Comments by "TruthWarrior" (@Truth-warrior-j3e) on "Nigel Farage Responds To Elon Musk Statement That He Isn't The Right Man To Lead Reform Uk!" video.

  1. He broke the law. Get over it.
    3
  2. You mean breaking the law?
    3
  3.  @nickvinten7803  you mean just like that perpetrated by Robinson? Except in Robinsons case it wasn’t borderline. It was proven libel. Which was the beginning of why he in prison now.
    2
  4.  @Gagge-c9y but he doesn’t have a legit argument to deliberately prejudice a jury - frequently!
    2
  5. Well that’s not true is it. Contempt of court is a serious offence and imprisonment is a justified response when the administration of justice is at risk. Got it?
    2
  6.  @The-Midnight-Crow  which part of contempt of court is not clear? By live streaming proceedings outside the court and naming those accused, he was reckless. If these kinds of acts were allowed to continue - or even encouraged by his actions - then defendants who are found guilty would have a prima facie case of an unsafe verdict because of an unfair trial. As such, people who would normally be found guilty under a fair trial would suddenly be free, which is the exact opposite of what you (I assume) and I would want.
    1
  7.  @kevinlinley3273  The cases of Nelson Mandela and Tommy Robinson are vastly different in terms of context, causes, and the circumstances under which they were jailed. This might help you to understand key differences. Historical and Political Context Nelson Mandela: He was jailed as part of a systemic apartheid regime in South Africa, which enforced racial segregation and denied basic rights to the majority Black population. Mandela’s activism was aimed at dismantling this oppressive system, and his imprisonment made him a global symbol of the fight for freedom and equality. Tommy Robinson on the other hand is a far-right activist and former leader of the EDL who has been jailed for contempt of court and other legal violations, including mortgage fraud. To compare his actions with those of Mandela would be utterly absurd and show total ignorance of the facts. Nature of Actions Mandelas activism was rooted in principles of equality, justice, and human rights. While he was convicted for sabotage against the apartheid regime, his goal was liberation for an oppressed majority. Many view his imprisonment as a symbol of political suppression. Robinson’s actions have included breaching court orders (e.g., filming outside trials in a way that could prejudice proceedings), which undermines the rule of law. His imprisonment has been for specific breaches of legal processes, rather than for advocating systemic change. Public and Global Perception Mandela is seen as a hero by the majority of the global community, Mandela’s imprisonment galvanized international movements against apartheid, leading to widespread condemnation of the South African government. Robinson is a polarizing figure. While his supporters claim he is a victim of censorship or persecution, critics view his actions as harmful and disruptive to social cohesion, often pointing to his association with far-right ideologies which aim to undermine democratic institutions - the exact opposite of Mandela. Broader Impact Mandela s imprisonment helped to unify people against an unjust system, eventually leading to the dismantling of apartheid and the establishment of a democratic South Africa. Robinson’s actions and imprisonment have sparked debates around free speech, media coverage, and extremism. However, his impact is more localized and controversial, often deepening societal divides rather than addressing systemic injustice. Key Difference Mandela’s imprisonment is widely regarded as unjust because it was tied to his fight against an oppressive regime. In contrast, Robinson’s legal troubles stem from breaches of law within a democratic system, which many argue are legitimate consequences of his own actions rather than political persecution.
    1