Comments by "" (@Rav01508) on "DW News"
channel.
-
37
-
37
-
23
-
13
-
11
-
9
-
The bottom 5 countries with the lowest GDP per capita in G20 (1990)
16. Brazil🇧🇷 = $3,190
17. Indonesia🇮🇩 = $771
18. Russia🇷🇺 = $472
19. China🇨🇳 = $374
20. India🇮🇳 = $369👈
The bottom 5 countries with the lowest GDP per capita in G20 (2000)
16. Brazil🇧🇷 = $3,865
17. Russia🇷🇺 = $1,898
18. Indonesia🇮🇩 = $870
19. China🇨🇳 = $951
20. India🇮🇳 = $442👈
The bottom 5 countries with the lowest GDP per capita in G20 (2010)
16. Turkey🇹🇷 = $10,533
17. S. Africa🇿🇦 = $8,130
18. China🇨🇳 = $4,500
19. Indonesia🇮🇩 = $3,177
20. India🇮🇳 = $1,351👈
The bottom 5 countries with the lowest GDP per capita in G20 (2020)
16. Turkey🇹🇷 = $8,613
17. Brazil🇧🇷 = $7,345
18. S. Africa🇿🇦 = $5,672
19. Indonesia🇮🇩 = $3,919
20. India🇮🇳 = $1,916👈
*Consistency is the key to success, India🇮🇳 took it to the next level
9
-
9
-
The McMahon Line was first drafted in 1913, and the treaty to ratify them (Simla Accords) was never signed by the Republic Of China(ROC) who had just overthrown the Qing dynasty. There was no such thing as the McMahon Line in 1890, and China isn't disputing where the Line was drawn, she's disputing the validity of the Line in its entirety. The primary Indian claim is that the ROC did sign the Simla Accords because a British official called Olaf Caroe fabricated a narrative in 1938 where the ROC signed the Simla Accords (they didn't) and ceded parts of Tibet to the Raj.
In 1963 a British diplomat compared a pre-1938 treaties compendium with the post-Caroe compendium and found that Caroe had changed the note on the ROC's not signing the Simla Accords into one where the ROC signed it and considers the Indo-Tibetan border finalised. Nehru picked up a copy of Caroe's fabricated compendium so he got the impression that his country was legally entitled to more than she actually was. Compounding this was the US' decision to add fuel to the flames by declaring the McMahon Line as the legitimate boundary in an attempt to contain the spread of communism, despite reservations from the US State Department and protests from the fiercely non-communist Chiang Kai-Shek, leader of the ROC.
However, we all know Nehru irreversibly altered his country's relations with China in 1962, so by 1963, when the fabrication was discovered, it was already too late to stem the tide of Indian nationalism based on the false compendium entry. And that leaves us with the situation today, in the aftermath of a British attempt to de jure carve out a piece of Chinese territory which failed but had some success de facto, then a British fabrication of her failed attempt to carve out Chinese territory, then an Indian acceptance of the British fabrication alongside American endorsement, and a Chinese refusal to accept the fabrication as anything remotely legal.
Some Indians recognise that they don't actually have a legal claim to South Tibet, so they've begun using a different claim in that the people living in South Tibet want to be part of India more than China; in essence, a claim based on the principle of self-determination. This is India's secondary claim. However, as history has shown time and time again (Catalonia, Confederate States, Taiwan, Corsica, Chechnya, Tibet, Naxalites), without the permission of the larger body, a smaller section of the population will not be allowed to separate from its original country regardless of what they want.
A much more detailed account of the McMahon Line and its history is available here, written by Peter Lee who, contrary to impressions given by his surname, is not at all Chinese.
8
-
8
-
The McMahon Line was first drafted in 1913, and the treaty to ratify them (Simla Accords) was never signed by the Republic Of China(ROC) who had just overthrown the Qing dynasty. There was no such thing as the McMahon Line in 1890, and China isn't disputing where the Line was drawn, she's disputing the validity of the Line in its entirety. The primary Indian claim is that the ROC did sign the Simla Accords because a British official called Olaf Caroe fabricated a narrative in 1938 where the ROC signed the Simla Accords (they didn't) and ceded parts of Tibet to the Raj.
In 1963 a British diplomat compared a pre-1938 treaties compendium with the post-Caroe compendium and found that Caroe had changed the note on the ROC's not signing the Simla Accords into one where the ROC signed it and considers the Indo-Tibetan border finalised. Nehru picked up a copy of Caroe's fabricated compendium so he got the impression that his country was legally entitled to more than she actually was. Compounding this was the US' decision to add fuel to the flames by declaring the McMahon Line as the legitimate boundary in an attempt to contain the spread of communism, despite reservations from the US State Department and protests from the fiercely non-communist Chiang Kai-Shek, leader of the ROC.
However, we all know Nehru irreversibly altered his country's relations with China in 1962, so by 1963, when the fabrication was discovered, it was already too late to stem the tide of Indian nationalism based on the false compendium entry. And that leaves us with the situation today, in the aftermath of a British attempt to de jure carve out a piece of Chinese territory which failed but had some success de facto, then a British fabrication of her failed attempt to carve out Chinese territory, then an Indian acceptance of the British fabrication alongside American endorsement, and a Chinese refusal to accept the fabrication as anything remotely legal.
Some Indians recognise that they don't actually have a legal claim to South Tibet, so they've begun using a different claim in that the people living in South Tibet want to be part of India more than China; in essence, a claim based on the principle of self-determination. This is India's secondary claim. However, as history has shown time and time again (Catalonia, Confederate States, Taiwan, Corsica, Chechnya, Tibet, Naxalites), without the permission of the larger body, a smaller section of the population will not be allowed to separate from its original country regardless of what they want.
A much more detailed account of the McMahon Line and its history is available here, written by Peter Lee who, contrary to impressions given by his surname, is not at all Chinese.
8
-
8
-
7
-
The McMahon Line was first drafted in 1913, and the treaty to ratify them (Simla Accords) was never signed by the Republic Of China(ROC) who had just overthrown the Qing dynasty. There was no such thing as the McMahon Line in 1890, and China isn't disputing where the Line was drawn, she's disputing the validity of the Line in its entirety. The primary Indian claim is that the ROC did sign the Simla Accords because a British official called Olaf Caroe fabricated a narrative in 1938 where the ROC signed the Simla Accords (they didn't) and ceded parts of Tibet to the Raj.
In 1963 a British diplomat compared a pre-1938 treaties compendium with the post-Caroe compendium and found that Caroe had changed the note on the ROC's not signing the Simla Accords into one where the ROC signed it and considers the Indo-Tibetan border finalised. Nehru picked up a copy of Caroe's fabricated compendium so he got the impression that his country was legally entitled to more than she actually was. Compounding this was the US' decision to add fuel to the flames by declaring the McMahon Line as the legitimate boundary in an attempt to contain the spread of communism, despite reservations from the US State Department and protests from the fiercely non-communist Chiang Kai-Shek, leader of the ROC.
However, we all know Nehru irreversibly altered his country's relations with China in 1962, so by 1963, when the fabrication was discovered, it was already too late to stem the tide of Indian nationalism based on the false compendium entry. And that leaves us with the situation today, in the aftermath of a British attempt to de jure carve out a piece of Chinese territory which failed but had some success de facto, then a British fabrication of her failed attempt to carve out Chinese territory, then an Indian acceptance of the British fabrication alongside American endorsement, and a Chinese refusal to accept the fabrication as anything remotely legal.
Some Indians recognise that they don't actually have a legal claim to South Tibet, so they've begun using a different claim in that the people living in South Tibet want to be part of India more than China; in essence, a claim based on the principle of self-determination. This is India's secondary claim. However, as history has shown time and time again (Catalonia, Confederate States, Taiwan, Corsica, Chechnya, Tibet, Naxalites), without the permission of the larger body, a smaller section of the population will not be allowed to separate from its original country regardless of what they want.
A much more detailed account of the McMahon Line and its history is available here, written by Peter Lee who, contrary to impressions given by his surname, is not at all Chinese.
7
-
The McMahon Line was first drafted in 1913, and the treaty to ratify them (Simla Accords) was never signed by the Republic Of China(ROC) who had just overthrown the Qing dynasty. There was no such thing as the McMahon Line in 1890, and China isn't disputing where the Line was drawn, she's disputing the validity of the Line in its entirety. The primary Indian claim is that the ROC did sign the Simla Accords because a British official called Olaf Caroe fabricated a narrative in 1938 where the ROC signed the Simla Accords (they didn't) and ceded parts of Tibet to the Raj.
In 1963 a British diplomat compared a pre-1938 treaties compendium with the post-Caroe compendium and found that Caroe had changed the note on the ROC's not signing the Simla Accords into one where the ROC signed it and considers the Indo-Tibetan border finalised. Nehru picked up a copy of Caroe's fabricated compendium so he got the impression that his country was legally entitled to more than she actually was. Compounding this was the US' decision to add fuel to the flames by declaring the McMahon Line as the legitimate boundary in an attempt to contain the spread of communism, despite reservations from the US State Department and protests from the fiercely non-communist Chiang Kai-Shek, leader of the ROC.
However, we all know Nehru irreversibly altered his country's relations with China in 1962, so by 1963, when the fabrication was discovered, it was already too late to stem the tide of Indian nationalism based on the false compendium entry. And that leaves us with the situation today, in the aftermath of a British attempt to de jure carve out a piece of Chinese territory which failed but had some success de facto, then a British fabrication of her failed attempt to carve out Chinese territory, then an Indian acceptance of the British fabrication alongside American endorsement, and a Chinese refusal to accept the fabrication as anything remotely legal.
Some Indians recognise that they don't actually have a legal claim to South Tibet, so they've begun using a different claim in that the people living in South Tibet want to be part of India more than China; in essence, a claim based on the principle of self-determination. This is India's secondary claim. However, as history has shown time and time again (Catalonia, Confederate States, Taiwan, Corsica, Chechnya, Tibet, Naxalites), without the permission of the larger body, a smaller section of the population will not be allowed to separate from its original country regardless of what they want.
A much more detailed account of the McMahon Line and its history is available here, written by Peter Lee who, contrary to impressions given by his surname, is not at all Chinese.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
The McMahon Line was first drafted in 1913, and the treaty to ratify them (Simla Accords) was never signed by the Republic Of China(ROC) who had just overthrown the Qing dynasty. There was no such thing as the McMahon Line in 1890, and China isn't disputing where the Line was drawn, she's disputing the validity of the Line in its entirety. The primary Indian claim is that the ROC did sign the Simla Accords because a British official called Olaf Caroe fabricated a narrative in 1938 where the ROC signed the Simla Accords (they didn't) and ceded parts of Tibet to the Raj.
In 1963 a British diplomat compared a pre-1938 treaties compendium with the post-Caroe compendium and found that Caroe had changed the note on the ROC's not signing the Simla Accords into one where the ROC signed it and considers the Indo-Tibetan border finalised. Nehru picked up a copy of Caroe's fabricated compendium so he got the impression that his country was legally entitled to more than she actually was. Compounding this was the US' decision to add fuel to the flames by declaring the McMahon Line as the legitimate boundary in an attempt to contain the spread of communism, despite reservations from the US State Department and protests from the fiercely non-communist Chiang Kai-Shek, leader of the ROC.
However, we all know Nehru irreversibly altered his country's relations with China in 1962, so by 1963, when the fabrication was discovered, it was already too late to stem the tide of Indian nationalism based on the false compendium entry. And that leaves us with the situation today, in the aftermath of a British attempt to de jure carve out a piece of Chinese territory which failed but had some success de facto, then a British fabrication of her failed attempt to carve out Chinese territory, then an Indian acceptance of the British fabrication alongside American endorsement, and a Chinese refusal to accept the fabrication as anything remotely legal.
Some Indians recognise that they don't actually have a legal claim to South Tibet, so they've begun using a different claim in that the people living in South Tibet want to be part of India more than China; in essence, a claim based on the principle of self-determination. This is India's secondary claim. However, as history has shown time and time again (Catalonia, Confederate States, Taiwan, Corsica, Chechnya, Tibet, Naxalites), without the permission of the larger body, a smaller section of the population will not be allowed to separate from its original country regardless of what they want.
A much more detailed account of the McMahon Line and its history is available here, written by Peter Lee who, contrary to impressions given by his surname, is not at all Chinese.
6
-
6
-
6
-
Problem in pajeetland 🇮🇳 which will never be solved
1. Poverty: Persistent poverty affects millions, especially in rural areas.
2. Unemployment: High joblessness, particularly among the youth.
3. Education Disparities: Unequal access to quality education across regions.
4. Healthcare Access: Inadequate healthcare infrastructure, especially in rural areas.
5. Corruption: Corruption hinders development and public services.
6. Pollution: Severe air and water pollution, especially in urban areas.
7. Rape and Sexual Violence: Widespread reports of rape, harassment, and abuse, calling for stronger legal action and protection for victims.
8. Gender Inequality: Discrimination and violence against women in various forms.
9. Sanitation and Hygiene: Poor sanitation, leading to diseases and health problems.
10. Water Scarcity: Limited access to clean drinking water and irrigation.
11. Climate Change: Rising temperatures and erratic weather affecting agriculture.
12. Religious and Communal Tensions: Conflicts based on religion disrupt social harmony.
13. Judicial Delays: Slow legal processes and a massive backlog of court cases.
14. Child Labor: Continued exploitation of children in labor despite laws.
15. Farmer Suicides: Agricultural distress leading to farmer suicides.
16. Urban Slums: Overcrowded and underdeveloped slums in major cities.
17. Drug Addiction: Rising drug addiction, particularly in states like Punjab.
18. Caste Discrimination: Persistent social inequality based on caste.
19. Public Infrastructure: Inadequate transportation, electricity, and roads in many regions.
20. Mental Health Stigma: Lack of access to mental health care and societal stigma.
And Many More
Shame on poojeets.
6
-
6
-
6
-
The McMahon Line was first drafted in 1913, and the treaty to ratify them (Simla Accords) was never signed by the Republic Of China(ROC) who had just overthrown the Qing dynasty. There was no such thing as the McMahon Line in 1890, and China isn't disputing where the Line was drawn, she's disputing the validity of the Line in its entirety. The primary Indian claim is that the ROC did sign the Simla Accords because a British official called Olaf Caroe fabricated a narrative in 1938 where the ROC signed the Simla Accords (they didn't) and ceded parts of Tibet to the Raj.
In 1963 a British diplomat compared a pre-1938 treaties compendium with the post-Caroe compendium and found that Caroe had changed the note on the ROC's not signing the Simla Accords into one where the ROC signed it and considers the Indo-Tibetan border finalised. Nehru picked up a copy of Caroe's fabricated compendium so he got the impression that his country was legally entitled to more than she actually was. Compounding this was the US' decision to add fuel to the flames by declaring the McMahon Line as the legitimate boundary in an attempt to contain the spread of communism, despite reservations from the US State Department and protests from the fiercely non-communist Chiang Kai-Shek, leader of the ROC.
However, we all know Nehru irreversibly altered his country's relations with China in 1962, so by 1963, when the fabrication was discovered, it was already too late to stem the tide of Indian nationalism based on the false compendium entry. And that leaves us with the situation today, in the aftermath of a British attempt to de jure carve out a piece of Chinese territory which failed but had some success de facto, then a British fabrication of her failed attempt to carve out Chinese territory, then an Indian acceptance of the British fabrication alongside American endorsement, and a Chinese refusal to accept the fabrication as anything remotely legal.
Some Indians recognise that they don't actually have a legal claim to South Tibet, so they've begun using a different claim in that the people living in South Tibet want to be part of India more than China; in essence, a claim based on the principle of self-determination. This is India's secondary claim. However, as history has shown time and time again (Catalonia, Confederate States, Taiwan, Corsica, Chechnya, Tibet, Naxalites), without the permission of the larger body, a smaller section of the population will not be allowed to separate from its original country regardless of what they want.
A much more detailed account of the McMahon Line and its history is available here, written by Peter Lee who, contrary to impressions given by his surname, is not at all Chinese.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
The McMahon Line was first drafted in 1913, and the treaty to ratify them (Simla Accords) was never signed by the Republic Of China(ROC) who had just overthrown the Qing dynasty. There was no such thing as the McMahon Line in 1890, and China isn't disputing where the Line was drawn, she's disputing the validity of the Line in its entirety. The primary Indian claim is that the ROC did sign the Simla Accords because a British official called Olaf Caroe fabricated a narrative in 1938 where the ROC signed the Simla Accords (they didn't) and ceded parts of Tibet to the Raj.
In 1963 a British diplomat compared a pre-1938 treaties compendium with the post-Caroe compendium and found that Caroe had changed the note on the ROC's not signing the Simla Accords into one where the ROC signed it and considers the Indo-Tibetan border finalised. Nehru picked up a copy of Caroe's fabricated compendium so he got the impression that his country was legally entitled to more than she actually was. Compounding this was the US' decision to add fuel to the flames by declaring the McMahon Line as the legitimate boundary in an attempt to contain the spread of communism, despite reservations from the US State Department and protests from the fiercely non-communist Chiang Kai-Shek, leader of the ROC.
However, we all know Nehru irreversibly altered his country's relations with China in 1962, so by 1963, when the fabrication was discovered, it was already too late to stem the tide of Indian nationalism based on the false compendium entry. And that leaves us with the situation today, in the aftermath of a British attempt to de jure carve out a piece of Chinese territory which failed but had some success de facto, then a British fabrication of her failed attempt to carve out Chinese territory, then an Indian acceptance of the British fabrication alongside American endorsement, and a Chinese refusal to accept the fabrication as anything remotely legal.
Some Indians recognise that they don't actually have a legal claim to South Tibet, so they've begun using a different claim in that the people living in South Tibet want to be part of India more than China; in essence, a claim based on the principle of self-determination. This is India's secondary claim. However, as history has shown time and time again (Catalonia, Confederate States, Taiwan, Corsica, Chechnya, Tibet, Naxalites), without the permission of the larger body, a smaller section of the population will not be allowed to separate from its original country regardless of what they want.
A much more detailed account of the McMahon Line and its history is available here, written by Peter Lee who, contrary to impressions given by his surname, is not at all Chinese.
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
The McMahon Line was first drafted in 1913, and the treaty to ratify them (Simla Accords) was never signed by the Republic Of China(ROC) who had just overthrown the Qing dynasty. There was no such thing as the McMahon Line in 1890, and China isn't disputing where the Line was drawn, she's disputing the validity of the Line in its entirety. The primary Indian claim is that the ROC did sign the Simla Accords because a British official called Olaf Caroe fabricated a narrative in 1938 where the ROC signed the Simla Accords (they didn't) and ceded parts of Tibet to the Raj.
In 1963 a British diplomat compared a pre-1938 treaties compendium with the post-Caroe compendium and found that Caroe had changed the note on the ROC's not signing the Simla Accords into one where the ROC signed it and considers the Indo-Tibetan border finalised. Nehru picked up a copy of Caroe's fabricated compendium so he got the impression that his country was legally entitled to more than she actually was. Compounding this was the US' decision to add fuel to the flames by declaring the McMahon Line as the legitimate boundary in an attempt to contain the spread of communism, despite reservations from the US State Department and protests from the fiercely non-communist Chiang Kai-Shek, leader of the ROC.
However, we all know Nehru irreversibly altered his country's relations with China in 1962, so by 1963, when the fabrication was discovered, it was already too late to stem the tide of Indian nationalism based on the false compendium entry. And that leaves us with the situation today, in the aftermath of a British attempt to de jure carve out a piece of Chinese territory which failed but had some success de facto, then a British fabrication of her failed attempt to carve out Chinese territory, then an Indian acceptance of the British fabrication alongside American endorsement, and a Chinese refusal to accept the fabrication as anything remotely legal.
Some Indians recognise that they don't actually have a legal claim to South Tibet, so they've begun using a different claim in that the people living in South Tibet want to be part of India more than China; in essence, a claim based on the principle of self-determination. This is India's secondary claim. However, as history has shown time and time again (Catalonia, Confederate States, Taiwan, Corsica, Chechnya, Tibet, Naxalites), without the permission of the larger body, a smaller section of the population will not be allowed to separate from its original country regardless of what they want.
A much more detailed account of the McMahon Line and its history is available here, written by Peter Lee who, contrary to impressions given by his surname, is not at all Chinese.
3
-
A "World Super Power" is one that can exert it's influence/dominance on the World's stage. For example, USA has the USD as the reserve currency of the world whereas China is the factory of the world and also the largest exporter of trade of the World. Russia, on the other hand, is one of the top 5 oil producing country and also the country with the largest number of nuclear arsenal. In addition, Russia also happens to be largest country of the world in terms of land mass and also one of the largest resources rich country. Take a look at how big the size of Russia on the map? What about India?
1) World Super Super Power , India , wanted to pay cheap and heavily discounted Russian oil in Rupees to take advantage of the Ukraine's crisis/war but was ordered to pay in Chinese Yuan instead.
2) World Super Super Power , India , objects to BRICS expansion but everyone in BRICS ignored India's demand and went ahead and expanded BRICS (refer to BRICS Summit)
3) World Super Super Power , India , said that they are "Global leader of technology". However, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has said that India's attempt to develop an artificial intelligence tool like ChatGPT is "hopeless" and that is why Sam Altman over the weekend called for enhanced collaboration between the U.S. and China on artificial intelligence development? Is Sam Altman, the inventor of ChatGPT, belittling India and praising China?
Fun fact 1: OpenAI's Sam Altman Makes Global Call For AI Regulation—And Includes China. Contributor. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman over the weekend called for enhanced collaboration between the U.S. and China on artificial intelligence development.13 Jun 2023
Fun fact 2: 10 Jun 2023 — OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has said that India's attempt to develop an artificial intelligence tool like ChatGPT is 'hopeless.
4) World Super Super Power , India , begged for a permanent UNSC seat for over 30+ years. Nobody listened for over 30+ years since 1994 and each UNSC permanent member took turns to veto against India
Source1 : JSTOR
Title of article: INDIA'S PERMANENT MEMBERSHIP OF THE U. N. SECURITY COUNCIL : CHANGING POWER REALITIES AND NOTIONS OF SECURITY
Author: Manoj Kumar Mishra (Indian)
What article said specifically: India has been bidding for the permanent membership of the United Nations Security Council since 1994 when India made its intention clear in the General Assembly that it was prepared to bear the responsibility of the permanent membership of the Security Council
3
-
3
-
3
-
With riots in Manipur, separatists in Kashmir, Naxalite insurgency, Khalistani resentment, wrestler's protest, massive unemployment, rising farmers suicides, falling groundwater levels, communal tensions,religion politics,north-south india sentiments,uttar pradesh crime rate,poverty,bihar overpopulated,income gap,woman safety,global warming,infrastructure problems,train safety.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Despite similar population number at 1.4b, India only have 672m workforce vs 931m for China. 48% Indian worked to support the others 52% unproductive population vs 66% Chinese worked to support the others 34% unproductive population.
India:
Population 1.4b
Male 700m = 73% labor force participation rate
Female 700m = 23% labor force participation rate (On par with Somalia, Pakistan, Palestine)
Total workforce = 511+ 161 = 672m
Literacy Rate = 69%
Educated workforce = 463m
Grain production = 330 million tons
Grain Reserve = <40 million tons
China:
Population 1.4b
Male 700m = 72 % labor force participation rate
Female 700m = 61% labor force participation rate (On par with Canada, Netherlands, Israel)
Total workforce = 504 + 427 = 931m
Literacy Rate = 95%
Educated workforce = 844m
Grain production = 686 million tons
Grain Reserve = >700 million tons
Comparing India to China is akin to comparing Pakistan to Japan , Bangladesh/Nepal to South Korea , Sri Lanka to Taiwan . One group is influenced by Chinese civilization, the others group is influenced by Indian civilization. Two different class. One is Yellow the others is Brown/Dark. One uses chopsticks, the others uses bare hand. The most developed country in ASEAN is Singapore, a nation populated by predominantly Chinese an East Asian origin people.
One group collectively & consistently ranked within the world top 10-20 in IQ Test, PISA Score, University Rank, International Collegiate Programming Contest (ICPC) & Mathematical Olympiad standing shoulder to shoulder with western world ....while the others group collectively & consistently ranked somewhere in the middle out of 100+ participant nation standing shoulder to shoulder with some failed states & banana republic.
It's like comparing some Africans countries with Europe. No developed countries exist outside of Western & East Asian world.
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Impedance_Z With riots in Manipur, separatists in Kashmir, Naxalite insurgency, Khalistani resentment, wrestler's protest, massive unemployment, rising farmers suicides, falling groundwater levels, communal tensions,religion politics,north-south india sentiments,uttar pradesh crime rate,poverty,bihar overpopulated,income gap,woman safety,global warming,infrastructure problems,train safety.
2
-
▪︎Didn't indians say back in 2021 that China's doomed property market would bring down the Chinese economy and India would surpass China by 2030?
▪︎Didn't indians say back in 2021 that by 2025, there would be no Japanese factories left in China? This is after the Japanese government's announcement of a scheme to financially assist Japanese firms to shift production from China to India
▪︎Didn't indians say back in 2021 that the Evergrande crisis would spell the end of China's economic miracle?
▪︎Didn't indians say back in 2021 that India has a $1.2 trillion dollar master plan to grab factories from China. It's called the "Gati Shakti" or "Strength of Speed" initiative to attract multinational companies and enhance India's image as the manufacturing hub of the world
▪︎Didn't indians say back in 2020 that India's unofficial "Boycott China Campaign" after Galwan incident would see a substantial reduction of imports from China and thus pave the way for Self-reliant India?
▪︎Didn't indians say back in 2020 that 20,000 foreign owned factories will move from China to India due to Covid?
▪︎Didn't indians say back in 2021 that Modi's $10 billion dollar plan to attract semiconductor manufacturers would turn India into semiconductor and electronics giant by 2025? What happened to the Foxconn and Vedanta deal?
▪︎Last week, the Indian gov't suddenly announced a total ban on the import of laptops, servers and tablets. However, the GOI announced a postponement of the ban for 3 months. Only an amateur and indecisive gov't would do such a thing. Which would impact severely on foreign investors' trust and confidence in the Indian government.
▪︎A failing grade(india) worries about the top grader(china) in the class. . . this is india:
China🇨🇳 = $19.91 trillion
India🇮🇳 = $3.45 trillion
International trade:
China🇨🇳 = $3.7 trillion
India🇮🇳 = $740 billion
External trade to GDP:
China🇨🇳 = 18%
India🇮🇳 = 22%
India's exports are also falling due to global recession and worse, India's economy is more reliant on foreign trade than China
"Farmers' income would double by 2022, this is a promise I would assure our Indian farmers.."
- Modi, 2019
"China has bullet trains, so are we Indians too, very soon. Our 508 km Sabarmati-Mumbai bullet train, would be a reality before August 15, 2022.."
-Modi, 2018
"Make in India would end China's era as the factory 🏭 of the world 🌎.."
-Modi, 2015
"I will create at least 20 million jobs a year until there are not enough workers if elected as the PM of India.."
- Modi, 2014
"When we Indians celebrate our 75th year of independence in 2022, I shall present 🎁 to you all, India's very first bullet train.."
- Modi, 2017
"India will send its first astronauts to space before independence day 2022, this is not a promise but a guarantee.."
- Modi, 2018
"Give me 5 years as the PM of India and people won't even remember there was once something called pollution in India.."
- Modi, 2014
"If I'm the PM of India, Pakistan and China would be so scared of India's power, they would think twice before attempting any funny moves on India.."
- Modi, 2014
"Give me 6 years and corruption would be a thing of the past in India.."
- Modi, 2014
"We will build 100 smart cities within 5 years in India to the point where Americans, Japanese, Europeans and even Chinese would want to come and study our smart city concept.."
- Modi, 2015
"Atmanirbhar Bharat Self-Reliant India will end our imports from China, instead, China will even have to import stuffs from us after that.."
- Modi, 2018
"Give me 6 years as the PM of India and everyone in the world would want to come to India to study our achievements.."
- Modi, 2014
2
-
2
-
2
-
With riots in Manipur, separatists in Kashmir, Naxalite insurgency, Khalistani resentment, wrestler's protest, massive unemployment, rising farmers suicides, falling groundwater levels, communal tensions,religion politics,north-south india sentiments,uttar pradesh crime rate,poverty,bihar overpopulated,income gap,woman safety,global warming,infrastructure problems,train safety.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@latikaagarwal9096
If India says that China is not doing well, I just can't imagine how horrific it must be in India
This is like an F-grade student telling an A+ student he is not doing well.
- China's economy is 6 times larger than India's.
- China's yearly growth is 5 times greater than India's.
- China has better living conditions and healthcare; on average, they live a whole decade more than their Indian counterpart.
- China is 60 times richer than India. (I know it's unfair that the British looted 45 trillion from India, but it is what it is).
- China launches 20–50 times more rockets than India into space every year.
- China is a lot more intelligent, with an IQ of 104 compared to India's 76.
- China is more athletic and stronger than India, winning 38 times more gold medals than India in the world olympic games.
- China's reserves is 7 times larger than India's reserves.
- India is forced to use the Chinese currency when purchasing oil from Russia, Iran, or Venezuela. Due to weak & undesirable Indian Rupees.
- China has 21 times more companies in the Fortune 500 than India.
Rovers on Mars China: Yes India: No
Brought back Lunar Samples China: Yes India: No
Humans in space China: Yes India: No
Space station orbiting above us right this moment China: Yes India: No
Reference:
FirstPost : China overtakes US to become world's richest nation
Wion - At $514 trillion, China overtakes US in terms of amassing the biggest net worth
Indiatoday - China overtakes US as world’s richest nation
Tribuneindia - China overtakes US as world’s richest country
Businessinsider india - China overtakes US as the richest country in the world
Thequint - China Overtakes US as the World's Richest Nation
Hindustantimes - China overtakes US to grab top spot in list of richest countries
Indiatimes - Global wealth surges as China overtakes US to grab top spot
NDTV - China Is Now World's Richest Nation, Ahead Of US
NewsX - China Overtakes US As World's Richest Nation
India - China Becomes Richest Country In The World, Overtakes US To Grab The Top Spot
Timesofindia - Global wealth surges as China overtakes US to grab top spot
Newindianexpress - China overtakes US as richest country in the world
Oneindia - China overtakes US as the richest country in the world
News18 - चीन बना दुनिया का सबसे अमीर देश, अमेरिका को किया पीछे
Aajtak - छिन गया America से ताज, अब China दुनिया का सबसे अमीर देश!
Zeenews - Worlds Richest Country: America पीछे... China बना दुनिया का सबसे अमीर देश
TV9 Hindi - अमेरिका को पछाड़कर चीन बना दुनिया का सबसे अमीर देश, 20 साल में बनाई इतनी संपत्ति
Newsleadindia - चीन ने अमेरिका को पछाड़ा दुनिया का सबसे अमीर देश
List of countries by GDP (nominal)
Medal Tally | Tokyo Olympics 2021
List of countries by FOREX reserves
Fortune Global 500 2021 | Full list of ranking
Spaceflights in 2021
Average IQ by Country 2022
USA News
BIoomberg - Global Wealth Surges as China Overtakes US to Grab Top Spot
Yahoo Finance - Global wealth surges as China overtakes US to grab top spot
Japanese News
Nikkei - China overtakes U.S. in national net worth to grab top spot
UK News
Dailymail - Global wealth trebles in last 20 years as China overtakes US with the highest net worth - accounting for a third of world's growth
1
-
1
-
@latikaagarwal9096 Despite similar population number at 1.4b, India only have 672m workforce vs 931m for China. 48% Indian worked to support the others 52% unproductive population vs 66% Chinese worked to support the others 34% unproductive population.
India:
Population 1.4b
Male 700m = 73% labor force participation rate
Female 700m = 23% labor force participation rate (On par with Somalia, Pakistan, Palestine)
Total workforce = 511+ 161 = 672m
Literacy Rate = 69%
Educated workforce = 463m
Grain production = 330 million tons
Grain Reserve = <40 million tons
China:
Population 1.4b
Male 700m = 72 % labor force participation rate
Female 700m = 61% labor force participation rate (On par with Canada, Netherlands, Israel)
Total workforce = 504 + 427 = 931m
Literacy Rate = 95%
Educated workforce = 844m
Grain production = 686 million tons
Grain Reserve = >700 million tons
Comparing India to China is akin to comparing Pakistan to Japan , Bangladesh/Nepal to South Korea , Sri Lanka to Taiwan . One group is influenced by Chinese civilization, the others group is influenced by Indian civilization. Two different class. One is Yellow the others is Brown/Dark. One uses chopsticks, the others uses bare hand. The most developed country in ASEAN is Singapore, a nation populated by predominantly Chinese an East Asian origin people.
One group collectively & consistently ranked within the world top 10-20 in IQ Test, PISA Score, University Rank, International Collegiate Programming Contest (ICPC) & Mathematical Olympiad standing shoulder to shoulder with western world ....while the others group collectively & consistently ranked somewhere in the middle out of 100+ participant nation standing shoulder to shoulder with some failed states & banana republic.
It's like comparing some Africans countries with Europe. No developed countries exist outside of Western & East Asian world.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1