Comments by "sogerc1" (@sogerc1) on "Zeihan on Geopolitics" channel.

  1.  @cemasikoglu9597  Typical Russian propaganda talk.
    1
  2.  @cemasikoglu9597  You can still be the a victim of Russian propaganda without knowing it. Think of it this way, Russia was threatening with nukes for supplying M777 howitzers and that was 16 months ago, so where are those nukes? We've sent a lot more terrifying weapons to Ukraine since then and still nothing. Even worse, according to Russian law Kherson is part of Russia and according to their dogma they use nukes to defend their own territory and yet Russians retreated from Kherson and then a big load of nothing. It just shows that nobody is taking seriously that Russia annexed parts of Ukraine, not even the Kremlin. Here's a third argument, if Russia used nukes in an offensive war then literally every country bordering China or the South China sea would get their hands on nukes and Xi just can't allow that to happen. Hope you'll sleep better tonight.
    1
  3. So kind of like: "If you give anything to North Korea we give everything to Ukraine" ?
    1
  4.  @rob6927  I don't know, Tomahawks from the new Typhon, Rapid Dragon, Reapers with Hellfire, there's so much more to give.
    1
  5. IMO the United States of Europe is the solution. I'd be all for it.
    1
  6.  @tamaszlav  Nem, hanem magyar.
    1
  7. *assembled. Parts of it made too. Did you actually watch the video?
    1
  8.  @normalname3623  Except that Peter says they are unsolveable problems.
    1
  9. Hmmm... maybe Ukraine should go into Belgorod.
    1
  10. Okay, but that won't do sh*t about their war effort. Can't the russkies sniff out any actual military targets to hit with those missiles? Peter says they won that round, but what did they actually win? Nothing, they are stalling.
    1
  11. The Ukrainians are blessed with those fuckin neighbours... 🤦‍♂
    1
  12. Well you haven't been paying enough attention. In Peter's videos it's always the end of the world for any county he talks about and if the Ukrainians already lost how come they are holding back the Russian army even when they push beyond their capabilities? How come you missed that their key interest rate is at 21% without any signs of relief and they are already borrowing NK soldiers. In fact it's you who's one sided.
    1
  13.  @davebrewer7170  <- Trollki accusing somebody of being a CIA plant, well that's new!
    1
  14. Not all 6000 of them, but some of them probably do. My guess is they have just enough working nukes to counter China.
    1
  15. I'll let the diswasher do my dishes.
    1
  16. Well, if he pushes the candy button then you pickle off a bunker buster but I can't imagine they'd only try to launch just one, some will still work.
    1
  17. Boy, the members of the Trump Cult are maaaaaaaaad in this comment section.
    1
  18. Then you weren't looking hard enough.
    1
  19.  @themanwiththegoldengun1998  C'mon man, don't tell me you haven't seen the viral video where the S400 operator was freaking out and shot 6 interceptors at the ATACMS and still got his ass burned. Everybody has been making fun of the Russian air defence since.
    1
  20.  @TimAZ-ih7yb  I think just the one. But since then the russians have improved their system and sometimes they can intercept ATACMS missiles. IDK the percentage but the Ukrainian strikes continue to be successful so it's not very high.
    1
  21.  @themanwiththegoldengun1998  One missile. How do you shoot down 7 missiles with 6 interceptors? It was just one. You're bullshitting, the video only showed the S400 and just one missile which exploded it's cluster munition over the S400. But yes, any air defence can be overwhelmed, that's why I always wondered why Russia never launched 10 Kinzhals at one Patriot radar to overwhelm it. My guess is they only have 6 MiGs that can launch them.
    1
  22.  @truthseeker9454  Everybody's favorite word is collapse. Russian economy, Chinese real estate, Western democracy, everything has been "collapsing" for years yet nothing happens.
    1
  23. Didn't quite bounce back, but it's getting there. And it was stupid anyway, if there's a cheaper way to do LLM more people will do it and more chips will be demanded.
    1
  24. Except that it won't be, that only where the attrition is happening.
    1
  25. I don't understand why a CIWS can't handle the jetskies? You know, those R2D2s with an erection.
    1