Comments by "Dr. Ian Plect" (@Dr.IanPlect) on "Destiny" channel.

  1. Watch out for an ignoramus called Indy Reno spewing ignorant taxonomy.
    3
  2. That we know of, 'ever exist' cannot be stated.
    2
  3. That we know of, 'to ever have lived' cannot be stated.🙄
    2
  4. they do
    2
  5.  @lloydivenn9809  T-Rex is a common presentation in public use, not a scientific one.
    2
  6. 1:30 well done repeating the name.
    2
  7. The spelling is a mess.
    1
  8.  @PenadoX3  Ok.
    1
  9. That's a Jurassic yeti for scale, stupid! Actually, the scale is correct, the numbers are miles off.
    1
  10. The title should be 'reptiles', not 'creatures', as it clearly ignores whales!
    1
  11. vile vomit mythology
    1
  12.  @YECBIB  The sewer rat is muted.
    1
  13.  @jennyanydots2389  pleb
    1
  14.  @peteabrh-fairest9463  "If size estimates are accurate, this creature could have measured up to 26 meters (85 feet) long — for comparison, blue whales top out around 25 meters (82 feet)." - NONSENSE - first, blue whales DO NOT top out at around 25m, there are verified records exceeding 30m. Some populations (there's significant size difference by population) EXCEED your 'top out' figure on AVERAGE for females, the larger sex. You are clueless. - second, length is ONE metric contributing to 'largest'. Several animals exceed blue whales in length, but are physically much smaller; bootlace worms being an example. Ichthyosaurs do not have the build of a blue whale (in terms of girth from tip to tail), so even at equal length they would be much lighter. - third, this recent discovery is of a superlative specimen 20-25m long, NOT your 'could have measured up to 26 meters' nonsense. Of which my first point already tells you even 26m doesn't rival VERIFIED blue whale size "Newly discovered ichthyosaur could give this normal-looking reptile..." - this thread is about blue whales; MAMMALS, not reptiles! ------------ Absolutely misrepresented cluelessness.
    1
  15. RIDDLED with errors.
    1
  16.  @plep1046  "what a stupid thing to say. Of course everything is "that we know of". "Homo Erectus are the only species that drives cars" -------- You'll be muted after this reply for your sewer rat attitude; 1. The commenter didn't state it accurately, I corrected it to make the clear distinction. 2. It's Homo erectus, Homo Erectus. 3. What a stupid example! And my reply would be 'they didn't that we know of, and as we do, they clearly wouldn't be alone, if they did'. ------------ The vile oxygen thief is muted.
    1
  17. vile vomit mythology
    1
  18. yes
    1
  19. It's a shame your spelling and grammar is poor.
    1
  20. 1. you're 2. regardless of what they say, not all of Earth's water came from meteorites
    1
  21. It's Tyrannosaurus rex. You don't capitalise the specific name.
    1
  22.  @lloydivenn9809  ignoramus
    1
  23. pleb
    1
  24. "I like how they showed India as a different continent rather than as a part of Asia 😂 At 5:04" - well now, brain of the century; they were separate land masses as illustrated. Of course you'd label them as separate, Asia was still a continent, India a separate land mass!
    1
  25. Nope.
    1