Comments by "Top Quark" (@topquark6919) on "'Russia More Powerful Than Us': Ukrainian Military Pilots Admit Weakness; Plead West For F-16s" video.

'31 NATO countries plus Ukraine, vs Russia. Yet Russia is still in Ukraine.' What kind of nonsense are you talking?! 🤔😂🤣 Here are the FACTS. NATO is supporting Ukraine, with military hardware, ammunition, intelligence, training, supply. NO NATO troops fighting in Ukraine. It's NOT Russia alone! Russia is being supported by: China, Iran, Syria, Belarus, North Korea, India, Eritrea. How could you have possibly forgotten, that?! 🤔😂🤣
3
If that's the case, why wasn't this war concluded, in the specified 'three days'?! 🤔😂🤣😂🤣
3
@IhateNazilovers It's NOT a matter of 'cannot afford the release troops from other operations'. That's BS. NATO doesn't put 'troops on the ground', because that would be a grave escalation of an already volatile situation. NATO troops on the ground, in Ukraine, would be that last thing NATO wants. Let's hope Alexander Lukashenko's provocation's/sabre rattling with Poland, doesn't escalate things to a point of no return.
2
@IhateNazilovers 'What happened to the spring summer autumn winter counter offensive that started 10 weeks ago with 5 days to Crimea but not made it passed the greyzone???' What happened to Russia's 'It'll be over within days' invasion of Ukraine? On day 545+ on said invasion?! Now who's laughing?! 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
2
@jackhand2051 Wrong! 😂😂 Soviet losses in Afghanistan. 15,000 Mujahideen/Taliban losses. 53,000 NATO losses. 3,502. You have to be 'spot on' with your figures, when posting here!
2
@jackhand2051 Incorrect! 'The war began on 25 December 1979, when the Soviets brought their 40th Army to fight in Afghanistan, and lasted until 15 February 1989, when they announced that all of their troops had left the country. About 15,000 Soviet soldiers were killed, and about 35,000 were wounded.' 'American service members killed in Afghanistan: 2,358. U.S. contractors: 3,846. Afghan national military and police: 66,000. Other allied service members, including from other NATO member states: 1,144.' I'm always spot on with my figures. I Don't want any Pro-Putin/Pro-Russian bots/trolls think they can catch me out! 😂🤣😂🤣 Let's NOT forget, the Soviets also killed 2 MILLION Afghan civilians. I'm sure you wouldn't want me to omit that figure?! 🤔😂
2
@hb9145 Well said. 👍
2
@user-xg6yc8ho3w No, wrong. Not all NATO countries are supplying Ukraine. 'Ukrainian government documents show that as of the end of last year, Kyiv had paid arms suppliers more than $800 million since the Russian invasion in February 2022'. Russia buy's theirs, or does a 'deal' in exchange for oil. What difference that makes, I don't know.
1
@jack-sy3gb Yes it is.
1
@Lz-kj4uy Yes he did.
1
@IhateNazilovers 'if you read western media narratives yes. What happened to the spring summer autumn winter counter offensive that started 10 weeks ago with 5 days to Crimea but not made it passed the greyzone???' Yes, and you clearly believe the Pro-Putin/Pro-Russian narrative?! So what's the difference? Remember, Russia's media is STATE CONTROLLED for a reason! 😂🤣😂🤣 I can get my information, from any number of 'free press' news sources. Try that in Russia. Putin controls the MEDIA, so he can CONTROL the narrative!
1
@jackhand2051 You keep in mind, the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan in 1979. During their 10 year occupation, they managed to kill 2 MILLION Afghan civilians. They also used Biological & Chemical weapons. 'The Soviets have used lethal chemical weapons in Afghanistan including nerve agents, phosgene or phosgene oxide and mustard gas.' 'In countries where chemical weapons have been employed by the Soviets or their allies-Afghanistan, Laos, Kampuchea, and, years ago, Yemen-they were used to eliminate the resistance of stubborn, highly resilient irregular forces located in inaccessible mountainous or jungle terrain.' Yes, the US were in Afghanistan for 20 years, in that time, the civilian death rate, was less that 1/20th of that of the Soviet Union. It was never called a 'Special Military Operation'! 😂😂
1
@Lynda-z9v Putin made himself out to look an incompetent fool, in front of the whole world. He invaded a country 28 times smaller. Russia was supposed to be a 'Superpower', and completely underestimate his opponent. Putin's calamitous invasion, will go down in the annals of history, as one of the greatest military misjudgements/blunders of the 21st century! I suspect, Putin's incompetent invasion of Ukraine, will be used by military scholars for decades, as an example of how NOT to invade a SMALLER country! 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣 Putin did claim, his invasion would be over 'In a matter of days'. Yet, here 'we' are on day 545+! 😂🤣😂🤣
1
@jackhand2051 'NATO is not like the soviets? ' No, it killed less than 1/20th of the civilians that the Soviet Union did! 'the Taliban are currently in power and stronger than originally started.' Yes they are, and what a disaster it is for those living under the Taliban rule. In all fairness, I think a decision was rightly made at the 'top' of government, that the sh1t hole country wasn't worth one more NATO/Allied life. 'Taliban and also dropped a total of 85,108 on an inferior group of rebels. ' Of course they dropped bombs, it was a war. What did you expect them to drop, food parcels?! 😂 'NATOs drone attack killed innocent civilians.' Less than a 20th that the Soviets killed.
1
@jackhand2051 No, the figures I gave were/are absolutely correct. The Afghan National Security Forces loses, whilst unfortunate, cannot be 'attached' to NATO figures, and they are not. I've done multiple searches regarding NATO losses in Afghanistan, none attach the ANSF to NATO's 'tally'. I checked, Statista, AP news, Wiki, US department of def, France 12, The Guardian etc. ALL listed ANSF deaths separately. So, the figures I stated, are right, they just don't suit your Pro-Putin/Pro-Russian narrative! 😂🤣😂🤣 'NATO forces lost 3,579 is bad considering what NATO was there to do.' Of course those 3,579 deaths are bad. I never inferred otherwise. Still, less than the 15,000 that the Soviet Union, lost. As I originally stated.
1
@jackhand2051 Ahh, yes, I see what we have here. The typical YouTube troll, who doesn't have the intelligence, maturity or education to acknowledge when he is wrong. Individuals like you, are 'Ten a penny' here. No matter what evidence/convincing arguments someone poses, you'll just attempt discredit their argument, because it doesn't suit your narrative. Yet, you've shown NO, convincing 'evidence' to support your position?! 😂 Predictably, you try to discredit the actual number of NATO/Coalition deaths, by inferring that the figures from the US defence department, are somehow 'bogus'! 😂 Whilst conveniently, ignoring the other, quoted sources! 😂😂 So, my ABSOLUTELY CORRECT figures, are corroborated by multiple, independent sources.
1