Comments by "Martin Parsons" (@MartinParsons-tr6wi) on "If you’re right-wing you’re ARRESTED, if you’re left-wing NOTHING happens! | Richard Tice FUMES" video.

  1. ​ @steve-en7bm  Well said, Steve. Two cheeks ...
    15
  2. That one always stirs the establishment trolls. 👍
    8
  3. Go for it 👍
    5
  4.  @chkldstgee2433  Yourself included
    5
  5.  @chkldstgee2433  You have no qualms about causing offence
    5
  6. ​ @PaulK-ve1pu  That's offensive, you'd better be more careful, that's a crime, that is ...
    5
  7. ​ @ClactonCuun  Voting costs nothing, brains
    4
  8. Hence the incompetence
    4
  9. Does The Ministry of Information write their questions for them ?
    4
  10.  @Thomas-vg8ov  Well said, mate. There's something distinctly iffy about Clactoncun
    3
  11. ​ @porschia.3318  Don't be, there's at least four million of us, and more are realising every day
    3
  12.  @Lollyng3ms  Clacton and his ilk are too challenged to realise they do cluelessness a disservice
    3
  13.  @Thomas-vg8ov  I know what you mean,Tom. My comments are vanishing ten to the dozen, even the complimentary ones
    2
  14. Agreed 👍
    2
  15.  @ClactonCuun  Predictably underhand, but my comment still stands
    2
  16.  @ClactonCuun  What is it that appeals to you about totalitarianism ?
    2
  17.  @sayitasitis100  You're probably right. Either way, Clactoncun seems to be struggling to come up with a reply
    2
  18. He had the law changed specially
    2
  19. ​ @Bella-tx1rz  For sure. He's too psychopathic for that
    2
  20. Is that supposed to convince anyone ?
    2
  21. The flak is concentrated on N I g e, now
    2
  22. Red team/blue team illusion
    2
  23. Re form are doing what they can. The others are compromised
    2
  24. ​ @JulieSayce-ko1yj  Taqiyya, being one of them
    2
  25. ​ @richardgallagher4880  Vous etes bien tordu
    2
  26. Because he threatens to expose their lies
    1
  27. The watchdogs are compromised. The government institutions are culpable
    1
  28. No point. The answer is too obvious. The snouts are in the trough
    1
  29. Surprised that comment didn't vanish. Too truthful
    1
  30. My day was ruined yesterday, when a lovely message of support from India was met with "They all despise you" from a bloke who went on to call me a far right fascist, after I tried to offer the gentleman my thanks, and apologise for the lack of civility that had been shown to him
    1
  31.  @baldy3405  You people are reprehensible
    1
  32.  @baldy3405  You don't seem to understand your own non sense
    1
  33. LOL
    1
  34. Quangocracy
    1
  35. The Manchester airport psychos ?
    1
  36. People with nothing to offer do baseless insults
    1
  37.  @wundurra24  Do you believe in unquestioning obeisance (like in 1984) ?
    1
  38.  @wundurra24  Because you think we must all blindly submit to a system, and if anyone dares to question the agenda, they're a "conspiracy theorist", or listening to a viewpoint that goes against the narrative that you've chosen to submit to
    1
  39. ​ @geoffhinde  Your hat red is showing. Just saying
    1
  40. Big pharma calls the shots
    1
  41. At least one of their members advocates the unaliving of the "far right".
    1
  42. Truth
    1
  43. ... If I say more, my comment will vanish
    1
  44.  @richardgallagher4880  You're all over the shop, pal. You just dissemble
    1
  45. My answer to this might be why I got cancelled yesterday. Let me just say one side believes in standing on their own two feet. Hope I haven't overstepped the mark again ...
    1
  46. ... or Andrew Parker ?
    1
  47. There is another dang...... ideo...... , of course, but it's a crime to question that ethos. My observations on the one you've mentioned, concordant with yours, just tend to vanish (thus far)
    1
  48. Right wing : Stand on your own two feet. Left wing : Rely on somebody else
    1
  49. They'd all be skint
    1
  50. Uni party proper gander
    1
  51. They're the only ones that aren't
    1
  52. That wouldn't have saved Charlie Hebdo et al. @Clactoncun
    1
  53. Contribution vacuum @robertcreighton
    1
  54. He didn't subscribe to that, he's pointing out the outrage in the video
    1
  55. Do you think you're entitled to someone else's?
    1
  56. "Probably" being the operative word, eh, mate ? ( ! - )
    1
  57. That's animated the dissemblers 👍
    1
  58. He's a uni party man
    1
  59. The others are worse
    1
  60. 7x11 ☝️
    1
  61. ​​ @Dan_A_Bol  The user is probably 7 7 th, maybe just a troll. Don't expect anything constructive by way of an answer
    1
  62. ​ @chkldstgee2433  How much do you get paid ? I think we have a right to know
    1
  63. Uni party
    1
  64. Exactly. 👍
    1
  65. Is that wrongthink ?
    1
  66. You two don't ☝️. That's for sure
    1
  67. Are you in favour of unaliving people at pop concerts ?
    1
  68.  @musopaul5407  That's an odd reply, not "no", then ? Do you mean like David Amess ?
    1
  69.  @aasiyapowell875  I was referring to the Manchester Arena (and Bataclan), but do you think the reason you've given is a satisfactory excuse for the unaliving of civilians ?
    1
  70. ​ @musopaul5407 I think we both know that there's a bit more to it than that
    1
  71.  @musopaul5407  It's your presumption of my "rage" which is helping to emphasise the polarity that you've alluded to. If I'm conscious of recognising certain patterns, I will draw an inference, but that will not affect my primary consideration, which is to question everything.
    1
  72. The uni party side
    1
  73. ​ @zombies66  They don't pretend otherwise. Do you favour dishonesty ?
    1
  74.  @chkldstgee2433  He pretends to be a "man of the people". Are you a champagne socialist too ?
    1
  75.  @chkldstgee2433  You are, aren't you ?
    1
  76. ... People hating other people who they've been told to define as hateful ...
    1
  77. It can be hard to isolate the source of gas lighting
    1