Comments by "" (@Rav01508) on "Diplomatic tensions with Canada escalates! India issues travel advisory for Indians in Canada" video.
-
2
-
India tried to paint itself as a "peaceful" country but in actual fact, is the real threat to humanity. India spends money on expansionism, but not on environments. To think they still have the cheek to demand 1 trillion dollars for COP26. Look, this is what it did to its neighbor countries.
---Annexed Kalapani from Nepal in 1962; ---Annexed Turtuk from Pakistan in 1971; ---Separated Eastern Pakistan from Pakistan to become Bangladesh in 1971; ---Annexed Tin Bigha from Bangladesh in 1972
---Annexed Sikkim to become one of its states in 1975
---Tried to invade Mauritius but failed in 1983
---Committed massacres of Sikhism, captured their territories and attacked Harmandir Sahib so Sikhism believers assassinated Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi in 1984
---Invaded Sri Lanka in 1987
---1st time invaded Bhutan and failed in 1990 due to international pressure, but has controlled its defense and diplomatic affairs till now
---Supported and financed the terrorist organization Tamil LTTE to rebel against Sri Lanka government but gave it up later under great international pressure. The betray triggered huge anger of LTTE so it assassinated its Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi in 1991
---Annexed Dooars from Bhutan in 2006; ---Annexed Moreh from Myanmar in 2013; ---2nd time invaded Bhutan but failed in 2017 due to international pressure; ---Tried to invade Maldives in 2018; ---Invaded Nepal and one of its soldiers was shot dead by Nepal Security force in Jun of 2020
---Keeps nibbling lands from China Tibet and Kashmir that led to a war in 1962 and border conflicts with China till today; ---Keeps nibbling lands from Pakistan Kashmir that led to daily border wars and gun fights
--- At least 14 tribal civilians and one security personnel were mistakenly killed when Indian forces opened indiscriminate fire in the remote northeastern state of Nagaland in Dec 2021
---And more….. Not convince? Do your own research and verify it then. /////// 1954: 60 civilians killed in Nagaland
1962: captured Nelong-Jadhang villages 1962: annexed Kalapani from Nepal
1971: annexed Turtuk from Pakistan
1971: annexed Tyakashi, Chalunka, Dhothang, Bogdang from Pakistan
1976: 20+ civilians killed by the police in Old Delhi
1979 to 2012: 1528 civilians killed in Manipur
1984:Sikh Golden temple attacked by Indian army
1984: 17000 sikhs killed 1987 Oinam massacre. 112 houses, 6 schools and 10 churches were dismantled, properties worth of Rs 50,75,000 were looted from seven villages, villagers were forced to work, 27 persons are alleged to have been killed in the encounter in Senapati District of Manipur, 3 women were alleged raped and five women were alleged sexually molested and 300 persons are alleged tortured by Assam Rifles.
1989: 52+ Tamils killed in Sri Lanka by Indian Peacekeeping Forces
1992: held two British citizens in Nagaland for documenting human right violations in India
1993: 55 Kashmiri protestors killed
1994: 12 Nagaland civilians killed 1994: 9 youths killed in Assam
1995: 7 Nagaland civilians killed
1995: 7 killed, 36 injured by Indian Army 1998-2001: Secret killings of Assam ordered by India 2000: 10 civilians killed by Assam Rifles in Manipur (Malom massacre)
2001: 14 killed by CPRF in Manipur
2001 to 2010: around 1000 Bangladeshi civilians killed by BSF
2011: killed a 15 year old girl heading to Bangladesh by BSF Since
2019: 96 civilians killed in Kashmir
2020: 1 protester killed and 20 injured in Tripura
2020: 3 Kashmiri labourers killed (Sophian fake encounter)
2020: EU disinfo lab exposed India's propaganda network
2021: Manipuri man arrested without any reason
2021: killed 15 civilians in Mon district, Nagaland by Indian army (internet shutdown)
2021: hundreds join insurgent leader's funeral procession in Meghalaya
2
-
1
-
 @alexmartin6219 The McMahon Line was first drafted in 1913, and the treaty to ratify them (Simla Accords) was never signed by the Republic Of China(ROC) who had just overthrown the Qing dynasty. There was no such thing as the McMahon Line in 1890, and China isn't disputing where the Line was drawn, she's disputing the validity of the Line in its entirety. The primary Indian claim is that the ROC did sign the Simla Accords because a British official called Olaf Caroe fabricated a narrative in 1938 where the ROC signed the Simla Accords (they didn't) and ceded parts of Tibet to the Raj.
In 1963 a British diplomat compared a pre-1938 treaties compendium with the post-Caroe compendium and found that Caroe had changed the note on the ROC's not signing the Simla Accords into one where the ROC signed it and considers the Indo-Tibetan border finalised. Nehru picked up a copy of Caroe's fabricated compendium so he got the impression that his country was legally entitled to more than she actually was. Compounding this was the US' decision to add fuel to the flames by declaring the McMahon Line as the legitimate boundary in an attempt to contain the spread of communism, despite reservations from the US State Department and protests from the fiercely non-communist Chiang Kai-Shek, leader of the ROC.
However, we all know Nehru irreversibly altered his country's relations with China in 1962, so by 1963, when the fabrication was discovered, it was already too late to stem the tide of Indian nationalism based on the false compendium entry. And that leaves us with the situation today, in the aftermath of a British attempt to de jure carve out a piece of Chinese territory which failed but had some success de facto, then a British fabrication of her failed attempt to carve out Chinese territory, then an Indian acceptance of the British fabrication alongside American endorsement, and a Chinese refusal to accept the fabrication as anything remotely legal.
Some Indians recognise that they don't actually have a legal claim to South Tibet, so they've begun using a different claim in that the people living in South Tibet want to be part of India more than China; in essence, a claim based on the principle of self-determination. This is India's secondary claim. However, as history has shown time and time again (Catalonia, Confederate States, Taiwan, Corsica, Chechnya, Tibet, Naxalites), without the permission of the larger body, a smaller section of the population will not be allowed to separate from its original country regardless of what they want.
A much more detailed account of the McMahon Line and its history is available here, written by Peter Lee who, contrary to impressions given by his surname, is not at all Chinese.
1
-
@@rathodarjun-xq3rp The McMahon Line was first drafted in 1913, and the treaty to ratify them (Simla Accords) was never signed by the Republic Of China(ROC) who had just overthrown the Qing dynasty. There was no such thing as the McMahon Line in 1890, and China isn't disputing where the Line was drawn, she's disputing the validity of the Line in its entirety. The primary Indian claim is that the ROC did sign the Simla Accords because a British official called Olaf Caroe fabricated a narrative in 1938 where the ROC signed the Simla Accords (they didn't) and ceded parts of Tibet to the Raj.
In 1963 a British diplomat compared a pre-1938 treaties compendium with the post-Caroe compendium and found that Caroe had changed the note on the ROC's not signing the Simla Accords into one where the ROC signed it and considers the Indo-Tibetan border finalised. Nehru picked up a copy of Caroe's fabricated compendium so he got the impression that his country was legally entitled to more than she actually was. Compounding this was the US' decision to add fuel to the flames by declaring the McMahon Line as the legitimate boundary in an attempt to contain the spread of communism, despite reservations from the US State Department and protests from the fiercely non-communist Chiang Kai-Shek, leader of the ROC.
However, we all know Nehru irreversibly altered his country's relations with China in 1962, so by 1963, when the fabrication was discovered, it was already too late to stem the tide of Indian nationalism based on the false compendium entry. And that leaves us with the situation today, in the aftermath of a British attempt to de jure carve out a piece of Chinese territory which failed but had some success de facto, then a British fabrication of her failed attempt to carve out Chinese territory, then an Indian acceptance of the British fabrication alongside American endorsement, and a Chinese refusal to accept the fabrication as anything remotely legal.
Some Indians recognise that they don't actually have a legal claim to South Tibet, so they've begun using a different claim in that the people living in South Tibet want to be part of India more than China; in essence, a claim based on the principle of self-determination. This is India's secondary claim. However, as history has shown time and time again (Catalonia, Confederate States, Taiwan, Corsica, Chechnya, Tibet, Naxalites), without the permission of the larger body, a smaller section of the population will not be allowed to separate from its original country regardless of what they want.
A much more detailed account of the McMahon Line and its history is available here, written by Peter Lee who, contrary to impressions given by his surname, is not at all Chinese.
1
-
@ryukendo7194 The McMahon Line was first drafted in 1913, and the treaty to ratify them (Simla Accords) was never signed by the Republic Of China(ROC) who had just overthrown the Qing dynasty. There was no such thing as the McMahon Line in 1890, and China isn't disputing where the Line was drawn, she's disputing the validity of the Line in its entirety. The primary Indian claim is that the ROC did sign the Simla Accords because a British official called Olaf Caroe fabricated a narrative in 1938 where the ROC signed the Simla Accords (they didn't) and ceded parts of Tibet to the Raj.
In 1963 a British diplomat compared a pre-1938 treaties compendium with the post-Caroe compendium and found that Caroe had changed the note on the ROC's not signing the Simla Accords into one where the ROC signed it and considers the Indo-Tibetan border finalised. Nehru picked up a copy of Caroe's fabricated compendium so he got the impression that his country was legally entitled to more than she actually was. Compounding this was the US' decision to add fuel to the flames by declaring the McMahon Line as the legitimate boundary in an attempt to contain the spread of communism, despite reservations from the US State Department and protests from the fiercely non-communist Chiang Kai-Shek, leader of the ROC.
However, we all know Nehru irreversibly altered his country's relations with China in 1962, so by 1963, when the fabrication was discovered, it was already too late to stem the tide of Indian nationalism based on the false compendium entry. And that leaves us with the situation today, in the aftermath of a British attempt to de jure carve out a piece of Chinese territory which failed but had some success de facto, then a British fabrication of her failed attempt to carve out Chinese territory, then an Indian acceptance of the British fabrication alongside American endorsement, and a Chinese refusal to accept the fabrication as anything remotely legal.
Some Indians recognise that they don't actually have a legal claim to South Tibet, so they've begun using a different claim in that the people living in South Tibet want to be part of India more than China; in essence, a claim based on the principle of self-determination. This is India's secondary claim. However, as history has shown time and time again (Catalonia, Confederate States, Taiwan, Corsica, Chechnya, Tibet, Naxalites), without the permission of the larger body, a smaller section of the population will not be allowed to separate from its original country regardless of what they want.
A much more detailed account of the McMahon Line and its history is available here, written by Peter Lee who, contrary to impressions given by his surname, is not at all Chinese.
1