Comments by "Vikki McDonough" (@vikkimcdonough6153) on "" video.

  1. 6:58 - So they could have chopped out that routine entirely and saved even more RAM, CPU cycles, and HDD space!
    3
  2. 4:38 - If the first satellite had lots of extra propellant but the second one didn't, then why not use the first satellite to de-incline the two satellites together?
    2
  3. 6:49 - Then why keep it running while the rocket is actually in flight, rather than shutting it off as soon as the SRBs ignite (at which point a scrub becomes impossible)?
    2
  4. 7:47 - Carp, revert to VAB!
    2
  5. 5:36 - Why didn't they have the software designed to simply saturate (hold the number at its maximum value) in the event of an overflow, instead of rolling over? Seems to me that, with control software for a rocket, the effects of having one of the parameters saturate could not possibly be worse than the effects of having one suddenly roll over to zero or to a large negative number...
    2
  6. How so?
    2