Comments by "Tasty Pymp" (@tastypymp1287) on "PensionCraft" channel.

  1. Because markets never crash?
    1
  2. 'Wage growth hasn't responded to monetary policy tightening'. Because such policy doesn't directly affect it.
    1
  3. Funny how this line is now being pushed out by the investment community right now.... David Girouxs been running his mouth the same way. It's almost like these talking heads are all fed the narrative to repeat!! Of course, this is exactly the line spun before the great depression....
    1
  4. I wonder if it noticed subprime mortgages.
    1
  5. Always?
    1
  6. Hmmmm..... Takes two to tango.....
    1
  7. Why?
    1
  8.  @dumbcat  This is true.
    1
  9. Marks and Ramin: Investors facing an environment with a greater default rate. Also Marks and Ramin: So that means it's a great time to be investing in high yield (risk) debt....
    1
  10.  @Borat_Kazakh  Why can you expect the 6% average return? Why not expect an average 10% loss per year, every year, for the next 10 years? What's your case? And you better not return to me with 'historic performance'.
    1
  11.  @Borat_Kazakh  Now now, I didn't say that, or even imply it. Answer the question.
    1
  12. It is sustainable. They will only be able to have two holidays a year now.
    1
  13.  @chrisf1600  They pay an 'excess' return because of inflation and speculation. The return figures the investment industrial complex quote are never adjusted for inflation.
    1
  14. @Chris F  Absolute twaddle. That's pure textbook regurgitation. There is no 'risk premium' that you describe. Apart from dividends, stocks bear no yield at all. Any 'premium' is theoretically deducted from the intrinsic value, which itself is essentially an assumption. It is IMPOSSIBLE for equity, or any asset, to indefinitely outperform inflation if you understand the maths. Think about it, the aggregate value of all things cannot be above total money supply. That's impossible. Even double entry accounting methods demonstrate that. So if equities are always providing an excess return, at what expense elsewhere? It is the increase in debt that ultimately increases the values in a debt based economy. When does that turn from investment into speculation and eventually into a ponzi result?
    1
  15. @Chris F  It's straight forward. Look at an index over time, look at the supply of money in the currency it is denominated in and look at inflation. You will see a positive correlation between all three. Which one is driving the others? And to add to that, look at the levels of debt. Also a positive correlation.
    1
  16. Jibberish.
    1
  17. @Alex Mason  Nah. It's QE. Increased money supply ALWAYS leads to inflation, that's an iron law of economics. If not in CPI, than assets instead. But inflation comes none the less.
    1
  18.  @djayjp  No. It ALWAYS leads to inflation, somewhere. Always, without fail. It's an axiom of economics 101.
    1
  19. Until they don't.
    1
  20. You sound like a gambler.
    1
  21. Should definitely solve inflation then.
    1
  22.  @immers2410  Not at all. Why would I be jealous of those that don't live within their means and are now going to get royally squeezed? A fool and their money are soon split. I'm very well placed to receive.
    1
  23. It's not the asset being traded. It's the risk attached. Once you get this, you realise nothing is cheap. It's priced exactly what it is worth.
    1
  24.  @TheCompoundingInvestor  Nope, wrong. You're merely repeating the tired ol clichéd hackneyed rhetoric and talking points. You're being too general. Buffet doesn't randomly buy undervalued stocks (no such thing as oversold, that's trade talk BS). The firm puts ALOT of work into the analysis (something your average mom n pop homebody cannot hope to do) behind their decision making. We're talking millions and millions spent in the research. And even then they sometimes get it wrong or get unexpected negative outcomes. It's undervalued for a reason....
    1
  25.  @djayjp  Yes, they viewed it as negative.
    1
  26.  @ohkee  Parroting investment industrial complex clichés....
    1
  27. @djayjp  Oh it is.
    1
  28.  @djayjp  But you don't know WHY it went up. It wasn't out of optimism. It was out of fear.
    1
  29.  @djayjp  What's funny?
    1
  30. Wtf does that even mean?!
    1
  31. I see Ramin joined the other talking heads in talking up Germany in his newsletter. Boy o boy, are they DESPERATE for you to believe that it's all fine in Deutschland. Germany. Is. DONE. Investing anything in that highly risky economy right noe is akin to literally burning your money. Maybe one day in the mid to distant future it will be fine. But obviously the good ol days of cheap abundant energy and money are gone. That's a profoooooouuunnnnd difference. Don't believe the investment industrial complex gaslighting. Get out if you can. Don't look back.
    1
  32. No it doesn't.
    1
  33.  @cooper8t  You're literally a cliché. Parroting what the Financial Asset Industrial Complex has groomed you to believe.
    1
  34. The Financial Investment Industrial Complex will never stop trying to make you buy their products and services. Never.
    1
  35. This is exactly what the financial industrial complex needs you to think. But where's the bottom?
    1
  36. Flat? Optimistic. At best.
    1
  37. Are retail sales strong? Are they adjusted for inflation?
    1
  38. No, it's petrol. Can you say the word petrol?
    1
  39. They might? But what decade?
    1
  40. The UK has the lowest corporation tax rates of all major economies.
    1
  41.  @GavinLawrence747  Wouldn't it be nice if we didn't keep feeling we needed to look to governments.
    1
  42. Is it 'incredibly' eloquent? What's incredible?
    1
  43. Always? Hmmm....
    1
  44. What if there isn't.
    1
  45. Quite frankly this is marxist drivel. Corporations think forward. Yes, they are holding prices up, but why? Greed you say? They currently get higher revenue but also higher operating costs including wages. If and when revenue declines they will be left holding the bag with those higher operating costs. Margins collapse. This seems like propaganda to deflect responsibility onto corporations and away from the true cause of this volatility which is irresponsible fiscal and monetary policy by governments and central banks.
    1
  46. You also neglect the fact that while energy companies have had great profits, they barely if at all make up for the covid losses.
    1
  47. Why should central banks ease policyv rates down?
    1
  48.  @thomasmeredith9124  Beep.
    1
  49. Mesmerising? How so?
    1
  50. The government are not manipulating prices. There's no such thing as a price cap.
    1