Comments by "David Ford" (@davidford3115) on "Sky News Australia" channel.

  1. 20 years ago, you would be correct. But Obama and Biden paid the ransom for Bergdahl and now terrorists everywhere know the US WILL paid ransom if a Democrat is in the White House.
    1
  2. And CNN or MSNBC isn't one sided? Spare me.
    1
  3.  @Soipelez  All indications say otherwise.
    1
  4. It is insane to defend yourself from people who want to drive you into the sea?
    1
  5. Israel is acting to protect its people like it always has. Hamas is exploiting theirs, like they always have. Don't be disingenuous.
    1
  6. Hamas was elected by the people of Gaza.
    1
  7. FREE JUDEA.
    1
  8. Sure, blame the victim for being a victim.
    1
  9.  @stavrosaristidou5779  They "got defeated" because they realize it was becoming a pointless quagmire. Even the US gave up in the 1980s. it isn't that they couldn't annihilate the terrorists, it is that they chose not to kill innocents being used as human shields.
    1
  10.  @cjay2  You don't know that. And you "Deal with it" is just the emotional outburst of someone who is spiritually bankrupt and wants to make others as miserable as you are.
    1
  11.  @denningmp37  Spoken with the ignorance of a child. MAN caused this with bad choices, not the Almighty. You better hope you don't have to face him and account for your contempt. Even I do not dare blatantly insult and disrespect Shiva despite being a Christian; I just don't want to tempt fate like that.
    1
  12. Just like they always do.
    1
  13. But did Ghandhi kill women and children when he resisted British rule? You spit on his legacy when you compare India's past with Hamas.
    1
  14.  @albertroberts5929  Nice Strawman argument. Israel has spent six years fighting for its very survival against people who want to wipe them off the map. Your "occupation" claim is hogwash because there are Muslim Arab members of the Knesset. Occupiers don't allow those they are subjugating to have representation in the government.
    1
  15.  @albertroberts5929  Yes, and the Palestinians threatened to drive Israel into the see first in 1948, then again in 1967. They have NEVER renounced that and have ALWAYS rejected Israel's right to exist. Also, the IDF pulled completely out of Gaza in 2005. So calling that area "occupied" is totally disingenuous.
    1
  16. The problem is that they elected them.
    1
  17.  @justjustjustify  The Rajahs of India are more civilized than the rabid dogs who call themselves "Palestinian".
    1
  18. Murdering women and children indiscriminately and taking hostages is NOT legal. NO LEGAL SYSTEM IN THE WORLD ACCEPTS THAT.
    1
  19. They have a border with Egypt. It is a prison of their own making. And NOTHING justifies murder when breaking out of prison. Even the Law of Armed Conflict forbids escaping POWs from killing anyone while escaping.
    1
  20. Sure, blame the victim for being a vicitm.
    1
  21. "Very little separates man from the animals. And most people throw that away," -Confucius Author of "The Analects". Yes, that is a dangerous mindset. But when you act like a rabid dog, don't be surprised when you get treated like one.
    1
  22.  @ronwinkles2601  The problem is that the women are nursing their children on the very same hate that Hamas cultivates.
    1
  23. Funny, because for the longest time, the media and Europe were hating on Israel. I guess Hamas so overplayed their hand that they turned even there most avid supporters in Europe against them.
    1
  24. He tried to do the same in Jordan. Had assassins try to murder King Hussein (House Hashim, the only living descendants of the prophet Mohammed). After the Dawson's field hijackings he kicked them all out.
    1
  25.  @mya4126  Israel didn't exist until 1948, genius.
    1
  26.  @A-15-v2c  "Attacked for decades"? You realize the IDF completely pulled out of Gaza in 2005. And since then nearly non-stop rocket attacks fired from schools and hospitals. You don't care about the people, you only want justification for your anti-semitism.
    1
  27. JUDEA. Palestine was a made-up name by the Romans to erase Jewish history.
    1
  28. "Si vis pacem, para bellum: To prepare for peace, arm for war" -Roman adage.
    1
  29. What complete drivel. Eye for an Eye was a rejection of the Code of Hamurabi which stated that a noble's eye was more valuable than a slave's eye. Hence you put out the eye of the noble's slave instead. Try learning your history instead of such sophomoric responses.
    1
  30. Don't give them that kind of publicity. It will become a media circus and humanize them.
    1
  31.  @CoreyANeal2000  “The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn’t exist”—Charles Baudelaire Those who apologize for evil by pretending it doesn't exist are the favored servants of the card-carrying villain. They are the "useful idiots" that Vlad Lenin talked about.
    1
  32.  @timookello3822  1948, 1967, and 1973 all say otherwise.
    1
  33. Bullshit. That is disinformation by the anti-Semites who want Israel delegitimized. Your scenario would hurt the Ukrainian war effort. Such corruption has been played as hurting their efforts against the Russians by Zelensky's government.
    1
  34.  @EL_Duderino68  Only people who hate freedom of speech call corporate oligarchism "free-markets". Musk while not a free speech absolutist, is the closet thing to it in Big Tech. The fact you chose to attack him says more about you than him.
    1
  35. Cope harder.
    1
  36.  @atownofbigheads  The fact that the organization disbanded only days after the filing is tacitly admitting that they know they violated the law and would lose in court.
    1
  37.  @atownofbigheads  Considering that it was organized under the auspices of the WEF, that is clearly a violation of Sherman Anti-Trust Statutes. Stop parroting the talking points of the people who hate free speech.
    1
  38. Actually, the two go hand in hand. This isn't free-market, it is corporate oligarchism, the anthesis of free-markets.
    1
  39. Really? Because this Australian division is actually politically to the right of FoxNews. They are closer to One America News, Tucker Carlson, and Bill O'Reily.
    1
  40.  @EL_Duderino68  In this case it isn't that simple. The fact that they organized into a body to leverage power is what makes it a cartel and in violation of Sherman Anti-Trust law.
    1
  41.  @EL_Duderino68  Forming a cartel to control advertisers so as to hurt a business is called a Trust and is monopolistic. Just because you don't like Elon doesn't mean he is wrong.
    1
  42.  @EL_Duderino68  Not paying attention are you. It is a collusion between companies to hurt him which is a violation of the Sherman Anti-Trust Law.
    1
  43.  @bil8647  Because the west walked away from capitalism in the 1950s and chose to embrace "soft communism".
    1
  44. Who Trump? Regardless of who wins, it is clear we are looking at an election of 1860 situation.
    1
  45.  @pwillis1589  Lean to code. And don't quit your day job.
    1
  46.  @pwillis1589  Again you accuse us of doing exactly what you are doing. That is call psychological projection and is a classic tactic of a Saul Alinsky disciple. Go touch grass.
    1
  47.  @pwillis1589  Don't confuse opinion for objective fact. Everything I said is objective. And no, the preponderance of evidence doesn't prove you correct, it actually refutes you. I have your plate of crow ready for you to eat.
    1
  48.  @pwillis1589  They were acknowledging what they could no longer deny. Keep in mind that before the disastrous debate, they still had Biden leading. Shows you how worthless they really are.
    1
  49.  @pwillis1589  And all of them are biased towards the left. Further, if you actually look at the question they ask, they are skewed to drive a narrative rather than actually get a pulse on the electorate. Civics in particular has been really bad about that as of late which is why I stopped participating in their questionnaires.
    1
  50. Agreed. Neo-Feudalists who take Umbridge that political upstarts would "steal" their "birthright". As if holding onto power was an inheritance.
    1