Comments by "Randy Schissler" (@randyschissler5791) on "Candace Owens" channel.

  1. Ridiculous. How do you fake 1/6 gravity in a vacuum environment, in continuous footage of up to two hours in length, with no breaks or cuts?
    7
  2. Don't let yourself get conned by this nonsense. Your father's integrity deserves defending.
    7
  3. Why are you so easy to be fooled? Maybe you should watch the whole 17 minute interview with little girl Zoey, instead of the edited conspiracy theory version. Notice the question Zoey asks: "Why has nobody been to the moon in such a long time?" Long time means from the last time since going to the moon. Buzz answers appropriately, "We didn't go there" during the long time since the last time going to the moon. Please pay close attention to what he said immediately after, as it's very telling as to why no one has gone back to the moon since the last time going to the moon. It's not that hard to understand. Also, if you watch the first part of the interview he talks about going to the moon. And at the end of the interview, he still talks about going to the moon. With all that talk about going to the moon, he went to the moon.
    6
  4. You really want to mention one measly piece of petrified wood, that was never given by NASA or any astronaut? No footage or blueprints are lost. You can watch all the footage for all the missions, right here on this site, so it can't be lost.
    6
  5. Kind of dispels your false notion that modern day NASA has an unlimited budget.
    6
  6. Trump has publicly congratulated Buzz Aldrin on his trip to the moon.
    6
  7. "they all looked liked they were at a funeral rather then being excited about coming back from the moon." Three weeks after being treated like a hamster, you would be bored too.
    6
  8. You know nothing about the CIA. That the CIA would care anything about any moon landings, is laughable.
    5
  9.  @peterblauarsch800  Total nonsense. He was commenting on how wacky conspiracy theorists are becoming.
    5
  10. In Capricorn One, how long did the hoax last until discovered? Was it 50+ years, or a measly week?
    5
  11. Dwight D. Eisenhower, the guy who started NASA, was no Nazi. He fought Nazi's in WWII.
    5
  12.  @solitairecat1  "Gene Gomar (birth name Eugene Rubin Akers)" Once he said powdered cement was spread around, I knew he was a fraud. You've never worked with dry cement, have you? Sorry, but you can't have dust clouds on the moon.
    5
  13.  @motorhead4870  After 1972, they quit trying to go back.
    5
  14.  @kaone3151  "even nasa admit the radiation issues have not been resolved. ' Totally false. What's next, the Kelly Smith video? You are easily fooled.
    5
  15. "reasonably asked him that question." That's a laugh. No wonder you are so deluded.
    5
  16.  @joeceonnia1954 "they didn’t look happy at all and supposedly they just got back from the most important achievement in man’s history!" How laughable, since you didn't come up with that on your own. A conspiracy theory video had to tell you that, and you lapped it up. What a sheep!
    5
  17. Rogozen was fired, and for good reason. That he tries to compare Russian cosmonauts in weightless space for long periods of time, to Apollo astronauts on much shorter missions partly in gravity, is a prime example.
    5
  18. Totally false. Try watching the whole 17 minute version, instead of allowing yourself to be fooled by an edited little clip?
    5
  19. I know, isn't it amazing how it is impossible for a camera to take a picture, without a real live human holding the camera?
    5
  20. No, they were men of integrity, which you are not.
    5
  21.  @lastfirst3291  Sibrel making stuff up, is not evidence.
    5
  22. Maybe you should look at what Dr. James Van Allen has said about the belts. You know, the same guy who discovered and studied the belts that even bear his name? "The radiation belts of the Earth do, indeed, pose important constraints on the safety of human space flight. The very energetic (tens to hundreds of MeV) protons in the inner radiation belt are the most dangerous and most difficult to shield against. Specifically, prolonged flights (i.e., ones of many months’ duration) of humans or other animals in orbits about the Earth must be conducted at altitudes less than about 250 miles in order to avoid significant radiation exposure. A person in the cabin of a space shuttle in a circular equatorial orbit in the most intense region of the inner radiation belt, at an altitude of about 1000 miles, would be subjected to a fatal dosage of radiation in about one week. However, the outbound and inbound trajectories of the Apollo spacecraft cut through the outer portions of the inner belt and because of their high speed spent only about 15 minutes in traversing the region and less than 2 hours in traversing the much less penetrating radiation in the outer radiation belt. The resulting radiation exposure for the round trip was less than 1% of a fatal dosage – a very minor risk among the far greater other risks of such flights. I made such estimates in the early 1960s and so informed NASA engineers who were planning the Apollo flights. These estimates are still reliable. The recent Fox TV show, which I saw, is an ingenious and entertaining assemblage of nonsense. The claim that radiation exposure during the Apollo missions would have been fatal to the astronauts is only one example of such nonsense." James A. Van Allen
    5
  23.  @backinmyrightmind  "It’s not me saying that it’s impassable, it’s scientists who are making the claim." Ok, let's hear about one of those scientists? Can you name even one?
    5
  24. Silly you, for being a fan of Sibrel. Are you really that gullible?
    4
  25. Totally false! You got fooled by an edited little clip. Try watching the whole 17 minute version with little girl Zoey.
    4
  26. Ridiculous.
    4
  27.  @chiwaled  "NO MAN has ever went to the moon. And there is NO proof NOR evidence to that." Have you been living in a cave for the last 50+ years?
    4
  28.  @lindysaltwell9628  The problem, is that man was lying throughout the whole interview.
    4
  29. You're delusional. How can anybody be this dumb?
    4
  30.  @jaymac1355  Your comment is dumber than dumb, as well as false. You couldn't even get your hand around one of those "thin curtain rods" of the LM.
    4
  31.  @WinkyFromNorthChicago74  Exposing the Lies of Bart Sibrel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03x2MC3wv5Q&t=653s
    4
  32.  @WinkyFromNorthChicago74  You want to talk about one measly piece of petrified wood, that was never given by NASA or any astronaut. Yet, you ignore over 800+ pounds of real moon rocks. Hundreds of samples examined by scientists, geologist, educators, and institutions, from around the world, and not one has ever been in dispute.
    4
  33. Maybe you should watch the whole 17 minute interview with little girl Zoey, instead of the edited conspiracy theory version. Notice the question Zoey asks: "Why has nobody been to the moon in such a long time?" Long time means from the last time since going to the moon. Buzz answers appropriately, "We didn't go there" during the long time since the last time going to the moon. Please pay close attention to what he said immediately after, as it's very telling as to why no one has gone back to the moon since the last time going to the moon. It's not that hard to understand. Also, if you watch the first part of the interview he talks about going to the moon. And at the end of the interview, he still talks about going to the moon. With all that talk about going to the moon, he went to the moon.
    4
  34. "NASA has astronauts stating there is no possibility at present to exceed lower earth orbit." Pay attention to the "at present" part. Yeah, if there isn't a heavy lift rocket presently available to go beyond lower earth orbit, then I guess you aren't going beyond lower earth orbit. Not hard to figure that out. "Ask yourself how have all of the tapes been lost? " They weren't. Ask yourself how you became so gullible to believe such nonsense?
    4
  35. Everything is fake, according to you. Flat earther, right?
    4
  36. "I say simple, all Freemasons" Totally false! I don't know how your poor husband puts up with all your foolishness.
    4
  37.  cinereus3601  They did, as did the Indians and South Koreans.
    4
  38. Totally false. Not with little girl Zoey, Conan O'brien, or the Oxford Union. You let yourself get fooled by selective editing.
    4
  39. Get over yourself. Elon fully believes in the six real moon landings, and has publicly talked about them. Trump as well.
    4
  40. No technology to go to the moon, has been lost.
    4
  41.  @chrism5086  "How did they get through the radiation belt? The argument is, no one can get through it." It's a dumb argument, only pushed by flat earthers and moon landing deniers. No one with knowledge on the subject, says it can't be done.
    4
  42.  @chrismanning9336  Anyway, here is a partial list of some of the best photos of the earth from space. Not CGI, Photoshopped, or composite. All shot on celluloid film. AS17-148-22725 to 22751, that's 26 photos. AS08-14-2383 to 2394, that's 12 photos. AS08-15-2535 to 2580, that's 46 photos. AS08-16-2588 to 2609, that's 22 photos. AS11-44-6668 to AS11-44-6696, that's 29 photos. AS11-36-5293 to 5309, that's 17 photos. AS11-36-5317 to 5381, that's 65 photos.
    4
  43.  @designingtheenemy5869  "Anyone with a pulse would be full of joy " And they were, when they were picked up after splashdown, by the USS Hornet. That was immediately after their return, so why are you ignoring that? Instead, you want to talk about a boring press conference, three weeks later.
    4
  44.  @AyloynOwlFeather  Dave McKeegan, Exposing the lies of Bart Sibrel.
    4
  45.  @plusmalin  Why would you want to share this nonsense with family members? Do they think you are a nutcase?
    4
  46. Actor Tom Mayk didn't even look or sound like Kubrick. Face it, you got fooled.
    4
  47. Maybe you should watch the whole 17 minute interview with little girl Zoey, instead of the edited conspiracy theory version. Notice the question Zoey asks: "Why has nobody been to the moon in such a long time?" Long time means from the last time since going to the moon. Buzz answers appropriately, "We didn't go there" during the long time since the last time going to the moon. Please pay close attention to what he said immediately after, as it's very telling as to why no one has gone back to the moon since the last time going to the moon. It's not that hard to understand. Also, if you watch the first part of the interview he talks about going to the moon. And at the end of the interview, he still talks about going to the moon. With all that talk about going to the moon, he went to the moon.
    4
  48. Just a huckster, peddling his grift.
    4
  49.  @garyolsen4160  The thinking that the Challenger crew is alive and well, and was never on board the ill fated ship, is one of the dumbest of conspiracy theories.
    4
  50. "We can’t send any maned rocket 🚀 to “the Moon” because the radiation would kill them! Total nonsense! You're a bit confused by the video with NASA engineer Kelly Smith.
    4
  51. Too bad your mom has a dummy for a son.
    4
  52. Perhaps it was displaying images from the Lunar Recognizance Orbiter, which could see the rover tracks.
    4
  53.  @Saeedmustapha-v1l  I said, during the moon landings. Did you know (of course not) that a lunar day is 29 earth days? They were there during the dawn of the lunar day. With that in mind, the Apollo 11 recorded moon surface temperatures were -9F to 44F. Another fact you might want to consider, is that there is no atmosphere on the moon, so even with those temperatures, not much heat transfer going on.
    4
  54.  @solitairecat1  American moon is nothing but innuendo, outright lies and half truths.
    4
  55. You're embarrassing yourself with ignorance.
    4
  56. Try watching "Exposing the lies of Bart Sibrel', by Dave McKeegan.
    4
  57. The USSR lost the lead in space exploration, a couple years before the first moon landing.
    4
  58. Question though .. Buzz A .. is on film "Multiple times saying they did not go to the moon " Totally false. Not to little girl Zoey, Conan O'brien, or the Oxford Union. You let yourself get fooled.
    4
  59. They don't. You're confused.
    4
  60. "If NASA came out tomorrow and said the Earth was actually flat or even pyramid-shaped based on all the "evidence" they have, people would say, "Wow. How about that?" " Totally ridiculous.
    4
  61. Totally false. Not to little girl Zoey, Conan O'Brien, or the Oxford Union. You let yourself get fooled by edited little clips. Obviously, you are also being fooled by the lying huckster con Bart, and Candace, here. Why so gullible?
    4
  62. Try watching "People think Apollo 11 never left Low Earth orbit??" by Dave McKeegan and "Exposing the lies of Bart Sibrel", also by Dave McKeegan and "Addendum A Funny Thing Happened... (By GreaterSapien - MIRROR)"
    4
  63. "I saw an interview Buzz Aldren gave to a little girl " Yeah, you let yourself get fooled by an edited little clip. Also, thinking that Challenger astronauts are alive, shows how easily you can be fooled.
    4
  64.  @SolarChronicle  Yes, that part always seems to get ignored.
    4
  65. "Candace, could you do a piece on the "Challenger accident/tragedy" and that those astronauts are still alive!" That would be as dumb as can be. What a load of nonsense. Sad that you are so indoctrinated with silly conspiracy theories.
    4
  66. Isn't it amazing how there is no way to take a picture or video, without a human actually holding the camera?
    4
  67. A ridiculous claim. Yeah, you're going to murder three astronauts in a very public and embarrassing way, that almost got the whole program cancelled.
    4
  68. What a load of nonsense and lies. How do you sleep at night, while spreading such garbage?
    4
  69. Ok, so maybe the flag was moving because of other reasons, than wind. A horizontal rod at the top, keeping the flag up, and an astronaut touching the flag pole, caused it to move. With such light gravity and no atmosphere on the moon, it kept moving for an extra second or two longer. Never thought of that, right? I thought Netherlanders were supposed to be smart?
    4
  70. Try Dave McKeegan's, Exposing the lies of Bart Sibrel.
    4
  71. Nonsense, you just don't understand what firmament really means. The Bible doesn't say anything about a dome or flat earth.
    4
  72. Dumb, as well as false.
    3
  73.  @Lostartsradio  "Trolls are gov't employees who hopefully will soon be fired by Trump." Trump fully believes in the moon landings by the way. He's been very public about it.
    3
  74.  @Lostartsradio  "Perhaps once he finds out that thousands of trolls, employed by gov't contractors are on the U.S. payroll" What a load of nonsense, and of course you have zero evidence for that delusion.
    3
  75. "Especially after seeing the footage of someone from NASA claiming they lost all the documents/ instructions from the original mission." You must be a liar, or grossly ignorant, as no one from NASA ever said that. Not even old astronaut Don Pettit said anything close to that.
    3
  76.  @dfkuz  "I remind myself of how depressed that first crew of astronauts were when they held that first news conference" Of course, you didn't watch it and come up with that on your own. A fellow conspiracy theorist told what to think, regarding the press conference. What a sheep! Those astronauts were mostly bored, and for good reason.
    3
  77. You love your silly conspiracy theories, don't you? Flat earther, too?
    3
  78. If they faked six moon landings with no AI, surely they would have faked going to Mars in these last 50 years? They never even faked going back to the moon, in the last 50 years?
    3
  79.  @chiwaled  "But I know man has never been to the moon no matter" You know it because you know? That's hilarious, and false.
    3
  80. Why pushing an outright lie? Try watching the whole 17 minute version, instead dumb nonsense.
    3
  81.  @RudeDogRanch  Isn't it funny how you wouldn't have even known about the Van Allen Belts if it wasn't for NASA and Dr. James Van Allen? So, why should we believe you, instead of them?
    3
  82. The six moon landings by six different crews, are not fake.
    3
  83. Are you really that dumb?
    3
  84.  @laurenavaneale1364  "we still can’t get a man on the moon in 2025." Well, you know they haven't been trying to get to the moon, for decades after 1972, right?
    3
  85. Why don't you just admit that you don't know anything about the CIA? That the CIA would care anything about any moon landings, is a laugh.
    3
  86.  @karungarimaina7613  "It’s just factual that technology gets cheaper with advancements. " For computers and TV's, but that's about it. You really think a rocket is cheaper? A spacecraft? No! Look at modern cars with all the technology they have nowadays. Are they cheaper and easier to make than they were 50 years ago? No!
    3
  87. "They admitted it on film! " What a liar you are.
    3
  88. Six moon landings by six different crews happened, period!
    3
  89.  @VintageFootball32  Vanishing point is for artists drawing pictures, not reality.
    3
  90. Totally false.
    3
  91. Your husband is right.
    3
  92. "Also, why was the video of the NASA engineer cut off?" One of the overused deceptions by Sibrel and others. NASA engineer Kelly Smith is talking about Orion, not Apollo, and the sensitivity of its modern microcircuit electronics, to radiation. The physically big electronics of Apollo were much more robust.
    3
  93.  @Eron55555  Get over it. They landed six different times with six different crews.
    3
  94.  @Eron55555  No, of course not, that's as dumb as can be. If you watch the whole Kelly Smith video, you will also hear where he talks about how "Orion has shielding, to be put to the test as it cuts through the waves of radiation." Orion made a successful orbit (no astronauts on board) around the moon last year, so the electronics will be fine.
    3
  95.  @Eron55555  Because he didn't like being harassed and stalked by a lying huckster con, like Sibrel. Besides, astronauts Alan Bean, Eugene Cernan, and Edgar Mitchell, did swear on the Bible, that they went to the moon. I guess that means they went to the moon.
    3
  96. What is it with you guys, thinking everything is about the technology?
    3
  97. Ridiculous. The Indian probe Chandraayan 2 verified, and published pictures of Apollo landing sites.
    3
  98. Bart is still begging for money too.
    3
  99. You should feel betrayed by Candace, for putting this huckster con on.
    3
  100. It wasn't. The Russians eventually abandoned their own moon program, because their moon rockets kept blowing up, among other issues they had.
    3
  101. "So the US goes to the moon only ONE time?" You're embarrassing yourself with ignorance. You don't deserve to have an opinion.
    3
  102. "wouldn't the same energy be needed for a return trip to Earth?" Of course not. Try reading a book for a change.
    3
  103. "Von Braun Van Allen " LOL!
    3
  104. You got fooled into believing nonsense.
    3
  105. No, he never did. Not to little girl Zoey, Conan O'Brien, or the Oxford Union. You let yourself get fooled by edited, little video clips.
    3
  106. All it means is that Kubrick was an admirer of NASA and the moon landings, which he was. There is zero evidence of a moon landing production.
    3
  107.  @takeittothelordinprayer  "how do you explain Cyrus Eugene Akers' testimony? " Once I heard about cement powder being spread around, I knew it was nonsense.
    3
  108. Wow, one measly piece of petrified wood, that never came from NASA or any astronaut. That's the best you can come up with?
    3
  109.  @garyolsen4160  Just admit that you believe every cockamamie conspiracy theory there is? Probably even flat earth.
    3
  110. I've watched it a few times. They were mostly bored, and for good reason. What about the parts where they were smiling and laughing?
    3
  111. Ridiculous.
    3
  112.  @JONCHAIDEZ  Another one who has been fooled by the edited video from NASA engineer Kelly Smith, right?
    3
  113. Admiral Byrd was no flat earther, either.
    3
  114. I'm tired of waiting. 50+ years, and you people have yet to come up with anything credible.
    3
  115. They never said that! Why are you lying?
    3
  116.  @martinx7251 "Also explains why the camera and tapes were destroyed later" Ridiculous. You can watch every video, right here on this site.
    3
  117. "The "moon rocks" were proven to be fossilized wood, and fake asf." Totally false. One measly piece of petrified wood that never came from NASA, or any astronaut. Also, no footage is lost. You can watch it all right here on this site.
    3
  118. "I’m not gonna get into why you can’t go south passed the 60th parallel, you’ll be arrested, or turned away with destroyer ships." Good, because that would be a laugh. You saw a video of a couple guys in an open boat, wearing a short sleeved shirt. Shouldn't that tell you that they were no where near the 60th parallel?
    3
  119. Bart Sibrel is such a lying huckster con. How can anyone with a brain, believe the nonsense he spews?
    3
  120. That was Apollo 17, and took three different moon landings to finally get it right. But you didn't know that, right?
    3
  121. Or, "People think Apollo 11 never left Low Earth orbit?", also by Dave McKeegan. Then "Addendum A Funny Thing Happened... (By GreaterSapien - MIRROR)"
    3
  122.  @doylestoner5779  "if it's not him, then they did a good job playing him" Ridiculous! Actor Mayk, didn't even look or sound like the real Kubrick.
    3
  123. Sad, because your children deserve better, than to be taught stupid nonsense like this.
    3
  124.  @andrewworth7574  Likely, she only thinks of the LM, and that there was only one moon landing.
    3
  125. @Elvin-m6l Watch "Exposing the lies of Bart Sibrel," by Dave McKeegan.
    3
  126.  @masterxofficiel  "They filmed it in the studio, slowed the movie down by 50 or 25%" Ridiculous. You think arm moving in slow motion would look normal? That's a laugh. Also, notice how the dust arcs from the rover, fall straight back down. Not one dust cloud to be seen, since they are impossible on the moon with an airless environment. Time for you to wake up.
    3
  127. Totally false! You got fooled by T. Patrick Murray's spoof "Shooting Kubrick", with actor Tom Mayk as Kubrick. Mayk didn't even look or sound like the real Kubrick. Obviously, you have been fooled by Sibrel as well.
    3
  128. Look how you've been conned, by Sibrel's nonsense.
    3
  129. A huge public event, wouldn't be the type of environment you'd want to fake something on such a grand scale, would it?
    3
  130. Makes perfect sense, since von Braun spent his life's work and passion, building rockets and spacecraft to explore the heavens and universe.
    3
  131. You got fooled by Bart Sibrel. You should feel embarrassed.
    3
  132. Trump is no denier of the moon landings. Look how he publicly honored Buzz Aldrin.
    3
  133. Bart Sibrel is nothing but a lying huckster con, and always has been. Too bad Candace fell for his nonsense. Be smarter.
    3
  134. "There's a slew of info, including interviews' A bunch of edited clips, that don't say what you think they do. You're easy to fool, obviously.
    3
  135. Is Trump down on your list too, since he also believes in the moon landings?
    3
  136.  @roberthak3695  Weak answer, with no evidence.
    3
  137. You married a dufus. Time to remove your own tinfoil hat, and come back to reality.
    3
  138. "the greatest achievement in all of history and they looked like they were at a funeral" What a sheep! You watched a conspiracy theory video on the press conference, and not only did it tell you what to think, it told you what to say about it! Classic! The same verbatim quote, you guys always parrot. No wonder you guys are so easily fooled.
    3
  139. Meteorites are called meteorites for a reason. The moon rocks brought back from the moon are not meteorites.
    3
  140. "These astronauts were told, in no uncertain terms, from day 1 that they will be involved in this hoax and if they were ever to admit it was a fraud, they would be wacked" What a load of nonsense. Buzz would have responded the same way he did to Bart.
    3
  141.  @Mike-v4v5d  You're the one looking like a clown. Maybe you should watch the whole 17 minute interview with little girl Zoey, instead of the edited conspiracy theory version. Notice the question Zoey asks: "Why has nobody been to the moon in such a long time?" Long time means from the last time since going to the moon. Buzz answers appropriately, "We didn't go there" during the long time since the last time going to the moon. Please pay close attention to what he said immediately after, as it's very telling as to why no one has gone back to the moon since the last time going to the moon. It's not that hard to understand. Also, if you watch the first part of the interview he talks about going to the moon. And at the end of the interview, he still talks about going to the moon. With all that talk about going to the moon, he went to the moon.
    3
  142. Why is it that only the men in your family have brains?
    3
  143. What a laugh, to think all you have to do is make a movie.
    3
  144. I suggest you quit falling for stupid stuff, like this. Bart Sibrel is nothing but a lying huckster con.
    3
  145.  @anniekerpels  What gets me is how the moon landing deniers will go on and on about a few seconds of the flag waving, but then totally ignore the long periods of time, an hour or more, where the flag is totally dead still, not the slightest movement whatsoever during that time. That can only happen on the moon with no atmosphere. Any flag on earth, even indoors, will always have some flag movement, with air currents moving around.
    3
  146. When you take pictures, how often do you include the sun? Most people taking pictures want to avoid the sun, to avoid lens flare. You obviously haven't looked the thousands of photos available online, with the ones that show lens flare. The sun is 93 million miles away, and you want to talk about the moon being 230,000 miles closer? No there aren't huge canyons on the moon. Try looking at the footage with the rover, Apollo 15, 16, 17, that show mountains thousands of feet high. You knew that there were six other missions to the moon, right?
    3
  147. The six moon landings and one aborted mission, were as publicized and open as can be, so hard to understand what you are talking about.
    3
  148. Obviously, you don't know how shadows work.
    3
  149. Double yawn. One measly piece of petrified wood that was never given by NASA or any astronaut. Meanwhile, over 800+ pounds of moon rocks that have never been in dispute.
    2
  150. Read a book for a change, and learn something.
    2
  151. Totally false.
    2
  152. "how am I supposed to accept that in 1969 and in the early 1970s they went to the moon without any incident! I’m not a fool" You must be a fool, because you never heard of Apollo 13.
    2
  153. One measly piece of petrified wood that never came from NASA or any astronaut, and you want to talk about insurance overage?
    2
  154. Yes, Sibrel will go to any lengths to push his nonsense to foolish people.
    2
  155. Even Trump believes the six moon landings by six different crews happened, and has publicly talked about them.
    2
  156.  @alevans7475  Truth hurts, for you. Trump and Musk, both Apollo landing believers!
    2
  157. Totally false. Why do you let yourself get fooled by edited little snippets?" Try watching the whole 17 minute version.
    2
  158. Not cost effective to do so, and maintain.
    2
  159. Ridiculous.
    2
  160.  @alisonturner2603  Sorry, but only a few were Freemasons.
    2
  161.  @alisonturner2603  Six of the Apollo missions landed on the moon. That's 18 astronauts, yet only three were Freemasons.
    2
  162.  @alisonturner2603  Buzz Aldrin, Apollo 11; Edgar Mitchell, Apollo 14; James Irwin, Apollo 15. That's it on the missions that landed on the moon. " Why did the whole crew go to the ceremony?" Only two people were on the moon, at a time. Pretty small ceremony.
    2
  163.  @Liquoricilicious  How many pounds did the non human missions bring back? Five pounds or so? So, that idea is a laugh.
    2
  164.  @kaone3151  "I don’t buy NASA lost the technology" Good, because no technology was lost. After six moon landings, they figured that with the enormous cost and effort required, they would try other things for awhile, and they did. Going through the Van Allen belts has been explained over and over. They went very quickly through the thinnest parts, to limit exposure, simple as that. If you can't find real photos of earth, you must not be looking very hard. Anyway, here is a partial list of some of the best photos of the earth. Not CGI, Photoshopped, or composite. All shot on celluloid film. AS17-148-22725 to 22751, that's 26 photos. AS08-14-2383 to 2394, that's 12 photos. AS08-15-2535 to 2580, that's 46 photos. AS08-16-2588 to 2609, that's 22 photos. AS11-44-6668 to AS11-44-6696, that's 29 photos. AS11-36-5293 to 5309, that's 17 photos. AS11-36-5317 to 5381, that's 65 photos.
    2
  165. Who were the 4 astronauts? If you can make stupid claims, surely you can answer that.
    2
  166. Instead of the edited little conspiracy theory clip, try watching the whole 17 minute version with little girl Zoey.
    2
  167. Totally false. You let yourself get fooled by an edited little clip. Try watching the whole 17 minute version with little girl Zoey.
    2
  168. "Soldiers who fought in Iraq will tell you about the problem of "brown outs" when landing a helicopter in sand." Irrelevant. You forgot that there is no atmosphere on the moon, for that to happen. The "huge rocket engine" in 1/6 gravity, further shows your ignorance.
    2
  169.  @BwanaFinklestein  Let me guess, that one measly piece of petrified wood, that was never given by NASA or any astronaut?
    2
  170.  @mystik.mermayde.aotearoa  Still ridiculous. Like all the governments of the world, all the world's space agencies, all scientists of the world, are all working together to lie about the shape of the earth and space travel. Flat earther, right? I don't know about Hinduism, but the Bible certainly doesn't "insinuate that space travel is impossible", or that the earth is not a globe.
    2
  171. "But Buzz has numerously admitted they never went to the moon" Totally false, not even once. Not with little girl Zoey, Conan O'brien, or at the Oxford Union.
    2
  172. Congratulations! You got the Kelly Smith and Don Pettit videos all wrong!
    2
  173. Ridiculous.
    2
  174. So, you're fooled by a lying huckster con like Bart Sibrel, that sadly Candace also seems to be?
    2
  175.  @stacey-leehattingh6957  I guess she didn't want to say it was a globe, either.
    2
  176. How long did they keep the hoax secret in the movie? A week or so? 50+ years?
    2
  177. Nonsense! You got fooled. That was T. Patrick Murray's spoof "Shooting Kubrick", with actor Tom Mayk as Kubrick. Laughable, since Mayk didn't even look or sound like the real Kubrick.
    2
  178.  @ArYan-fx3ty  "actual nasa engineers disputed that happening" Ridiculous. No one from NASA, or anyone else with credibility, has disputed the six moon landings other than true.
    2
  179. The events that took place with Apollo 13, are one of the biggest proofs that the landings were real, in my opinion. Some stuff, you can't make up.
    2
  180.  @johnturtle6649  "NASA has admitted that the original recordings of the Apollo 11 Moon landing were erased and reused, primarily due to a severe data tape shortage in the early 1980s." You're confused. A few BACKUP tapes from the Apollo 11 moonwalk were accidentally recorded over. They were BACKUP's in case the live TV broadcast failed. Since the live TV broadcast didn't fail, and multiple copies of the broadcast were made, the BACKUP tapes were thrown into a box and forgotten. With those copies, you can watch all the footage, so not lost.
    2
  181. What were the temperatures on the moon, during the moon landings? I'll bet you don't know.
    2
  182. You certainly have some wacky ideas.
    2
  183. Why would you expect to see stars in daylight, or while looking at the solar corona?
    2
  184.  @sinistersteel1042  "Now imagine you're above the Earth with zero light pollution" Zero light pollution? You forgot about the sun lighting up the sky. Remember when I asked you "Why would you expect to see stars in daylight, or while looking at the solar corona?
    2
  185. Why let yourself fall for such stupid stuff? Candace is doing a great disservice here.
    2
  186. "watch Buzz Aldrin say it twice about never being there!" Isn't it three times? Totally false! Not with little girl Zoey, Conan O'brien, or the Oxford Union. Why let yourself be fooled so easy?
    2
  187.  @drago987  There is zero real evidence one or six moon landings were fake. Sibrel is a proven fraud.
    2
  188. Totally false. Not with little girl Zoey, Conan Obrien, or the Oxford Union. You let yourself get fooled.
    2
  189.  @doylestoner5779  You saw a beard and glasses, and thought that was good enough. Not.
    2
  190.  @daryllect6659  You're the gullible dimwit. Fifty years ago, we got along just fine with the technology we had at the time. It did everything we needed it to. I don't remember even once, wishing that someone would invent a fancy phone or gaming computer, so that I could actually accomplish something in life.
    2
  191.  @makilune  "they knew it had to be faked in order to maintain the prestige. " Too bad you have no evidence of that so called fakery. "the disappearances of the ones who didn’t morally comply…" And who are all those ones?
    2
  192.  @makilune  The idea that Gus Grissom was murdered by the CIA is a laugh. You have no evidence that the CIA did anything. Why would the CIA care anything about moon landings? And that they would do it in a highly publicized manner, that set the entire Apollo program backwards for many months, is beyond ridiculous. Cyrus Acres video: Once I heard about the cement power spread around, I knew that was nonsense. If you've ever done cement work, you would know that the dust creates large dust clouds. Something that is impossible on the moon with no atmosphere, and you never see any dust clouds in the moon videos. The dust falls straight back to the ground, just like it was on the moon. "The camera filming? The first person to land? The lightning? The astronauts’ equipment and suits? The lack of stars? The flag waving?" The same old, tired, easily debunked nonsense.
    2
  193.  @robymaru03  "no hard evidence just made up fabrication that you have to believe blindly" As dumb as can be. Your own research is pretty lousy, then.
    2
  194. It was never in the capsule.
    2
  195.  @ProSanity-n5v  Dumbest argument ever. You really think moon landings come off of an assembly line?
    2
  196. False. You can watch every video, right here on this site. If you can watch it, it can't be lost.
    2
  197. You sure do love your conspiracy theories. The Gulf of Tonkin incident was certainly not faked. The first attack was very real, with real damage and dead North Vietnamese sailors. The second attack didn't happen, but from a miscommunication, not from faking. Also, you mention 9/11, which had nothing to do with the Middle East. Afghanistan is in Asia. RFK assassination?
    2
  198. Why doesn't Trump or Musk believe the six moon landings were fake?
    2
  199. False. Jack Parsons died in 1952, NASA wasn't founded until 1958. The Pasadena reference is false, as well.
    2
  200. Despite his other lies, even Bart Sibrel believes the earth is a globe.
    2
  201.  @HaleyMarieIrishQueen  Wow, you want to talk about that one measly piece of petrified wood, that never came from NASA or any astronaut?
    2
  202.  @Sid_XXl  One measly piece of petrified wood that never came from NASA or any astronaut. Give me a break, with that stupid story.
    2
  203.  @daryllect6659  The clown who never has any evidence for his lame "Fake" claims.
    2
  204. "sciense?" That's a laugh. What else did you flunk in school, besides science?
    2
  205. What a cowardly claim.
    2
  206.  @RexSkittles  "I’m just a normal person exploring things." Yet, you're more than eager to declare fakery, on flimsy evidence by a well-known huckster con like Sibrel.
    2
  207.  @raiderlarry3255  Old astronaut Don Pettit never said "lost." That you are incapable of understanding what Pettit was talking about, doesn't help your case.
    1
  208.  @Karlrainer  "those details were mentioned in the doc a funny thing happened on the way to the moon." That's a laugh, not a doc. Anything by Bart is nonsense.
    1
  209.  @amybella  "that 24 hours sun that was filmed was using green screen" Green screen has been proven to be nonsense. What's next, giant LED screens?
    1
  210.  @amybella  "Those images are all fake I have seen them all, and examined them. They have been altered and edited. " That's a laugh. Since all those images on celluloid film don't fit your flat earth fantasy, you declare them all fake, without any evidence to back it up. Typical flat earther.
    1
  211. "the idea that something so massive and historical wasnt real just couldnt register " And now you've lost your way, in the world of reality. You've turned into a nutcase, just like your husband.
    1
  212. Trump is a full believer in the moon landings. He's been very public about it.
    1
  213.  @BwanaFinklestein  That's dumb as can be.
    1
  214.  @paulbeardsley4095  I always wondered if perhaps the original rock was a real moon rock, but during the time it was sitting in a drawer, etc., someone stole it and replaced with the petrified wood, hoping no one casually looking at it, would notice.
    1
  215.  @paulbeardsley4095  I was referring to, during the time it was in the possession of Pime Minister Willem Drees, before it went to the museum.
    1
  216.  @NYCgirl927  There were six different moon landings by six different crews. After the last mission in 1972, the Apollo program was cancelled. That's probably why Vince quit in 1973. His expertise wasn't needed anymore.
    1
  217.  @timwhaley8810  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03x2MC3wv5Q&t=653s
    1
  218. No. The morons disputing the moon landings should watch it.
    1
  219. Explain what technology should make it easier to go to the moon. Does a computer or cell phone replace a big rocket with a load of fuel?
    1
  220. Trump fully believes in the moon landings, and has publicly said so.
    1
  221. LOL! Trump and Musk are firm believers in the moon landings.
    1
  222. "entire governments are setting up movie scripts & hiring actors" You're delusional.
    1
  223.  @imana4838  No you don't. Your whole life revolves around silly conspiracy theories.
    1
  224.  @Abundantlyfamous  "NASA s satanic origins" There is none. You just let yourself be fooled by stupid stuff.
    1
  225.  @kikaree  You're delusional.
    1
  226.  @Ceeceelea  Next thing you will say is, Michelle is a man?
    1
  227.  @paolorossi8470  That's nonsense. Clinton wasn't saying that at all. He was referring to the plethora of stupid stuff, that we see more and more of these days. Your reading between the lines, is nothing but a feeble attempt make up stuff to meet your silly agenda.
    1
  228. Speaking from ignorance, I see.
    1
  229.  @Guest_1138  "no other country has released any photos of the US moon landing sites. " They have, but they are as good as the ones from the Lunar Recognizance Orbiter.
    1
  230. "the gov, threatened these men, who were the 'best in class pilots' and forced them to do this." Who's the bigger liar, you or Bart?
    1
  231. Instead of following gross misinterpretations by flat earthers, learn what firmament really means in the Bible. It certainly isn't a flat earth and impenetrable dome.
    1
  232. You have a weak mind.
    1
  233. Face it, you got fooled.
    1
  234. Smart man.
    1
  235.  @makilune  "Even AI detects the images as staged lmfao 😂" So, now you are showing how gullible you are to a Russian propaganda stunt? Here is what Microsoft Copilot AI says: Are the Apollo moon landing images staged? No, the Apollo moon landing images are not staged. The Apollo missions were real, and the images and videos captured during those missions are genuine. NASA has provided extensive evidence to support the authenticity of the moon landings, including telemetry data, rock samples brought back from the moon, and independent verification from other countries. There have been conspiracy theories suggesting that the moon landings were faked, but these claims have been thoroughly debunked by experts in various fields. The overwhelming consensus is that the Apollo moon landings were genuine and historic achievements in human space exploration.
    1
  236. Who cares? Clinton isn't disputing the moon landings, in that quote.
    1
  237. Bart Sibrel is the big liar here!
    1
  238.  @brucegorst8005  You forgot that it is 250 miles up, not a few feet off the ground.
    1
  239. The truth is that Bart Sibrel is a lying huckster con, and has been for years.
    1
  240. "The astronauts were all free masons." Totally false.
    1
  241.  @mirandasworld  LOL! You probably had a link or something included. Can you also tell Elon that I've had comments deleted, too? If yt is indeed censoring truth, then why is this ridiculous Candice/Sibrel video not deleted? By the way, Elon fully believes in the six moon landings.
    1
  242. It's one of the silliest of questions, so quit asking it.
    1