General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Martin Parsons
UnHerd
comments
Comments by "Martin Parsons" (@MartinParsons-tr6wi) on "UnHerd" channel.
Exactly
13
Early on, I suddenly remembered Orson Welles radio adaptation of War of the Worlds, and the effect that had on people ...
6
It sort of underlined the conclusions. ( 2+ 2 = 5 )
5
@jimpaddy79 You were doing well, till you got to "...free market".
5
Und you too vill be on ze list
5
@jimpaddy79 I'm afraid so
5
@stephenbond2478 That's a frequent thought of mine
4
@Baldnesz Tell that to the uni party, it seems to be one of their mainstays
4
@velvetindigonight The dumbing down seems to be working
4
He's trying to be analytic in a hostile environment
3
Same in the UK. It's a Western world thing
3
@davidbottana7494 The (absurdity) graph is hockey stick shaped ...
3
The dice are loaded
3
@ The two are commensurate
3
And the other half thank him for exposing the hegemony at the heart of the EU
2
@dkvikingkd233 "We're in a crisis, so let's accentuate it." is absurdism
2
That's how disinformation works. But it may be possible to discern sense within the (contrived) chaos
2
.... or "Far right"
2
Yup. Now you're getting it
2
@fredgarvinMP I think you meant ..."liberals".
2
Thanks ,from Airstrip One, my friend
2
@DieFlabbergast Russia Today. Or was that rhetorical ?
2
Refreshingly poignant comments here. Such truisms don't get expressed often enough
2
👍 I'm surprised that comment didn't vanish
2
Bridgen is pursuing Hancock through the courts
2
The biggest computers with the most accurate models to date, can't accurately predict the weather four days hence
2
Quite so
2
It's anyone who dares to question the narrative control
1
Fossil fuels are used to mine, process and transport uranium (a finite resource). Many of its disasters remain unresolved. Damming up the estuaries would make more sense, but rarely gets mentioned
1
@Spacedog79 Hydropower is cleaner than nuclear will ever be. Not least, it obviates the need for fuel, and nuclear waste is not an issue. Environmental issues are resolvable, and extra benefits could be accrued (eg transport and service links and more reliable upstream navigation). Nuke stations are dangerous, expensive and short lived. The hot uranium isotope is a tiny fraction of the mined ore. But the MIC would agree with you
1
@Spacedog79 My physics teacher was at Windscale during the disaster. He told us all about it
1
@Spacedog79 There have been many accidents since then. Reactor design is still contentious. You've brushed over the mining/processing issues, and completely ignored the waste actuality. And you tell me I'm misinformed. My degree is in hard rock mining and I know that what can go wrong will go wrong. There may be a place for nuclear energy, but it's not a panacea, and tapping flowing water is safer and more economic by every metric
1
Citing a one off as an example is an old trick
1
The summit of intellectual reasoning
1
Fear
1
The answer to your last question, Peter, is, there's more sheep than goats
1
@wheel-man5319 Uranium is not a panacea
1
Not at all curious about the detractors ?
1
You're streets ahead of the dog whistled, knee jerk ranters
1
To let the uni party know that they've been found out
1
Geniuses reside within the loon fraction
1
@jasonrose6288 WEF practitioners
1
That's one of Orwell's premises in 1984
1
Marxist concepts are being exploited
1
The "watchdogs" are like the dogs in Orwell's Animal Farm (hijacked)
1
He's trying to consider the big picture, rather than knee jerk reacting
1
Well said. Or, as far as your last sentence is concerned, " You must socially isolate, but you can go to the supermarket."
1
He's a pragmatist
1
The infantilisation of society
1
@jimpaddy79 Are you in advertising. Jim ?
1
There are "greener" ways to store energy
1
@orsoncart802 Nice one Orson. Worth the effort
1
So true
1
@rickremco6275 totalitarian = uni party
1
Vote reform
1
When I tried to type something akin to your first sentence yesterday, my comment repeatedly vanished. Presumably, the lizard theory is acceptable to the propagandists
1
@embalmertrick1420 # Moral Hazard
1
That open mind of yours is a precious (and scarce) resource. Keep asking the questions 👍
1
That suits those who want to conceal the truth (in plain sight)
1
Bridgen is going after Hancock through the courts. It'll be interesting to see how compromised the judiciary are, but I think I know the answer
1
It could also be that not everybody wants to be subsumed by the NWO
1
Well said. I couldn't argue with any of that. (nor can anyone else, seemingly, mine being the only reply)
1
Pandemic ?
1
@jasondashney All part of the corporate stitch up
1
@catalogueofwonders Your follow up comment needed to be said 👍
1
The Emperor's Clothes. Top handle, Pleb
1
Predicting the future is the realm of the snake oil salesmen
1
The "pandemic" has been the epitome of disinformation
1
@anabolicamaranth7140 The dust bowl happened a century ago. To cite just one historical event of many.
1
@123noah3211 "Doing research" to find opinions that you agree with, can also be called confirmation bias
1
@123noah3211 No amount of "online research" can accurately predict the future
1
@123noah3211 You suggested to Noah that he'd find all the answers if he did some "online research". You've backtracked somewhat. Dogma is not a scientific approach, quite the opposite. Galileo (and Socrates) would tell you that. Supercomputers and state of the art modelling cannot accurately predict the weather four days hence. There are known unknowns and unknown unknowns.
1
The dude abides. ( ! - )
1
Trouble is, Vlad keeps killing people
1
Trouble is, Vlad keeps unaliving people
1
@johnricercato740 It's a hypothesis
1
Agreed. There's no shortage of bad actors in this
1
Group think is responsible for most of mankinds' mistakes
1
@NaMe-ku4cl holisticism
1
Welcome to the party
1