Comments by "David Ford" (@davidford3115) on "Russia's Retaliation: How Putin Escalated The War" video.

Indeed. The fact that the bridge sections were lifted up and sideways similar to the US-90 bridge after Hurricane Katrina indicates that the explosion was UNDER the bridge, not above it.
4
The fact that the bridge sections were lifted up and sideways is indication that the explosion was UNDER the deck, not above it.
2
Yeah, the claim that it was a truck bomb ignores the damage patter which indicated that the explosion occurred UNDER the bridge deck.
2
@shadyhaze1559 Except, the damage patter doesn't indicate that it was a truck bomb. The fact that portions of the deck were lifted UP and sideways indicated that the explosion was UNDER the bridge, not on top of it.
1
@Pystro Then how do you explain the lack of scorching? I am focusing on the damage patters which do NOT line up with the use of a truck mounted explosive. Further, there are actually TWO separate collapsed sections with a completely intact section between them? The security footage doesn't show it, but the video of the aftermath shows a collapsed section further down where the bridge section sheared off cleanly.
1
@Mr.Nichan It is called basic structural engineering. A downward blast would have separated the collapsed bridge section in the middle, not folded it and shear off at the ends.
1