Comments by "TruthWarrior" (@Truth-warrior-j3e) on "World Leaders BLAST Kier Starmer As He "Destroys' The UK!" video.

@chrisscutchings3742 No thats false. Blair did not get rid of the crime of Treason in the UK. The offence of Treason is still part of British Law.
10
Except that is not true is it. Latest polling facts: As of August 2024 Keir Starmer has a significantly greater overall popularity rating at +3 compared Nigel Farage for example at -19%.
3
So which example of the two tier justice system do you have in mind?
3
@philgee4730 The recent Opinium poll on the popularity of Keir Starmer surveyed a broad demographic of the UK public. The poll results were also mirrored in other polls like YouGov, where his ratings fell from 44% to 37% over a similar period. The poll included a range of participants from different political backgrounds and demographic groups, aiming to capture a representative view of the UK electorate.
3
Latest polling shows that he still has an overall approval rating of +3%. Compared to Farage of -19%. So call me Sherlock but im guessing you haven’t listened to the people before making your comment.
2
@jessiegleaves9037 incorrect: he resigned because he was about to be suspended for deliberately and intentionally lying to parliament. The first time in parliamentary history a sitting prime minister has been censured in this way. It’s called being held to account.
2
By having the confidence of Parliament unlike, for example, Boris Johnson who resigned before he was about to be suspended.
2
@Teecee-y8m well done! For calling out ambiguous and contentious or misleading comments. I am relieved I am not the only truth warrior out there. Given the echo chamber participants on here it often seems like a very thankless task but it’s not. More people need to hold social media posts responsible for the often appalling comments, and the one you challenged is a perfect case in point. Thank you.
2
That’s probably a good thing when posting on a public forum
2
@MrScabbyhorse There are a number of reputable polling companies (and some to be viewed with caution). Ipsium is pretty good and is often quoted by the more responsible U.K. press. The latest Ipsium poll (released just 13 hours ago) shows further falls in Starmers popularity down to -7%. Interestingly according to another respectable polling agency YouGov, Farage has also fallen significantly since the riots, down to -42 across all groups. Time will tell how this plays out in the future. If you look more deeply at both recent polling as well as the election results it does seem that there are very significant electoral challenges in the future both for Labour, Conservatives, and Reform. Happy to share if anyone is interested.
2
@ajax-n1v Come on, is that the best you can do? Often the harsh words we hear from others are not reflections of who we are, but mirrors of their own insecurities and frustrations. How about reasoned argument based on evidence? What are you afraid of? Either you will present a compelling case or you will learn something. Either way it’s a win win. So come on, try using verifiable facts. Im waiting.
2
@emmahowells8334 I don’t really understand what you mean by “not to the people”. I only provide facts. I don’t provide opinions albeit I will always challenge opinions that are patently wrong. Sadly I cant find a crystal ball that works so I will have to wait and see if his popularity will go down at the next election but it its certainly highly probable that it will go further down during his term simply based on previous experience of elected prime ministers.
2
@emmahowells8334 As of August 2024, Keir Starmer’s popularity in the UK has seen a decline in his approval ratings. 53% of Britons view him unfavourably. On the other hand 37% have a favourable opinion. This still represents the highest approval for a UK leader since February 2021.
1
@paulsouthall2731 There you go again. Resorting to insults all the time doesn’t do you any favours. Do you know what a Troll is? “Troll: A person who deliberately provokes others online, often by posting inflammatory or deceptive content without regard for the truth.” I am seeking truth. It’s your comments that are taken down, not mine. Draw your own conclusions and have a nice day.
1
@paulsouthall2731 Well it does stop me since the question would have been a qualifying one. Since the question has been deleted I cannot now recall specifically what you were saying so that rather ends my enquiry. Regarding the rest of your points these are all false assumptions so I have to deduce that jumping to unfounded conclusions is a habit of yours when someone asks a question. To seriously debate anything we first need to be on the same page as the evidence. Without that there can be no logical discussion. Finally regarding violence and targets I have no idea what you are talking about since I have never seen a post from you like that but I take it at your word that you did write one. Clearly too violated the Utube community rules so it’s not my fault it was taken down but yours. Finally your logic of blaming me for incitement to violence when i haven’t even seen the post you mention let alone commented on it is yet another one of these jumping to conclusion examples. Happy to debate anything you like but only on the basis of verifiable information and certainly not if a genuine clarification question asking for evidence so that I can exactly understand the basis of your comment is responded with insults and false statements. Good luck for the future.
1
@paulsouthall2731 if your comments are deleted by utube then I cant ask my question again since I would need to refer to it and in any case, if it’s deleted then it can’t be misleading any more so no harm done. If I say in any comment that something is interesting then it is usually because I have not seen any verifiable evidence to support it and I would like to see that and include it I’m my references for the future.
1
@Daxxieful “all of it” isn’t an example but clearly you can point to lots. Terrific, I’m only asking for one out of your vast collection so go on then, give me a specific example
1
@paulsouthall2731 interesting that because I ask for an example that you decide I think otherwise. Go on have a go at answering a simple question. Just one example will do.
1
@philgee4730 You do know what a troll is don’t you? All I am doing is asking for evidence and, if it is false or not presented at all, I am disclosing the actual verifiable facts. I appreciate it may be uncomfortable for some people to be found out but Im not making the original comments. If comments can be backed up then great. If not then they get found out. Truth matters, even in an echo chamber.
1
@taniaharvey8294 oh dear. May I politely suggest that hate isn’t good for you….and wont help. Nelson Mandela: “Resentment is like drinking poison and then hoping it will kill your enemies.” Free tip: take John F.Kennedy’s advice, “Don't hate your enemies, just remember their names"
1
@emmahowells8334 it would have been more helpful to have a clearer definition of “the people’’ instead of simply insulting. You accuse me of condescending - have you read your own comment? Anyway, just in case I have missed it, where did I say 53 is lower than 37? Since you don’t want to clarify anything I take it you mean the 37% are not included in your definition of “the people” which is somewhat biased and very misleading. I do understand it’s difficult to accept facts sometimes when they don’t support your statements. That’s not mean to be anything other than making sure statements are correct and not misleading. “Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.” Aldous Huxley
1
@quantisedspace7047 I don’t. I do remember that trump was never very popular in the U.K. though. I have not found any evidence that his popularity has significantly improved at any time according to regular polls taken from 2016.
1
@raypowell5701 …and blindly follow any post or comment without fact checking it first.
1
@DaveBeaven-tx2tp such as?
1
@elsiecook2259 just someone who can do fact checking before making totally misleading statements. But Im all ears, in what way is the Poll debased? You do know how evidence works dont you? Saying something is so doesn’t make it so. What are you afraid of? Come on, give it a go, try using evidence and reasoned argument instead of unquantifiable statements. What have you got to loose? “A wise man, therefore, proportions his belief to the evidence." — David Hume.
1
@wendystrachan3240 And your evidence is?
1
And exactly what actions are the same as Stalin’s?
1
@jeanlockley2911 Im very much awake and by the definition of a troll your comment is rather ironic don’t you think? Once again, my question was simple and very reasonable: what specific example of an action by Starmer are the same as Stalin’s? Come on…Im sure you must have hundreds of examples. Im only asking for one. What have you got to loose? You might just prove your case. Thomas Paine: “Reason obeys itself; and ignorance submits to whatever is dictated to it. Truth is always the strongest argument.”
1
@skybluescaff or maybe he just wanted to spread sensational fake and misleading posts.
1
@jenniferrussell9118 you mean stupidity?
1
@janebruce6625 except that it is not the only part of the Human Rights Act. The Freedom of Expression rights protected are many but not absolute. Specifically is can be restricted for reasons including national security, public safety, prevention of disorder or crime, protection of health or morals, or the protection of the reputation or rights of others.
1