Comments by "David Ford" (@davidford3115) on "Ukraine War: Can evidence prove who shelled the dam?" video.

  1. From the Russian side of the damn? It is so easy to poke holes into your claims.
    5
  2. From the Russian side of the river?
    3
  3. Wagner was complaining that MOD troops were shelling their own forces. This is actually par the course for Russian "friendly fire".
    2
  4.  @zelenskyy-the-blackmailerh5920  HIMARS doesn't create large holes. Look at the Antinovski Bridge.
    2
  5. Antonovski Bridge says otherwise. THAT is the extent of the damage HIMARS could deliver to the dam.
    2
  6.  @tbird4a  Prove it. The burden of proof is on those accusing Ukraine because the preponderance of evidence implicates Russia.
    2
  7. @Kale White Antinovski Bridge says otherwise.
    1
  8.  @tbird4a  That is what Russia keeps doing.
    1
  9. They blew up other dams after their retreat from Kherson city.
    1
  10. How about the damn the Russians destroyed just months prior? The blew up a few after the retreat from Kherson.
    1
  11.  @zelenskyy-the-blackmailerh5920  Antinovski Bridge says otherwise.
    1
  12. Then why wasn't the Antonovski bridge destroyed to the same degree?
    1
  13. So explain to me my the Antinovski bridge was not destroyed in a similar fashion?
    1