Comments by "Top Quark" (@topquark6919) on "Russia 'Wipes Out 1,500 Ukrainian Fighters'; Moscow Dubs Kyiv's Invasion Attempt 'Utter Failure'" video.

Really? You can't be very intelligent then. It's a war, that Putin started. Ukraine is fighting back. What confused you?
5
Yet more BS propaganda, from Putin supporting Hindustan Times. 🙄
1
It's you who is the clown, if you don't think Ukraine should try and defend itself, or fight back! 😂😂😂
1
@SenatePalpatinetroller 'NATO* not Russia.' No, completely wrong. Russia invaded Ukraine, not NATO! 😂😂😂
1
@princedahking4539 'but they are dying they can't defend why become stupid to attempt to invade they got what they wanted' WTF are you talking about! 'but they are dying', yes soldiers die in war. 'they can't defend' Clearly they can, Putin's 'three day war' is now in it's third year! 'why become stupid' Putin was stupid in the first place, for invading Ukraine.
1
@andretorben9995 'a war started by ukraine. Clearly you need to get educated about what is going on .' No, Russia invaded Ukraine. You need to STOP believing Putin's BS propaganda, and get educated!
1
@anonanon7235 'NATO started the war in 2014. Put yourself in Russia's shoes, would Americans allow Canada to be overthrown via violent coup d'etat? Then allow Russian and Chinese troops and weapons in to Ontario and BC? WOULD the Americans NOT fight?' No, NATO didn't start this. STOP being so gullible, and try using your brain for a change. STOP believing Putin's STATE CONTROLLED media!
1
@alexnurworld 'ur papa comedian actually Using proxy war ' You need to learn what a 'proxy war' is, you clearly don't know! 😂🤣😂🤣😂
1
@The_Prince_Of_Crows 'Did you think this was going to end in them capturing territory? Was this the drive to Moscow with 2,500 men amd a handful of tanks? This was a waste of men and munitions to capture a few headlines and it was pointless in a strategic sense. You don't attack just to attack or get headlines.' Putin thought his invasion of Ukraine would be over 'in a matter of days'. Now, it's entering it's third year! WTF was Putin thinking? God only knows! He's embarrassed himself and his country! 😂😂😂😂😂
1
@The_Prince_Of_Crows Putin thought his invasion would be 'over within days'! 😂😂😂😂😂😂
1
@anonanon7235 No they didn't. Stop with the BS lies.
1
@andretorben9995 You need to wake up from your coma, and stop believing Putin's BS propaganda!
1
@The_Prince_Of_Crows 'You don't attack just to attack or get headlines.' That's exactly what Putin did. 😂😂😂😂
1
@The_Prince_Of_Crows 'it was pointless in a strategic sense.' Not pointless for Ukraine. It was defending itself, against an invading superpower adversary. It didn't have much choice. 😂😂😂
1
@The_Prince_Of_Crows 'This was a waste of men and munitions' Blame Putin, he started the war. 😂😂😂
1
@anonanon7235 'NATO started the war in 2014.' Stop believing Putin's 'fairy tales'. Just makes you look gullible and easily led.
1
@andretorben9995 'a war started by ukraine. Clearly you need to get educated about what is going on .' Utter nonsense. You need to get educated, and STOP believing Putin's propaganda. Why are you so gullible? 🤔😂😂
1
@The_Prince_Of_Crows So, YOU actually believed Putin's propaganda, that he was going to take Ukraine 'within days'?! 🤔😂🤣😂🤣 See the problem here, do you?! 🤔😂😂😂
1
@The_Prince_Of_Crows 'Did Putin tell you that personally? Because there is no source for that claim anywhere.' The Pro-Putin/Pro-Russian bots/trolls ALWAYS try to deflect AWAY from Putin's incompetence! 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
1
@The_Prince_Of_Crows 'All I have to do is let you ramble on like a man who lost his mind' You don't have a choice, you severely over estimate your importance, if you think you do! 😂😂😂 Whilst you keep replying, to my so called 'ramblings'! 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Looks like it's actually you, who has lost his mind!
1
@The_Prince_Of_Crows 'Anyone when reads your posts sees the problem you have my friend.' How did you establish that? Did you conduct a survey, of some description? Can you post the link, I want to check the validity of your 'data'.
1
@The_Prince_Of_Crows 'Show US where Putin said that?' Prove he didn't! 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣 You can't prove he didn't! 😂🤣😂🤣
1
@The_Prince_Of_Crows 'that were discredited several years ago' Discredited by who? 🤔The Pro-Putin/Pro-Russian 'alliance'?! 🤔🤣
1
@The_Prince_Of_Crows 'they make you sound clever' I couldn't agree more! 😂🤣
1
@alexnurworld 'ur european papa back Ukraine' Do you even have a clue, as to what you are 'talking' about?! 🤔😂😂😂 No, I didn't think so. 🤣😂
1
@The_Prince_Of_Crows 'All I have to do is let you' You significantly ever estimate your importance, if you think you have a choice! Bit of a narcissist?! 🤔😂😂
1
@The_Prince_Of_Crows 'Anyone when reads your posts sees the problem you have my friend.' My 'problem' is, the Pro-Putin/Pro-Russian 'bots' that can't think for themselves.
1
@The_Prince_Of_Crows 'my friend' I'm not. 🤨
1
@The_Prince_Of_Crows Nope! I didn't 'prove' your point, in the slightest! 😂😂😂Good try at misdirection, but it didn't work! 😂🤣😂🤣 I enjoy correcting you, and I'm about to do it AGAIN! 😂 Here are the dictionary definitions, of the two words, you mistakenly confused. Quack, 'The characteristic harsh sound made by a duck.' Quark,' Any of a number of subatomic particles carrying a fractional electric charge, postulated as building blocks of the hadrons. Quarks have not been directly observed but theoretical predictions based on their existence have been confirmed experimentally.' Thanks for demonstrating your ignorance, it is a joy to behold! 😂🤣😂🤣
1
@The_Prince_Of_Crows I just LOVE proving you wrong! 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
1
@The_Prince_Of_Crows 'thanks for playing quack.' I'd suggest YOU stick to playing with your LEGO! Intellectually, completely out of your depth here! 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
1
@The_Prince_Of_Crows Quack/Quark two SIMPLE five letter words, yet you couldn't differentiate the difference between them! 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
1
@The_Prince_Of_Crows Yes, it's shows you don't have the intelligence, to think of more to say! 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣 I've always got plenty to retaliate with, whilst you, and your empty head, struggle! 😂🤣😂
1
@The_Prince_Of_Crows 'for every one line reply I send to you.' Absolutely, and you struggle with the one line reply! 😂🤣😂🤣
1
@The_Prince_Of_Crows 'for every one line reply I send to you.' Excellent, you know your intellectual limits! 😂🤣🤣😂🤣😂🤣
1
@The_Prince_Of_Crows 'And I love watching you make yourself look' I simply look superior, to you! 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
1
@The_Prince_Of_Crows 'look like a total quack' Better than looking like a total c**t. 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
1
@The_Prince_Of_Crows Shouldn't it be, 'The prince of clowns'? More apt, I would have thought?! 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
1
@The_Prince_Of_Crows 'another sudden onset' It's not sudden, I'm replying to your comments! 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
1
@The_Prince_Of_Crows 'The top quack is back' As is the the Prince of Clowns! 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
1
@The_Prince_Of_Crows 'Verbal diarrhea' I'm replying to your verbal diarrhea. Are you not familiar with the phrase, 'fight fire with fire'??!! 🤔😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
1
@The_Prince_Of_Crows In all fairness, I think a more accurate description of you, would be 'King of Clowns', rather than 'Prince of Clowns'. You've earned the 'promotion'! 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
1