General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Martin Parsons
British Stand
comments
Comments by "Martin Parsons" (@MartinParsons-tr6wi) on "Nigel Farage Makes SHOCKING ‘Southport Coverup’ Announcement!" video.
@giancarlomatta4145 You've missed "IF" off the start of your post. Not sure why
8
@davidc2733 You must be on the inside with all that "knowledge"
3
@The_Phoenix_Saga Anyone can be negative, but if you haven't got a better, more positive suggestion, you're helping no one, except the powers that be
3
@BrianLesliePerry Have you not seen his speeches to the hostile EU chamber ?
3
@katelynburgess7720 "phoenix saga"s input is exclusively negative. Furthermore, he's making assumptions. Nigel has to tread very carefully, as, one wrong move, and he'll be cast into the wilderness with the other whistle blowers. The powers that be would love that, and he knows it
3
You seem confused. He is constantly berated by the likes of you
2
Starmer is the ultimate grubby chancer
2
That's too tragic to be satirical, my friend
2
@rokketron Far from it, Ron. I spend my time on here trying to explain to people why it would not be in anyone's interests (except the powers that be) for him to do so. I'm not sure how you've come to that conclusion
2
@neilpike6758 Blanket legislation is what's created the situation you have described. More of the same will only exacerbate this
1
Tommy's voice has been silenced. They'd love to do the same with Nigel
1
... and he'd be banished, with no chance of changing anything
1
Far age has been demonised since he secured the vote to leave the EU. He knows all too well what it's like
1
@upduckie9643 You're going to get governed anyway. Before voting was conceived, there were governors. The new arrivals will be voting for their theocracy, and the wokies think it's clever to support them
1
They'd love to ban him from parliament
1
@karentaylor8987 It's called gaslighting, and it's important that you know that's what they're trying to do to you, otherwise, they win
1
Can't you see that were Nigel to do that, he'd meet the same fate as Tommy (and Andrew Bridgen) ? He has to box clever
1
These days, it's the whistle blowers that get singled out for special treatment
1
@The_Phoenix_Saga Okay, that's a fair comment, but it hasn't stopped the Americans pushing back by voting for whom they were discouraged from doing so. It's not just the bankruptcy, it's the choice of whether to acquiesce to subjugation by an insane ideology, or to advocate common sense, and self reliance
1
@The_Phoenix_Saga And I take full responsibility for my own actions, but on my own, I'm just going to get steam rollered by wokery, and, subsequently, a totalitarian theocracy, much as I'm all too aware that i have to operate within the confines imposed on me
1
@The_Phoenix_Saga What a surprise. My penultimate comment has vanished. Did you see it ? It had more pertinence than the one showing. Suppose I'll have to trawl through the newest first section to see if it's showing there ...
1
@The_Phoenix_Saga Looks like you saw it. Tribes (/empires) are not new, and all tribes have rulers, irrespective of whether you condone them, or not. A mass expression of dissatisfaction in the process is more likely to make a difference than mass apathy
1
@The_Phoenix_Saga Agreed. It's in the newest first section. I'm going to try again ...
1
@The_Phoenix_Saga ... Okay, that's a fair comment [your first], but it hasn't stopped the Americans pushing back by voting for whom they were discouraged from doing so. It's not just the bank ruptcy, it's the choice of whether to acquiesce to subjugation by an insane ideology, or to advocate common sense and self reliance
1
@The_Phoenix_Saga Like you said, freedom is the illusion, if we're not subordinate to the travails of society, then it's to the dominion of nature, and whether she can satisfactorily fulfil our needs, something that will inevitably require putting ourselves out
1
@The_Phoenix_Saga Another vanished reply (probably in the newest first section again). I understand the point you're making, and am inclined to agree, but your argument is defeatist. The Darwinian reality, it's always going to be a competition of the survival of the fittest, applies, come what may. Freedom can only ever be illusory, and relative, there will always be constraints
1
@The_Phoenix_Saga I think I'm going to throw in an engineering dictum: "Every system has a limiting condition."
1
@The_Phoenix_Saga It's not that ironic, my friend. I agree with much of your premise, but trying to discourage people from banding together to make a difference seems to serve no purpose. I'm even on board with your misanthropy, and frequently frustrated by the actions of many of my fellow humans, but they will be better served by encouragement, they don't need any more dissuasion than that which already exists
1
@The_Phoenix_Saga Because you deem it an exercise in futility, that doesn't necessarily make it so (though you are assisting in that preconception). I'm sure you're aware that upheaval revolutions in the past have only ended up with the same systemic outcome, though with different faces in charge, after much destruction, as alluded to in Animal Farm
1
@The_Phoenix_Saga Voting for something different doesn't constitute abiding
1
@The_Phoenix_Saga The only way to call their bluff is to vote for something different
1
@The_Phoenix_Saga And you say "inevitably"(the same) about an untried party, with a very different prospectus, and you say you're not defeatist. You're being deterministically negative
1
@rokketron perhaps you meant that for phoenix, though his stance seems to be "don't bother doing anything, it's pointless" ( "plus ça change ...")
1
@The_Phoenix_Saga I don't think I do. I say it's possible to take care of yourself AND vote en masse for a movement that promotes self reliance. But you seem determined to deny such a possibility
1
@The_Phoenix_Saga Not sure what you're referring to. Nigel is the only thorn in the establishment narrative, as such, he has to be more than careful. Assumptions are the mother of all fxxx ups. Question everything
1
@The_Phoenix_Saga He has to tread carefully. Reading between the lines was a prerequisite once. These days, people seem overly keen to take things at face value
1
@The_Phoenix_Saga Starmer is quite incapable of treading carefully. It's only because he's the establishment chosen one that he's got away with his blundering. Him meeting the Chinese fills me with dread
1
@The_Phoenix_Saga And, as far as dual rules are concerned, he's not called two tier for no reason
1
@The_Phoenix_Saga Nah. He's a clumsy apparatchik who reads from his script. He's leaden footed
1
@The_Phoenix_Saga Because he reads from his script
1
Exactly, Mike. Tommy doesn't speak ill of reform, the division is being hyped up
1
A misinformer misinforming. You do yourself no credit
1