General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
David Ford
Times Radio
comments
Comments by "David Ford" (@davidford3115) on "Megyn Kelly: Does Trump still have a shot at the Whitehouse?" video.
The same thing was said in 2016. Guess what happened next.
3
No, you have zero clue how the legal system works. Time on the statute of limitations does NOT suspend just because he leaves the state. Even Democrat lawyers refute your claims. You are grasping at straws.
2
Not is it not. Even Democrat lawyers say that you cannot count each transaction as if it were a separate crime. How about you try reading the RICO statute before you speak in complete ignorance.
2
@mattburns8839 Thank you for proving that you don't actually have an argument worth making. If auto-correct putting in the wrong word is the best you can do, you have already lost the debate. Learn to debate as well as to code. “I always cheer up immensely if an attack is particularly wounding because I think, well, if they attack one personally, it means they have not a single political argument left.” ― Margaret Thatcher
2
@livingtribunal4110 Yeah, you sure showed me. Try actually debating what I said rather than acting like a seal barking and clapping after getting a fish.
2
Lost support with independents? You have not been paying attention. Turmp got MORE votes in 2020 than he did in 2016. Biden however, has only gone downhill since his inauguration. Buyer's remorse is strong among independents.
1
@JesusSaysMAGAtrashMAGAfilth Grover Cleaveland rematch against Benjamin Harrison. Who won? Trump IS going to repeat Cleeland's feat for the very same reasons; buyer's remorse. Learn your history.
1
@cooldudecs Independents are having buyer's remorse over electing Biden. Further, they see this as a political witch hunt and are NOT impressed, further hurting the Dems. You are only making him a maryter. "Strike me down and I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine," -Obi Wan Kenobi, "A New Hope".
1
Yeah, you people said the same thin in 2016. how did that work out?
1
@JesusSaysMAGAtrashMAGAfilth Grover Cleaveland's 1892 rematch against Benjamin Harrison. Trump WILL repeat that, and for the exact same reasons.
1
@livingtribunal4110 Sorry, my bad. So many people here are exactly what George Orwell described. Particularly with regards to blindly accepting what the inner party tells them to think. Again, I apologize for lashing out.
1
Yeah, their Trump derangement Syndrome makes the blind to critical details which completely shatters their narrative.
1
Yes, because karma has a funny way of coming back to hurt those people who wish evil on others. "Be careful what you wish for, you just might get it (and EVERYTHING that comes with it)"
1
Garland has EVERY reason to bring ANY case against Trump forward. The fact that he and the Feds chose NOT to go forward on the finance case shows that there was no case to be made. Yeah, the president has original authority to declassify any and all documents. Biden as VP at the time he removed classified documents did not, nor did Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State. The Marilago documents were kept in a safe AND LOCK provided by the National Archives, so that alone blows up their case against Trump. January 6th is also proving to have been a false flag just like the Reichstag Fire. Federal agents have been proven to be among the primary instigators of the violence. Further, almost all of the people who actually made it into the chambers WERE ESCORTED BY CAPITOL POLICE. GA election is yet another nothing burger because it is NOT a crime to work the legal system if you have a complain about the election process. Criminalizing opposition is what they do in Belarus, not the US.
1
You said that in 2016 and were eating crow. Haven't you learned that it is not wise to bet against a Casino owner?
1
@JesusSaysMAGAtrashMAGAfilth Thank you for proving you don't actually have anything coherent to say. Engaging in ad hominins like you just did proves you have lost the plot. "“I always cheer up immensely if an attack is particularly wounding because I think, well, if they attack one personally, it means they have not a single political argument left.” ― Iron Margaret Thatcher
1