Comments by "Vikki McDonough" (@vikkimcdonough6153) on "Why Antitank Rifles Were Not Sniper Rifles" video.

@DubhghlasMacDubhghlas I think they meant that statement as (or, at least, I understood it as) "there are actual real-life soldiers who have sexually humiliated", not as "to be a real soldier, you have to sexually humiliate". Admittedly, not the best choice of words there.
5
@DubhghlasMacDubhghlas Video: about why real-life antitank rifles weren't generally used as sniper rifles. Master Gecko's comment: "Next episode: why don’t real soldiers teabag dead enemies", fairly-obviously intended to mean "why don't soldiers teabag dead enemies in real life". Dick Jifferson's reply to Master Gecko (for context): "im willing to bet a few have been teabagged irl, unfortunately" David Venegas's reply to Master Gecko: "Real soldiers do sexually humiliate killed enemies and civilians.", fairly-obviously intended as pointing out that "some soldiers do sexually humiliate killed enemies and civilians in real life", in the same vein as Dick Jifferson's earlier reply, rather than as a defense of sexually humiliating dead enemies and civilians. guppy719's reply to Master Gecko: "I guarantee you a real soldier has in fact teabagged a dead enemy.", again in the vein of "there is at least one real-life soldier who has actually teabagged a dead enemy".
4
@DubhghlasMacDubhghlas Do I what?
4
@DubhghlasMacDubhghlas Do I what?
3
I can think of one justification for using the biggest round possible for sniping, iff you have accurate ammo and an accurate gun; a bigger, heavier round has a higher ballistic coefficient than a lighter one (lower surface-to-mass ratio, courtesy of the square-cube law), hence is slowed down more slowly by aerodynamic drag and less affected by crosswinds between you and your target, hence is (potentially) more accurate at long range, hence is (potentially) usable for sniping out to longer ranges than something smaller (also, even if a big round had the exact same ballistic coefficient and impact speed as an equally-accurate smaller round, the big round would still have greater kinetic energy at impact - and, hence, lethality - due to its greater mass, making it still, potentially, useful out to greater ranges), hence can take potshots at the enemy from further away than they can shoot back with their own rifles.
2
In fairness, that was actually the case back during the World Wars, when the "sniper"/"sharpshooter"/"designated marksman" roles, and the rifles for those roles, hadn't yet separated; a sniper would have basically a standard bolt-action rifle, just one individually selected for having superior individual accuracy.
2