Comments by "TruthWarrior" (@Truth-warrior-j3e) on "This is starting to show..." video.

  1. 7
  2. 4
  3. 3
  4. 3
  5. 3
  6. 2
  7. 2
  8. 2
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. @ Who “Doesn’t Want Them”? I know you don’t. But the world doesn’t revolve around you or me. “Not wanted” is a massive generalisation - not necessarily obvious though if you only ever get your reference points from echo chambers like this one. Many migrants are welcomed and appreciated, especially in sectors where they fill vital roles (e.g., healthcare, agriculture). As a NHS volunteer I can tell you that without the migrant employees in the service the NHS would totally collapse. Surveys show that public attitudes toward migrants vary, with many people recognising their contributions. Many migrants integrate into communities, build businesses, and enrich cultural diversity. Secondly, “Going Home” Isn’t Simple. For refugees and asylum seekers, returning home could mean facing war, persecution, or violence. Fortunately, International law (e.g., the 1951 Refugee Convention) protects individuals who cannot safely return to their home countries. Concerning Economic Migrants, what is wrong with that? You and I would do it in the same circumstances I am sure. Migrants often move for better opportunities, and they may not have viable options in their home countries. Many migrants have families, homes, and communities in the host country, making it their “new home.” It’s how Britain was built from the earliest years. The reality is that migration is often a difficult and emotional decision. Migrants leave behind loved ones and familiarity to seek a better life. Of course you might argue that you would prefer women and children from Ukraine to go back “home” and die there because you prefer that but the polling evidence suggests few people would agree. How would you feel if your own family had to migrate due to poverty, conflict, or lack of opportunity? You talk about different values and certainly everyone is different. But my own personal experience living and working in many different parts of the world demonstrated to me that we have far more in common with shared values, such as wanting safety, opportunity, and a better life for loved ones. Migration can be a two-way benefit: migrants gain opportunities, and host countries gain skills, labor, and cultural diversity. I understand from your comments that you have concerns about housing, jobs, and public services. I do understand that and can sympathise but blaming migrants oversimplifies the issues. Structural problems, not migration, often cause strains on resources. Brexit for example has massively reduced the tax take, reducing the effectiveness of the economy leading to resource stresses while at the same time significantly increasing undocumented immigration. Instead of blaming migrants, maybe we should focus on policies that ensure everyone—migrant or not—can thrive. Wouldn’t that be better than hate?
    1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28.  @nockianlifter661  well unfortunately that’s not in line with the facts is it : here they are - like them or not: Here’s a chronological timeline of UK borrowing trends since Margaret Thatcher, organised by time and government: Conservative Governments 1. 1979–1990: Margaret Thatcher (Conservative) • Early 1980s: High borrowing during the recession. • Late 1980s: Borrowing reduced through austerity, privatization, and economic reforms. 2. 1990–1997: John Major (Conservative) • Early 1990s: Borrowing peaked at 7.7% of GDP during the recession. • Mid-1990s: Borrowing declined as the economy recovered. Non-Conservative Government 3. 1997–2010: Tony Blair/Gordon Brown (Labour) • Late 1990s: Low borrowing due to strong growth and adherence to fiscal rules. • Early 2000s: Borrowing increased with higher public spending on health and education. • 2008–2010: Borrowing surged during the financial crisis, peaking at £157 billion in 2009-10 (10.2% of GDP). Conservative Governments 4. 2010–2019: David Cameron/Theresa May (Conservative) • Post-2008 crisis: Borrowing remained high but reduced through austerity measures. • Gradual decline, though levels stayed above pre-crisis figures. 5. 2019–present: Boris Johnson/Rishi Sunak (Conservative) • 2020–2021: Borrowing surged to £327.6 billion (15.3% of GDP) during COVID-19. • 2022–present: Borrowing decreased but remains elevated due to Brexit and energy challenges. This timeline reflects key shifts in borrowing tied to economic policy, global crises, and political priorities. Overall Labour hasn’t been any more profligate than labour though time will tell. I do wish people would speak fact rather than what they went to hear. If the latter best to go and emigrate to live in the Russian Federation.
    1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1