General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Top Quark
Hindustan Times
comments
Comments by "Top Quark" (@topquark6919) on "Russia threatens UK with destruction; Moscow fumes over 'Storm Shadow Missiles' to Ukraine" video.
WTF are you talking about?! ππππ It was Russia who invaded Ukraine, thus THEY are the aggressor! What is it with you people?
8
'Russia has more freedoms than here'. Now, you just KNOW, making that comment, he's a Russian bot! ππππ
7
Β @PerceivedREALITY999Β 'If nato continues to escalate this conflict, Russia will be forced to destroy nato.' That's quite possibly, the most hilarious comment I've read all year! ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£ππ€£
6
Β @PerceivedREALITY999Β 'Finland has placed a target on its back. The foolish decision to join nato has harmed Finland's national security.' Finland had NO intention of joining NATO, until Russia invaded Ukraine! ππ After Russia invaded Ukraine, Finland saw that Russia cannot be trusted (it said it had NO intention of invading Ukraine) so, along with Sweden, requested membership of the defensive alliance. Yeah, Putin's THREATS drove the increase of NATO membership! πππ
2
Β @PerceivedREALITY999Β 'I already explained the situation. You can read my other comment. Russia is not interested in attacking Finland or Sweden. They never said Finland or Sweden joining is a red line. Obviously Russia is not happy about it. Finland joining nato is a mistake. This only increased tensions. Russia has already taken countermeasures. (nukes in Belarus)' You have just CONTRADICTED YOURSELF! πππ You posted that Finland joining NATO has, 'Finland has placed a target on its back. The foolish decision to join nato has harmed Finland's national security.' Make your mind up! πππππ Russia has repeatedly warned Finland and Sweden against joining Nato, saying the βserious military and political consequencesβ of such a move would oblige it to βrestore military balanceβ by strengthening its defences in the Baltic Sea region, including by deploying nuclear weapons. If the ABOVE isn't a threat, I don't know what is! ππ Perceivedreality7933, why do you persist in telling LIES???
2
Β @PerceivedREALITY999Β 'Zelensky had the chance to prevent this conflict through diplomacy. But he lacked the courage and the conviction.' You posted this BS previously. Let me explain, AGAIN. The definition of Diplomacy is: 'The profession, activity, or skill of managing international relations, typically by a country's representatives abroad.' So, definitely NOT just 'signing on the dotted line' to all the opponents demands/conditions. I'm continually astounded, that you don't seem to grasp the intricacies of diplomacy!
2
Β @kazikowski1976Β 'Nato invaded ukraine with ruzzian army getting to help' WTF are you talking about?! πππ
1
Β @XtremeNeedΒ 'Remember the 8 years of bombings? Yeah straw that breaks the camel's back' Ahh, you are talking about when Russia invaded Crimea. Yes, I do remember it.
1
Β @tanzat3859Β Russia invaded Ukraine because, Putin claimed the purpose of the operation was to "protect the people" in the predominantly Russian-speaking region of Donbas who Putin falsely claimed that "for eight years now, had been facing humiliation and genocide perpetrated by the Kyiv regime". Putin also lied (nothing new here for Putin) that the Kyiv regime was run by Nazi's, gangsters & drug dealers. Laughably, that simply sounds like a description of Putin's 'inner circle'! ππππ Putin was also anxious about Ukraine 'exploring' the proposition of joining NATO & the EU. You also have to remember, that in 1991 when Ukraine returned it's nuclear warheads, back to the then, Soviet Union. The Soviet Union PROMISED NEVER to attack Ukraine as part of the 'deal'. Yup, more lies!
1
I see you are here AGAIN, with your pro-Putin BS. 'If the UK wants to swing its little stick around, it needs to be reminded that Russia has a much bigger stick.' YOU need to be reminded that, Britain is a founder member of NATO, thus, it's 'stick' is equally as big as Russia's.
1
Iran supplies explosive drones to Russia, so what's the difference? Sounds a bit hypocritical, to me. Also remember, Russia is a supposed 'Superpower' and a far larger adversary than Ukraine. However, you still believe Ukraine shouldn't be able to defend itself?! πππππ
1
Why are the UK's actions 'low'? Russia is being supplied with weapons, and it's supposed to be a 'Superpower'?! Ukraine is being supplied weapons, to help DEFEND itself against a much larger adversary. You are a hypocrite.
1
YOU ARE AT IT AGAIN! πππ Did you conveniently forget, that NATO is a nuclear SUPERPOWER, too?! Why don't you engage your brain, before making these inane comments?!
1
Β @PerceivedREALITY999Β 'The UK would win the ashes. LITERALLY. I think the UK should stick to cricket.' I think YOU should stick to playing with your LEGO, or completing that colouring book you have. You seem to have absolutely NO clue, regarding nuclear retaliation!
1
Β @radio9730Β The guy completely distorts the 'facts' and/or blatantly lies, to suit his Pro-Putin narrative.
1
Β @PerceivedREALITY999Β 'Some Ukrainian troops have been using human shields. Hiding in civilian infrastructure, storing weapons inside or in close proximity to civilian buildings, refusing to allow civilians to leave etc. Russia is trying to minimize civilian casualties. Praying for the innocent civilians.π' The depths you'll go, to perpetuate the Russia BS propaganda is truly staggering. You'll happily tell untruths and distort facts, to suit your Pro-Putin narrative. NOBODY HERE SHOULD BELIEVE A WORD YOU SAY.
1
Β @PerceivedREALITY999Β NO! You are an ***T. I didn't claim Russia had attacked Finland. GET YOUR FACTS RIGHT, FOR A CHANGE. I said, threatened, FFS. Don't you know the difference?! ππππ
1
Why blame UK? Iran is supplying Russia with explosive drones. Are you being a hypocrite? Are you saying, It's okay for Russia to be supplied with weapons, but NOT Ukraine?
1
Why isn't Putin looking for a peaceful solution, to the WAR he started? THAT'S THE QUESTION.
1
Putin is FULL of BS hypocrisy. In Putin's mind, it's acceptable for Russia, a supposed 'Superpower', to be supplied with weapons, to continue it's INVASION of a sovereign & democratic country. However, if the UK supplies weapons, to assist Ukraine DEFEND itself, then Putin starts complaining. The utter hypocrisy of the individual, it staggering.
1