Comments by "Martin Parsons" (@MartinParsons-tr6wi) on "TalkTV" channel.

  1. At the end, they drowned out Errol as he was answering "Yes" to the question: "Is it Davos, is it the WEF ?"
    73
  2. starmer should be in the dictionary as the definition of vile
    58
  3. Welcome to the party
    57
  4. ​ @JonnyMc7 Is that what the Dear Leader's told you, Jonny ? Oh, well. Probably time for your next jab, isn't it ?
    57
  5. ​​ @paulsaunders2033  You'd have to have a brain cell deficit to listen to Starmer
    42
  6. ​ @gloriadenning3860  "...return...". Argentina never owned the Malvinas
    35
  7. He asserts 5 million people is 0.1 per cent of the population. He's just another liebore liar
    24
  8. No mention of the soldier, gravely wounded days earlier
    22
  9. ​ @adriantowe278  You, and millions like us, my friend
    22
  10. ​ @nadakbar  Our forebears exported order. Yours have only exported chaos
    22
  11. ​ @esthermartin6699  Trying to defend unforgivable behaviour is just embarrassing to behold
    21
  12.  @MarkPayne-ss6yu  You're calling her a "vile woman". That could be construed as incitement. It's certainly offensive
    20
  13.  @MarkPayne-ss6yu  She didn't behave badly, she wrote some words on a keyboard
    19
  14. Reform or bust
    16
  15. ​ @odoggow8157  It's called the British Isles. Guess why
    16
  16. He spits pure venom when he mentions the British people
    15
  17. Unite behind the alternative
    15
  18. We tried to explain the obvious
    15
  19. He said he prefers Davos to Westminster.
    15
  20. Coalition of the WEF fing
    13
  21. ​ @bh_486  Nicely put. I couldn't agree more
    13
  22. ​ @roddieglossop3942  He set the destructive ball rolling
    13
  23. ​ @ukraine7249  You're putting the cart before the horse
    13
  24. It's the tip of the iceberg
    13
  25. Duncan Smith should join reform
    13
  26. Hate speech
    13
  27.  @johnkitching2248  Imagine thinking you can lose a referendum, and just reverse the decision, whilst trying to con people that you believe in democracy
    12
  28. Because Starmer's a WEF lackey
    12
  29. Physics is raycist
    12
  30. Always the victims, never the perpetrators
    11
  31. Taqqiya Starmer
    11
  32. When having four wives results in a prison sentence for one side, and extra benefits for the other, what more evidence is needed for double standards ?
    11
  33. Liz wasn't "on side"
    11
  34. He's giving it to them
    11
  35. ​ @steveharrison4176  So are you
    11
  36. Nigel said it, and they queued up to say it couldn't be done
    11
  37. ​ @Celtictribes Reform being screwed by the WEF puppets tells me what I need to know about who to vote for
    11
  38. His husband ?
    10
  39. PM
    10
  40. ​​ @47mrdoug  It looked like there was more than four people at that riot to me
    10
  41. Liebore revel in sophistry
    10
  42. WEFmonsters
    10
  43. ​ @mark.e.p  Reform are also questioning the net zero and DEI dogma
    10
  44. ​ @jannenreuben7398  Subordinating yourself to an unaccountable body who does not have your best interests at heart is non sensical. We have plenty of laws as it is
    9
  45. ​ @minstrelofMir Starmer couldn't run a bath
    9
  46. Coalition of the effing WEF
    9
  47. ​ @DenisMclean-e9o  Let's face it, they're not known for their mental acumen
    9
  48. He didn't seem entirely convinced by his own fairy tale
    9
  49. Dan Wooten too
    9
  50. He's marring the efficacy of the gaslighting
    9