Comments by "David Ford" (@davidford3115) on "Ukraine War: Mystery in southern Ukraine after news blackout" video.

  1. Well, don't forget that Canada and Norway have been sending cold weather gear since August. The Russians are not even properly equipped with summer combat gear.
    3
  2. Why did the US evacuate Kabul? Why did the US evacuate Saigon? Use your head.
    2
  3.  @thetaexali9550  So how does Russia evacuating Kherson make any difference? What is good for the goose is good for the gander.
    2
  4. Wishful thinking. The tide has turned against Russia. The fall of Isyum and the complete route of the First Army Tank Guards, the pride of Moscow is proof of that.
    2
  5.  @MrB1923  Yeah, the retreat of the Russian Army in Kharkiv speaks for itself. The Russian Bear is Geriatric.
    2
  6. Not with Moscow and Petrograd's air defenses dismantled and sent to Ukraine. Why leave himself vulnerable like that if he plans on using nukes?
    2
  7. With the Moscow and Petrograd air defenses having been completely removed and sent to Ukraine? Why leave himself exposed like that if he is going to use a nuke?
    2
  8. They still made pushes in Kherson, it was just slower and more methodical. Too many people expect a Blitzkrieg when war is usually a slow slog.
    2
  9. The Russian Bear is Geriatric. They should have captured Kiev in just three days. It has been six months, and at the rate they are going, it will be next century before they return to the gates of Ukraine's capital.
    2
  10. With the air defenses around Moscow and Petrograd completely dismantled and sent to Ukraine? Why would he do so while he is vulnerable like that?
    2
  11. That dam is what ensures water gets to Crimea. They would be shooting themselves in the foot if they did.
    2
  12.  @thetaexali9550  Russia doesn't actually care about the civilians. Them reducing Sevrodonetsk to rubble is proof of that. IF Kherson is to be flattened, they will use their artillery, not a nuke.
    1
  13. Consider this: the anti-air defenses around both Moscow and Petrograd have been completely stripped down and sent to Ukraine. If Putin were to use a nuke, his proverbial pants are down leaving him exposed to a conventional counterstrike.
    1
  14. Unlikely when the air defenses around Moscow and Petrograd have been removed and sent to Ukraine. Putin's proverbial pants are down.
    1
  15. Considering how many civilians they killed with their artillery shelling, I don't think civilian casualties matter to the Russian Army.
    1
  16. Considering that the anti-air defenses around both Moscow and Petrograd have been completely removed and sent to Ukraine, that leaves Putin open for an unopposed counterstrike. Tell me, why would he use a nuke when his proverbial pants are down?
    1
  17. Not with the anti-air defenses around Moscow and Petrograd stripped bare and sent to Ukraine. Putin's proverbial pants are down.
    1
  18. Not likely with the Moscow and Petrograd air defenses having been dismantled and sent to Ukraine.
    1
  19. Moscow and Petrograd's anti-air defenses have been completely removed and sent to Ukraine. Why would he use a nuke if his proverbial pants are down leaving him exposed to a counterstrike?
    1
  20. With the Petrograd and Moscow air defenses having been stripped and sent to Ukraine? Why would Putin use nukes when he is vulnerable like that?
    1
  21. With Moscow and Petrograd's air defenses having been removed and sent to Ukraine? Why would they drop a nuke when they are vulnerable like that?
    1
  22. Not with the Petrograd and Moscow air defenses having been removed and sent to Ukraine. Why use nukes when Putin is vulnerable like that?
    1
  23. With the air defenses around both Moscow and Petrograd removed and sent to Ukraine, why would Putin use a nuke while exposed to counterattack like that?
    1