Comments by "Peter Jacobsen" (@pjacobsen1000) on "The Wall Street Journal"
channel.
-
284
-
184
-
50
-
49
-
35
-
34
-
33
-
30
-
29
-
18
-
16
-
15
-
14
-
13
-
10
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
6
-
@thomaszhang3101 " when China ordered isolation for foreign tourists, it offered free hotel, services and meals,".
That is not true. Visitors had to pay for quarantine rooms. In Shanghai it was RMB 300-500 per night. And there were other costs, of course, incl. special testing clinics. Overall, on average it cost around RMB 12,000 to enter China, not including flight or visa. It was troublesome for everybody, but we got through it. And now, it's almost over. A few more months from now it may be as simple to enter China as it was in 2019.
6
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The Kiel Institute's account of spending/support for Ukraine only starts from February 2022, not from 2014. So they're not wrong, they just don't start from back in 2014. But what does the US government itself say about its support for Ukraine? Quote from the US State Department website, March 4, 2025, entitled 'U.S. Security Cooperation with Ukraine':
"To date, we have provided $66.5 billion in military assistance since Russia launched its premeditated, unprovoked, and brutal full-scale invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022, and approximately $69.2 billion in military assistance since Russia’s initial invasion of Ukraine in 2014. We have now used the emergency Presidential Drawdown Authority on 55 occasions since August 2021 to provide Ukraine military assistance totaling approximately $31.7 billion from DoD stockpiles."
So, in fact, the EU is NOT way behind, but on par with the US on assistance to Ukraine.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@calvinblue894 "on the overall..the government still wins..and have most of the say". Yes, I agree with you that the PAP has abused the law to stay in power since independence. Your democracy still needs some improvement, but at the base it has the tools for change. And let's not forget that apparently, most Singaporeans prefer to vote PAP. It's not a terrible party, but not perfect, either.
I'm familiar with Amos Yee. And generally, I will agree with you that Singapore has some of that authoritarian style we see here in China. It's still better, though, kinda half way between the Chinese style and the Taiwanese style.
You make a lot of references to social problems in North America. Those problems are real. I'm not from there, though, but from Europe. I'm quite happy with the way European society functions. It's pretty nice, but I also think Singaporean society is pretty nice. A well functioning society.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@bobcharles7716 No, it's a conclusion made by people who don't have much knowledge of Chinese history or of world history. Just one point: If you do not engage with the rest of the world, how can you know if you're stronger, and why would it matter? Comparative strength only matters if there is engagement, whether it is cultural, military, trade or otherwise. Apart from short trips by Zheng He, China rarely went outside East Asia until the 20th century.
There is no doubt China is an illustrious culture with a proud and rich history, but 95% is putting it too high. Think of all the troubles starting long before the Han Dynasty, with invasions from the north, invasions from Tibet, and numerous internal uprisings, again, and again, and again. Splitting up and reuniting, again and again. Like other countries, China has had its problems for thousands of years. Now, China is on the upswing again, but the world is a different place than it was before.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
A few notes:
Tastien, the 'Chinese McDonald's' in the video currently only has 10 stores nationwide; 9 in Beijing, 1 in Guangzhou. China has had McDonald's and KFC clones for decades. Since the 1990s, the Taiwanese chain Dico's, and for almost as long, a plethora of small clones in 3rd and 4th tier cities and below, small local chains often named something like 麦肯基 (Mai Ken Ji), which can best be translated as McKentucky, serving approximations of food from the two big US chains.
The Nike competitor Anta has existed for decades, but mostly popular in 3rd and 4th tier cities, serving consumers who couldn't afford to buy international brands. Their logos are designed to be close enough to Nike's swoosh to make it interesting, but not so close as to invite copyright lawsuits. Going from a low-end brand to a high-end brand is going to take a lot of effort, no matter where you are. Could you imagine Walmart becoming a desirable, exclusive grocery?
Luckin Coffee has a very viable business model. They are to coffee what Domino's is to pizza: Cheap, quick, and everywhere. But few people would claim that Domino's Pizza represent a high quality Italian dining experience.
The video highlights the use of patriotism/nationalism by several of these homegrown brands. This can work for short periods, but I think history tells us that long term success cannot be built on patriotism alone. Americans buy Toyotas, Europeans buy California Wine, Japanese buy Hermes scarves. There's no reason to believe that Chinese people will be any different, at least not in the long term.
What we're seeing now is Chinese consumers realizing that they can no longer afford to buy foreign premium brand goods, so they buy the next-best thing: Local, cheap and cheery, good-enough brands.
1
-
1
-
1