about "liberating" Ukraine is BS.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@dimostenisn.4642 The country has been an empire since the early 1900s, and we have a military-industrial complex that outproduce the rest of the world.
This is the most armed nation on earth, and is essentially mostly known for Hollywood and dropping bombs.
You probably don't like it. I'm not sadistic or murderous either, but this isolationist talk, anti-war, and touchy feely stuff is not realistic and is disingenuous.
If you want to make an anti-war case, you would need to know geopolitics and something about foreign policy, which you don't. All you know is war is bad. Okay, we get that, but that's got nothing to do with reality.
That not even a public policy. That's just wishful thinking and platform a child running for student president would say. Pollution and Covid-19 are bad, too..... okay.
You shouldn't be attacked for your own personal beliefs, no matter how much I think the exact opposite. I get one vote and so do you. Hopefully, yours gets lost in the mail.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@brianticas7671 Not a realist because Russia was defeated in the Battle of Kyiv, and no serious forecaster expects them to win and hold the country. They've lost over 15,000 so far. A lot of those deaths are from US weapons. The sanctions have ruined their economy and now this year the GDP will shrink by 30%. They won't even have enough money to control prices.
Also, war doesn't hurt the US economy. It does the exact opposite. We're arming Ukraine. How would that hurt the economy? That makes no sense. The war is increasing the US GDP. Inflation is a sign of the market growing faster than supply can keep up. When was the last time you've seen a US jobs report? Go look at one of those and explain how the economy is hurting.
Based on that misinformation, it's a sign that you're clueless and just repeating right-wing propaganda. If you're scared of Russia, don't go to war. You don't have to lie about facts to make a point. You might not realize it, but there are people who keep up with geopolitics and this war and know a lot more than you do. That's how I can tell that you're not telling the truth and you know it.
Finally, in normal conversations, I would say that I "respectfully disagree with you," but you've lost my respect for intentionally lying. You almost sound like a child trying to explain something you don't understand. I wouldn't mind you having a different opinion, but you keep lying and don't seem to believe in the truth. It's waste of time. I'm not interested in continuing with someone who lies. The End.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The UK is part of the strongest military alliance on Earth, and has relations with the US and European Union. Unlike China, Britain is not being kept from reuniting it's own country like the Mainland China is still being bullied by the US from retaking Taiwan, which has become a US colony. NATO patrols the South China Sea and the ability to once again cut China off from international trade.
When China is brave enough touch anything with an American flag on it, anywhere around the world, then we'll take them seriously. Right now, they are assertive with smaller nations allied with the US, but is still far too weak to face the United States and get humiliated. They are still upset with the UK because of the "Century of Shame" and European and Japanese colonialism.
The US and UK contained the Soviet Union and the CCP since the 1950s. China would be still having famines and eating bats had Nixon not decided to reopen China to the world. Pretty soon China's going to be closed again, so that it can rot from within with it's communism, corruption, concentration camps, and coronavirus labs. The people of China are wonderful human beings, but the CCP is an evil government that would collapse during a major economic recession or military defeat.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jimmipadge There are people who are genuinely interested in world affairs and love interacting with informed people, not imposters with a political agenda.
When you have to read something that's not relevant, intelligent, and obviously a cliché. You're going to want to let the poster know that they are uninformed.
It's my public service to advise you that you are lost. If it helps, get GPS, a map, and a mirror, but don't pretend to be Henry Kissinger, Noam Chomsky, or an intellectual. You're entitled to an opinion on international affairs, so I'm giving you the feedback and a grade of D+.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@stevennguyen4993 I'm sure you think social scientists is a real job as well, but there's a huge gap in emotional maturity and academics knowledge that you clearly don't have.
I noticed that you made a reference to law school. If I quizzed you on contact law, torts, substantive due process, or LSAT logic problems, we'd find out where you rank in your law school.
I've had GRE and LSAT and can identify the writing skills of a graduate students and legal writing.
I question almost everything from trolls because their existence is mostly isolated and based upon anonymity and deception.
If you made claims that were well-sourced, credible, and supported by polling data and economic indicators, you'd be at a level of political skills, public administration, and behavior-sciences research that I could respect and be persuaded by your argument.
You come off as a scammer and faker pretending to be smart because of the stereotype of Asians and STEM fields.
You're relying too much on that positive stereotype. It would be like me trying to be a believable athlete or rapper just because I'm Black.
I have a undergrad background in physics and mathematics, so I can always ask for a simple, concise, and non-plagiarized description of the distinctions between Einstein's Special and General Theory of Relativity.
Since you mention test scores, CRT, and affirmative action in university admissions, then you should be able tell me something about Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, or how calculus and differential equations are used in classical physics?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The final results are still unknown, but most consider midterm elections as a referendum on the White House incumbent and majority in Congress.
Since the balance of power is virtually unchanged, it's seen as 1) justification to maintain the status quo; or 2) a mandate for the president to continue his agenda.
The Democrats do appear to be celebrating, but it's mostly due to the many of Trump-backed candidates and election deniers that lost their campaigns. This will make the GOP leadership more competitive.
In the end, there will likely be a slight GOP majority in the House and the Senate remaining unchanged.
The GOP invested billions of dollars during this campaign season and expected Red Wave, and a solid majority to stop the president's agenda.
With the inflation rates, crime, Biden's low approval, and border situation being problematic, they expected to be awarded with a landslide of seats and have the power to pass veto-proof legislation.
We're two days out from the vote, and we still don't know the final results, which means that it was much closer to being evenly split than expected.
With the forecasted number of winning seats, the GOP won't be in a strong enough of a position to block the president's agenda. They will have the ability to pick the Speaker and committee assignments, not much else.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It's a British institution, and the UK is world's oldest continuously functioning constitutional monarchy and liberal democracy.
If the British people and politicians support keeping the Royal Family, and also continue to enjoy the rights and liberties of parliamentary sovereignty, then what difference does it make if they inherited their wealth?
You would effectively be seizing property and titles without a crime, misconduct, abuse of authority, or a violation of oath or constitutional convention.
There was time when the Crown literally owned the land and governed the nation without a prime minister.
The tax situation is complicated because of sovereign immunity, and the fact that the Crown owns the treasury, government, courts, and the currency.
In the US, it would be similar to taxing the US Treasury Department, so the only way to resolve it would be change the constitution or make it voluntary.
The reason the British monarchy has survived this long and remained relevant is because there's no reason to abolish it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I think it was a clever idea to insert humor in a legal brief, and it was genuinely funny. Maybe I'm getting too old and grumpy, but it just has no place in a legal document or part of the record.
It would be more appropriate to send it to the political branches; e.g., maybe bring attention to dark money, ethics, or special interests. Stephen Colbert's Super PAC and presidential campaign being registered with the Federal Elections Commission was a great example of using parody and humor to lobby politicians.
The Supreme Court's amicus curiae filings, opinions, and legal briefs are already confusing and time-consuming for legal research. IMO, that would be similar to The Onion publishing research and medical literature in the New England Journal of Medicine or CDC's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.
I might have an unpopular opinion, but if judicial economy and efficiency truly matter and the legal briefs are from "friends of the court," then The Onion shouldn't flood the court and case record with additional paper that doesn't contain a legal analysis, argument, or a relevant question.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Previously, I had little or no interest in appeasing the fascist cult members, but there could be a reasonable power-sharing agreement and coalition arrangement that could help. It doesn't even require changing any laws or amending the constitution. Each of the two major political parties and their nominees can implement this.
Rather than the election for president and vice president continue being a "zero-sum game," we could return to the previous method of selecting the vice president: The candidate who gets the most electors will still become president, but the change is that the person receiving the second-most electors should become vice president. Currently, the running mate of the winner becomes vice president.
Since the vice president is mostly a ceremonial role, we could possibly have a Biden-Trump Administration, without it triggering a constitutional crisis. Also, since the DOJ Memo and legal opinion that prohibits the DOJ from indicting a sitting president does NOT apply to the vice president, Jack Smith can continue doing God's work in prosecuting Trump; i.e., if Biden wins and Trump is the GOP nominee.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Pfefferpotthast
Westfälischer Pfefferpotthast, Westphalian Pepperpot (German)
beef, onions, carrots, lemon, bay leaves, peppercorns
Pfefferpotthast is a centuries-old goulash-style dish of braised beef from the North Rhine Westphalia region, particularly popular around the city of Dortmund. Traditional accompaniments to this dish are boiled potatoes, pickled gherkins and pickled beetroot.
The “pfeffer” in its name refers to all the herbs and spices it's cooked in (which really, are not very many). The flavors are both familiar and pleasing to the western palate, I particularly like the acidity that the lemon juice brought to the stew.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@gerrylee1687 They could use debt-trap diplomacy to pressure the return of Vladivostok, but the CCP is no where near as militant as the US, Europe, and Russia.
They have a much larger economy than Russia, but there's no reason to rush into a conflict with Taiwan, Japan, the Philippines, India, or the United States.
The CCP doesn't many allies as it is, and their new "assertiveness" is not making them more popular. Despite Russia's blunders and humiliation trying to conquer territory from Ukraine, it's much different trying to invade and take possession of Russian land that has been internationally recognized since 1860.
Nothing should be considered impossible anymore, but the US and NATO would almost certainly side with Russia.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ferdil1987 It's still by far the richest and the greatest. If you lived here, you would know despite the crime and political violence, no one is leaving.
There are people dying to get in here. The truth is jealousy from poorer and less influential countries, which I believe you're from.
Living in a world dominated by American hegemony makes conspiracy theories and personal opinions easily confused with truth.
It's good to have an opinion, but no educated person with critical thinking skills could believe that it's possible for anyone in government to pull off an inside job like that and not be detected.
Hundreds of British citizens died in 9/11, and they have access to US intelligence. That would mean every government official in office after 9/11 in the US, Canada, New Zealand, Australia, New Zealand, and all NATO countries decided to go to war based upon a lie.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@tj2484 [1/2]
The bias in the news media, professional sports, culture, and entertainment world is NOT a secret. I initially said nearly all of the hatred and frustration comes from Trump Supporters. In today’s political environment,
(1) Nearly every viewer of CNN, MSNBC, and other liberal networks know there’s a preference for liberal politics; and
(2) They know FOXNEWS, NEWSMAX, BRIETBART, CNBC, WSJ, WASHINGTON EXAMINER, OANN, RT AMERICA, RT America; and Joe Rogan have politics that are Right of center.
[...]
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Glancing over the comments keeps me from losing all hope in humanity. Most of them are able to recognize the value of human life.
I definitely want Ukraine to be victorious and for Russia to return home, but that was difficult to watch.
It's easy to become desensitized by war, drone attacks, and seeing daily violence without considering the human suffering.
Regardless of Putin's actions and the war crimes against Ukrainian civilians, I still can't help but think the dead Russian soldiers was possibly someone's child, spouse, father, or loved one.
I don't know the background of that soldier, and he could have very well been a sadistic monster and mass murderer, but unless we have credible evidence, we should assume he would have been covered by the Geneva Convention, the rules of engagement, and that he genuinely believes in the justification and pretext Putin told to the Russian people and citizens.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
They made physical contact and violated the human rights of protestors inside a liberal democracy with freedom of political speech and expression. It is absolutely inappropriate, highly illegal, and the fault of Chinese officials at the Consulate General in Manchester. The CCP has become selectively aggressive with smaller nations, but would never show that type of disrespect and escalation of tensions in the United States, Russia, European Union, or Japan. The hostility and international competition is between Washington, DC and Beijing. Rather than confronting the United States directly, the CCP has been bullying smaller nations with historically close ties with, and within, the Anglosphere, e.g., Australia, Canada, South Korea, the Philippines, India, and the United Kingdom.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@kakistocracyusa Odysseus @Odysseus
Odysseus @Odysseus
Odysseus @Odysseus
Odysseus
21 minutes agoOdysseus @Odysseus
Odysseus @Odysseus
Odysseus @Odysseus
Odysseus
21 minutes ago
@RiteMo LawBks Logic 101 - I'm not the one making the positive claim, dimwit.
21 minutes ago @Odysseus
Odysseus
21 minutes ago
@RiteMo LawBks Logic 101 - I'm not the one making the positive claim, dimwit.
@RiteMo LawBks Logic 101 - I'm not the one making the positive claim, dimwit.
21 minutes ago @Odysseus
Odysseus
21 minutes ago
@RiteMo LawBks Logic 101 - I'm not the one making the positive claim, dimwit.
@RiteMo LawBks Logic 101 - I'm not the one making the positive claim, dimwit.
21 minutes ago
@RiteMo LawBks Logic 101 - I'm not the one making the positive claim, dimwit.
@RiteMo LawBks Logic 101 - I'm not the one making the positive claim, dimwit.
21 minutes ago @Odysseus
Odysseus
21 minutes ago
@RiteMo LawBks Logic 101 - I'm not the one making the positive claim, dimwit.
@RiteMo LawBks Logic 101 - I'm not the one making the positive claim, dimwit.
21 minutes ago @Odysseus
Odysseus
21 minutes ago
@RiteMo LawBks Logic 101 - I'm not the one making the positive claim, dimwit.
@RiteMo LawBks Logic 101 - I'm not the one making the positive claim, dimwit.
21 minutes ago
@RiteMo LawBks Logic 101 - I'm not the one making the positive claim, dimwit.
Odysseus @Odysseus
Odysseus @Odysseus
Odysseus @Odysseus
Odysseus
21 minutes ago
@RiteMo LawBks Logic 101 - I'm not the one making the positive claim, dimwit.
21 minutes ago @Odysseus
Odysseus
21 minutes ago
@RiteMo LawBks Logic 101 - I'm not the one making the positive claim, dimwit.
@RiteMo LawBks Logic 101 - I'm not the one making the positive claim, dimwit.
21 minutes ago @Odysseus
Odysseus
21 minutes ago
@RiteMo LawBks Logic 101 - I'm not the one making the positive claim, dimwit.
@RiteMo LawBks Logic 101 - I'm not the one making the positive claim, dimwit.
21 minutes ago
@RiteMo LawBks Logic 101 - I'm not the one making the positive claim, dimwit.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@stevewilson4321 I want to make sure I understand the example, and find out how you've come to the conclusion that I've contradicted myself with something I've posted.
This following is the only example you've referenced:
"Understand that ppl now claim that if I stand on the North pole and you stand on south and we both jump up at the same time to same height, that Newtons laws dont explain how we both arrive back on earth at the same time... They claim its a phenomena of spacetime... They say Newton was just wrong and now we understand Einstein's work better... BTW Im not talking about just uneducated ppl look at Veritasium youtube videos..."
1. Personally, I've never heard someone make the argument that a physical example in Earth's gravity can't be explained by Newtonian Mechanics; and
2. In my previous remark, I referenced "The Correspondence Principle," which covers how General Relativity and Modern Physics must be able to reduce back to Newtonian Gravity and Classical Mechanics in observational problems; so
3. I haven't heard of the example from Derek Mueller (Veritasium's Host) claiming that Newton's Laws of Motion wouldn't be able to describe your "North Pole" example. If anyone made that claim regarding Newton's Laws of Motion, I would share the opinion of you.
Isaac Newton was the greatest scientist and mathematician, and possibly the most intelligent human to exist in the past 1,000 years. Einstein stood on the shoulders of Newton, and he would never claim that the minor changes and corrections to Newtonian Mechanics makes him comparable to the creator of physics, calculus, and the fundamental theories and enlightenment that made modern science, technology, engineering, and mathematics possible.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
He's playing a dangerous game with NATO and the White House. His armed forces are already struggling to find gently expired food, gas, and the Nazis they originally went looking for in Ukraine.
Yes, arming the Ukrainians with defensive weaponry is definitely provocative, but sending idle threats of military action could cause a miscalculation that would bring fresh US and NATO troops into the war.
The US has stockpiles of biological, chemical, and nuclear weapons as well. Unlike the Kremlin, the American missiles, conventional weapons, and nuclear triad actually work.
At this point, a conventional or nuclear war against NATO is "unwinnable." The Russians should be more focused on the Ukrainian Armed Forces since Zelenskyy is the one winning on the battlefield and has mostly been responsible for uniting the West to wage economic warfare against the Russian economy and the ruble.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Kermit_T_Frog The history books will likely describe her as an overachieving bookworm, who worked her entire life to become president only to lose an election that shouldn't have been close.
I'm not downplaying the significance of her winning the popular vote or the fact that the Russian Government interfered to damage her campaign, but there was a large segment of the population she was unable to reach. Most stayed home on election day.
It might just be her boring personality, but her resume and Trump were enough for Democrats to support her. I know hindsight is 20/20, but she didn't seem interested in targeting independents and "Never Trumper" GOP members.
She clearly loves America and is working to preserve her reputation of not showing emotions in public. If I invested my entire life getting an Ivy-league education, a legal career, and climbing the ladder in Democratic politics, only to lose after the October Surprise of "fake news," and an email scandal that was forgotten after the election, I would have said, "F*c* this country. I'm joining ISIS!"
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@OlancerZ The relationship between the US and the East has deteriorated more since 2017. The Russian sanctions have ruined their economy, and Nato now recognizes Russia and the biggest threat to peace in Europe.
China's actions in the South China Sea, East China Sea, and Taiwanese Strait is more hostile than it has been in the past, but their military and defense budget are growing to reflect regional tensions with the US, Australia, and our Asian allies.
Their naval powers hasn't been tested. There's not much China could gain by starting a fight with the strongest military power there is. At worst, we'll have a proxy war, economic warfare, and CIA operations. China doesn't have the same mindset as the Soviet Union, so they are much more willing to allow diplomacy to work before beginning an arms race. Their hostility has mostly been directed toward the US's closest allies, none of whom Beijing fears.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ultimatedab743 If that's true, go to plead that in a court. If you really think that a legitimate Constitutional Claim, then don't rant about it on the internet.
You have to right to seek relief in a court of law. That's where you'll get your school on how the US Constitution works. This has nothing to do with law. This is not that complicated because The First Amendment reads:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."
U.S. Const. amend. I.
If you, and other people confused about how Free Speech works, tried to petition the government or a court for a redress of your grievances regarding Twitter and politics, and were immediately censored and arrested by the state law enforcement or federal agents not wanting government leaders to be embarrassed, then I'd agree with you.
Elon Musk isn't a lawyer or an expert on Free Speech. He's been sanctioned in the past by the US Securities and Exchanges Commission ("SEC") for violating securities laws via his Tweets.
He's a talented businessman, but as soon as he starts talking about a topics he's uneducated on, he sounds like a fool. He's free to run Twitter, a private company, as long as it's consistent with the law, and the contracts and government ("FTC" and "SEC") settlements that are still binding him and Twitter.
Where he doesn't have influence is over the administration of law. If he wants to make public policy, then he should run for office. The audience is upset with his decision to insert himself into national politics, and his business decisions regarding Twitter. None of that is related to Free Speech.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The US and some EU sanctions against Russia are slightly different since they apply to, and must be followed by, every country that does business in US dollars.
As with all DC politics, American business interest has intervened since the Magnitski Act and later Crimean, Donbass, Malaysian Air bombing, and chemical-weapons related sanctions were apply to Russian oligarchs and business contracts.
During the Trump Administration, the US LNG and energy sector had more influence in the drafting of US sanctions. Under Biden, although he's administration is openly more hostile to Putin, they are more open to negotiating sanctions relief because he has authority to relax sanctions than Trump could on Russia. It politically, and by law, nearly impossible for Trump to remove any sanctions on Russia.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@auberginemanproductions1608 You believe she's, probably the last good monarch? I honestly don't know enough about the popularity and public support for the future king, Charles and his wife Camilla, but how about William and Kate? William, Kate, and their heirs will definitely be the future of the monarchy, and they both seem to be popular, humble, and well liked throughout the world.
Which ever historical monarch who decided to have the Royal Family focus on charitable work, public service, official/impartial state functions, international human rights, health and welfare, and doing nothing to give the appearance of corruption, interfering with parliamentary supremacy; or expanding the aristocracy and peerage, may have saved the institutional.
It's impressive that the Royal Family remains very popular in the United States, and that so many Americans follow the Royal Weddings and travel to Britain to see palaces, castles, and other symbols of British royal history, and anything related to Winston Churchill.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Rather than demonetizing this well-sourced, historically accurate, and mostly educational Cold War documentary, it should be made easily available and encouraged to counter misinformation motivated by actual anti-Semitism. I'm not for censorship of true and factually supported information or silencing political dissidents critical of the Israeli government, US/UK foreign policy in the Middle East, and Zionism by labeling them as "hateful bigots."
Unlike like the laws barring governments in the West from restricting protected speech, the same doesn't apply to privately owned platforms like YouTube. I'm not sure how YouTube will place additional restrictions on the terms of service, but it does seem like the online community and dark corners of the internet have regressed back to the type of anti-Semitic conspiracy theories and tropes that were common in pre-1945 Europe.
Accurately portraying, documenting, and covering the 20th-century history of Judaism and Zionism is enough to show how we can learn from history and not repeat the mistakes of the past. Anti-Semitism, xenophobia, and racial hatred were enough for humanity to return to barbarism and commit war crimes and genocide that would have been unthinkable prior to WWI.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
We good friends with the Brits, but with the exception of the Soviet Union at its height, no nation or empire in history has come close to size and influence of the United States. The US has an "informal empire," and if it had official colonies, all of the European Union, Japan, Australia, New Zealand, Israel, Gulf Arab states, Turkey, South Korea, the Philippines, Ukraine, and the Americas (North and South) would be part of the "American Empire."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@DelaDoesWork We get our money back with the rebuilding of Ukraine. The US rebuilt West Europe, South Korea, and Japan last century.
When the war is over there will be a new market of 45 million Pro-American Ukrainian customers to buy Coke, Pepsi, iPhones, Hollywood Films, Boeing planes, COVID vaccines, bombs, Google products, Teslas, Facebook, US financial products and loans, McDonald's, and what's left over can be given to the UK to sell some Jaguars, English tea, British sarcasm, and pictures of the Queen's Platinum Jubilee Celebration.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@chriswaden884 I've got to give you the designation of "Anti-Black communism 🦝," who's afraid of White men but have no problem getting tough with a dead Queen.
Mandela, MLK, Ghandi, and even modern-day BLM have all gone after law enforcement and government officials.
You're going after a dead Queen, who was a figurehead and head of the Anglican church. They're actually mourning the Queen, so why would you kick them while they're down?
I've always been against xenophobia, racism, Islamophobia, and neo-fascism in Europe, but being that you have no decency or sense of morality, you're giving them a reason to not want migrants from Africa and the Middle East.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@arbendit4348 If you have some fake stats supporting this myth about Russia not losing at least 27,000 men and 1/3 of the invasion force, then share those.
Honestly, I have no idea what you're talking, and based on your analysis of the war, it sounds like you don't either. I haven't read a single factual statement from you about the Russo-Ukrainian War.
You can call it "Ukrainian Propaganda," but if you can't offer a rebuttal or support from an impartial source, then you're only giving an opinion and not adding anything of substance.
The war is going badly for Russia. Yes, they are killing civilians targets out of desperation, but that wasn't the pretext for the invasion.
Kyiv is still under the control of Zelenskyy, and after 80 days, Russia is now one hour closer to Kyiv. If the war wasn't going so badly, the Kremlin wouldn't have taken over Russian media.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@gusjackson3658 They hate demographic change, women, the mainstream media, liberals, immigrants, and some of them are genuine conservatives.
There is something about Trump that inspires them. I'm repulsed by his politics, xenophobia, fascism, and racism, but I can understand why White males, without college degrees, would be attracted to his politics.
It's large base, and by targeting White men, he's established a massive political movement.
1
-
@gusjackson3658 The legitimate concerns that have been exploited by far-Reich politicians are the following:
1. Economic issues and Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math ("STEM") transforming workplace productivity;
2. Blue-collar jobs being sent overseas;
3. Automation in manufacturing replacing humans;
4. College-degree requirements for entry-level positions;
5. Females making more money and are more educated than their male counterparts; and
6. High-tech, STEM, and medical positions in Silicon Valley and around the nation being filled by immigrants with advanced degrees and experience in high-demand STEM fields.
I can understand their frustration, and I am definitely not racist against White men. I want to share the country with them and the economic progress.
It's just there is a lot of anger from them, and Donald Trump is able to take advantage of them. The way I speak sounds condescending to them, so it makes it hard to communicate. I (or a politician I preferred) would be willing to focus on the employment issue, and keep them gainfully employed and not left behind.
The US is the most highly competitive country in the world, but White Males are a large segment of the population. We have to work together and make them part of the solution and the decision-making process: e.g., if we were to relocate a large number of refugees to a rural area, the local citizens should be involved in the screening process to ensure the refugees can successfully assimilate in their new home and community. That's an example of them being apart of the process, and they won't have anyone but themselves to blame for any later complaints they might have against the migrants.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@gusjackson3658 I wouldn't live anywhere else. I think I'm more patriotic than the nationalist who pretend to love America. If my candidate lost an election, the thought of seizing power would be unthinkable to me.
I'm a supporter of liberal democracy. Last year, with the Covid-19 and the economic shutdown, I knew Trump fate was sealed, but he still came dangerously closer to being re-elected.
The way you describe America is how I describe the US adversaries: Winston Churchill defined Russia as "a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma," and to this day I've always been fascinated with them and their culture.
The same with China. I know that we and the Australians are a global competition with them, but I'd love to visit. I never thought America would be a "riddle." There are so many Hollywood films describing the American life.
I'm in Texas, and when I went to Australia and Europe, they seem nearly exactly like America. The languages and accents were different, but it was similar to American culture. There were McDonalds, KFC, Coke, Pepsi, and iPhones everywhere, so it felt like home.
1
-
@gusjackson3658 Not all of his supporters are extremist. Yes, media companies like FOXNEWS, RT America, NewsMax, and Brietbart portray him as the savior of traditional values in American, but most Americans don't follow cable news and politics as closely as I do.
I'm a lawyer by profession, but I've been interested in politics, international affairs, and business since I was a child. There are plenty of people who believe that all politicians lie, and nothing Trump did was worst than any normal politicians.
There are a lot of people disinterested in politics, and it's similar to how Hitler was able to take advantage of people who couldn't distinguish between Hitler vs. Hindenburg. In 2016 and 2020, Donald Trump lost the popular vote by millions, but he didn't need a single vote to win because of our Presidential electoral-college system.
I'm not sure if you're able to watch "Real Time with Bill Maher," but he's a Democrat only because the Republicans have become insane (the same with me), but he is excellent at describing how the politics of the Democratic party are hostile to White men. The party has become associated with "cancel culture," and defunding the police. The Right-wingers have been able to take advantage of that, and of voters who are disinterested; and have used laws to make it harder for traditionally Democratic voter to be counted.
1
-
@gusjackson3658 About Prince's death, that likely had more to do with journalistic ethics and confirmation before releasing information. They needed to confirm his opioid addiction because most of the sources weren't credible.
He was always known as a person who never drank or did drugs. Like so many Americans, he became addicted to opioid pain killers. There were rumors about him dying from HIV/AIDS and other health conditions, but after the police confirmed there were pill bottles and it was an apparent overdose, we didn't know the drug until the toxicology report was done a month later.
During the last 12 months, 100,000 people in the US died from drug overdoses. Most of it was from pills laced with fentanyl. that's what killed Prince.
I don't agree with all of her politics, but I think you should be proud of PM Jacinda Ardern
. Her government's handling of the Covid-19 Pandemic was a model for the entire world, and it a sign of how much the government values human life.
I'm not sure how supportive of the British Commonwealth and Monarchy, but your Queen is definitely someone to be proud of.
We don't have monarchy, but the president is Head of State, and before President Obama, was called a liar by a Congressman; it was unthinkable to call a president out of a lie before a live audience.
There not a Prime Minister's questions for the US president, but other members of the government can be questions by the media and the Congress. It's not quite as a violation of Royal Protocol, but it's very disrespectful to call any president a liar.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@soberanobrasil9370 The media doesn't have to tell me anything. There are open source resources that have captured the destroyed Russian military equipment. The number of damaged vehicles and tanks are consistent with the number of Russian casualties and loss of military equipment. The figures reported by the Ukrainians, NATO, and US are more believable.
The only side that uses lies, propaganda, and disinformation is the Kremlin and their allies in the East. They're even desperate to hire trolls like you to serve as "useful idiots."
The reason you're pretending not to know the dire situation of Russia is either because 1) you're uninformed; 2) intentionally trolling; or 3) you live in a country desperate for cheap Russian gas and oil.
You can have your own opinions, but you can't lie to someone with critical-thinking skills and access to uncensored media and accurate statistics.
Russia and the CCP are the corrupt states and great powers that rely on lies, trolls, and fake news to keep their own citizens from knowing the truth.
Zelenskyy, NATO, and the Ukrainian Armed Forces have no reason to lie because their results speak for themselves: Russia has been militarily defeated on the ground, and the suffering from the economic warfare and financial sanctions that have cut Russia's international trade, frozen assets of Russian oligarchs and has weakened the ability of the Russian Central Bank to stop the inevitable economic recession.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@AY-tv4gw Russian mercenaries tried to attacked US troops in Syria, and got blown to smithereens by the hundreds. The US and Israel continued striking targets as if Russia wasn't in the country. That's not a good example.
Russia is not a superpower. The Soviet Union absolutely was and had a larger standing military than NATO, but Russia is not the USSR, and it's no where close to challenging NATO. They don't have manpower, economy, or technology. All they have are the disinformation trolls like you who conveniently misrepresent the facts.
I'm not sure why a serious adult would make war into a video game like competition, but since you decided to mention Georgia; in 2008, the Bush Administration used the threat of a military airstrike on Russia troops for invading the territory, and Putin took him seriously.
Russia is a very strong country still celebrated for defeating the Nazis, and Putin is an experience bureaucrat who is playing a game of chess, but he's not crazy enough speed up his demise by starting a conflict with the US.
The Russian economy is ruined; the full pension retirement age of a Russian male is 245 years old, so they're strategy against the US is called, "asymmetrical warfare," and that's why they use trolls, bots, and useful idiots like you to spread propaganda and lies rather than directly challenging the US or a NATO country.
Putin's biggest fear is an American-backed regime change because it can happen without US military power or an invasion. The country is so poor that the CIA could send an agent into Russia with a $billion and bring people in the streets to start a revolution, and give Putin the Romanov ex-tsar treatment.
1
-
@AY-tv4gw Go write that as an academic essay, and when it's peer-reviewed by anyone with a background on economics or geopolitics, then I'll it seriously.
As of right now, you don't come off as credible or knowledgeable, and you haven't shown that you can even clearly and coherently state Vladimir Putin's and Russia's position. If you were able to compare and contrast the POV of Russia and the US, I would have been eager to listen to your stance.
You don't have to share my position because I would love to interact with someone who is competent in geopolitics, and someone who actually took the time to research and learn the history of the Cold War. My problem is that you're trying to BS me, as if I can't tell that you don't know anything about Russia-US relations.
It's a complicated topic, and it took decades for me to even get a comfortable understand it. Russia definitely has some legitimate grievances with the US and NATO, but you don't know what those are. They have a public position which is spread like propaganda in Western media by "useful idiots," and their true objectives, which is in their timing and subtle messages.
You definitely have the right to your opinion, but it would be better if you were honest and asked for help rather than pretending to be an expert on topic you've spent no time researching. I could ask you about America's interest in Syria or Ukraine, and I would already know your answer: It's going to be the Kremlin talking point that you are repeating verbatim. I already know those. You're repeating them without even knowing the meaning and the message. That's were the term "useful idiot" comes from.
You're doing a favor for neither the US, China, nor Russia. The only thing you're doing is trying to pretend to be smart and engage in a conversation that you're not an expert on. You might as well try to argue against Einstein's theory of relativity because I'm sure you're clueless on that, too. Long story short, be honest, humble, and stop lying. It's a waste of time engaging with someone who doesn't believe in TRUTH.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ndongengone7284
Full Transparency: I haven't read a single word you've posted. I only saw those cringe emojis, and immediately hit the YouTube Mute Feature, which I would like to advertise now:
__________________________________
Are your notifications getting cluttered with nonsense from Russian-back trolls, CCP, communist, socialist, fascist, and other nutcases? What if I told you that you could immediately put a stop to it by using the YouTube Mute Feature, and SpamBot Reporting.
Just go about your day free of distraction, without seeing ALL CAPS about DOCTOR FAUCI, BLACK LIVES MATTER, HUNTER BIDEN's LAPTOP, and other crap you never asked about. Mute it; Report it; and let them finish the conversation with your online ghost .
----------
To keep my notification from being cluttered with nonsense from Russian bots.
Just pretend my online ghost is still here reading everyone of your posts.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It's fine to evaluate yourself and own personal failures, but you can't speak for half the globe and the oldest and most stable markets in history. China and other developing nations are experiencing economic growth because it was cut off from most of world trade during the Cold War, and has now re-joined the global market. Before the 19th and 20th centuries, and before industrialization and being overtaken and weakened by European and Japanese imperialism during, China and India had been the largest economies and relied on their large populations to outproduce most of the world.
It's a great accomplishment to bring hundreds of millions of the population out of poverty, but communism never works. It causes corruption, waste of resources, and gives the illusion of a planned economy, free of recessions. Market corrections and recessions serve a purposes and changes behavior. The CCP functions more like a single corporation rather than a nation, and the recent hostile stance is not all because of Trump's aggression and trade war. In China, there are many economic, environmental, human rights, and structural weaknesses that are being brought to light. The question of what will happen when the growth slows substantially, is a genuine one.
If the US, put Apple Inc. or Google as the global representative of the American system of government, culture, and economics, we'd appear as organized as the CCP as well. It's good to prepare for war, but a direct war with the US won't happen. China will definitely defend itself if attacked or if it's frontiers are threatened; but there is nothing to gain from going to war directly with the United States. The U.S. and Russia defense strategy is to make war unwinnable and as close to nonvalue added as possible. The U.S. and Russia could destroy the planet, and the U.S. economy alone affects the global market, so there won't a direct war.
It's likely there could be proxy conflicts similar to the Cold War. Both sides could arm the enemies of each other, and would be hostile to smaller nations picking sides. It's likely that China is already using North Korea as a proxy to harass the US. I don't see a war because China is proud of what it has accomplished and would like to be treated as an equal to the US; and they want the rest of the international community to recognize that as well. The nuclear threat from the US is an effective deterrent and China is surrounded by American forces and allies. They could challenge India, since it doesn't have a security agreement with the US, but not America directly.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@user-jt3dw6vv4x I'm not familiar with the IT threat. I'm in Texas myself, and when PM Modi came here, he was treated like a rockstar. I think a relationship between the US and India will depend on the US threating India as an equal, and not a colony, or pawn in our Cold War against China and Russia.
As far as geopolitics and economics, the rise of China will depend greatly on its international reputation and domestic affairs. I doubt there's much we could do to stop China's economic progress, without harming ourselves. The system is still communist and there is a lot of corruption.
I agree that EU isn't a single nation, but its powers are becoming centralized, and Germany appears the by far the most powerful and influential member.
I think this will interesting, but I doubt much would change in the world order. The permanent members of the UN Security Council will continue to be powerful and stable countries. We need more representation from emerging great powers, i.e., India, Africa, and maybe replacing the French seat with the European Union.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@MrMacky-co6zn When did the CCP claim it wanted "buffer states?" I've heard that used by Stalin, but the US and European empires have been inside China and the Pacific region since the 19th century.
The intervention in the Korean War happened during the same time frame that the US defended Taiwan and recognized it as the legitimate Chinese government. There was combat involving Chinese and UN forces, but that definitely wasn't a US-China War. It was Beijing using soldiers as cannon fodder.
The US military presence in the Pacific Ocean, South China Sea, Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, New Zealand, and Australia had been strategically placed to contain mainland China, the spread of communism, and cut China off from global trade.
The example of a Chinese buffer state in Asia would be Mongolia. US-CHINA relations have improved, but during the Cold War, the US posed an existential threat to Mao.
China was cut off from the UN, international trade, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. The US was much hostile during the Cold War, and made nuclear threats because China became communist.
China and the US will continue to play a game of chess in geopolitics to counter the US, there will never a global conflict or even direct fighting between the US and China.
They're the two largest markets and ending the trading relationship would damage both nations. There are more effective ways the CCP could counter the US without a direct conflict.
That's why Taiwan is so crucial and it's an indicator China readiness and willingness to have a war against the US. It's my opinion but the only way the two countries would have a direct military conflict is of they attack each other, or if the CCP attacks NATO or the American bases in the Pacific. Both options would drastically favor the US, but both nations will pay too high of a price. China isn't pacifist, but it doesn't start wars of conquest and before Xi, the foreign relations with the West were much more cordial and non hostile.
The US isn't invincible, but the status as the foremost global superpower after 1918, makes it nearly unthinkable of any country to start a direct conflict.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The UK has its economic problems, labor disputes, higher-than-normal inflation rates, uncertainty about post-Brexit trade, and the rapidly changing demographics from migration and high birthrates from minorities, but it's arguably the most adaptable, resilient, and stable liberal democracy in the West.
A century ago, the British Empire reached its zenith as world's foremost naval power with the second-largest economy, control of the international-reserve currency, and a total population half a billion people.
Before the onset of the Second World War, the Partitioning of the Indian Subcontinent, and the subsequent UN-era right to self determination and post-war decolonization, it was on par with the United States as a global superpower.
In 2022, they had a number of challenges not unique to Britain; i.e., other the lost of a very popular queen and the appointment of three different prime ministers during a single year.
I'm probably biased due to the fact that Americans typically have a positive opinion of a nation that is nearly identical with a common cultural, economic, and political system.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Do you have time stamp for it? I must have missed that because the typical example of classical physics, which includes General Relativity ("GR"), failing to explain a quantum system deals with the electron orbitals and discrete energy levels.
GR predict that an accelerated electron would radiate out gravitational waves and eventually collide with the nucleus of an atom. There's a much more complex incompatibility that happens when quantum field theory is used in curved spacetime and a process called, "renormalization."
Other than those examples, observations on the macro scales are completely explained by Newtonian physics. The exceptions being due to relativistic velocities, cosmological evolution; e.g., dark energy, Hubble expansion, and dark matter, and in ultra-high-density gravitational fields (like Black holes and neutron stars). GR and Newtonian gravity diverge significantly in highly curved spacetime.
Depending on the scenario, GR, Special Relativity, dark-matter gravitation, or quantum field theory are required.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jimbo2629 If you've never heard of "pseudo force," "fictional force," or "inertial force," should you really be lecturing about classical mechanics, spacetime, and gravity?
Relativity from Galileo, Newton, and Einstein are all proven scientific theories, there's nothing to be "duped" about. You either understand them or not; and the models and predictions are either right, wrong, or incomplete.
I'm a humble guy, and despite having modern technology and the benefit of hindsight, I believe it's better to fully comprehend the theories of Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein before trying to disprove them.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jeffkardosjr.3825 You clearly haven't read the law. No one is being forced to work with or without compensation. That's a matter between employee and employer and not the government.
You should at least perform your due diligence of understanding the government's role in the labor dispute and what a government intervention means.
The deprivation of the rights, liberties, and immunities you're describing would look nothing like what happened in this law.
The government isn't seizing private property or sending in the police to force work at gunpoint without due process of law.
The work they're doing is highly regulated, and a disruption of railways affects other businesses, consumers, and the government.
The government isn't forcing pilots, TSA , ATC, and airport employees to work at gunpoint and without pay, but if a labor dispute shut down US aviation, interstate commerce, and conflicts with international law, then it's affecting the general public and not just the striking employees.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TheNJB The US has a global role, and millions of people around the world are trying to come here. You might disagree with it, but the US is an empire and protects its overseas interests.
America has the ability and resources to close or secure the border if it wanted to. It might be business and political influence, but the US hasn't prioritized changing any immigration laws.
Regardless, that has nothing to do with Ukraine. The US didn't just randomly get involved with the dispute. The US, UK, and Russia all agreed to provide military aid in exchange for Ukraine returning their Soviet-era nukes.
There aren't many topics that have bipartisan support in Congress, but confronting and countering China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea is something all of Washington, DC agrees on.
The military aid and NATO membership isn't about charity or handouts. The US rebuilt most of post-WWII West Europe to have markets to sell American goods, financial services, weapons, and energy.
When this war is over, Ukraine will be a new market with 45 million Pro-American Ukrainians, and German-led EU will be transitioning away from Russian gas to be replaced with US LNG.
This war was a miscalculation and blunder by the Kremlin. The leaders of the West are all united, and the US is the only country strong enough to keep Russia from attacking Europe.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@michaelhammond7115 Being bigoted is the expertise of your fellow cultist. Based on your laundry list of claims, conspiracy theories, and Right-wing political points, all of your predictable accusations just starts from your hating a free press.
The hatred of the media and intentionally spreading disinformation is the link that brings the entire Trump base together.
I'm not sure why you felt the need to reference your Native American ancestry or why it's relevant, but that doesn't explain the fact that you've made the media into an enemy.
The entire MAGA political movement and culture war isn't randomly called, "fascist-adjacent." It's the unjustified hatred of the elites, main-stream media, and the cult-like worship of Donald Trump.
You probably don't like being called a far-Right extremist, but it's obvious that you've been radicalized and can no longer distinguish fact from fiction, e.g., this video is about the surge of Covid-19 cases in India and the impending human tragedy that would follow a near collapse in their healthcare infrastructure.
Rather than express empathy or add substance to the discussions, you've decided to politicize this pandemic and exploit a human tragedy to criticize the media for report an factually accurate report.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It took long enough. We've had hydrogen/fusion bombs since the fifties. One of the few positives of this new "Cold War" against China, and to a lesser extent, Russia, is the advances in the space, technology, engineering, pharmaceuticals, and infrastructure investments.
Most of the spending and investments are for proxy wars, intelligence, economic warfare, and weapons systems, but every now and then something not intentionally designed to kill or terrorize people is developed.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@justwallace You can't possibly be a real person defending Russia if your from America. Are the world thinking the world's countries (The West) are bullying on Russia just to be mean, and that the US is only interested in starting a war with another country with nuclear weapons?
I've followed Putin and listened to his speeches since he replaced Yeltsin when I was 16. The man's a compulsive liar and will literally say anything. This whole act of being a tough guy and spymaster always outsmarting the US is fake.
He's just a glorified government bureaucrat with a bunch of online trolls protecting his image and reputation. His advantage over the US is not due to his intelligence or his military; it's his tenure in office and ability to just wait until a hostile US president (e.g., Bush, Obama, and Biden) leaves office.
His government is run by criminals, and although he does kills political opponents and bullies smaller countries, he's not crazy enough to do that with the United States.
At the beginning of George W. Bush's presidency, he claimed to have looked into Putin's eyes and saw his soul. At the end of the Bush Administration, Putin was in a conflict with Georgia for seeking ties with NATO.
Clearly, something changed in the US-Russia relationship. Instead of blaming everything on the nation you claim is your home, you should find WHY Russia has fewer allies now than it did before 2014.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
In the US, it's determined by political decisions and regulations; thus Arabs, Persians, and other Muslim-majority countries (i.e., Middle Eastern and excluding Indonesia, Bangladesh, and India) are demographically classified as Middle Eastern and Northern Africa ("MENA").
There are hundreds of different racial groups who are followers of Islam, so census takers use ethnicity and race, e.g., India and Pakistan were part of the same country, but Pakistanis are MENA and Indians are Asian American Pacific Islanders.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@linx8376 That's just Cold War-style politics. China has its own problems. Even if there were no hostile US, there would still be tensions will the CCP, India, UK, European Union ("EU"), Japan, Vietnam, Australia, South Korea, and even Russia. The despite the spying, the EU is more aligned with the US. It needs China for economic reasons.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
That's a question of law, and the constitution vests that power solely within the judicial branch. The Supreme Court isn't passing new legislation. It applies facts and settled law. An Act of Congress can't be written to be applicable to every situation or set of facts without needing to be interpreted.
The rulings, opinions, case law, constitutional law, and other judge-made laws are from English common law and judges have always had that power before the US existed.
Congress, state governments, regulatory agencies, and executive branch politicians, pass statutes, budgets, amend the constitution, and other acts of legislation. That's not the same as what the courts rule on.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Madame702 I never heard of this "Cuban American war." There was the Spanish-American War that involved Cuba. There was also the Cold War/Fidel Castro and Cuban-Missile Crisis.
I'm not sure what drugs you're on, but I know my own country, and it history in int'l affairs. You don't even have a valid point. You're just jealous that there is only one superpower controlling world affairs.
I know it's unfair and it won't last forever, but stick to that instead of spreading misinformation. My post is that seeing the US fully mobilize for war would scare Russia, Putin, China, or anyone.
There more money, technology, advanced weapon systems, and the strongest military here. Why would anyone underestimate this country, when it's mostly know for war.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@kihondosa4 I dumbed it down, so you could understand, but it still didn't work. The US won't enter any country without permission, UN authorization, Congressional Authorization, Nato mission, or retaliation for a terror attack or act of war.
The most famous Middle East Peace Accord (Israel v. Egypt) was brokered by the US. I tend to expect people to have a better understanding of history, and not just rely on Russian and other anti-Western propaganda.
Before there was the Azerbaijan-Armenian Peace Deal brokered by your Tsar Putin, there was the Middle East Peace Accord. The US proves peacekeepers and so does European, Australian, and Canadian forces.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TheNefastor The questions of education and reading comprehension might work on other people, but I can see through your BS. I'm not a historian, but I'm pretty confident this is not a topic you understand.
If you were simply making a case against US foreign policy and Nato, you would have had a respectable point. It would have been wiser had you not presented yourself as an expert and troll because you obviously don't know what the ultimate objectives of any US-led war were.
You've decided to take the low road by revising history and attempting link withdrawal of troops as a shameful act. The US has the resources to establish a permanent base and continue killing with impunity.
Essentially all post-WWII military conflicts have been police actions commencing (mostly) with a request of US or Russia military advisors. There was a never a total war, and the new system international law requires the UN Security Council approval.
It's just naive and disingenuous to claim that these poor nations that have been invaded, occupied, and colonized are having military victories.
Your oversimplified assessment of the military history could explain why there is always little or no support in the US for Marshall Plan-style aid, rebuilding, reparations, and setting claims against US military intervention.
You've admitted that you're neither American nor Russia. If that's the case, stay focused on your own domestic politics. There's nothing you can add to the discussion because there's not much you know about it. It's pitiful because there are so many people who don't know when to shut up.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Hasan-we7qp That wasn't a what-if scenario or revision of history. It's the future change in the region that will be dominated by the US and China.
You should be more focused on how to navigate a Beijing-controlled South China Sea and remain non-aligned and independent instead of US-Persian relations from the Cold War.
Enforcing "Freedom of Navigation patrols" with the US Navy and protecting Australia, the Philippines, New Zealand, South Korea, Japan, and Taiwan are the most important regional and business interest of the US and the West. That and selling US goods, financial products, and services to new markets.
Under a hypothetical US puppet regime with democratic principles, Indonesia would probably be similar to the other liberal democracies in the Indo-Pacific that have close ties to the US and American military bases for protection.
Indonesia might seem like the center of the world to you, but in case you haven't noticed, the US still has a global hegemony and is more focused on China, Iran, North Korea, and Russia and domestic issues rather than interfering in Indonesian politics.
That could change if there's a major reservoir of oil, natural gas, and precious minerals for semiconductors discovered in Indonesia. Getting India as an economic partner and military ally against the CCP is a higher priority for the West.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Over a year ago, most of the world thought that about Ukraine and Zelenskyy, too. You shouldn't use generalization about a continent with many different nationalities still haunted by the many wars, genocide, and revolution. They want peace and prosperity, and for most of West Europe they've had it with a US-backed military alliance.
The CCP definitely doesn't have the military capability or near-term prospects of fighting a war of conquest against NATO in Europe, even if it's to aid Russia. The US is the superpower competing for regional dominance against Mainland China, Russia, and Iran. Unlike those countries, the US actually has allies willing to cede economic, military, and political sovereignty to have junior partnership with America.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Phil-ui4tm Communism never works and would have eventually collapsed, but even in socialist governments, wars and imperialism (adding new communist nations and markets) can lead to an increase in government spending and grow the economy.
In the short run, they create jobs, increase GDP, raise prices and wages, and increase the demand for the weapons industry. It does backfire at times; e.g., the current Russo-Ukraine War, which led to sanctions and damage to Russia's international trade and the Ruble/U$D exchange rate.
I got too wordy and lost my original point 🤔. It had something to do with the Soviet-Afghan War, Perestroika and Glasnost, and the dissolution of the USSR.
1
-
@citizensallianceaustralia2025 That's a much better explanation, and it's clear you didn't wing it. If I got it right, it wasn't a single event or miscalculation. It was the totality, and not just Afghanistan alone that caused the collapse. You mentioned the following:
1. The Afghan Invasion, Chernobyl disaster, and economic stagnation increased costs and kept the Red Army preoccupied;
2. Perestroika (privatization) was used to transition to a free-market system to gain revenue but eventually caused shortages;
3. Glasnost (protected political speech) gave the people the right to petition the state, and exposed the fragility of system, which encouraged solidarity and protest movements;
4. Warsaw Pact + Satellite state + whatever you consider Yugoslavia realized they had their own domestic problems with civil unrest and couldn't rely on the Red Army or economic assistance from Moscow;
That makes sense and is a much more detailed explanation, but what caused the end of détente? Did something trigger the Kremlin to see a US threat in Afghanistan? It had been a Soviet satellite state with a communist government. The US re-established relations with Mainland China and Taiwan, but its position in the Middle East wasn't too stable either. The Iranian Revolution, War in Lebanon, Libyan-backed terrorism, and Iran-Iraq War all occurred at nearly the same time.
1
-
1
-
@Phil-ui4tm I have a background in economics, and most of the time even I forget Marxism is an actual economic theory and not just about political control, class warfare, Iron Curtains, Stalin, gulags, and anti-capitalist revolutions.
I was born during the final decade of the Cold War in America and have been accustomed to hearing "communism" and "socialism" associated with all things evil and anti-American.
Proving that with economics, human behavior, and financial data has always been fascinating. The "Red Scare" still lingers today and taking an unbiased approach and proper analysis is difficult since it's still considered taboo, even in universities and corporate America.
I still feel required to first condemn communism, and make the remark about how "it never works" before using circular reasoning to come to the conclusion that supports the capitalism arguments.
The spread of communism did pose a genuine threat to US and UK business interests, overseas investments, and access to international markets to offset the costs of WWII debt, but in order to prove it requires a mastery of Karl Marx's theory. in corporate America, reading anything from Karl Marx would be similar to them discovering you have a signed copy of Mein Kampf.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
NoYourWrong1 Still the wrong war. You might as well bring up the Roman Empire as well. You don't understand the concept of being relevant.
If your house is on fire, do you complain about the neighbors always playing loud music, or do you put out the fire?
If the US foreign policy were relevant, we could address. It's not, and you don't even seem capable of understanding the perspective of the Ukrainians.
Unlike the situation with the the US and NATO, Ukraine actually worked to establish an international alliance to counter Russia. That's something Saddam, Gaddafi, Bin Laden, and other countries attacked by the West should have considered.
You're using the same whataboutism as the Kremlin. If you and the Kremlin were opposed to US military action, you should have done something to stop it.
The US is doing plenty to stop Russia now. The White House isn't just whining and complaining about how mean Putin is.
The US is providing intel, weapons, economic warfare, propaganda, diplomacy, and economic aid to Ukraine. All options are working to ensure Russia fails.
You should have done that when he US was at war. That's why they say, "put up or shut up." You can't compare Russia to the US because it's clearly not America.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@IMGreg.. The post is only regarding American business interests and why the US should also invest in rebuilding Ukraine. I'm aware of the significant contributions from the UK, Canada, and other NATO countries.
I'm sure the UK for example are looking for a new post-Brexit trading relationship, but my remark are specifically from the perspective of the US.
There are a lot of American who think their money is being used as charitable contributions and NATO is a philanthropic organization.
FDR and Woodrow Wilson were greedy Yanks, too. That's how the US, as an ally, replaced the British Empire and British Pound as the global currency. The reason you see iPhones, Coca Cola, KFC, McDonald's, YouTube, Hollywood Films, American vehicles, Boeing planes, Microsoft, American banks, and US defense contractors around the globe is because "Greedy Yanks" need a return on their investment.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@bryandimery6509 A few things to note:
1. I'm not "wondering (sic) in the intellectual wilderness[1]," and this has nothing to do with CNN or my own personal opinions regarding China or the US. I prefer to engage with people who present truth and historical factual support when discussing geopolitics or making an argument about international trade. You continue to state your own opinions that aren't relevant to the topic or done with any fact-based analysis;
2. Somehow you've made economics and international affairs into some type of a game and trolling. There's no way I can take you seriously when you get away from reality and start changing topics. Your opinion isn't the problem. The problem is that you're not saying anything that exists in the real world, so how could I know what you're talking about? You're also making assumptions about the CCP and the US dollar that you can't support with evidence or economic indicators;
3. I mistakenly believed you were genuine about your interests in geopolitics related to China. China is fascinating, and I love history and some of the economic aspects. I'm not trying to insult you, but I don't think you know anything about China or its economic politics or role in global affairs. I'm not claiming to be an expert on Chinese affairs, but you are pretending to be one; so finally
4. That's why I got immediately turned off when you started lying and making those claims about the US dollar, which is a realm where I do have an academic background. I don't like calling people "bots," but seriously you're not even talking like a human being or even an adult. You're describing China and geopolitics the way a child would describe their favorite action-hero cartoon.
I do wish you well, but you should be humble and start asking more questions rather than giving "expert opinions" and irrational arguments on issues as complex as international economics, geopolitics, and superpower competition.
___________________
[1] FYI: It's spelled "wandering."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
A NATO state should intervene and escort the Ukraine's grain shipments from the Black Sea. Preferably, it should be the one big naval power, other than China's PLA Navy, that scares the 💩out of Vladimir Putin; i.e., Uncle Sam's US Navy. The British Royal Navy could also be added to the list.
It will be tense confrontation and seem like a Cold War 2.0 game of chicken, but the Russians aren't suicidal; they don't own the international waters of the Black Sea; and they won't attack anything with an American or British flag on it, nor will they attack NATO territory. This war has gone on too long and has damaged an already stressed global food supply chain by contributing to a spike in prices.
The Russian Armed Forces may have a proud heritage of being a superpower that pulled off, arguably, two of the the greatest military victories in history by defeating Fascist Germany and Napoleonic France. The Soviet Union and Russian Empire were defending their homeland and actually had something to fight for. Because of the fact that both Russia and Ukraine were once part of a single nation, both the Red Army and the Imperial Russian Army are now essentially fighting themselves, instead of a foreign invader.
I'm not downplaying the possibility of a nuclear war, but Russia isn't going to use nukes against another Slavic country. As a reminder, this is a war Putin started but can't easily win. Moscow is too weak militarily and economically to continue dragging out this unwinnable proxy war against NATO. It takes US leadership to escalate in order to de-escalate. A non-nuclear state would have already had its capital bombed and intelligence agencies would have orchestrated a coup d'état or regime change.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Kreze202 That's better. I calmed down once I saw "Brown Mamba" and your picture. I thought you were a troll. I've written you novel.
RUSSIA-US:
That would seem dumb and counter productive for Russia to publicly announce that they are siding with the US over China. The point was not to get Russia to intentionally damage relations with their most important strategic partner, it was to send a covert message that the US is only willing to negotiate and accept a position harmful to the interest of its closest allies (British + Europeans) if it's detrimental to our biggest global competitor, China. Neither Russia not China are our enemies, and we still cooperate with Russia on space, North Korea, and terrorism, etc., but Russia and the CCP are hostile foreign adversaries. As far as an actual, direct war among any of the countries on the UN Security Council, it will never happened. That's just nonsense and propaganda in the media. Russia and the CCP are against US foreign policy and imperialism, and the fact that the US and its troops have remained in Europe and Asia even though WWII and the Cold War have ended. It's completely reasonable that they feel threatened.
The US had a reverse situation when relations between China and the Soviet Union worsened, and Nixon even threatened to use nuclear weapons against the Soviet union to aid China during their border battle. The Russian are well aware of the US-China tensions, and if they were smart, they would play US and China to benefit their own national interests.
US ECONOMIC SANCTIONS ON RUSSIA:
The reason I referenced US sanctions are because they were designed as economic warfare specifically for Russia and their oligarchs. There's no legal way to go around them without getting the assets frozen or being prosecuted. It seems like there would be a way to just start dealing with China or the European Union to avoid US sanctions, but that's not the not how they work. in Russia, most of the wealth, including Putin's personal wealth was held by oligarchs in Western banks. When the sanctions were announced, they didn't have time to recall all of their assets back to Russian owned bank. Any of the accounts in US institution were, and are still, frozen and inaccessible. They also have sanction designed to interrupt Russian contracts with international companies, including ExxonMobil and the pipeline transporting gas from Russia to central Europe:
UN SANCTION:
The UN sanctions are the ones that are voted on in the UN Security Council, and they work as embargos to cut off nations like North Korea and previously Iraq off from all sources of foreign income. North Korea had been cut off from international trade by US sanctions alone. Their only trading partner was China, so in designing a sanction regime for North Korea that would prevent them from obtaining funds to develop nuclear weapons without starving the country was to use UN sanction that required China and Russia's vote in the UN Security Council.
The reason I said all nation have to follow US sanctions is because the US sanction Iran, and a Chinese executive was arrested in Canada for violating US sanction on Iran even though she wasn't a US citizen and the control was between the Chinese company and Iran. It became US jurisdiction because the same Chinese company does business within the US, so Chinese companies are essentially forced to observe US or choose between doing business with America or with Iran. Because the US is China's largest customer, the CCP wisely chooses America. The other countries don't implement sanction that way. There are EU sanction, but the US has been able to coerce other nations into cooperating because the dollar is the reserve currency and because of the amount of international trade the US does with most countries. China could eventually start to use a similar power, but they prefer to use diplomacy and other strategies rather than military power and sanctions.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Kreze202 Not American, but you're clearly not a hostile.
China is a centralized economy and the strength and weakness is that it functions like a single corporation. It helped them when Trump announced his trade war, which is the worst thing he could have possibly done because they had more than enough time to prepare.
Tariffs and trade wars are types of warfare. China and the US are at a different level of hostility than US and Iran. The reason I mentioned it is because China's interest is making money and expanding markets. That's what they were doing with Iran. They tried to deceive US authorities, and do business with both the US and Iran.
Their response was to immediately pressure Canada, and arrested Canadians in China, which ultimately failed. The US was willing to harm its own economic interest to maintain the sanction regime against Iran. In reality, it might be debatable, but the Iran sanctions were more to benefit Israel and Saudi Arabia, and damage the Iranian economy to get them to change the leadership.
I'm not communist and I think it's terrible system that always fails, but in the short term it appears to be a reasonable alternative like with China. I'm trying to be as fair to China as I can, but there are systems problems with their system and a lot of wasted resources. The only way to keep the communist party in power is if they continue the rapid growth indefinitely, and that's why it's so important for them to maintain positive relations with the US and European Union. Their tone has gotten more aggressive because obviously the US is very hostile and the Covid-19 pandemic has damaged their growth potential and international relations.
If the US were to use the sanctions power on China, which it already is, it would have do it clandestinely and not make it public to be most effective. That was the strategy during the Cold War against the Soviet Union and when China was cut off from international trade. The US isn't perfect or invincible, but the economy and dollar is the most stable on earth. It's been growing at the same rate for over a century. We're able to deal with recessions and high-levels of unemployment. In Beijing and Moscow, they have to keep the economies growing so there no civil unrest or uprisings.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The problem with managing pandemics and facilitating a forum for civil discourse, is that everyone considers themselves experts in relevant fields; e.g., constitutional law, epidemiology, virology, and internal medicine. Not all opinions are equal and supported by credible sources, so giving more weight to healthcare practitioners, CDC, and university researcher is NOT an example of "medical tyranny."
The caller is speaking from his personal perspective and naively parroting right-wing and libertarian talking points as if they are undisputed fact. Covid-19 affects us all, so politicizing it and spreading misinformation only encourages people, like the caller, to confidently believe they're making a scientifically sound argument on vaccinations.
At some point, we'll have to make a decision to regarding the Covid-19 guidelines. We'll either side with the opinions supported by facts, evidence, and data; or we'll keep going around in circles debating conspiracy theories, misinterpretations of the law, and pseudoscience without making progress.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jerrybobteasdale Do you at least understand the position of the Left, and why they considered Trump different and more dangerous than any other GOP politician?
The election was a referendum on him, and yes outside of FoxNews, every media organization supported the democratic candidates. It had nothing to do with wanting corruption or hating Trump for "draining the swamp."
Trump presented himself as a decent and caring human being, only to his supporters. It's been four years, and at no time did he ever try to appeal to Americans who didn't vote for him.
A simple meeting with the opposition or even BLM would have had a huge difference, but he allowed the narrative about him begin a demagogue, fascist, and racist to go unchallenged. He alienated half of the country, and rather than being the Donald Trump of the 80/90s who was respectable. He encouraged divisiveness and hate, and used America achilles heel (racial tension) to benefit himself politically.
As the election results will eventually show, the establishment GOP got rid of him, not election fraud.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@sunrae3971 The US DOES protect its foreign interests in Europe and throughout the world. If it were to simply sit back as an isolationist nation and allow the UK economy to collapse and become bankrupt, it would be damaging to the financial sector, international trade, international monetary policy, and the markets for US Dollars-UK Pound Sterling exchanges.
Despite being a sovereign nation with the sole authority to make the UK's austerity, fiscal stimulus, and monetary policy, Britain and the Bank of England ("BOE") will never act unilaterally.
The UK is closely integrated with the economies of its main trading partners, so the BOE's inflation targets, interest rates, exchange rates, and economic-growth projections are nearly identical to the influential policies and targets set by the US Federal Reserve Bank, Int'l Monetary Fund, and the European Central Bank.
The GDP of the UK is well above three US$ trillion, so from the perspective of the US and G7 nations, the UK economy, Pound Sterling, and the Bank of England are TOO big to fail without negatively impacting the global economic situation and consumer confidence.
In the past, the US has intervened around the world (including Europe), to protect both (1) the domestic economies and currency-exchange rates of its international trading partners; and (2) to implement policies beneficial to the US GDP, business interests, and the health of the domestic US job market.
If the UK were to be bailed out by the US again, the negotiations and settlements will mostly be determined by the leverage of US corporations and special interests groups that aggressively lobbies DC politicians and diplomats to include financially beneficial terms in treaties and executive international agreements that make US corporations wealthier, more productive, and competitive against international rivals.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@shackdaddy7106 The claims of "plandemic," "hoax," "just the flu," or "China Virus" nearly made me lose faith in humanity this year 🤬🤬. I do spend a lot of time fighting because I don't want anyone to die needlessly over stupid 🐂💩, and that includes Trump and his supporters.
I've just accepted that believing in conspiracy theories has become a religious experience for some, and there is a segments of the population who use it to cope with mass death and post-traumatic stress. With that being said, none of those are reasons to consider them entitled to a public platform like Dr. Fauci, other government immunologist, epidemiologist, public health civil servants, and healthcare workers.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@kevinp4449 I'm in the US, but I thought the British Empire, much like the British Commonwealth, were loosely connected colonies and dominions; and the Queen-Empress was a constitutional figure head.
Weren't Australia, NZ, South Africa, and Canada already dominions? Regardless of what happens, if the deal involved trade, oil, and a counterbalance to the China, America and India will almost inevitably join it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rawwrrob9395 I'm in total agreement with everything you've said. I made the mistake of replying to @nanoRat before completely watching the video and fully comprehending what was his point of commenting.
Your answer was very accurate and more complete than mine because I didn't take the time understand that he was referring to the "American Rule," fee-shifting statutes, and awards to recover attorney fees and court cost. I can only speak for myself, but I consider that a complicated legal question and analysis that's rare in Legal Eagle comments.
I didn't expect a non-lawyer would know that. I interpreted it as suggesting that recovering attorney fees and court cost ONLY existed in British law, and for for civil cases in the US, a new type of remedy or contractual provision was needed to make the losing party liable for all litigation-related costs.
Also, despite not being relevant to the post, your comment about ONLY pre-1789 English common law, case law, and equity principles being merged and restated into American jurisprudence is spot on. I agree with that as well.
As an Anglophile and forever student of history, I'm always eager to go off on a tangent just to make the point that, like our native language, our legal system was also "Made in England."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This year, the geopolitical situation has drastically changed to the point of Transatlantic partners, which include English-speaking liberal democracies, openly demanding a more assertive German and European Union leadership over the collective energy, economic, political, and security affairs in Europe.
As a potential superpower, Germany should have a more active role in promoting free trade, European economic and defense integration, and countering the influence of hostile adversaries and the autocratic regimes in Moscow, Beijing, Tehran, and Pyongyang.
A German-led European Union and NATO wouldn't be seen as an existential threat to US economic and military interests. The US and Britain have both pivoted toward Southeast Asia and countering the regional influence of the CCP by enforcing maritime law and freedom of navigation on behalf of US allies in the Pacific.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1