Comments by "Top Quark" (@topquark6919) on "China's Direct Attack On NATO For Aggravation Of Putin's War | 'Fuelling Tensions Everywhere'" video.

Didn't Russia aggravate the WAR, by invading Ukraine in the first place? 🤔😂'Fuelling tensions everywhere', yup sound like Russia!
2
@GGLEDOU Did you ever hear about the Budapest Memorandum (Treaty)? Make sure YOU, are fully conversant with all the information/facts! 😂
2
@PerceivedREALITY999 Why are you still trying to intimidate people, who have a legitimate reason to disagree with you? You relentlessly bombard individuals, with this 'Tsunami of posts' tactic. It is, in all honesty, rather pathetic. I see why you are such an avid supporter of dictatorial regimes. You dislike: Others opinions/legitimate disagreement/independent views.
1
@PerceivedREALITY999 'The warmongers don't care about human life and the immense suffering they cause.' Exactly! Putin is TARGETING civilians in Ukraine. When he was supposedly 'supporting' Bashar al-Assad in Syria, who was covertly producing and using chemical weapons. Syria deployed chlorine and nerve agents in its civil war with horrible effects, against it's own people. FULLY supported by Putin/Russia.
1
@PerceivedREALITY999 'US used agent orange in Vietnam. This caused serious health issues including cancers, neurological problems and birth defects.' Soviet Union used Biological weapons in Afghanistan. 'There is now emerging a convincing body of evidence - and important parts of it from independent sources - that the Soviets may have direct complicity in the deployment of biological and chemical weapons not only in Afghanistan but also in Kampuchea and Laos.' The Soviet Union covertly operated the world's largest, longest, and most sophisticated biological weapons program, thereby violating its obligations as a party to the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention.
1
@PerceivedREALITY999 'The US has told many lies. I will just name a few.' Hilarious! 😂 Let's take a closer look at Putin's lies! This extract is taken from the Carnegie Endowment for International peace. Title: Why The Kremlin Lies: Understanding Its Loose Relationship With the Truth. 'One of the stickiest challenges for Western governments has been how to deal with, or even understand, a Russian leadership that lies insistently and incessantly, even when it doesn’t need to. Amid the current crisis over Ukraine, the Kremlin has made the situation both simpler and more confounding. On the one hand, the Russian leadership is stating its most important security concerns and demands more clearly and publicly than ever before. President Vladimir Putin has demanded formal guarantees that there will be no enlargement of NATO to the states of the former Soviet Union and no threatening military presence in Ukraine or elsewhere in eastern Europe. On the other hand, the Kremlin continues to mask its intentions in a torrent of falsehoods. Senior Russian officials claim that Russian military forces pose no threat to Ukraine while inventing apparent pretexts for a potential invasion—such as accusing Ukrainians of “genocide” and claiming that U.S. military contractors are deploying chemical weapons to the Donbas. The thuggish nature of the Kremlin’s demands and threats undercuts the hand of any Western officials who might want to engage with Moscow. What is the point of talking with a counterpart who has such blatant disregard for the truth? Chris Bort is a non-resident scholar with Carnegie’s Russia and Eurasia Program. The Kremlin, for its part, appears to expect that its messages and motivations are clear enough. It doesn’t seem terribly bothered that its reliance on brazen lies leads interlocutors to doubt that anything it says can be trusted. Still, knowing what Moscow is trying to communicate with its various uses and abuses of the truth is important as the West contends with the very real threat of a large-scale Russian military operation in Ukraine. Like it or not, Western policymakers simply do not have the luxury of throwing up their hands and tuning out everything the Kremlin is saying.'
1
@PerceivedREALITY999 'nato used a large amount of depleted uranium munitions in Iraq and Yugoslavia. DU caused a sharp increase in the incidence of cancer. DU caused birth defects in many children.' Why NO mention of Russia's use of Depleted Uranium?? Are YOU being a hypocrite, AGAIN?? 🤔😂🤣😂🤣 'Countries like the U.S., U.K., and Russia manufacture ammunition using depleted uranium because the metal is heavy and dense, making it ideal to break apart enemy armour.' 'Russia also maintains its own stocks of DU munitions. A U.S. Defense Department spokesperson told the Associated Press that the U.S. along with other nations, "have long possessed depleted uranium rounds as well, including Russia." 'Hamish de Bretton-Gordon, a retired British army colonel and regular commentator on Kremlin forces, told Newsweek: “Of course, the Russians use it [DU] extensively as well”. He said it “would be incongruous if they're not using it” in Ukraine as the weapons were a “key part of their armoury”.
1
@PerceivedREALITY999 Right, shall we look at the RECENT coups, that have been instigated by Russia? This should be interesting. I only mention them for clarity, as you seem to have conveniently forgotten about these! 😂😂 Ukraine 2004, Georgia 2008, Ukraine 2014, Montenegro 2016, Mali 2020, Ukraine 2022, Moldova 2023, Sudan 2023.
1
@PerceivedREALITY999 When the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan in 1979, not only did the Soviet Union lose 15,000 soldiers. It also killed 2 MILLION Afghan civilians!!!! Wherever the Soviet Union/Russia stick it's nose, into other countries affairs, there is mass murder, misery & destruction. Again Mr @perceivedreality7933, why NO mention of these atrocities? Doesn't suit your BS Pro-Russian propaganda, does it?!🤔😂🤣😂🤣 Thought you were a 'Truth Teller'??!! That's fu*king BS!
1
@PerceivedREALITY999 NATO's invasion of Afghanistan. I'm amazed you want to discuss that. Here are some FACTS, that won't 'sit' well with you, and your Pro-Putin/Pro-Russia BS narrative. The Soviet Union killed 2 Million civilians, when it invaded Afghanistan, in the ten years from it's 1979 occupation. Yet, during the 20 YEARS NATO was in Afghanistan, 'only' 70,000 civilians were killed. THAT'S IN TWENTY YEARS!
1
@PerceivedREALITY999 'US used nuclear weapons on civilian targets (Hiroshima and Nagasaki). Many civilians suffered from radiation.' Yes it did. It ended World War 2, thus saving many millions more innocent lives. 'In Atomic Salvation, Dr. Tom Lewis—an independent historian, former high school teacher. Lewis estimates that the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, to the extent that it induced Japanese surrender, saved the lives of roughly 30 million people. His calculations are detailed, and his argument is persuasive.'
1
@GGLEDOU How about YOU research the Budapest Memorandum (Treaty)??!! Then YOU will understand who the REAL culprit is!
1
@GGLEDOU I'm NOT off topic. You just don't want a 'conversation', regarding the Budapest Memorandum, because it doesn't suit your narrative, of a blameless Russia! 😂🤣😂🤣 Putin/Russia is responsible for the 'expansion' of NATO. BEFORE Russia invaded Ukraine, only 6%, yes that's correct, only 6% of Russia's bordered NATO member countries! FACT! Sweden & Finland had NO intention of joining NATO, UNTIL Russia invaded Ukraine. Those two facts alone, won't suit your Pro- Putin/Pro-Russia agenda! Nevertheless, they are still facts. 'Who cares about the Budapest Memorandum', clearly not someone who's in denial about the reality of history. You keep believing the BS Putin propaganda, enjoy life in denial. You might 'wake up' one day, though I doubt it.
1
@laosasean8482 Hilarious! 😂🤣😂🤣Russia is going to bankrupt itself, just like it did, trying to keep up with the US/NATO during the 'cold war'. 'In November 2022 it was reported that Russia had officially entered a recession as the Federal State Statistics Service had reported a national GDP loss for the second consecutive quarter. According to most estimates, every day of the war in Ukraine costs Russia $500 million to $1 billion.'! 😂😂 'Sean Spoonts, editor-in-chief of Special Operations Forces Report (SOFREP), told Newsweek that Grozovski's numbers are likely too low. During the third month of the invasion, Spoonts estimated that Russia sustaining its military efforts cost as much as $900 million per day.' 😂😂
1
@@ladteknologies687 WOW! You thought of that, all on your own?! 🤔I doubt it!! 😂🤣😂🤣
1