Comments by "" (@Rav01508) on "Xi Jinping Stakes Claim On Ladakh; China Says Indian UT Belongs To Beijing After Article 370 Verdict" video.
-
The McMahon Line was first drafted in 1913, and the treaty to ratify them (Simla Accords) was never signed by the Republic Of China(ROC) who had just overthrown the Qing dynasty. There was no such thing as the McMahon Line in 1890, and China isn't disputing where the Line was drawn, she's disputing the validity of the Line in its entirety. The primary Indian claim is that the ROC did sign the Simla Accords because a British official called Olaf Caroe fabricated a narrative in 1938 where the ROC signed the Simla Accords (they didn't) and ceded parts of Tibet to the Raj.
In 1963 a British diplomat compared a pre-1938 treaties compendium with the post-Caroe compendium and found that Caroe had changed the note on the ROC's not signing the Simla Accords into one where the ROC signed it and considers the Indo-Tibetan border finalised. Nehru picked up a copy of Caroe's fabricated compendium so he got the impression that his country was legally entitled to more than she actually was. Compounding this was the US' decision to add fuel to the flames by declaring the McMahon Line as the legitimate boundary in an attempt to contain the spread of communism, despite reservations from the US State Department and protests from the fiercely non-communist Chiang Kai-Shek, leader of the ROC.
However, we all know Nehru irreversibly altered his country's relations with China in 1962, so by 1963, when the fabrication was discovered, it was already too late to stem the tide of Indian nationalism based on the false compendium entry. And that leaves us with the situation today, in the aftermath of a British attempt to de jure carve out a piece of Chinese territory which failed but had some success de facto, then a British fabrication of her failed attempt to carve out Chinese territory, then an Indian acceptance of the British fabrication alongside American endorsement, and a Chinese refusal to accept the fabrication as anything remotely legal.
Some Indians recognise that they don't actually have a legal claim to South Tibet, so they've begun using a different claim in that the people living in South Tibet want to be part of India more than China; in essence, a claim based on the principle of self-determination. This is India's secondary claim. However, as history has shown time and time again (Catalonia, Confederate States, Taiwan, Corsica, Chechnya, Tibet, Naxalites), without the permission of the larger body, a smaller section of the population will not be allowed to separate from its original country regardless of what they want.
A much more detailed account of the McMahon Line and its history is available here, written by Peter Lee who, contrary to impressions given by his surname, is not at all Chinese.
8
-
The McMahon Line was first drafted in 1913, and the treaty to ratify them (Simla Accords) was never signed by the Republic Of China(ROC) who had just overthrown the Qing dynasty. There was no such thing as the McMahon Line in 1890, and China isn't disputing where the Line was drawn, she's disputing the validity of the Line in its entirety. The primary Indian claim is that the ROC did sign the Simla Accords because a British official called Olaf Caroe fabricated a narrative in 1938 where the ROC signed the Simla Accords (they didn't) and ceded parts of Tibet to the Raj.
In 1963 a British diplomat compared a pre-1938 treaties compendium with the post-Caroe compendium and found that Caroe had changed the note on the ROC's not signing the Simla Accords into one where the ROC signed it and considers the Indo-Tibetan border finalised. Nehru picked up a copy of Caroe's fabricated compendium so he got the impression that his country was legally entitled to more than she actually was. Compounding this was the US' decision to add fuel to the flames by declaring the McMahon Line as the legitimate boundary in an attempt to contain the spread of communism, despite reservations from the US State Department and protests from the fiercely non-communist Chiang Kai-Shek, leader of the ROC.
However, we all know Nehru irreversibly altered his country's relations with China in 1962, so by 1963, when the fabrication was discovered, it was already too late to stem the tide of Indian nationalism based on the false compendium entry. And that leaves us with the situation today, in the aftermath of a British attempt to de jure carve out a piece of Chinese territory which failed but had some success de facto, then a British fabrication of her failed attempt to carve out Chinese territory, then an Indian acceptance of the British fabrication alongside American endorsement, and a Chinese refusal to accept the fabrication as anything remotely legal.
Some Indians recognise that they don't actually have a legal claim to South Tibet, so they've begun using a different claim in that the people living in South Tibet want to be part of India more than China; in essence, a claim based on the principle of self-determination. This is India's secondary claim. However, as history has shown time and time again (Catalonia, Confederate States, Taiwan, Corsica, Chechnya, Tibet, Naxalites), without the permission of the larger body, a smaller section of the population will not be allowed to separate from its original country regardless of what they want.
A much more detailed account of the McMahon Line and its history is available here, written by Peter Lee who, contrary to impressions given by his surname, is not at all Chinese.
8
-
6
-
5
-
The McMahon Line was first drafted in 1913, and the treaty to ratify them (Simla Accords) was never signed by the Republic Of China(ROC) who had just overthrown the Qing dynasty. There was no such thing as the McMahon Line in 1890, and China isn't disputing where the Line was drawn, she's disputing the validity of the Line in its entirety. The primary Indian claim is that the ROC did sign the Simla Accords because a British official called Olaf Caroe fabricated a narrative in 1938 where the ROC signed the Simla Accords (they didn't) and ceded parts of Tibet to the Raj.
In 1963 a British diplomat compared a pre-1938 treaties compendium with the post-Caroe compendium and found that Caroe had changed the note on the ROC's not signing the Simla Accords into one where the ROC signed it and considers the Indo-Tibetan border finalised. Nehru picked up a copy of Caroe's fabricated compendium so he got the impression that his country was legally entitled to more than she actually was. Compounding this was the US' decision to add fuel to the flames by declaring the McMahon Line as the legitimate boundary in an attempt to contain the spread of communism, despite reservations from the US State Department and protests from the fiercely non-communist Chiang Kai-Shek, leader of the ROC.
However, we all know Nehru irreversibly altered his country's relations with China in 1962, so by 1963, when the fabrication was discovered, it was already too late to stem the tide of Indian nationalism based on the false compendium entry. And that leaves us with the situation today, in the aftermath of a British attempt to de jure carve out a piece of Chinese territory which failed but had some success de facto, then a British fabrication of her failed attempt to carve out Chinese territory, then an Indian acceptance of the British fabrication alongside American endorsement, and a Chinese refusal to accept the fabrication as anything remotely legal.
Some Indians recognise that they don't actually have a legal claim to South Tibet, so they've begun using a different claim in that the people living in South Tibet want to be part of India more than China; in essence, a claim based on the principle of self-determination. This is India's secondary claim. However, as history has shown time and time again (Catalonia, Confederate States, Taiwan, Corsica, Chechnya, Tibet, Naxalites), without the permission of the larger body, a smaller section of the population will not be allowed to separate from its original country regardless of what they want.
A much more detailed account of the McMahon Line and its history is available here, written by Peter Lee who, contrary to impressions given by his surname, is not at all Chinese.
3
-
2
-
Fun fact: India has only 2 Olympic gold medalists based on individual effort. They have only a total of 10 gold medals in their entire Olympic history. 8 out of the 10 gold medals were won by team efforts, hockey. 2 Olympic gold medals out of an entire population of 1.4 billion people is truly "impressive". Super "strong". They really have the world oldest martial arts and taught the entire world martial arts. 🤭 Read more below. 👇
Indians are creating so many lies and propagandas nowadays to help them to cope with their very slavery and shameful past .The Indians claimed that they taught the entire world martial arts or have the oldest martial arts but why are they the most invaded and enslaved country in history?
Although the exact answer is up for debate, there are compelling reasons to believe that India may just be the most invaded country of all time. Foreigners have invaded the state over 200 times. The first person to successfully invade India was Alexander the Great in the year 321 BCE while the last people were the British who finally give way for an independent India. WorldAtlas
Important Muslim Dynasties and Rulers in India – Medieval History
Arab Invasion of Sindh, 712 A.D.
Ghazni (962-1116 A.D.)
Ghori (1186-1206 A.D.)
Slave Dynasty (1206-1290 A.D.)
Khilji (1290-1320 A.D.)
Tughlaq (1320-1414 A.D.)
The Lodhi (1451-1526 A.D.)
Mughal Rulers (1526-1857)
I wanted to add the Europeans and the British rule of India but then, those wars were fought with firearms and cannons and thus not so relevant. But if you were to add up all those years of enslavement and their Olympic record of 10 gold medals for a population of 1.4 billion people, you will come to a conclusion they are simply too weak
Indian combat sports prowess in the Olympics = zero
Indian combat war prowess in their entire history = zero
Indian enslaved and conquered history = 1600++ years (1000+ years claimed by Muslims and 600 years by the Europeans/British according to Henry Kissinger)
Indian taught the entire world how to fight or have the oldest martial arts? Yea, please try harder.
One thing we know about Indians is that they're a over proud people with little real achievements so making up fairy tales to help them cope is their favorite pastimes. The fact is, nobody knows what is the oldest martial arts and neither can they prove it as ancient historians simply say whatever fits into their agenda especially when under pressure from their king or when it is in their interest to do so. Who even verify their claims? They simply say whatever they want. Their words are the absolute truth? Remember history can be distorted?......But one thing is for certain. Everyone knows what is self defense since caveman era and that certainly includes their own unique martial arts. Otherwise, all countries would be brought under one ruler before the invention of firearms. It is self defense that created territorial/land boundaries or borders. To claim that Indians invented and taught martial arts to the entire world or have the oldest martial arts is pure Indian shayme-luhs. Besides, if they're so powerful, why are they the world most invaded and enslaved country? That is before the invention of firearms whereby hand to hand combat were relevant? Ask the Mughals? 😆😅🤣😂
When the invaders came, their so called oldest and most powerful martial arts magically disappeared. That is before the inventions of firearms and when hand to hand combat was relevant. Ask the Mughals and all the colonizers before them? 😆😁😅🤣
Let me tell you why they are lying so much....Because Indians from India have nothing to show to the entire world today but only
1) Poverty (GDP per capita ranking)
2) Filth (open defecations history eg. Swachh Bharat toilet mission 2014-2019, India's mount Everest of trash etc.)
3) Misery (happiness Index)
4) Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI)
5) Deformed babies (refer to Unicef report)
6) Weak history, world most invaded and enslaved country for 1000+ years and never fought in any major wars as an independent nation etc. and so on.....
2
-
2
-
Fun fact: India has only 2 Olympic gold medalists based on individual effort. They have only a total of 10 gold medals in their entire Olympic history. 8 out of the 10 gold medals were won by team efforts, hockey. 2 Olympic gold medals out of an entire population of 1.4 billion people is truly "impressive". Super "strong". They really have the world oldest martial arts and taught the entire world martial arts. 🤭 Read more below. 👇
Indians are creating so many lies and propagandas nowadays to help them to cope with their very slavery and shameful past .The Indians claimed that they taught the entire world martial arts or have the oldest martial arts but why are they the most invaded and enslaved country in history?
Although the exact answer is up for debate, there are compelling reasons to believe that India may just be the most invaded country of all time. Foreigners have invaded the state over 200 times. The first person to successfully invade India was Alexander the Great in the year 321 BCE while the last people were the British who finally give way for an independent India. WorldAtlas
Important Muslim Dynasties and Rulers in India – Medieval History
Arab Invasion of Sindh, 712 A.D.
Ghazni (962-1116 A.D.)
Ghori (1186-1206 A.D.)
Slave Dynasty (1206-1290 A.D.)
Khilji (1290-1320 A.D.)
Tughlaq (1320-1414 A.D.)
The Lodhi (1451-1526 A.D.)
Mughal Rulers (1526-1857)
I wanted to add the Europeans and the British rule of India but then, those wars were fought with firearms and cannons and thus not so relevant. But if you were to add up all those years of enslavement and their Olympic record of 10 gold medals for a population of 1.4 billion people, you will come to a conclusion they are simply too weak
Indian combat sports prowess in the Olympics = zero
Indian combat war prowess in their entire history = zero
Indian enslaved and conquered history = 1600++ years (1000+ years claimed by Muslims and 600 years by the Europeans/British according to Henry Kissinger)
Indian taught the entire world how to fight or have the oldest martial arts? Yea, please try harder.
One thing we know about Indians is that they're a over proud people with little real achievements so making up fairy tales to help them cope is their favorite pastimes. The fact is, nobody knows what is the oldest martial arts and neither can they prove it as ancient historians simply say whatever fits into their agenda especially when under pressure from their king or when it is in their interest to do so. Who even verify their claims? They simply say whatever they want. Their words are the absolute truth? Remember history can be distorted?......But one thing is for certain. Everyone knows what is self defense since caveman era and that certainly includes their own unique martial arts. Otherwise, all countries would be brought under one ruler before the invention of firearms. It is self defense that created territorial/land boundaries or borders. To claim that Indians invented and taught martial arts to the entire world or have the oldest martial arts is pure Indian shayme-luhs. Besides, if they're so powerful, why are they the world most invaded and enslaved country? That is before the invention of firearms whereby hand to hand combat were relevant? Ask the Mughals? 😆😅🤣😂
When the invaders came, their so called oldest and most powerful martial arts magically disappeared. That is before the inventions of firearms and when hand to hand combat was relevant. Ask the Mughals and all the colonizers before them? 😆😁😅🤣
Let me tell you why they are lying so much....Because Indians from India have nothing to show to the entire world today but only
1) Poverty (GDP per capita ranking)
2) Filth (open defecations history eg. Swachh Bharat toilet mission 2014-2019, India's mount Everest of trash etc.)
3) Misery (happiness Index)
4) Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI)
5) Deformed babies (refer to Unicef report)
6) Weak history, world most invaded and enslaved country for 1000+ years and never fought in any major wars as an independent nation etc. and so on.....
2
-
1
-
1
-
Fun fact: India has only 2 Olympic gold medalists based on individual effort. They have only a total of 10 gold medals in their entire Olympic history. 8 out of the 10 gold medals were won by team efforts, hockey. 2 Olympic gold medals out of an entire population of 1.4 billion people is truly "impressive". Super "strong". They really have the world oldest martial arts and taught the entire world martial arts. 🤭 Read more below. 👇
Indians are creating so many lies and propagandas nowadays to help them to cope with their very slavery and shameful past .The Indians claimed that they taught the entire world martial arts or have the oldest martial arts but why are they the most invaded and enslaved country in history?
Although the exact answer is up for debate, there are compelling reasons to believe that India may just be the most invaded country of all time. Foreigners have invaded the state over 200 times. The first person to successfully invade India was Alexander the Great in the year 321 BCE while the last people were the British who finally give way for an independent India. WorldAtlas
Important Muslim Dynasties and Rulers in India – Medieval History
Arab Invasion of Sindh, 712 A.D.
Ghazni (962-1116 A.D.)
Ghori (1186-1206 A.D.)
Slave Dynasty (1206-1290 A.D.)
Khilji (1290-1320 A.D.)
Tughlaq (1320-1414 A.D.)
The Lodhi (1451-1526 A.D.)
Mughal Rulers (1526-1857)
I wanted to add the Europeans and the British rule of India but then, those wars were fought with firearms and cannons and thus not so relevant. But if you were to add up all those years of enslavement and their Olympic record of 10 gold medals for a population of 1.4 billion people, you will come to a conclusion they are simply too weak
Indian combat sports prowess in the Olympics = zero
Indian combat war prowess in their entire history = zero
Indian enslaved and conquered history = 1600++ years (1000+ years claimed by Muslims and 600 years by the Europeans/British according to Henry Kissinger)
Indian taught the entire world how to fight or have the oldest martial arts? Yea, please try harder.
One thing we know about Indians is that they're a over proud people with little real achievements so making up fairy tales to help them cope is their favorite pastimes. The fact is, nobody knows what is the oldest martial arts and neither can they prove it as ancient historians simply say whatever fits into their agenda especially when under pressure from their king or when it is in their interest to do so. Who even verify their claims? They simply say whatever they want. Their words are the absolute truth? Remember history can be distorted?......But one thing is for certain. Everyone knows what is self defense since caveman era and that certainly includes their own unique martial arts. Otherwise, all countries would be brought under one ruler before the invention of firearms. It is self defense that created territorial/land boundaries or borders. To claim that Indians invented and taught martial arts to the entire world or have the oldest martial arts is pure Indian shayme-luhs. Besides, if they're so powerful, why are they the world most invaded and enslaved country? That is before the invention of firearms whereby hand to hand combat were relevant? Ask the Mughals? 😆😅🤣😂
When the invaders came, their so called oldest and most powerful martial arts magically disappeared. That is before the inventions of firearms and when hand to hand combat was relevant. Ask the Mughals and all the colonizers before them? 😆😁😅🤣
Let me tell you why they are lying so much....Because Indians from India have nothing to show to the entire world today but only
1) Poverty (GDP per capita ranking)
2) Filth (open defecations history eg. Swachh Bharat toilet mission 2014-2019, India's mount Everest of trash etc.)
3) Misery (happiness Index)
4) Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI)
5) Deformed babies (refer to Unicef report)
6) Weak history, world most invaded and enslaved country for 1000+ years and never fought in any major wars as an independent nation etc. and so on.....
1